IP Library Granted Patent US 11,558,132
Granted Patent B2
US 11,558,132 · App. 16/896,323 · Granted Jan 17, 2023

Systems and methods for identifying a source of radio frequency interference in a wireless network

Inventors: Ricardo Francisco Borges (Noblesville, IN); Hector A. Garcia Crespo (Waltham, MA); Brian A. Ward (Fort Worth, TX); Dean P. Jarski (Rochester Hills, MI)
Assignee: Verizon Patent and Licensing Inc.
H04B17/345H04W64/00
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,558,132
App. No.
16/896,323
Granted
Jan 17, 2023
Kind
B2
Abstract

An interference detection system in a network identifies a first wireless station that has experienced radio frequency (RF) interference from an unknown source on at least one physical resource block (PRB) and identifies one or more second wireless stations that have experienced similar interference on the at least one PRB. A plurality of estimated interference source locations are determined based at least on geographic locations of the first wireless station and the one or more second wireless stations. The plurality of estimated interference source locations are scored based on a comparison of estimate interference to observed interference at the one or more second wireless stations and a geographical map is generated based on the scored plurality of estimated interference source locations, wherein the geographical map includes indicia indicative of the relative scores of the plurality of estimated interference source locations.

Claims (68)

1. A method, comprising:

identifying a first wireless station that has experienced radio frequency (RF) interference from an unknown source on at least one physical resource block (PRB);

identifying one or more second wireless stations that have experienced similar interference on the at least one PRB;

determining a plurality of estimated interference source geographic locations based on at least geographic locations of the first wireless station and the one or more second wireless stations;

scoring the plurality of estimated interference source geographic locations based on a comparison of estimated interference to observed interference at the one or more second wireless stations; and

generating a geographical map based on the scored plurality of estimated interference source geographic locations,

wherein the geographical map includes indicia indicative of the relative scores of the plurality of estimated interference source geographic locations.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein identifying the first wireless station comprises determining that a key performance indicator (KPI) for the at least one PRB on the first wireless station has a value indicative of interference.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the KPI comprises at least an uplink signal power level.

4. The method of claim 2 , wherein identifying the one or more second wireless stations comprises:

identifying neighboring wireless stations proximate to the first wireless station based on respective geographic locations, and

identifying the one or more second wireless stations by comparing actual KPI values for the at least one PRB for each of the neighboring wireless stations proximate to the first wireless station.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein determining the plurality of estimated interference source geographic locations comprises:

generating a boundary based on the geographic locations of the first wireless station and the one or more second wireless stations;

selecting a plurality of interference source estimated locations within the boundary;

calculating expected KPI values for each of the first and one or more second wireless stations based on the plurality of interference source estimated geographic locations; and

determining an accuracy associated with each of the plurality of interference source estimated geographic locations based on the calculated expected KPI values and the actual KPI values.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein calculating the expected KPI values for each of the first and one or more second wireless stations based on the plurality of interference source estimated geographic locations comprises:

calculating an estimated free space path loss for each of the first and one or more second wireless stations and for each of the plurality of interference source estimated geographic locations; and

calculating the expected KPI values based on the estimated free space path loss.

7. The method of claim 6 , further comprising:

adjusting the expected KPI values based on a sector of a respective wireless station experienced the interference.

8. The method of claim 5 , wherein determining the accuracy associated with each of the plurality of interference source estimated geographic locations further comprises calculating an error for each of the plurality of interference source estimated geographic locations.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein selecting the plurality of interference source estimated geographic locations within the boundary further comprises:

performing minimization processing on the error.

10. The method of claim 8 , wherein scoring the plurality of estimated interference source geographic locations comprises:

scoring the plurality of estimated interference source geographic locations based at least on the error calculations.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the error comprises a Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and scoring is based on the RMSE calculations and a count of the second wireless stations.

12. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

providing the geographical map to field personnel for use in ascertaining the source of the RF interference.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein at least one of the first wireless station or the one or more second wireless stations further comprise a plurality of sectors experiencing interference on the at least one PRB, wherein the method further comprises:

determining a main sector based on the observed interference on each of the plurality of sectors;

determining an initial vector for each of the one or more second wireless stations having the plurality of sectors experiencing interference based on the main sector; and

adjusting an angle of the initial vector based on the observed interference levels on the plurality of sectors to generate an adjusted vector,

wherein the adjusted vector indicates a direction of a likely source of interference.

14. A network device, comprising:

a communication interface configured to:

receive performance and location information regarding a plurality of wireless stations; and

a processor configured to:

identify a first wireless station in the plurality of wireless stations that has experienced radio frequency (RF) interference from an unknown source on at least one physical resource block (PRB);

identify one or more second wireless stations in the plurality of wireless stations that have experienced similar interference on the at least one PRB;

determine a plurality of estimated interference source geographic locations based on at least geographic locations of the first wireless station and the one or more second wireless stations;

score the plurality of estimated interference source geographic locations based on a comparison of estimated interference to observed interference at the one or more second wireless stations; and

generate a geographical map based on the scored plurality of estimated interference source geographic locations,

wherein the geographical map includes indicia indicative of the relative scores of the plurality of estimated interference source geographic locations.

15. The network device of claim 14 , wherein the processor configured to identify the first wireless station is configured to:

determine that a key performance indicator (KPI) for the least one physical resource block (PRB) on the first wireless station has a value indicative of interference,

wherein the KPI comprises at least an uplink signal power level.

16. The network device of claim 15 , wherein the processor configured to identify one or more second wireless stations is configured to:

identify neighboring wireless stations proximate to the first wireless station based on respective geographic locations, and

identify the one or more second wireless stations by comparing actual KPI values for the at least one PRB for each of the neighboring wireless stations proximate to the first wireless station.

17. The network device of claim 16 , wherein the processor configured to determine a plurality of estimated interference source geographic locations is further configured to:

generate a boundary based on the geographic locations of the first wireless station and the one or more second wireless stations;

select a plurality of interference source estimated geographic locations within the boundary;

calculate expected KPI values for each of the first and one or more second wireless stations based on the plurality of interference source estimated geographic locations; and

determine an accuracy associated with each of the plurality of interference source estimated geographic locations based on the calculated expected KPI values and the actual KPI values.

18. The network device of claim 17 , wherein the processor configured to calculate expected KPI values for each of the first and one or more second wireless stations based on the plurality of interference source estimated geographic locations is further configured to:

calculate an estimated free space path loss for each of the first and one or more second wireless stations and for each of the plurality of interference source estimated geographic locations; and

calculate the expected KPI values based on the estimated free space path loss.

19. The network device of claim 17 , wherein the processor configured to determine the accuracy associated with each of the plurality of interference source estimated geographic locations is configured to:

calculate a root mean square error (RMSE) for each of the plurality of interference source estimated geographic locations.

20. A non-transitory storage medium storing instructions executable by a network device, wherein the instructions comprise instructions to cause the network device to:

identify a first wireless station in a plurality of wireless stations that has experienced radio frequency (RF) interference from an unknown source on at least one physical resource block (PRB);

identify one or more second wireless stations in the plurality of wireless stations that have experienced similar interference on the at least one PRB;

determine a plurality of estimated interference source geographic locations based on at least geographic locations of the first wireless station and the one or more second wireless stations;

score the plurality of estimated interference source geographic locations based on a comparison of an estimated interference to observed interference at the one or more second wireless stations; and

generate a geographical map based on the scored plurality of estimated interference source geographic locations,

wherein the geographical map includes indicia indicative of the relative scores of the plurality of estimated interference source geographic locations.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 9, 2020
From: BORGES, RICARDO FRANCISCO; GARCIA CRESPO, HECTOR A.; WARD, BRIAN A.; JARSKI, DEAN P.
To: VERIZON PATENT AND LICENSING INC.
Reel/Frame 052875/0032 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20210384994A1 · Dec 9, 2021
Cited By (2)
US 12,225,426 US 12,432,767