IP Library Granted Patent US 11,272,342
Granted Patent B2
US 11,272,342 · App. 16/906,010 · Granted Mar 8, 2022

Pedestrian safety communication system and method

Inventors: James Randolph Winter Lepp (Ottawa, CA); Stephen John Barrett (Haywards Heath, GB); Ian Christopher Drummond Doig (Roquefort les Pins, FR); Gordon Peter Young (Leamington Spa, GB); Michael Peter Montemurro (Toronto, CA)
Assignee: BlackBerry Limited
H04W4/80G08G1/162G08G1/166H04W4/021H04W52/0235H04W76/27H04W76/28H04L67/12Y02D30/70
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,272,342
App. No.
16/906,010
Granted
Mar 8, 2022
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method at a power-limited computing station for communicating in an intelligent transport system, the method including operating the computing station in one of a non-critical radio operating state and a safety-critical radio operating state; receiving a trigger at the computing station; determining whether the trigger should cause the computing station to transition a radio operating state; and if the trigger should cause the computing station to transition the radio operating state, changing the radio operating state to the other of the non-critical radio operating state and the safety-critical radio operating state.

Claims (41)

1. A method at a power-limited computing station for communicating in an intelligent transport system, the method comprising:

operating the computing station in one of a non-critical radio operating state and a safety-critical radio operating state, the safety-critical radio operating state having shorter sleep cycles to provide lower latency than the non-critical radio operating state for communications with one or more components of the intelligent transport system;

receiving a trigger at the computing station;

determining whether the trigger should cause the computing station to transition a radio operating state, wherein the determining ignores the trigger when the computing station is in a different plane from a transmitter that sent the trigger;

when the trigger should cause the computing station to transition the radio operating state, changing the radio operating state to the other of the non-critical radio operating state and the safety-critical radio operating state; and

when the radio operating state is changed to the safety-critical radio operating state, transmitting a signal indicating that the radio operating state is the safety-critical radio operating state.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the non-critical radio operating state consumes less power resources but has a higher response latency than the safety-critical radio operating state.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the trigger includes at least one of a wake-up radio signal and a Bluetooth Low Energy signal received at the computing station.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the trigger is relayed from a vehicle or other computing station in the intelligent transport system using an infrastructure element.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the trigger includes one or more messages of the type of a Cooperative Awareness Message, a Personal Safety Message, or a Basic Safety message.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the changing to the safety-critical radio operating state causes a second radio to be activated on the computing station.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the second radio is a safety radio for intelligent transportation systems.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the changing to the non-critical radio operating state causes a radio on the computing station to use discontinuous reception.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining uses information from local sensors on the computing station in conjunction with the trigger.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the trigger is a message from a cellular base station providing an indication that the computing station is entering or leaving a geofenced area.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining differs based on time of day.

12. A power-limited computing station for communicating in an intelligent transport system, the computing station comprising:

a processor; and

a communications subsystem,

wherein the computing station is configured to:

operate in one of a non-critical radio operating state and a safety-critical radio operating state, the safety-critical radio operating state having shorter sleep cycles to provide lower latency than the non-critical radio operating state for communications with one or more components of the intelligent transport system;

receive a trigger at the computing station;

determine whether the trigger should cause the computing station to transition a radio operating state, wherein the determining ignores the trigger when the computing station is in a different plane from a transmitter that sent the trigger;

when the trigger should cause the computing station to transition the radio operating state, change the radio operating state to the other of the non-critical radio operating state and the safety-critical radio operating state; and

when the radio operating state is changed to the safety-critical radio operating state, transmit a signal indicating that the radio operating state is the safety-critical radio operating state.

13. The computing station of claim 12 , wherein the non-critical radio operating state consumes less power resources but has a higher response latency than the safety-critical radio operating state.

14. The computing station of claim 12 , wherein the trigger includes at least one of a wake-up radio signal and a Bluetooth Low Energy signal received at the computing station.

15. The computing station of claim 12 , wherein the trigger is relayed from a vehicle or other computing station in the intelligent transport system using an infrastructure element.

16. The computing station of claim 12 , wherein the trigger includes one or more messages of the type of a Cooperative Awareness Message, a Personal Safety Message, or a Basic Safety message.

17. The computing station of claim 12 , wherein the computing station is configured to change to the safety-critical radio operating state by causing a second radio to be activated on the computing station.

18. The computing station of claim 17 , wherein the second radio is a safety radio for intelligent transportation systems.

19. The computing station of claim 12 , wherein the computing station is configured to change to the non-critical radio operating state by causing a radio on the computing station to use discontinuous reception.

20. The computing station of claim 12 , wherein the computing station is configured to determine using information from local sensors on the computing station in conjunction with the trigger.

21. The computing station of claim 12 , wherein the trigger is a message from a cellular base station providing an indication that the computing station is entering or leaving a geofenced area.

22. The computing station of claim 12 , wherein the computing station is configured to determine based on time of day.

23. A non-transitory computer readable medium containing instruction code, which, when executed by a processor of computing station, allow for communication in an intelligent transport system, the instruction code causing the computing station to:

operate in one of a non-critical radio operating state and a safety-critical radio operating state, the safety-critical radio operating state having shorter sleep cycles to provide lower latency than the non-critical radio operating state for communications with one or more components of the intelligent transport system;

receive a trigger at the computing station;

determine whether the trigger should cause the computing station to transition a radio operating state, wherein the determining ignores the trigger when the computing station is in a different plane from a transmitter that sent the trigger;

when the trigger should cause the computing station to transition the radio operating state, change the radio operating state to the other of the non-critical radio operating state and the safety-critical radio operating state; and

when the radio operating state is changed to the safety-critical radio operating state, transmit a signal indicating that the radio operating state is the safety-critical radio operating state.

Assignments (9)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE COVER SHEET AT PAGE 50 TO REMOVE 12817157 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 063471 FRAME 0474. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Sep 5, 2023
From: BLACKBERRY LIMITED
To: OT PATENT ESCROW, LLC
Reel/Frame 064806/0669 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT 12817157 APPLICATION NUMBER PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 064015 FRAME: 0001. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Sep 5, 2023
From: OT PATENT ESCROW, LLC
To: MALIKIE INNOVATIONS LIMITED
Reel/Frame 064807/0001 →
NUNC PRO TUNC ASSIGNMENT Recorded Jun 16, 2023
From: OT PATENT ESCROW, LLC
To: MALIKIE INNOVATIONS LIMITED
Reel/Frame 064015/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 27, 2023
From: BLACKBERRY LIMITED
To: OT PATENT ESCROW, LLC
Reel/Frame 063471/0474 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 19, 2020
From: LEPP, JAMES RANDOLPH WINTER; MONTEMURRO, MICHAEL PETER
To: BLACKBERRY LIMITED
Reel/Frame 052985/0931 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 19, 2020
From: BLACKBERRY FRANCE S.A.S.
To: BLACKBERRY UK LIMITED
Reel/Frame 052986/0112 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 19, 2020
From: BARRETT, STEPHEN JOHN; YOUNG, GORDON PETER
To: BLACKBERRY UK LIMITED
Reel/Frame 052985/0967 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 19, 2020
From: BLACKBERRY UK LIMITED
To: BLACKBERRY LIMITED
Reel/Frame 052986/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 19, 2020
From: DOIG, IAN CHRISTOPHER DRUMMOND
To: BLACKBERRY FRANCE S.A.S.
Reel/Frame 052986/0058 →