IP Library Granted Patent US 12,334,191
Granted Patent B2
US 12,334,191 · App. 16/862,266 · Granted Jun 17, 2025

Haplotype phasing models

Inventors: Catherine Ann Ball (Mountain View, CA); Keith D. Noto (San Francisco, CA); Kenneth G. Chahine (Park City, UT); Mathew J. Barber (Chicago, IL); Yong Wang (Foster City, CA)
Assignee: Ancestry.com DNA, LLC
G16B20/20G06F17/18G16B5/00G16B5/20G16B20/00G16B40/00G16B40/20G16B40/30
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,334,191
App. No.
16/862,266
Granted
Jun 17, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Novel haplotype cluster Markov models are used to phase genomic samples. After the models are built, they rapidly and accurately phase new samples without requiring that the new samples be used to re-build the models. The models set transition probabilities such that the probability for an appearance of any allele within any haplotype is a non-zero number. Furthermore, the most unlikely pairs of haplotypes are discarded from each model at each level until ε of the likelihood mass at each level is discarded. The models are also constructed such that contributing windows of SNPs partially overlap so that phasing decisions near one of the extreme ends of any model is are not significantly determinative of the phase. Additionally, the models are configured such that two or more nodes can be merged during the building/updating procedure to consolidate haplotype clusters having similar distributions.

Claims (84)

1. A computer-implemented method for phasing diploid genotypes, the computer-implemented method comprising:

accessing a set of reference haplotypes corresponding to reference diploid genotypes that have already been phased;

accessing an input sample of a diploid genotype;

iteratively updating, using one or more processors, a set of directed acyclic models based on the diploid genotype and the reference haplotypes, each directed acyclic model corresponding to a different window of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), at least one of the directed acyclic models comprising a set of nodes, wherein at least one node at a first level is a parent node that represents a particular haplotype sequence at the first level, the parent node having a first edge connected to a first sub node at a second level and a second edge connected to a second sub node at the second level, the first sub node representing a major allele at the second level and the second sub node representing a minor allele at the second level, and wherein iteratively updating the set of directed acyclic models comprises:

in each iteration,

applying the set of directed acyclic models to the input sample of the diploid genotype;

obtaining phasings of the input sample of the diploid genotype, the obtained phasing comprising a set of pairs of haplotypes of the input sample;

selecting, from the set of pairs of haplotypes of the input samples, a subset of pairs of haplotypes of the input samples;

updating the set of reference haplotypes by adding the selected subset of pairs of haplotypes of the input samples; and

updating at least one of the set of directed acyclic models using the updated set of reference haplotypes;

determining phasings of the diploid genotype using the one or more processors executing the set of directed acyclic models, the determining comprising:

applying the set of updated directed acyclic models to the input sample;

receiving output from each of the set of updated directed acyclic models, each output comprising at least a pair of phased haplotypes for the input sample; and

concatenating the received pairs of phased haplotypes to generate a single pair of phased haplotypes for the input sample; and

returning phased haplotypes for the input sample of the diploid genotype.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein determining phasings of the diploid genotype comprises:

generating, for each window, one or more haplotype phasing segments for the diploid genotype of that window based on one or more paths traversing the directed acyclic model for that window; and

combining the haplotype phasing segments for the windows into the phased haplotypes.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein each directed acyclic model is a Markov model.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one of the directed acyclic models comprises a merged node at the second level that is merged from two or more nodes at the second level.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 4 , wherein generating the merged node comprises:

accessing a plurality of candidate sub nodes at the second level;

for each pair of candidate sub nodes at the second level:

determining a first probability that a reference haplotype belongs to a first candidate sub node of the pair;

determining a second probability that the reference haplotype belongs to a first candidate sub node of the pair;

determining a difference between the first probability and the second probability; and

responsive to the difference being smaller than a threshold, merging the pair of candidate sub nodes into the merged node, the merged node comprising subsets of reference haplotypes represented by the first candidate sub node and the second candidate sub node.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 5 , further comprising:

responsive to the difference being at or larger than the threshold, not merging the pair of candidate sub nodes into the merged node.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein each edge is associated with a transition probability that represents a likelihood of an allele value associated with the edge.

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 7 , wherein the transition probability of each edge is a value greater than 0.

9. The computer-implemented method of claim 7 , wherein the transition probability of an edge of a sub node with a haplotype count of zero is nonzero.

10. A non-transitory computer readable medium for storing computer code comprising instructions, the instructions, when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to:

access a set of reference haplotypes corresponding to reference diploid genotypes that have already been phased;

access an input sample of a diploid genotype;

iteratively update, using one or more processors, a set of directed acyclic models based on the diploid genotype and the reference haplotypes, each directed acyclic model corresponding to a different window of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), at least one of the directed acyclic models comprising a set of nodes, wherein at least one node in a first level is a parent node that represents a particular haplotype sequence at the first level, the parent node having a first edge connected to a first sub node at a second level and a second edge connected to a second sub node at the second level, the first sub node representing a major allele for the second level and the second sub node representing a minor allele at the second level, and wherein iteratively updating the set of directed acyclic models comprises:

in each iteration,

applying the set of directed acyclic models to the input sample of the diploid genotype;

obtaining phasings of the input sample of the diploid genotype, the obtained phasing comprising a set of pairs of haplotypes of the input sample;

selecting, from the set of pairs of haplotypes of the input samples, a subset of pairs of haplotypes of the input samples;

updating the set of reference haplotypes by adding the selected subset of pairs of haplotypes of the input samples; and

updating at least one of the set of directed acyclic models using the updated set of reference haplotypes;

determine phasings of the diploid genotype using the one or more processor executing the set of directed acyclic models, wherein determining comprising:

applying the set of updated directed acyclic models to the input sample;

receiving output from each of the set of updated directed acyclic models, each output comprising at least a pair of phased haplotypes for the input sample; and

concatenating the received pairs of phased haplotypes to generate a single pair of phased haplotypes for the input sample; and

return phased haplotypes for the input sample of the diploid genotype.

11. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 10 , wherein the instructions that cause the one or more processors to determine phasings of the diploid genotype comprise instructions that cause the one or more processors to:

generate, for each window, one or more haplotype phasing segments for the diploid genotype of that window based on one or more paths traversing the directed acyclic model for that window; and

combine haplotype phasing segments for the windows into the phased haplotypes.

12. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 10 , wherein each directed acyclic model is a Markov model.

13. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 10 , wherein the at least one of the directed acyclic models comprises a merged node at the second level that is merged from two or more nodes at the second level.

14. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 13 , further comprising instructions that cause the one or more processors to:

access a plurality of candidate sub nodes at the second level;

for each pair of candidate sub nodes at the second level:

determine a first probability that a reference haplotype belongs to a first candidate sub node of the pair;

determine a second probability that the reference haplotype belongs to a first candidate sub node of the pair;

determine a difference between the first probability and the second probability; and

responsive to the difference being smaller than a threshold, merge the pair of candidate sub nodes into the merged node, the merged node comprising subsets of reference haplotypes represented by the first candidate sub node and the second candidate sub node.

15. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 14 , further comprising:

responsive to the difference being at or larger than the threshold, not merging the pair of candidate sub nodes into the merged node.

16. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 10 , wherein each edge is associated with a transition probability that represents a likelihood of an allele value associated with the edge.

17. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 16 , wherein the transition probability of each edge is a value greater than 0 .

18. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 16 , wherein the transition probability of an edge of a sub node with a haplotype count of zero is nonzero.

19. A system comprising:

one or more processors; and

a memory storing instructions that when executed by the one or more processors cause the one or more processors to perform steps comprising:

accessing a set of reference haplotypes corresponding to reference diploid genotypes that have already been phased;

accessing an input sample of a diploid genotype;

iteratively updating, using one or more processors, a set of directed acyclic models based on the diploid genotype and the reference haplotypes, each directed acyclic model corresponding to a different window of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), at least one of the directed acyclic models comprising a set of nodes, wherein at least one node in a first level is a parent node that represents a particular haplotype sequence at the first level, the parent node having a first edge connected to a first sub node at a second level and a second edge connected to a second sub node at the second level, the first sub node representing a major allele for the second level and the second sub node representing a minor allele at the second level, and wherein iteratively updating the set of directed acyclic models comprises:

in each iteration,

applying the set of directed acyclic models to the input sample of the diploid genotype;

obtaining phasings of the input sample of the diploid genotype, the obtained phasing comprising a set of pairs of haplotypes of the input sample;

selecting, from the set of pairs of haplotypes of the input samples, a subset of pairs of haplotypes of the input samples;

updating the set of reference haplotypes by adding the selected subset of pairs of haplotypes of the input samples; and

updating at least one of the set of directed acyclic models using the updated set of reference haplotypes;

determining phasings of the diploid genotype using the one or more processor executing the set of directed acyclic models, the determining comprising:

applying the set of updated directed acyclic models to the input sample;

receiving output from each of the set of updated directed acyclic models, each output comprising at least a pair of phased haplotypes for the input sample; and

concatenating the received pairs of phased haplotypes to generate a single pair of phased haplotypes for the input sample; and

returning phased haplotypes for the input sample of the diploid genotype.

20. The system of claim 19 , wherein the instructions that cause the one or more processors to determine phasings of the diploid genotype comprise instructions that cause the one or more processors to perform steps comprising:

generating, for each window, one or more haplotype phasings segments for the diploid genotype of that window based on one or more paths traversing the directed acyclic model for that window; and

combining the haplotype phasing segments for the windows into the phased haplotypes.

Assignments (3)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 7, 2020
From: ANCESTRY.COM DNA, LLC; ANCESTRY.COM OPERATIONS INC.; IARCHIVES, INC.; ANCESTRYHEALTH.COM, LLC
To: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH
Reel/Frame 054627/0212 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 7, 2020
From: ANCESTRY.COM DNA, LLC; ANCESTRY.COM OPERATIONS INC.; IARCHIVES, INC.; ANCESTRYHEALTH.COM, LLC
To: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Reel/Frame 054627/0237 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 19, 2020
From: BALL, CATHERINE ANN; NOTO, KEITH D.; CHAHINE, KENNETH G.; BARBER, MATHEW J.; WANG, YONG
To: ANCESTRY.COM DNA, LLC
Reel/Frame 052704/0989 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 15519099
Provisional Application 62065726 · Oct 19, 2014
Provisional Application 62065557 · Oct 17, 2014
Related Publication 20200303035A1 · Sep 24, 2020
References Cited (85)
US 8463554B2 · Hon et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8510057B1 · Avey et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 9213944B1 · Do et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9213947B1 · Do et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9367800B1 · Do et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9836576B1 · Do et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10504611B2 · Granka · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10679729B2 · Ball · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 12148507B2 · Granka · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20020143578A1 · Cole et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20030059808A1 · Liu et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030113727A1 · Girn et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20040175702A1 · Magness et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20080027656A1 · Parida · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080154566A1 · Myres et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080255768A1 · Martin et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20120283108A1 · Sampas · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130085728A1 · Tang et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130123120A1 · Zimmermann et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130297221A1 · Johnson et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140045705A1 · Bustamante et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140067355A1 · Noto et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140278138A1 · Barber et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20160026755A1 · Byrnes et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20200098445A1 · Granka et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2012099890A1 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014145280A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2016061260A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2016061568A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
Bonnen, P. E et al., “The International HapMap 3 Consortium . . . Integrating common and rare genetic variation in diverse human populations,” Nature, 2010, vol. 467, pp. 52-58. [cited by applicant]
Browning, B. L. et al., “A Unified Approach to Genotype Imputation and Haplotype Phase Inference for Large Data sets of Trios and Unrelated Individuals,” The American Journal of Human Genetics, Feb. 13, 2009, pp. 210-22… [cited by applicant]
Browning, B. L. et al., “Improving the Accuracy and Efficiency of Identity by Descent Detection in Population Data,” Genetics, Jun. 2013, pp. 459-471, vol. 194. [cited by applicant]
Browning, B.L et al., “Efficient Multilocus Association Testing for Whole Genome Association Studies Using Localized Haplotype Clustering,” Genetic Epidemiology, 2007, vol. 31, pp. 365-375. [cited by applicant]
Browning, B.L. et al., “A Fast, Powerful Method for Detecting Identity by Descent,” The American Journal of Human Genetics, 2011, vol. 88, No. 2, pp. 173-182. [cited by applicant]
Browning, S. R. Multilocus Association Mapping Using Variable-length Markov Chains. Jun. 2006. The American Journal of Human Genetics, col. 78 pp. 903-913. [cited by applicant]
Browning, S.R. et al., “Haplotype Phasing: Existing Models and New Developments,” Nature Reviews Genetics, Oct. 2011, pp. 703-714, vol. 12. [cited by applicant]
Browning, S.R. et al., “Rapid and Accurate Haplotype Phasing and Missing-Data Inference for Whole-Genome Association Studies by Use of Localized Haplotype Clustering,” The American Journal of Human Genetics, Nov. 2007, … [cited by applicant]
Browning, S.R. et al., “Rapid and Accurate Haplotype Phasing and Missing-Data Inference for Whole-Genome Association Studies by Use of Localized Haplotype Clustering,” The American Journal of Human Genetics, Sep. 21, 20… [cited by applicant]
Browning, S.R., “Multilocus Association Mapping Using Variable-Length Markov Chains,” American Journal of Human Genetics, Apr. 7, 2006, pp. 903-913, vol. 78, No. 6. [cited by applicant]
Druet, T., et al., “A Hidden Markov Model Combining Linkage and Linkage Disequilibrium Information for Haplotype Reconstruction and Quantitative Trait Locus Fine Mapping,” Genetics, 2010, pp. 789-798, vol. 184, No. 3. [cited by applicant]
Durand, E.Y. et al., “Reducing Pervasive False-Positive Identical-by-Descent Segments Detected by Large-Scale Pedigree Analysis,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, Apr. 30, 2014, pp. 2212-2222, vol. 31, No. 8. [cited by applicant]
Durbin, R. M. et al., “A Map of Human Genome Variation from Population-Scale Sequencing,” Nature, Oct. 28, 2010, pp. 1061-1073, vol. 467. [cited by applicant]
Elston, R.C. et al., “A General Model for the Genetic Analysis of Pedigree Data,” Human Heredity, 1971, pp. 523-542, vol. 21, No. 6. [cited by applicant]
European Extended Search Report, European Application No. 15850985.1, dated Mar. 6, 2018, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Extended Search Report, European Application No. 15851471.1, dated Mar. 6, 2018, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Falush, D. et al., “Inference of Population Structure Using Multilocus Genotype Data: Linked Loci and Correlated Allele Frequencies,” Genetics Society of America, 2003, vol. 164, pp. 1567-1587. [cited by applicant]
Gusev A. et al., “Whole Population, Genomewide Mapping of Hidden Relatedness,” Genome Research, 2009, pp. 318-326, vol. 19. [cited by applicant]
Jarvis, J.P. et al., “Patterns of Ancestry, Signatures of Natural Selection, and Genetic Association with Stature in Western African Pygmies,” PLoS Genetics, Apr. 2012, vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 1-15. [cited by applicant]
Kenny, E.E. et al., “Increased Power of Mixed Models Facilitates Association Mapping of 10 Loci for Metabolic Traits in an Isolated Population,” Human Molecular Genetics, 2011, oo. 827-839, vol. 20, No. 4. [cited by applicant]
Kong, A. et al. “Detection of Sharing by Descent, Long-Range Phasing and Haplotype Imputation,” Nature Genetics, Sep. 2008, pp. 1068-1075, vol. 40, No. 9. [cited by applicant]
Lander, E.S. et al., “Construction of Multilocus Genetic Linkage Maps in Humans,” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., Apr. 1987, pp. 2363-2367, vol. 84. [cited by applicant]
Li, H. et al., “Relationship Estimation from Whole-Genome Sequence Data,” PLOS Genetics, Jan. 30, 2014, e1004144, pp. 1-12, vol. 10, No. 1. [cited by applicant]
Li, Y. et al., “Haplotype Reconstruction in Large Pedigrees with Untyped Individuals through IBD reference,” Journal of Computational Biology, 2011, vol. 18, No. 11, pp. 1411-1421. [cited by applicant]
Li, Y. et al., “MaCH: Using Sequence and Genotype Data to Estimate Haplotypes and Unobserved Genotype,” Genetic Epidemiology, Nov. 5, 2010, pp. 816-834, vol. 34, No. 8. [cited by applicant]
Livne, O.E. et al., “Fast and Accurate Pedigree-based Imputation from sequence data in a Founder Population,” PLOS Computational Biology, 2015, vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 1-14. [cited by applicant]
Meuwissen, T. et al., “The Use of Family Relationships and Linkage Disequilibrium to Impute Phase and Missing Genotypes in Up to Whole Genome Sequence Density Genotypic Data,” Genetics, Aug. 2010, pp. 1441-1449, vol. 18… [cited by applicant]
Morrison, A.C. et al., “Prediction of Coronary Heart Disease Risk using a Genetic Risk Score: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study,” American Journal of Epidemiology, Apr. 18, 2007, vol. 166, No. 1, pp. 28-35. [cited by applicant]
Ott, J., “Estimation of the Recombination Fraction in Human Pedigrees: Efficient Computation of the Likelihood for Human Linkage Studies,” American Journal of Human Genetics, 1974, pp. 588-597, vol. 26, No. 5. [cited by applicant]
Palin, K. et al., “Identity-by-Descent based phasing and imputation in Founder populations using graphical models,” Genetic Epidemiology, 2011, vol. 35, No. 8, pp. 853-860. [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report & Written Opinion, International Application No. PCT/US2015/056164, dated Jan. 5, 2016, 9 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Platt, J.C., “Probablistic Outputs for Support Vector Machines and Comparisons to Regularized Likelihood Methods,” Microsoft Research, Mar. 26, 2999, pp. 1-11. [cited by applicant]
Price, A.L. et al., “Sensitive Detection of Chromosomal Segments of Distinct Ancestry in Admixed Populations,” PLoS Genetics, Jun. 2009, vol. 5, No. 6, pp. 1-18. [cited by applicant]
Purcell, S. et al., “Plink: A Tool Set for Whole-Genome Association and Population-Based Linkage Analyses,” The American Journal of Human Genetics, Sep. 2007, pp. 559-575, vol. 81. [cited by applicant]
Rabiner, L., “A Tutorial on Hidden Markov Models and Selected Applications in Speech Recognition,” Proceedings of the IEEE, Feb. 1989, pp. 257-286, vol. 77, No. 2. [cited by applicant]
Rabiner, L.R., “A tutorial on Hidden Markov Models and Selected Applications in Speech Recognition,” Proceedings of the IEEE, Feb. 1989, vol. 77, No. 2, pp. 257-286. [cited by applicant]
Rocchi, M., et al., “Ancestral genomes reconstruction: An integrated, multi-disciplinary approach is needed,” Genome Research, 2006, pp. 1441-1444, vol. 16, No. 12. [cited by applicant]
Ron, D. et al., “On the Learnability and Usage of Acyclic Probabilistic Finite Automata,” Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 1998, vol. 56, pp. 133-152. [cited by applicant]
Ron, D., et al., “On the Learnability and Usage of Acyclic Probabilistic Finite Automata,” Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 1998, pp. 133-152, vol. 56. [cited by applicant]
Scheet, P. et al., “A Fast and Flexible Statistical Model for Large-Scale Population Genotype Data: Applications to Inferring Missing Genotypes and Haplotypic Phase,” The American Journal of Human Genetics, Apr. 2006, v… [cited by applicant]
Seligsohn, M.D. et al., “Genetic Susceptibility to Venous Thrombosis,” The New England Journal of Medicine, Apr. 19, 2001, vol. 344, No. 16, pp. 1222-1231. [cited by applicant]
Speed, D. et al., “Relatedness in the post-genomic era: is it still useful?” Nature Reviews Genetics, 2015, vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 33-45. [cited by applicant]
Sundquist, A. et al., “Effect of genetic divergence in identifying ancestral origin using HAPPAA,” Genome Research, 2008, vol. 18, pp. 676-682. [cited by applicant]
Thompson, E. A. “Statistical Inference from Genetic Data on Pedigrees,” NSF-CBMS Regional Conference Series in Probability and Statistics, 2000, 186 pages, vol. 6. [cited by applicant]
Thompson, E.A., “Identity by Descent: Variation in Meiosis, Across Genomes, and in Populations,” Genetics, 2013, pp. 301-326, vol. 194. [cited by applicant]
Tipping, M.E., “Sparse Bayesian Learning and the Relevance Vector Machine,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2001, vol. 1, pp. 211-244. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 61/724,228, filed Nov. 8, 2012, Do et al. (copy not enclosed). [cited by applicant]
United States Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 15/519,105, dated Apr. 5, 2019, 121 pages. [cited by applicant]
Weedon, M.N. et al., “Combining Information from Common Type 2 Diabetes Risk Polymorphisms Improves Disease Prediction,” PLoS Medicine, Oct. 2006, vol. 3, No. 10, pp. 1877-1882. [cited by applicant]
Welch, B. L., “The Generalization of “Student's” Problem When Several Different Population Variances are Involved,” Biometrika, Jan. 1947, pp. 28-35, vol. 34, Issue 1-2. [cited by applicant]
Williams, A.L. et al., “Phasing of Many Thousands of Genotyped Samples,” American Journal of Human Genetics, Aug. 10, 2012, pp. 238-251, vol. 91, No. 2. [cited by applicant]
Yang, Q. et al., “Improving the Prediction of Complex Diseases by Testing for Multiple Disease-Susceptibility Genes,” American Journal of Human Genetics, 2003, vol. 72, pp. 636-649. [cited by applicant]
Yoon, B.J., “Hidden Markov Models and their Application in Biological Sequence Analysis,” Current Genomics, 2009, vol. 10, pp. 402-415. [cited by applicant]
United States Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 15/519,099, filed Oct. 3, 2019, ten pages. [cited by applicant]
Stevens, E. L. et al. “Inference of Relationships in Population Data Using Identity-by-Descent and Identity-by-State.” PLoS Genetics, vol. 7, No. 9, Sep. 2011, pp. 1-15. [cited by applicant]
United States Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/701,162, filed Sep. 28, 2023, 18 pages. [cited by applicant]