Systems and methods for AIDA based A/B testing
Systems and methods are described by which a serving module of a campaign controller identifies a first version of a model which the campaign controller uses to communicate a first simulated phishing communication to a plurality of users. The campaign controller receives a first response from a first user to the simulated phishing communication and a second response from a second user to the simulated phishing communication and determines that the first and second responses are corresponding, for example are the same or similar. The serving module assigns a first user to a first group of users and a second user to a second group of users and identifies a second version of the model to use for the first user and a third version of the model to use for the second user.
1. A method comprising:
(a) identifying, by a campaign controller, a first version of a model and a second version of the model to be used by the campaign controller for executing simulated phishing campaigns;
(b) assigning, by the campaign controller, a first user of a plurality of users to a first group of users and a second user of the plurality of users to a second group of users;
(c) communicating, by the campaign controller, a first simulated phishing communication to the first user using the first version of the model and a second simulated phishing communication to the second user using the second version of the model;
(d) receiving, by the campaign controller, a first response from the first user of the plurality of users to the first simulated phishing communication, and a second response from the second user of the plurality of users to the second simulated phishing communication;
(e) determining, by the campaign controller responsive to receiving the first response and the second response, whether the first version of the model or the second version of the model performed better in causing one or more users of the plurality of users to interact with a link of simulated phishing communications; and
(f) establishing, by the campaign controller responsive to the determination, one of the first version of the model or the second version of the model as the model to use for simulated phishing communications for the plurality of users.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein (e) further comprises determining that the first version of the model performed better than the second version of the model.
3. The method of claim 1 , wherein (e) further comprises determining that the second version of the model performed better than the first version of the model.
4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising assigning, by the campaign controller, the first user of the plurality of users to a third group of users and the second user of the plurality of users to a fourth group of users.
5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising identifying, by the campaign controller, a third version of the model for the third group of users and a fourth version of the model for the fourth group of users.
6. The method of claim 5 , further comprising communicating, by the campaign controller, one or more simulated phishing communications to the third group of users using the third version of the model and communicating, by the campaign controller, one or more simulated phishing communications to the fourth group of users using the fourth version of the model.
7. The method of claim 6 , further comprising receiving, by the campaign controller, a third plurality of responses from the third group of users and a fourth plurality of responses from the fourth group of users.
8. The method of claim 6 , further comprising determining, by the campaign controller, whether the third version of the model performed better than the fourth version of the model in causing one or more users to interact with a link of simulated phishing communications.
9. The method of claim 1 , wherein (e) further comprises establishing, by the campaign controller responsive to the determination, the first version of the model as the model to use for simulated phishing communications for the plurality of users.
10. The method of claim 1 , wherein (e) further comprises establishing, by the campaign controller responsive to the determination, the second version of the model as the model to use for simulated phishing communications for the plurality of users.
11. A system comprising:
a memory;
one or more processors, coupled to the memory;
a campaign controller executable on the one or more processors and configured to:
identify a first version of a model and a second version of the model to be used by the campaign controller for executing simulated phishing campaigns;
assign a first user of a plurality of users to a first group of users and a second user of the plurality of users to a second group of users;
communicate a first simulated phishing communication to the first user using the first version of the model and a second simulated phishing communication to the second user using the second version of the model;
receive a first response from the first user of the plurality of users to the first simulated phishing communication, and a second response from the second user of the plurality of users to the second simulated phishing communication;
determine, responsive to receiving the first response and the second response, whether the first version of the model or the second version of the model performed better in causing one or more users of the plurality of users to interact with a link of simulated phishing communications; and
establish, responsive to the determination, one of the first version of the model or the second version of the model as the model to use for simulated phishing communications for the plurality of users.
12. The system of claim 11 , wherein the campaign controller is further configured to determine that the first version of the model performed better than the second version of the model.
13. The system of claim 11 , wherein the campaign controller is further configured to determine that the second version of the model performed better than the first version of the model.
14. The system of claim 11 , wherein the campaign controller is further configured to assign the first user of the plurality of users to a third group of users and the second user of the plurality of users to a fourth group of users.
15. The system of claim 11 , wherein the campaign controller is further configured to identity a third version of the model for the third group of users and a fourth version of the model for the fourth group of users.
16. The system of claim 15 , wherein the campaign controller is further configured to communicate one or more simulated phishing communications to the third group of users using the third version of the model and communicating, by the campaign controller, one or more simulated phishing communications to the fourth group of users using the fourth version of the model.
17. The system of claim 16 , wherein the campaign controller is further configured to receive a third plurality of responses from the third group of users and a fourth plurality of responses from the fourth group of users.
18. The system of claim 11 , wherein the campaign controller is further configured to determine whether the third version of the model performed better than the fourth version of the model in causing one or more users to interact with a link of simulated phishing communications.
19. The system of claim 11 , wherein the campaign controller is further configured to establish, responsive to the determination, the first version of the model as the model to use for simulated phishing communications for the plurality of users.
20. The system of claim 11 , wherein the campaign controller is further configured to establish, responsive to the determination, the second version of the model as the model to use for simulated phishing communications for the plurality of users.