IP Library Granted Patent US 10,880,324
Granted Patent B2
US 10,880,324 · App. 16/911,078 · Granted Dec 29, 2020

Method and device for determining data anomaly

Inventors: Yuehao Wu (Hangzhou, CN); Ling Xie (Hangzhou, CN); Xin Xu (Hangzhou, CN)
Assignee: Advanced New Technologies Co., Ltd.
H04L63/1425G06N7/005G06N20/00H04L63/1416
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,880,324
App. No.
16/911,078
Granted
Dec 29, 2020
Kind
B2
Abstract

Computer-implemented methods, non-transitory, computer-readable media, and computer-implemented systems for determination of anomalous data are provided. In a computer-implemented method, a plurality of data packets is received within a predetermined time period, the plurality of data packets comprising a data structure. A historical distribution of historical data including the data structure as the data packets is determined. The plurality of data packets is compared to the historical distribution to generate a comparison result. If it is determined that data anomaly exists in the plurality of data packets according to the comparison result, an alert indicating the data anomaly is generated.

Claims (85)

1. A computer-implemented method for determination of anomalous data, the computer-implemented method comprising:

processing, by one or more processors, data packets comprising a data structure to determine a historical distribution of historical data based on the data structure and a current distribution corresponding to a data distribution state of the data packets;

determining, by the one or more processors, a first distribution state parameter of a randomly selected data packet in the current distribution;

determining, by the one or more processors, a second distribution state parameter of the randomly selected data packet in the historical distribution;

comparing, by the one or more processors, the current distribution of the data packets with the historical distribution by determining a difference value between the first distribution state parameter and the second distribution state parameter to generate a comparison result;

determining, by the one or more processors, that the difference value exceeds a predetermined difference threshold;

in response to determining that the difference value exceeds the predetermined difference threshold determining, by the one or more processors, that a data anomaly exists in the data packets; and

in response to determining that the data anomaly exists in the data packets, generating, by the one or more processors, an alert indicating the data anomaly.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein comparing the data packets with the historical distribution comprises:

generating a plurality of distribution state parameters by substituting the data packets into the historical distribution; and

comparing the plurality of distribution state parameters with a predetermined threshold related to a distribution state to determine a number of data packets having a distribution state parameter exceeding the predetermined threshold.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein comparing the data packets with the historical distribution comprises:

determining a data distribution state of the data packets as a current distribution; and

comparing the current distribution with the historical distribution.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 3 , wherein comparing the current distribution with the historical distribution comprises:

determining a distribution center of the current distribution;

determining a distribution center of the historical distribution;

determining an offset between the distribution center of the current distribution and the distribution center of the historical distribution;

determining that the offset between the distribution center of the current distribution and the distribution center of the historical distribution exceeds a predetermined offset threshold; and

in response to determining that the offset exceeds the predetermined offset threshold, determining that the data anomaly exists in the data packets.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 3 , wherein comparing the current distribution with the historical distribution comprises:

determining a first distribution state parameter of a randomly selected data packet in the current distribution;

determining a second distribution state parameter of the randomly selected data packet in the historical distribution;

determining a difference value between the first distribution state parameter and the second distribution state parameter;

determining that the difference value exceeds a predetermined difference threshold; and

in response to determining that the difference value exceeds the predetermined difference threshold, determining that the data anomaly exists in the data packets.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the historical distribution comprises a historical probability distribution determined by processing the historical data with a hybrid Gaussian model.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the historical distribution comprises a historical clustering distribution determined by processing the historical data with a clustering algorithm.

8. A non-transitory, computer-readable medium storing one or more instructions executable by a computer system to perform one or more operations for determination of anomalous data, comprising:

processing data packets comprising a data structure to determine a historical distribution of historical data based on the data structure and a current distribution corresponding to a data distribution state of the data packets;

determining a first distribution state parameter of a randomly selected data packet in the current distribution;

determining a second distribution state parameter of the randomly selected data packet in the historical distribution;

comparing the current distribution of the data packets with the historical distribution by determining a difference value between the first distribution state parameter and the second distribution state parameter to generate a comparison result;

determining that the difference value exceeds a predetermined difference threshold;

in response to determining that the difference value exceeds the predetermined difference threshold determining that a data anomaly exists in the data packets; and

in response to determining that the data anomaly exists in the data packets, generating an alert indicating the data anomaly.

9. The non-transitory, computer-readable medium of claim 8 , wherein comparing the data packets with the historical distribution comprises:

generating a plurality of distribution state parameters by substituting the data packets into the historical distribution; and

comparing the plurality of distribution state parameters with a predetermined threshold related to a distribution state to determine a number of data packets having a distribution state parameter exceeding the predetermined threshold.

10. The non-transitory, computer-readable medium of claim 8 , wherein comparing the data packets with the historical distribution comprises:

determining a data distribution state of the data packets as a current distribution; and

comparing the current distribution with the historical distribution.

11. The non-transitory, computer-readable medium of claim 10 , wherein comparing the current distribution with the historical distribution comprises:

determining a distribution center of the current distribution;

determining a distribution center of the historical distribution;

determining an offset between the distribution center of the current distribution and the distribution center of the historical distribution;

determining that the offset between the distribution center of the current distribution and the distribution center of the historical distribution exceeds a predetermined offset threshold; and

in response to determining that the offset exceeds the predetermined offset threshold, determining that the data anomaly exists in the data packets.

12. The non-transitory, computer-readable medium of claim 10 , wherein comparing the current distribution with the historical distribution comprises:

determining a first distribution state parameter of a randomly selected data packet in the current distribution;

determining a second distribution state parameter of the randomly selected data packet in the historical distribution;

determining a difference value between the first distribution state parameter and the second distribution state parameter;

determining that the difference value exceeds a predetermined difference threshold; and

in response to determining that the difference value exceeds the predetermined difference threshold, determining that the data anomaly exists in the data packets.

13. The non-transitory, computer-readable medium of claim 8 , wherein the historical distribution comprises a historical probability distribution determined by processing the historical data with a hybrid Gaussian model.

14. The non-transitory, computer-readable medium of claim 8 , wherein the historical distribution comprises a historical clustering distribution determined by processing the historical data with a clustering algorithm.

15. A computer-implemented system for determination of anomalous data, comprising:

one or more computers; and

one or more computer memory devices interoperably coupled with the one or more computers and having tangible, non-transitory, machine-readable media storing one or more instructions that, when executed by the one or more computers, perform one or more operations, comprising:

processing data packets comprising a data structure to determine a historical distribution of historical data based on the data structure and a current distribution corresponding to a data distribution state of the data packets;

determining a first distribution state parameter of a randomly selected data packet in the current distribution;

determining a second distribution state parameter of the randomly selected data packet in the historical distribution;

comparing the current distribution of the data packets with the historical distribution by determining a difference value between the first distribution state parameter and the second distribution state parameter to generate a comparison result;

determining that the difference value exceeds a predetermined difference threshold;

in response to determining that the difference value exceeds the predetermined difference threshold determining that a data anomaly exists in the data packets; and

in response to determining that the data anomaly exists in the data packets, generating an alert indicating the data anomaly.

16. The computer-implemented system of claim 15 , wherein comparing the data packets with the historical distribution comprises:

generating a plurality of distribution state parameters by substituting the data packets into the historical distribution; and

comparing the plurality of distribution state parameters with a predetermined threshold related to a distribution state to determine a number of data packets having a distribution state parameter exceeding the predetermined threshold.

17. The computer-implemented system of claim 15 , wherein comparing the data packets with the historical distribution comprises:

determining a data distribution state of the data packets as a current distribution; and

comparing the current distribution with the historical distribution.

18. The computer-implemented system of claim 17 , wherein comparing the current distribution with the historical distribution comprises:

determining a distribution center of the current distribution;

determining a distribution center of the historical distribution;

determining an offset between the distribution center of the current distribution and the distribution center of the historical distribution;

determining that the offset between the distribution center of the current distribution and the distribution center of the historical distribution exceeds a predetermined offset threshold; and

in response to determining that the offset exceeds the predetermined offset threshold, determining that the data anomaly exists in the data packets.

19. The computer-implemented system of claim 17 , wherein comparing the current distribution with the historical distribution comprises:

determining a first distribution state parameter of a randomly selected data packet in the current distribution;

determining a second distribution state parameter of the randomly selected data packet in the historical distribution;

determining a difference value between the first distribution state parameter and the second distribution state parameter;

determining that the difference value exceeds a predetermined difference threshold; and

in response to determining that the difference value exceeds the predetermined difference threshold, determining that the data anomaly exists in the data packets.

20. The computer-implemented system of claim 15 , wherein the historical distribution comprises a historical probability distribution determined by processing the historical data with a hybrid Gaussian model or a clustering algorithm.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 8, 2020
From: WU, YUEHAO; XIE, LING; XU, XIN
To: ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LIMITED
Reel/Frame 054007/0369 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 10, 2020
From: ADVANTAGEOUS NEW TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.
To: ADVANCED NEW TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.
Reel/Frame 053754/0625 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 31, 2020
From: ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LIMITED
To: ADVANTAGEOUS NEW TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.
Reel/Frame 053743/0464 →