Dynamic adaptive defense for cyber-security threats
Disclosed is a cyber-security system that is configured to aggregate and unify data from multiple components and platforms on a network. The system allows security administrators can to design and implement a workflow of device-actions taken by security individuals in response to a security incident. Based on the nature of a particular threat, the cyber-security system may initiate an action plan that is tailored to the security operations center and their operating procedures to protect potentially impacted components and network resources.
1. A method, comprising:
receiving, at one or more processors, a cyber-security alert;
analyzing, at the one or more processors, the cyber-security alert to determine a security threat to a network;
mapping, at the one or more processors, the security threat to at least one preplanned action to remediate the security threat, the at least one preplanned action pre-approved for an administrator to initiate;
receiving, at the one or more processors, an input from the administrator that correlates a custom network security action with a network security element, the custom network security action not correlated with the network security element prior to receiving the input, the input not initiating the at least one preplanned action; and
sending, by the one or more processors and in response to the input, a signal to initiate an execution of the custom network security action to the network security element to respond to the security threat.
2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
identifying, based on the security threat, at least one automated action to remediate the security threat; and
initiating, automatically without additional inputs from the administrator different from the input, an execution of the at least one automated action prior to mapping the security threat to the at least one preplanned action.
3. The method of claim 2 , further comprising:
determining an outcome of mitigation of the at least one automated action to the security threat,
the sending the signal being in response to the outcome of mitigation when the at least one automated action fails to mitigate the security threat.
4. The method of claim 2 , wherein:
the at least one automated action is blocking traffic within at least a portion of the network.
5. The method of claim 1 , wherein:
the input is a first input;
the signal is a first signal; and
the method further comprising:
receiving a second input from the administrator to initiate an execution of the at least one preplanned action; and
sending, in response to the second input, a second signal to initiate the execution of the at least one preplanned action to respond to the security threat.
6. The method of claim 5 , further comprising:
determining an outcome of mitigation of the at least one preplanned action to the security threat,
the sending the first signal being in response to the outcome of mitigation when of the at least one preplanned action fails to mitigate the security threat.
7. The method of claim 1 , wherein:
the mapping includes mapping the security threat to a plurality of preplanned actions including the at least one preplanned action and a second preplanned action;
the input is a first input;
the signal is a first signal;
the method further comprising:
receiving a second input from the administrator to initiate an execution of the at least one preplanned action;
sending, in response to the second input, a second signal to initiate the execution of the at least one preplanned action to respond to the security threat;
receiving, in response to the at least one preplanned action failing to mitigate the security threat, a third input from the administrator to initiate an execution of the second preplanned action;
sending, in response to the third input, a third signal to initiate the execution of the second preplanned action; and
determining an outcome of mitigation of the second preplanned action to the security threat,
the sending the first signal being in response to the outcome of mitigation when the second preplanned action fails to mitigate the security threat.
8. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
presenting, via a graphical user interface, a plurality of network security elements that are candidates for correlation with the custom network security action, the plurality of network security elements including the network security element.
9. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
presenting, via a graphical user interface, a plurality of custom network security actions that are candidates for correlation with the network security element, the plurality of custom network security actions including the custom network security action.
10. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
presenting, via a graphical user interface, a plurality of custom network security actions that are candidates for correlation with a plurality of network security elements, the plurality of custom network security actions including the custom network security action, the plurality of network security elements including the network security element.
11. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
in response to the security threat being mitigated by the execution of the custom network security action, storing the correlation of the custom network security action with the network security element in a network security policy as an automated action or a preplanned action to be applied in response to a subsequent security threat.
12. The method of claim 1 , wherein:
the cyber-security alert indicates a source of the security threat.
13. A non-transitory processor-readable medium storing code representing instructions to be executed by a processor, the code comprising code to cause the processor to:
receive a cyber-security alert;
determine, based on the cyber-security alert, a cyber-security threat to a network;
map the cyber-security threat to at least one preplanned action to remediate the cyber-security threat, the at least one preplanned action pre-approved for an administrator to initiate;
present, via a graphical user interface, a plurality of custom network security actions that are candidates for correlation with a plurality of network security elements to remediate the cyber-security threat;
receive, via the graphical user interface and after the plurality of custom network security actions are presented, a first input from the administrator that selects a custom network security action from the plurality of custom network security actions;
receive, via the graphical user interface and after the plurality of custom network security actions are presented, a second input from the administrator that selects a network security element from the plurality of network security elements, the first input and the second input collectively correlating the custom network security action with the network security element, the first input or the second input not initiating the at least one preplanned action; and
send a signal, in response to the first input and the second input, to initiate an execution of the custom network security action to the network security element to respond to the cyber-security threat.
14. The non-transitory processor-readable medium of claim 13 , further comprising code to cause the processor to:
identify, based on the cyber-security threat, at least one automated action to remediate the cyber-security threat; and
initiate, automatically without additional inputs from the administrator different from the first input or the second input, an execution of the at least one automated action prior to mapping the cyber-security threat to the plurality of preplanned actions.
15. The non-transitory processor-readable medium of claim 14 , further comprising code to cause the processor to:
determine an outcome of mitigation of the at least one automated action to the cyber-security threat,
the sending the signal being in response to the outcome of mitigation when the at least one automated action fails to mitigate the cyber-security threat.
16. The non-transitory processor-readable medium of claim 13 , wherein:
the signal is a first signal; and
the code further comprising code to cause the processor to:
receive a third input from the administrator to initiate an execution of the at least one preplanned action; and
send, in response to the third input, a second signal to initiate the execution of the at least one preplanned action to respond to the cyber-security threat.
17. The non-transitory processor-readable medium of claim 16 , further comprising code to cause the processor to:
determine an outcome of mitigation of the at least one preplanned action to the cyber-security threat,
the sending the first signal being in response to the outcome of mitigation when the at least one preplanned action fails to mitigate the cyber-security threat.
18. The non-transitory processor-readable medium of claim 13 , wherein:
the mapping includes mapping the cyber-security threat to a plurality of preplanned actions including the at least one preplanned action and a second preplanned action;
the signal is a first signal;
the code further comprising code to cause the processor to:
receive a third input from the administrator to initiate an execution of the at least one preplanned action;
send, in response to the third input, a second signal to initiate the execution of the at least one preplanned action to respond;
receive, in response to the at least one preplanned action failing to mitigate the cyber-security threat, a fourth input from the administrator to initiate an execution of the second preplanned action;
send, in response to the fourth input, a third signal to initiate the execution of the second preplanned action; and
determine an outcome of mitigation of the second preplanned action to the cyber-security threat,
the sending the first signal being in response to the outcome of mitigation when the second preplanned action fails to mitigate the cyber-security threat.
19. The non-transitory processor-readable medium of claim 13 , further comprising code to cause the processor to:
in response to the cyber-security threat is mitigated by the execution of the custom network security action, store the correlation of the custom network security action with the network security element in a network security policy as an automated action or a preplanned action to be applied in response to a subsequent security threat.
20. An apparatus, comprising:
a memory; and
a processor operatively coupled to the memory, the processor configured to:
receive, via a first network, a cyber-security alert;
analyze the cyber-security alert to determine a security threat to a second network;
map the security threat to at least one preplanned action to remediate the security threat, the at least one preplanned action pre-approved for an administrator to initiate;
receive an input from the administrator that correlates a custom network security action with a network security element, the custom network security action not correlated with the network security element prior to receiving the input, the input not initiating the at least one preplanned action; and
send a signal, in response to the input and via the first network, to initiate an execution of the custom network security action to the network security element to respond to the security threat.