IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,250,522
Granted Patent B2
US 12,250,522 · App. 16/933,323 · Granted Mar 11, 2025

Light driven contact hearing aid

Inventors: Cem Shaquer (Saratoga, CA); Louis Wong (Los Altos Hills, CA); Kin Chan (Los Gatos, CA); Paul Rucker (San Francisco, CA)
Assignee: Earlens Corporation
H04R25/606A61B5/6817A61F2/18H04R25/554H04R25/603A61F2002/183H01S5/005
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,250,522
App. No.
16/933,323
Granted
Mar 11, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present invention is directed to a contact hearing system utilizing an emitter adapted to emit light and a contact hearing device adapted to receive the emitted light and convert that light into sound by mechanical manipulation of a subjects ear drum. In the present invention the emitter may utilize multiple light sources and the multiple light sources may be passed through at least one diffuser in order to generate an emitted light having a broader angle of incidence with little or no loss in received power as measured by a photodetector on the contact hearing device when the contact hearing device is positioned on a subject's tympanic membrane and the emitter is positioned in the subject's ear canal.

Claims (31)

1. A hearing aid system comprising:

a multi-laser emitter, wherein the multi-laser emitter includes at least a first laser source positioned on a substrate and a second laser source positioned on the substrate with a configured separation distance between the first and second laser sources, and wherein the multi-laser emitter further includes a diffuser having a configured diffusion angle and positioned away from the first and second laser sources; and

a receiver, wherein the receiver comprises at least one photodetector and a microactuator, the at least one photodetector configured to receive a combined multi-laser output signal based on diffusion by the diffuser of a first laser beam from the first laser source and a second laser beam from the second laser source, wherein the combined multi-laser output signal has a total diffusion angle that is greater than the configured diffusion angle of the diffuser and is based at least in part on the configured separation distance between the first and second laser sources.

2. The hearing aid system according to claim 1 wherein the first and second laser sources comprise vertical-cavity surface-emitting laser (VCSEL) lasers.

3. The hearing aid system according to claim 1 wherein the diffuser diffuses light from the first and second laser sources with the configured diffusion angle being equal to an angle of greater than approximately 50 degrees.

4. The hearing aid system according to claim 1 wherein the diffuser diffuses light from the first and second laser sources with the configured diffusion angle being equal to an angle of greater than approximately 30 degrees.

5. The hearing aid system according to claim 1 wherein the first laser source is on a first side of the multi-laser emitter and the second laser source is on a second side of the multi-laser emitter.

6. The hearing aid system according to claim 5 wherein a centerline runs through the multi-laser emitter, the first laser source being positioned on a first side of the centerline and the second laser source being positioned on a second side of the centerline.

7. A method of selecting at least one laser source from a plurality of laser sources in a multi-laser emitter of a hearing aid system, the method comprising:

driving each laser source of the plurality of laser sources, wherein the plurality of laser sources includes at least a first laser source positioned on a substrate and a second laser source positioned on the substrate with a configured separation distance between the first and second laser sources, and wherein the multi-laser emitter further includes a diffuser having a configured diffusion angle and positioned away from the first and second laser sources;

measuring a feedback signal based on receiving a combined multi-laser output signal using at least one photodetector of a receiver of the hearing aid system, wherein:

the at least one photodetector is configured to receive the combined multi-laser output signal based on diffusion by the diffuser of a first laser beam from the first laser source and a second laser beam from the second laser source; and

a total diffusion angle associated with the combined multi-laser output signal is greater than the configured diffusion angle of the diffuser, the total diffusion angle based at least in part on the configured separation distance between the first and second laser sources; and

selecting, from the plurality of laser sources, a respective laser source which provides the feedback signal having the largest magnitude.

8. The method according to claim 7 wherein the method further includes the step of selecting an additional laser source from the plurality of laser sources by selecting the laser source which creates the feedback signal having the second largest magnitude.

9. The method according to claim 7 wherein the respective laser source selected from the plurality of laser sources is used to transmit information to the receiver of the hearing aid system, wherein the receiver comprises the at least one photodetector and a microactuator.

10. The method according to claim 9 wherein the respective laser source selected from the plurality of laser sources is used to transmit power to the receiver.

11. The method according to claim 7 wherein the feedback signal is an audio feedback signal.

12. The method according to claim 7 wherein the feedback signal is an electronic feedback signal.

13. A method of transmitting information from a multi-laser emitter to a receiver in a hearing aid, the method comprising:

radiating light energy from at least two laser sources in the multi-laser emitter;

diffusing the radiated light energy using a diffuser at an output of the multi-laser emitter; and

redirecting the radiated light energy as it passes through the diffuser, wherein the radiated light energy has a total diffusion angle that is greater than a configured diffusion angle of the diffuser and is based at least in part on a configured separation distance between the at least two laser sources.

14. The method according to claim 13 wherein:

the at least two laser sources includes a first laser source and a second laser source;

the light energy from the first laser source is redirected in a first direction; and

the light energy from the second laser source is redirected in a second direction.

15. The method according to claim 14 wherein the first direction is away from the second direction.

16. The method according to claim 14 wherein the first direction is toward the second direction.

17. The method according to claim 14 wherein the first direction is substantially orthogonal to a substrate on which the at least two laser sources are mounted.

18. The method according to claim 14 wherein the first direction is substantially orthogonal to an output surface of the diffuser.

Assignments (2)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 20, 2021
From: EARLENS CORPORATION
To: CRG SERVICING LLC, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 058544/0318 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 20, 2020
From: SHAQUER, CEM; WONG, LOUIS; CHAN, KIN; RUCKER, PAUL
To: EARLENS CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 053253/0881 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation PCTUS2019013822 · Jan 16, 2019
Provisional Application 62620341 · Jan 22, 2018
Related Publication 20200351600A1 · Nov 5, 2020
References Cited (133)
US 4375016A · Harada · 1983 [cited by applicant]
US 4747656A · Miyahara et al. · 1988 [cited by applicant]
US 5259032A · Perkins et al. · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 5624376A · Ball et al. · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5804109A · Perkins · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 6068589A · Neukermans · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6137889A · Shennib et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6190305B1 · Ball et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6473512B1 · Juneau et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6491644B1 · Vujanic et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6724902B1 · Shennib et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6931231B1 · Griffin · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6940989B1 · Shennib et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7095981B1 · Voroba et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7289639B2 · Abel et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7627131B2 · Nielsen et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7630646B2 · Anderson et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7983435B2 · Moses · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8116494B2 · Rass · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8157730B2 · LeBoeuf et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8194911B2 · Dyer et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8204786B2 · LeBoeuf et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8251903B2 · LeBoeuf et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8320982B2 · LeBouef et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8396239B2 · Fay et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8512242B2 · LeBoeuf et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8545383B2 · Wenzel et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8600089B2 · Wenzel et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8647270B2 · LeBoeuf et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8652040B2 · LeBoeuf et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8700111B2 · LeBoeuf et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8702607B2 · LebBoeuf et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8715152B2 · Puria et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8761423B2 · Wagner et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8788002B2 · LeBoeuf et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8885860B2 · Djalilian et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8886269B2 · LeBoeuf et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8888701B2 · LeBoeuf et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8923941B2 · LeBoeuf et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8929965B2 · LeBoeuf et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 8929966B2 · LeBoeuf et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 8934952B2 · LeBoeuf et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 8942776B2 · LeBoeuf et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 8961415B2 · LeBoeuf et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 8989830B2 · LeBoeuf et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9044180B2 · LeBoeuf et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9131312B2 · LeBoeuf et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9289135B2 · LeBoeuf et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9289175B2 · LeBoeuf et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9301696B2 · LeBoeuf et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9314167B2 · LeBoeuf et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9392377B2 · Olsen et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9427191B2 · LeBoeuf · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9521962B2 · LeBoeuf · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9538921B2 · LeBoeuf et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9750462B2 · LeBoeuf et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9788785B2 · LeBoeuf · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9788794B2 · LeBoeuf et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9791639B2 · Zhao et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9794653B2 · Aumer et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9801552B2 · Romesburg · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9808204B2 · LeBoeuf et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10306381B2 · Sandhu et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20060161255A1 · Zarowski et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20090052706A1 · Gottschalk et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090304216A1 · Hansen et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100034409A1 · Fay · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20100166241A1 · Sabio · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110268308A1 · Vasquez · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110295331A1 · Wells · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20120051578A1 · Parkins et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120097475A1 · Schumaier · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120099823A1 · Wu et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130016861A1 · Kaempf · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130023962A1 · Stafford et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130034258A1 · Lin · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130161119A1 · Mulvey · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130294630A1 · Matsuo et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140153768A1 · Hagen et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150146900A1 · Vonlanthen et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150222978A1 · Murozaki · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150245131A1 · Facteau et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150358749A1 · Karamuk et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160066110A1 · Shennib et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160173971A1 · Lott et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160330555A1 · Vonlanthen et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20180048970A1 · Demartini et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190166438A1 · Perkins et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190174240A1 · Johnson et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200137503A1 · Demartini et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200267485A1 · Perkins et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
DE 3508830A1 · 1986 [cited by applicant]
KR 100624445B1 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018035036A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2019143702A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
Dundas et al. The Earlens Light-Driven Hearing Aid: Top 10 questions and answers. Hearing Review. 2018;25(2):36-39. [cited by applicant]
Fay, et al. Preliminary evaluation of a light-based contact hearing device for the hearing impaired. Otol Neurotol. Jul. 2013;34(5):912-21. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31827de4b1. [cited by applicant]
Fritsch, et al. EarLens transducer behavior in high-field strength MRI scanners. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Mar. 2009; 140(3):426-8. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2008.10.016. [cited by applicant]
Gantz, et al. Broad Spectrum Amplification with a Light Driven Hearing System. Combined Otolaryngology Spring Meetings, 2016 (Chicago). [cited by applicant]
Gantz, et al. Light Driven Hearing System: A Multi-Center Clinical Study. Association for Research in Otolaryngology Annual Meeting, 2016 (San Diego). [cited by applicant]
Gantz, et al. Light-Driven Contact Hearing Aid for Broad Spectrum Amplification: Safety and Effectiveness Pivotal Study. Otology & Neurotology Journal, 2016 (in review). [cited by applicant]
Gantz, et al. Light-Driven Contact Hearing Aid for Broad-Spectrum Amplification: Safety and Effectiveness Pivotal Study. Otology & Neurotology. Copyright 2016. 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
International search report with written opinion dated Mar. 26, 2019 for PCT/US2019/013822. [cited by applicant]
Jian, et al. A 0.6 V, 1.66 mW energy harvester and audio driver for tympanic membrane transducer with wirelessly optical signal and power transfer. InCircuits and Systems (ISCAS), 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Ju… [cited by applicant]
Khaleghi, et al. Attenuating the ear canal feedback pressure of a laser-driven hearing aid. J Acoust Soc Am. Mar. 2017; 141(3):1683. [cited by applicant]
Khaleghi, et al. Attenuating the feedback pressure of a light-activated hearing device to allows microphone placement at the ear canal entrance. IHCON 2016, International Hearing Aid Research Conference, Tahoe City, CA,… [cited by applicant]
Khaleghi, et al. Characterization of Ear-Canal Feedback Pressure due to Umbo-Drive Forces: Finite-Element vs. Circuit Models. ARO Midwinter Meeting 2016, (San Diego). [cited by applicant]
Khaleghi, et al. Mechano-Electro-Magnetic Finite Element Model of a Balanced Armature Transducer for a Contact Hearing Aid. Proc. MoH 2017, Mechanics of Hearing workshop, Brock University, Jun. 2017. [cited by applicant]
Khaleghi, et al. Multiphysics Finite Element Model of a Balanced Armature Transducer used in a Contact Hearing Device. ARO 2017, 40th ARO MidWinter Meeting, Baltimore, MD, Feb. 2017. [cited by applicant]
Lee, et al. A Novel Opto-Electromagnetic Actuator Coupled to the tympanic Membrane. J Biomech. Dec. 5, 2008;41(16):3515-8. Epub Nov. 7, 2008. [cited by applicant]
Lee, et al. The optimal magnetic force for a novel actuator coupled to the tympanic membrane: a finite element analysis. Biomedical engineering: applications, basis and communications. 2007; 19(3):171-177. [cited by applicant]
Levy, et al. Characterization of the available feedback gain margin at two device microphone locations, in the fossa triangularis and Behind the Ear, for the light-based contact hearing device. Acoustical Society of Ame… [cited by applicant]
Levy, et al. Extended High-Frequency Bandwidth Improves Speech Reception in the Presence of Spatially Separated Masking Speech. Ear Hear. Sep.-Oct. 2015;36(5):e214-24. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000161. [cited by applicant]
Levy et al. Light-driven contact hearing aid: a removable direct-drive hearing device option for mild to severe sensorineural hearing impairment. Conference on Implantable Auditory Prostheses, Tahoe City, CA, Jul. 2017.… [cited by applicant]
McElveen et al. Overcoming High-Frequency Limitations of Air Conduction Hearing Devices Using a Light-Driven Contact Hearing Aid. Poster presentation at The Triological Society, 120th Annual Meeting at COSM, Apr. 28, 20… [cited by applicant]
Moore, et al. Spectro-temporal characteristics of speech at high frequencies, and the potential for restoration of audibility to people with mild-to-moderate hearing loss. Ear Hear. Dec. 2008;29(6):907-22. doi: 10.1097/… [cited by applicant]
Perkins, et al. Light-based Contact Hearing Device: Characterization of available Feedback Gain Margin at two device microphone locations. Presented at AAO-HNSF Annual Meeting, 2013 (Vancouver). [cited by applicant]
Perkins, et al. The EarLens Photonic Transducer: Extended bandwidth. Presented at AAO-HNSF Annual Meeting, 2011 (San Francisco). [cited by applicant]
Perkins, et al. The EarLens System: New sound transduction methods. Hear Res. Feb. 2, 2010; 10 pages total. [cited by applicant]
Perkins, R. Earlens tympanic contact transducer: a new method of sound transduction to the human ear. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Jun. 1996; 114(6):720-8. [cited by applicant]
Puria, et al. Cues above 4 kilohertz can improve spatially separated speech recognition. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2011, 129, 2384. [cited by applicant]
Puria, et al. Extending bandwidth above 4 kHz improves speech understanding in the presence of masking speech. Association for Research in Otolaryngology Annual Meeting, 2012 (San Diego). [cited by applicant]
Puria, et al. Extending bandwidth provides the brain what it needs to improve hearing in noise. First international conference on cognitive hearing science for communication, 2011 (Linkoping, Sweden). [cited by applicant]
Puria, et al. Hearing Restoration: Improved Multi-talker Speech Understanding. 5th International Symposium on Middle Ear Mechanics In Research and Otology (MEMRO), Jun. 2009 (Stanford University). [cited by applicant]
Puria, et al. Imaging, Physiology and Biomechanics of the middle ear: Towards understating the functional consequences of anatomy. Stanford Mechanics and Computation Symposium, 2005, ed Fong J. [cited by applicant]
Puria, et al. Sound-Pressure Measurements in The Cochlear Vestibule of Human-Cadaver Ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1997; 101 (5-1): 2754-2770. [cited by applicant]
Puria, et al. Temporal-Bone Measurements of the Maximum Equivalent Pressure Output and Maximum Stable Gain of a Light-Driven Hearing System That Mechanically Stimulates the Umbo. Otol Neurotol. Feb. 2016;37(2):160-6. do… [cited by applicant]
Puria, et al. The EarLens Photonic Hearing Aid. Association for Research in Otolaryngology Annual Meeting, 2012 (San Diego). [cited by applicant]
Puria, et al. The Effects of bandwidth and microphone location on understanding of masked speech by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. International Conference for Hearing Aid Research (IHCON) meeting, 2012 … [cited by applicant]
Puria. Measurements of human middle ear forward and reverse acoustics: implications for otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am. May 2003; 113(5):2773-89. [cited by applicant]
Puria, S. Middle Ear Hearing Devices. Chapter 10. Part of the series Springer Handbook of Auditory Research pp. 273-308. Date: Feb. 9, 2013. [cited by applicant]
Song, et al. The development of a non-surgical direct drive hearing device with a wireless actuator coupled to the tympanic membrane. Applied Acoustics. Dec. 31, 2013;74(12):1511-8. [cited by applicant]
Struck, et al. Comparison of Real-world Bandwidth in Hearing Aids vs Earlens Light-driven Hearing Aid System. The Hearing Review. TechTopic: EarLens. Hearingreview.com. Mar. 14, 2017. pp. 24-28. [cited by applicant]