IP Library Granted Patent US 12,282,324
Granted Patent B2
US 12,282,324 · App. 16/899,220 · Granted Apr 22, 2025

Model predictive maintenance system with degradation impact model

Inventors: Mohammad N. Elbsat (Milwaukee, WI); Michael J. Wenzel (Oak Creek, WI); Robert D. Turney (Watertown, WI)
Assignee: Tyco Fire & Security GmbH
G05B23/0283G05B19/0428G05B23/0291G06N3/08
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,282,324
App. No.
16/899,220
Granted
Apr 22, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A model predictive maintenance (MPM) system for building equipment includes one or more processing circuits having one or more processors and memory. The memory store instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform operations including estimating a degradation state of the building equipment, using a degradation impact model to predict an amount of one or more input resources consumed by the building equipment to produce one or more output resources based on the degradation state of the building equipment, generating a maintenance schedule for the building equipment based on the amount of the one or more input resources predicted by the degradation impact model, and initiating a maintenance activity for the building equipment in accordance with the maintenance schedule.

Claims (73)

1. A model predictive maintenance (MPM) system for building equipment, the MPM system comprising:

one or more processing circuits comprising one or more processors and memory storing instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform operations comprising:

estimating a degradation state of the building equipment;

using a degradation impact model to generate parameters of a separate resource consumption model based on the degradation state of the building equipment, wherein the degradation impact model receives the degradation state of the building equipment as an input to the degradation impact model and provides the parameters of the resource consumption model as an output of the degradation impact model;

using the resource consumption model to predict an amount of one or more input resources that are provided as inputs to the building equipment and consumed by the building equipment to produce an amount of one or more output resources by converting the one or more input resources into the one or more output resources, wherein the resource consumption model defines a relationship between the amount of the one or more input resources consumed and the amount of the one or more output resources produced based on the parameters generated and output by the degradation impact model;

generating a maintenance schedule for the building equipment and operating decisions for the building equipment based on the amount of the one or more input resources predicted using the resource consumption model;

initiating a maintenance activity for the building equipment in accordance with the maintenance schedule; and

controlling the building equipment by generating electronic control signals based on the operating decisions for the building equipment and causing the building equipment to affect a variable state or condition in a building using the electronic control signals.

2. The MPM system of claim 1 , wherein the degradation impact model is trained using historical or simulated training data prior to using the degradation impact model to predict the amount of the one or more input resources consumed by the building equipment, wherein training the degradation impact model comprises:

generating the training data for the degradation impact model, the training data comprising a plurality of different values of the degradation state of the building equipment and corresponding values of parameters of a resource consumption model for the building equipment; and

using the training data to train the degradation impact model to predict the values of the parameters of the resource consumption model as a function of the degradation state.

3. The MPM system of claim 2 , wherein generating the training data comprises:

performing a regression process to generate the values of the parameters of the resource consumption model using data associated with a first degradation state of the building equipment; and

repeating the regression process using data associated with one or more additional degradation states of the building equipment to generate a plurality of different values of the parameters of the resource consumption model, the plurality of different values of the parameters corresponding to a plurality of different degradation states of the building equipment.

4. The MPM system of claim 1 , wherein the degradation impact model comprises a neural network model and using the degradation impact model to predict the amount of the one or more input resources consumed by the building equipment comprises:

providing the degradation state of the building equipment and an amount of the one or more output resources to be produced by the building equipment as inputs to the neural network model; and

obtaining the amount of one or more input resources consumed by the building equipment as an output of the neural network model.

5. The MPM system of claim 1 , wherein generating the maintenance schedule for the building equipment comprises:

performing an optimization of an objective function that accounts for both a cost of operating the building equipment and a cost of performing maintenance on the building equipment over a time period; and

generating a set of maintenance decisions for the building equipment as a result of performing the optimization, the set of maintenance decisions forming the maintenance schedule.

6. The MPM system of claim 1 , wherein generating the maintenance schedule for the building equipment comprises:

calculating a cost of operating the building equipment over a time period as a function of the degradation state of the building equipment at one or more times within the time period;

calculating a cost of performing maintenance on the building equipment over the time period as a function of one or more maintenance activities defined by the maintenance schedule;

adjusting the degradation state of the building equipment at one or more times following the one or more maintenance activities defined by the maintenance schedule; and

generating the maintenance schedule that results in a lowest total cost comprising the cost of operating the building equipment over the time period and the cost of performing maintenance on the building equipment over the time period.

7. The MPM system of claim 1 , wherein generating the maintenance schedule comprises determining a specific type of maintenance activity to be performed at a service time from a set of multiple different types of maintenance activities based on (1) first costs of operating the building equipment over a time period predicted to result from the multiple different types of the maintenance activities and (2) second costs of servicing the building equipment over the time period predicted to result from the multiple different types of the maintenance activities.

8. The MPM system of claim 1 , wherein the degradation state of the building equipment is an initial degradation state, the operations further comprising:

predicting one or more future degradation states of the building equipment as a function of the initial degradation state; and

using the degradation impact model to predict the amount of the one or more input resources consumed by the building equipment at one or more future times as a function of the one or more future degradation states.

9. A method for using model predictive maintenance (MPM) to generate a maintenance schedule for building equipment, the method comprising:

estimating a degradation state of the building equipment;

using a degradation impact model to generate parameters of a separate resource consumption model based on the degradation state of the building equipment, wherein the degradation impact model receives the degradation state of the building equipment as an input to the degradation impact model and provides the parameters of the resource consumption model as an output of the degradation impact model;

using the resource consumption model to predict an amount of one or more input resources that are provided as inputs to the building equipment and consumed by the building equipment to produce an amount of one or more output resources by converting the one or more input resources into the one or more output resources, wherein the resource consumption model defines a relationship between the amount of the one or more input resources consumed and the amount of the one or more output resources produced based on the parameters generated and output by the degradation impact model;

generating a maintenance schedule for the building equipment and operating decisions for the building equipment based on the amount of the one or more input resources predicted using the resource consumption model;

initiating a maintenance activity for the building equipment in accordance with the maintenance schedule; and

controlling the building equipment by generating electronic control signals based on the operating decisions for the building equipment and causing the building equipment to affect a variable state or condition in a building using the electronic control signals.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the degradation impact model is trained using historical or simulated training data prior to using the degradation impact model to predict the amount of the one or more input resources consumed by the building equipment, wherein training the degradation impact model comprises:

generating the training data for the degradation impact model, the training data comprising a plurality of different values of the degradation state of the building equipment and corresponding values of parameters of a resource consumption model for the building equipment; and

using the training data to train the degradation impact model to predict the values of the parameters of the resource consumption model as a function of the degradation state.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein generating the training data comprises:

performing a regression process to generate the values of the parameters of the resource consumption model using data associated with a first degradation state of the building equipment; and

repeating the regression process using data associated with one or more additional degradation states of the building equipment to generate a plurality of different values of the parameters of the resource consumption model, the plurality of different values of the parameters corresponding to a plurality of different degradation states of the building equipment.

12. The method of claim 9 , wherein the degradation impact model comprises a neural network model and using the degradation impact model to predict the amount of the one or more input resources consumed by the building equipment comprises:

providing the degradation state of the building equipment and an amount of the one or more output resources to be produced by the building equipment as inputs to the neural network model; and

obtaining the amount of one or more input resources consumed by the building equipment as an output of the neural network model.

13. The method of claim 9 , wherein generating the maintenance schedule for the building equipment comprises:

performing an optimization of an objective function that accounts for both a cost of operating the building equipment and a cost of performing maintenance on the building equipment over a time period; and

generating a set of maintenance decisions for the building equipment as a result of performing the optimization, the set of maintenance decisions forming the maintenance schedule.

14. The method of claim 9 , wherein generating the maintenance schedule for the building equipment comprises:

calculating a cost of operating the building equipment over a time period as a function of the degradation state of the building equipment at one or more times within the time period;

calculating a cost of performing maintenance on the building equipment over the time period as a function of one or more maintenance activities defined by the maintenance schedule;

adjusting the degradation state of the building equipment at one or more times following the one or more maintenance activities defined by the maintenance schedule; and

generating the maintenance schedule that results in a lowest total cost comprising the cost of operating the building equipment over the time period and the cost of performing maintenance on the building equipment over the time period.

15. The method of claim 9 , wherein the degradation state of the building equipment is an initial degradation state, the method comprising:

predicting one or more future degradation states of the building equipment as a function of the initial degradation state; and

using the degradation impact model to predict the amount of the one or more input resources consumed by the building equipment at one or more future times as a function of the one or more future degradation states.

16. The method of claim 9 , wherein generating the maintenance schedule comprises determining a specific type of maintenance activity to be performed at a service time from a set of multiple different types of maintenance activities based on (1) first costs of operating the building equipment over a time period predicted to result from the multiple different types of the maintenance activities and (2) second costs of servicing the building equipment over the time period predicted to result from the multiple different types of the maintenance activities.

17. A model predictive maintenance (MPM) system for building equipment, the MPM system comprising:

one or more processing circuits comprising one or more processors and memory storing instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform operations comprising:

using a degradation impact model to generate parameters of a separate resource consumption model for the building equipment based on a degradation state of the building equipment, wherein the degradation impact model receives the degradation state of the building equipment as an input to the degradation impact model and provides the parameters of the resource consumption model as an output of the degradation impact model;

using the resource consumption model to predict an amount of one or more input resources provided as inputs to the building equipment and consumed by the building equipment to produce an amount of one or more output resources by converting the one or more input resources into the one or more output resources, wherein the resource consumption model defines a relationship between the amount of the one or more input resources consumed and the amount of the one or more output resources produced based on the parameters generated and output by the degradation impact model;

using the resource consumption model to generate a maintenance schedule for the building equipment and operating decisions for the building equipment that result in a lowest total cost of operating the building equipment and performing maintenance on the building equipment over a time period;

initiating a maintenance activity for the building equipment in accordance with the maintenance schedule; and

controlling the building equipment by generating electronic control signals based on the operating decisions for the building equipment and causing the building equipment to affect a variable state or condition in a building using the electronic control signals.

18. The MPM system of claim 17 , wherein using the resource consumption model to generate the maintenance schedule comprises:

using the resource consumption model to predict an amount of one or more input resources consumed by the building equipment to produce one or more output resources as a function of the parameters of the resource consumption model; and

generating the maintenance schedule based on the amount of the one or more input resources consumed by the building equipment to produce the one or more output resources.

19. The MPM system of claim 17 , wherein the degradation impact model is trained using historical or simulated training data prior to using the degradation impact model to generate the parameters of the resource consumption model, wherein training the degradation impact model comprises:

generating the training data for the degradation impact model, the training data comprising a plurality of different values of the degradation state of the building equipment and corresponding values of the parameters of the resource consumption model; and

using the training data to train the degradation impact model to predict the values of the parameters of the resource consumption model as a function of the degradation state.

20. The MPM system of claim 19 , wherein generating the training data comprises:

performing a regression process to generate the values of the parameters of the resource consumption model using data associated with a first degradation state of the building equipment; and

repeating the regression process using data associated with one or more additional degradation states of the building equipment to generate a plurality of different values of the parameters of the resource consumption model, the plurality of different values of the parameters corresponding to a plurality of different degradation states of the building equipment.

Assignments (3)
NUNC PRO TUNC ASSIGNMENT Recorded Feb 20, 2025
From: JOHNSON CONTROLS TECHNOLOGY COMPANY
To: JOHNSON CONTROLS TYCO IP HOLDINGS LLP
Reel/Frame 070279/0450 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 9, 2024
From: JOHNSON CONTROLS TYCO IP HOLDINGS LLP
To: TYCO FIRE & SECURITY GMBH
Reel/Frame 067056/0552 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 11, 2020
From: WENZEL, MICHAEL J.; ELBSAT, MOHAMMAD N.; TURNEY, ROBERT D.
To: JOHNSON CONTROLS TECHNOLOGY COMPANY
Reel/Frame 052912/0815 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation In Part 15895836 · Feb 13, 2018
Provisional Application 62883508 · Aug 6, 2019
Provisional Application 62511113 · May 25, 2017
Related Publication 20200301408A1 · Sep 24, 2020
References Cited (304)
US 5216612A · Cornett et al. · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 5630070A · Dietrich et al. · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 6145751A · Ahmed · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 7062361B1 · Lane · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7124059B2 · Wetzer et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7457762B2 · Wetzer et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7464046B2 · Wilson et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7693735B2 · Carmi et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8014892B2 · Glasser · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8126574B2 · Discenzo et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8170893B1 · Rossi · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8396571B2 · Costiner et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8880962B2 · Hosking et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8903554B2 · Stagner · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9002530B2 · O'Connor et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9058568B2 · Hosking et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9058569B2 · Hosking et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9185176B2 · Nielsen et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9235847B2 · Greene et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9424693B2 · Rodrigues · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9436179B1 · Turney et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9514577B2 · Ahn et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9740545B2 · Aisu et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9760068B2 · Harkonen et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9945264B2 · Wichmann et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10094586B2 · Pavlovski et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10101731B2 · Asmus et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10175681B2 · Wenzel et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10190793B2 · Drees et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10250039B2 · Wenzel et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10359748B2 · Elbsat et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10389136B2 · Drees · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10437241B2 · Higgins et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10438303B2 · Chen et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10554170B2 · Drees · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10564610B2 · Drees · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10591875B2 · Shanmugam et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10761547B2 · Risbeck et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10762475B2 · Song et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10817530B2 · Siebel et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10876755B2 · Martin · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11003175B2 · Xenos et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20020072988A1 · Aram · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20030158803A1 · Darken et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20040049295A1 · Wojsznis et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040054564A1 · Fonseca et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050091004A1 · Parlos et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20070005191A1 · Sloup et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070203860A1 · Golden et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070227721A1 · Springer et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20090112369A1 · Gwerder et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090204267A1 · Sustaeta et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090210081A1 · Sustaeta · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20090240381A1 · Lane · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090313083A1 · Dillon et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090319090A1 · Dillon et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100241285A1 · Johnson et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100262298A1 · Johnson et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110018502A1 · Bianciotto et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110035328A1 · Nielsen et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110093310A1 · Watanabe et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110130857A1 · Budiman et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110178643A1 · Metcalfe · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110231028A1 · Ozog · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110231320A1 · Irving · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120016607A1 · Cottrell et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120036250A1 · Vaswani et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120092180A1 · Rikkola et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120245968A1 · Beaulieu et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120259469A1 · Ward et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120296482A1 · Steven et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120310860A1 · Kim et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120316906A1 · Hampapur et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130006429A1 · Shanmugam et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130010348A1 · Massard et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130020443A1 · Dyckrup et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130085614A1 · Wenzel et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130103481A1 · Carpenter et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130113413A1 · Harty · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130204443A1 · Steven et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130274937A1 · Ahn et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130282195A1 · O'Connor et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130339080A1 · Beaulieu · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140039709A1 · Steven et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140163936A1 · Hosking et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140201018A1 · Chassin · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140244051A1 · Rollins et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140249680A1 · Wenzel · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140277756A1 · Bruce et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140277769A1 · Matsuoka et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140316973A1 · Steven et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150008884A1 · Waki et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150027681A1 · Ragland et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150088576A1 · Steven et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150134123A1 · Obinelo · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150309495A1 · Delorme et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150311713A1 · Asghari et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150316903A1 · Asmus et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150316907A1 · Elbsat et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150326015A1 · Steven et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150331972A1 · McClure et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150371328A1 · Gabel et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160020608A1 · Carrasco et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160043550A1 · Sharma et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160077880A1 · Santos et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160092986A1 · Lian et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160148137A1 · Phan et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160148171A1 · Phan et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160190805A1 · Steven et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160209852A1 · Beyhaghi et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160216722A1 · Tokunaga et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160218505A1 · Krupadanam · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160246908A1 · Komzsik · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160275630A1 · Strelec et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160281607A1 · Asati et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160305678A1 · Pavlovski et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160329708A1 · Day · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160356515A1 · Carter · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160363948A1 · Steven et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160373453A1 · Ruffner et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160379149A1 · Saito et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170003667A1 · Nakabayashi et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170083822A1 · Adendorff et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170097647A1 · Lunani et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170102162A1 · Drees et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170102433A1 · Wenzel et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170102434A1 · Wenzel et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170102675A1 · Drees · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170103483A1 · Drees et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170104332A1 · Wenzel et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170104336A1 · Elbsat et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170104337A1 · Drees · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170104342A1 · Elbsat et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170104343A1 · Elbsat et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170104344A1 · Wenzel et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170104345A1 · Wenzel et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170104346A1 · Wenzel et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170104449A1 · Drees · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170167742A1 · Radovanovic et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170169143A1 · Farahat et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170205818A1 · Adendorff et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170236222A1 · Chen et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170268795A1 · Yamamoto et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170288455A1 · Fife · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170309094A1 · Farahat et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170351234A1 · Chen et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170364043A1 · Ganti et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170366414A1 · Hamilton · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180004171A1 · Patel et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180004172A1 · Patel et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180046149A1 · Ahmed · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180082373A1 · Hong et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180173214A1 · Higgins et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180180314A1 · Brisette et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180196456A1 · Elbsat · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180197253A1 · Elbsat et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180203961A1 · Aisu et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180224814A1 · Elbsat et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180341255A1 · Turney et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180373234A1 · Khalate et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190066236A1 · Wenzel · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190129403A1 · Turney et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190271978A1 · Elbsat et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190295034A1 · Wenzel et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190311332A1 · Turney et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190325368A1 · Turney et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190338972A1 · Schuster et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190338973A1 · Turney et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190338974A1 · Turney et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190338977A1 · Turney et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190347622A1 · Elbsat et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190354071A1 · Turney et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200019129A1 · Sircar et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200088427A1 · Li et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200090289A1 · Elbsat et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200096985A1 · Wenzel et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200166230A1 · Ng et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200191427A1 · Martin · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200200423A1 · Gervais · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200301408A1 · Elbsat et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CA 2499695 · 2004 [cited by applicant]
CN 104833063A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
CN 104850013A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
CN 105320118A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
CN 106817909A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
CN 109980638A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CN 11895625A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
EP 3088972A2 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
EP 3447258A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
JP 2001357112 · 2001 [cited by applicant]
JP 2003141178 · 2003 [cited by applicant]
JP 2005148955A · 2005 [cited by applicant]
JP 2005182465 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
JP 2010078447A · 2010 [cited by applicant]
JP 2012073866 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2011072332A1 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2011080547A1 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2012145563A1 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014143908A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2015031581A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2016144586 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2017062896A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018128652A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018217251A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
Correlation, Wikipedia, printed Oct. 10, 2022. [cited by examiner]
Extended European Search Report on EP 18806317.6, dated Jun. 17, 2021, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Freire et al., “Predictive controllers for thermal comfort optimization and energy savings,” Energy and Buildings, 2008, vol. 40, No. 7, pp. 1353-1365. [cited by applicant]
Nwankpa et al., “Activation Functions: Comparison of Trends in Practice and Research for Deep Learning,” Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK, 2018, 20 pages. [cited by applicant]
Schiavon et al., “Dynamic predictive clothing insulation models based on outdoor air and indoor operative temperatures,” 2013, Building and Environment, 59, pp. 250-260. [cited by applicant]
Shanker et al., “Effect of Data Standardization on Neural Network Training,” Omega, Int. J. Mgmt. Sci., 1996, vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 385-397. [cited by applicant]
Srivastava et al., “Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2014, vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 1929-1958. [cited by applicant]
Taleghani et al., “A review into thermal comfort in buildings,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Oct. 2013, vol. 26, p. 201-215. [cited by applicant]
Timplalexis et al., “Thermal Comfort Metabolic Rate and Clothing Inference,” Centre for Research and Technology Hellas/Information Technologies Institute, Greece, Sep. 2019, pp. 690-699. [cited by applicant]
Weigel et al., “applying GIS and or Techniques to Solve Sears Technician-Dispatching and Home Delivery Problems,” Interface, Jan.-Feb. 1999, 29:1, pp. 112-130 (20 pages total). [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion on PCT/US2020/045237, dated Nov. 10, 2020, 18 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion on PCT/US2020/042916, dated Oct. 8, 2020, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion on PCT/US2020/045238, dated Oct. 26, 2020, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Moon, Jin Woo, “Performance of ANN-based predictive and adaptive thermal-control methods for disturbances in and around residential buildings,” Building and Environment, 2012, vol. 48, pp. 15-26. [cited by applicant]
Fuller, Life-Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) | WBDG—Whole Building Design Guide, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), https://www.wbdg.org/resources/life-cycle-cost-analysis-lcca, 2016, pp. 1-13. [cited by applicant]
Gedam, “Optimizing R&M Performance of a System Using Monte Carlo Simulation”, 2012 Proceedings Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 2012, pp. 1-6. [cited by applicant]
Hagmark, et al., “Simulation and Calculation of Reliability Performance and Maintenance Costs”, 2007 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, IEEE Xplore, 2007, pp. 34-40. [cited by applicant]
Mohsenian-Rad et al., “Smart Grid for Smart city Activities in the California City of Riverside,” In: Alberto Leon-Garcia et al.: “Smart City 360°”, Aug. 6, 2016, 22 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance on U.S. Appl. No. 16/232,309 DTD Aug. 26, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Office Action on EP 18150740.1, dated Nov. 5, 2019, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action on EP 18176474.7 dated Sep. 11, 2019. 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action on EP 18176474.7, dated Feb. 10, 2020, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action on EP 18190786.6, dated Feb. 5, 2020, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Rahman et al., “Cost Estimation for Maintenance Contracts for Complex Asset/Equipment”, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2008, pp. 1355-1358. [cited by applicant]
Ruijters et al., “Fault Maintenance Trees: Reliability Centered Maintenance via Statistical Model Checking”, 2016 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS), Jan. 25-28, 2016, pp. 1-6. [cited by applicant]
Afram et al., “Artificial Neural Network (ANN) Based Model Predictive Control (MPC) and Optimization of HVAC Systems: A State of the Art Review and Case Study of a Residential HVAC System,” Energy and Buildings, Apr. 15… [cited by applicant]
Ahou et al., “Reliability-centered predictive maintenance scheduling for a continuously monitored system subject to degradation,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2007, 92.4, pp. 530-534. [cited by applicant]
Astrom. “Optimal Control of Markov Decision Processes with Incomplete State Estimation,” J. Math. Anal. Appl., 1965, 10, pp. 174-205. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 16/294,433, filed Mar. 6, 2019, Hitachi-Johnson Controls Air Conditioning, Inc. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 62/673,479, filed May 18, 2018, Johson Controls Technology Co. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 62/673,496, filed May 18, 2018, Johnson Controls Technology Co. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 62/853,983, filed May 29, 2019, Johnson Controls Technology Co. [cited by applicant]
Aynur, “Variable refrigerant flow systems: A review.” Energy and Buildings, 2010, 42.7, pp. 1106-1112. [cited by applicant]
Bittanti et al., Adaptive Control of Linear Time Invariant Systems: The “Bet on the Best” Principle Communications in Information and Systems, 2006, 6.4, pp. 299-320. [cited by applicant]
Chan et al., “Estimation of Degradation-Based Reliability in Outdoor Environments,” Statistics Preprints, Jun. 19, 2001, 25, 33 pages. [cited by applicant]
Chen et al., “Control-oriented System Identification: an H1 Approach,” Wiley-Interscience, 2000, 19, Chapters 3 & 8, 38 pages. [cited by applicant]
Chu et al., “Predictive maintenance: The one-unit replacement model,” International Journal of Production Economics, 1998, 54.3, pp. 285-295. [cited by applicant]
Chua et al., “Achieving better energy-efficient air conditioning—a review of technologies and strategies,” Applied Energy, 2013, 104, pp. 87-104. [cited by applicant]
Crowder et al., “The Use of Degradation Measures to Design Reliability Test Plans.” World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Mathematical, Computational, Physical, Electrical and Co… [cited by applicant]
De Carlo et al., “Maintenance Cost Optimization in Condition Based Maintenance: A Case Study for Critical Facilities,” International Journal of Engineering and Technology, Oct.-Nov. 2013, 5.5, pp. 4296-4302. [cited by applicant]
E Costa et al., “A multi-criteria model for auditing a Predictive Maintenance Programme,” European Journal of Operational Research, Sep. 29, 2011, 217.2, pp. 381-393. [cited by applicant]
Ebbers et al. “Smarter Data Centers—Achieving Great Efficiency—Second Edition”, Oct. 21, 2011, 138 pages. [cited by applicant]
Emmerich et al., “State-of-the-Art Review of CO2 Demand Controlled Ventilation Technology and Application,” Nistir, Mar. 2001, 47 pages. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report on European Patent Application No. 18150740.1 dated May 16, 2018, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report on European Patent Application No. 18155069.0 dated Jun. 11, 2018, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report on European Patent Application No. 18190786.6 dated Oct. 10, 2018, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Reported on EP Patent Application No. 18176474 dated Sep. 5, 2018, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Feng et al., “Model Predictive Control of Radiant Slab Systems with Evaporative Cooling Sources,” Energy and Buildings, 2015, 87, pp. 199-210. [cited by applicant]
Fu et al., “Predictive Maintenance in Intelligent-Control-Maintenance-Management System for Hydroelectric Generating Unit,” IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, Mar. 2004, 19.1, pp. 179-186. [cited by applicant]
George et al., “Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control,” Fifth Edition, John Wiley & Sons, 2016, Chapters 4-7 and 13-15, 183 pages. [cited by applicant]
Grall et al., “Continuous-Time Predictive-Maintenance Scheduling for a Deteriorating System,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, Jun. 2002, 51.2, pp. 141-150. [cited by applicant]
Hardt et al., “Gradient Descent Learns Linear Dynamical Systems,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2018, 19, pp. 1-44. [cited by applicant]
Helmicki et al. “Control Oriented System Identification: a Worstcase/deterministic Approach in H1,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1991, 36.10, pp. 1163-1176. [cited by applicant]
Hong et al. “Development and Validation of a New Variable Refrigerant Flow System Model in Energyplus,” Energy and Buildings, 2016, 117, pp. 399-411. [cited by applicant]
Hong et al., “Statistical Methods for Degradation Data With Dynamic Covariates Information and an Application to Outdoor Weathering Data,” Technometrics, Nov. 2014, 57.2, pp. 180-193. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion on PCT/US2018/018039, dated Apr. 24, 2018, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
JP2003141178 WIPO Translation, Accessed Feb. 18, 2020, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Kelman et al., “Bilinear Model Predictive Control of a HVAC System Using Sequential Quadratic Programming,” Proceedings of the IFAC World Congress, Sep. 2, 2011, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Kharoufeh et al., “Semi-Markov Models for Degradation-Based Reliability,” IIE Transactions, May 2010, 42.8, pp. 599-612. [cited by applicant]
Kingma et al.,. “Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization,” International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2015, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Li et al., “Reliability Modeling and Life Estimation Using an Expectation Maximization Based Wiener Degradation Model for Momentum Wheels” IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, May 2015, 45.5, pp. 969-977. [cited by applicant]
Ljung et al., “Theory and Practice of Recursive Identification,” vol. 5. Jstor, 1983, Chapters 2, 3 & 7, 80 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ljung, editor. “System Identification: Theory for the User,” 2nd Edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 1999, Chapters 5 and 7, 40 pages. [cited by applicant]
Moseley et al. “Electrochemical Energy Storage for Renewable Sources and Grid Balancing” Nov. 7, 2014. 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Nevena et al., “Data center cooling using model-predictive control,” 32nd Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2018, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Pan et al., “Reliability modeling of degradation of products with multiple performance characteristics based on gamma processes,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2011, 96.8, pp. 949-957. [cited by applicant]
Peng et al., “Bayesian Degradation Analysis with Inverse Gaussian Process Models Under Time-Varying Degradation Rates,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, Mar. 2017, 66.1, pp. 84-96. [cited by applicant]
Peng et al., “Bivariate Analysis of Incomplete Degradation Observations Based on Inverse Gaussian Processes and Copulas,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, Jun. 2016, 65.2, pp. 624-639. [cited by applicant]
Peng et al., “Switching State-Space Degradation Model with Recursive Filter/Smoother for Prognostics of Remaining Useful Life,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, Feb. 2019, 15.2, pp. 822-832. [cited by applicant]
Perez-Lombard et al., “A review on buildings energy consumption information,” Energy and Buildings, 2008, 40.3, pp. 394-398. [cited by applicant]
PJM Economic Demand Resource in Energy Market, PJM State and Member Training Department, 2014, 119 pages. [cited by applicant]
PJM Manual 11: Energy & Ancillary Services Market Operations, pp. 122-137, PJM, 2015. [cited by applicant]
PJM Open Access Transmission Tariff, Section 3.3A, Apr. 4, 2016, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Wan et al., “Data Analysis and Reliability Estimation of Step-Down Stress Accelerated Degradation Test Based on Wiener Process,” Prognostics and System Health Management Conference (PHM-2014 Hunan), Aug. 2014, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Wang et al., “Reliability and Degradation Modeling with Random or Uncertain Failure Threshold,” Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 2007, pp. 392-397. [cited by applicant]
Xiao et al., “Optimal Design for Destructive Degradation Tests with Random Initial Degradation Values Using the Wiener Process,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, Sep. 2016, 65.3, pp. 1327-1342. [cited by applicant]
Xu et al., “Real-time Reliability Prediction for a Dynamic System Based on the Hidden Degradation Process Identification,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, Jun. 2008, 57.2, pp. 230-242. [cited by applicant]
Yang et al., “Thermal comfort and building energy consumption implications—a review,” Applied Energy, 2014, 115, pp. 164-173. [cited by applicant]
Yudong et al., “Model Predictive Control for the Operation of Building Cooling Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, May 2012, 20.3, pp. 796-803. [cited by applicant]
Yudong et al., “Predictive Control for Energy Efficient Buildings with Thermal Storage: Modeling, Stimulation, and Experiments.” IEEE Control Systems, Feb. 2012, 32.1, pp. 44-64. [cited by applicant]
Zhang et al., “A Novel Variable Refrigerant Flow (VRF) Heat Recovery System Model: Development and Validation,” Energy and Buildings, Jun. 2018, 168, pp. 399-412. [cited by applicant]
Zhang et al., “An Age- and State-Dependent Nonlinear Prognostic Model for Degrading Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, Dec. 2015, 64.4, pp. 1214-1228. [cited by applicant]
Zhang et al., “Analysis of Destructive Degradation Tests for a Product with Random Degradation Initiation Time,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, Mar. 2015, 64.1, pp. 516-527. [cited by applicant]
Zhou et al. “Asset Lite Prediction Using Multiple Degradation Indicators and Lifetime Data: a Gamma-Based State Space Model Approach,” 2009 8th International Conference on Reliability, Maintainability and Safety, Aug. 2… [cited by applicant]
Doring, Matthias, “Prediction vs Forecasting: Predictions do not always concern the future . . . ,” Data Science Blog, URL: https://www.datascienceblog.net/post/machine-learning/forecasting_vs_prediction/, 3 pages, Dec.… [cited by applicant]
Furuta et al., “Optimal Allocation of Fuzzy Controller and its rule tuning for Structural Vibration,” Journal of Japan Society for Fuzzy Theory and Intelligent Informatics, Dec. 2008, vol. 20, No. 6 (pp. 921-934). [cited by applicant]
JP Office Action on JP 2020-107153, dated Oct. 5, 2021, with English language translation. (7 pages). [cited by applicant]
JP Office Action on JP Appl. Ser. No. 2020-109855 dated Dec. 7, 2021, with English language translation. (10 pages). [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability on PCT Appl. Ser. No. PCT/US2020/045238 dated Feb. 17, 2022 (8 pages). [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability on PCT Appl. Ser. No. PCT/US2020/042916 dated Feb. 3, 2022 (8 pages). [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on patentability on PCT Appl. Ser. No. PCT/US2020/045237 dated Feb. 17, 2022 (11 pages). [cited by applicant]
Japanese Office Action on JP Appl. No. 2019-554919 dated Mar. 29, 2022 (9 pages with English language translation). [cited by applicant]
JP Office Action on JP Appl. Ser. No. 2020-109855 dated Jul. 12, 2022, with translation (7 pages). [cited by applicant]
CN Office Action on CN Appl. Ser. No. 2020800650785 dated Jan. 30, 2023 (13 pages). [cited by applicant]
Jakhrani et al., “Life Cycle Cost Analysis of a Standalone PV system,” IEEE, 2012 International Conference in Green and Ubiquitous Technology (pp. 82-85). [cited by applicant]
EP Office Action on EP Appl. Ser. No. 18806317.6, dated Feb. 8, 2023 (8 pages). [cited by applicant]
CN Office Action for CN Appl. Ser. No. 202080065078.5 dated Aug. 10, 2023 (30 pages). [cited by applicant]
CN Office Action for CN Appl. Ser. No. 202080065078.5 dated Jan. 31, 2024 (32 pages). [cited by applicant]
Japanese office Action for JP Appl. Ser. No. 2022-160166 dated Jan. 9, 2024 (8 pages). [cited by applicant]
DE Office Action for DE Appl. Ser. No. 112020003719.3 dated Sep. 25, 2024 (16 pages). [cited by applicant]