IP Library Patent Application 16940059
Patent Application
App. No. 16/940,059

THREAT MITIGATION SYSTEM AND METHOD

Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US None
App. No.
16/940,059
Abstract

A computer-implemented method, computer program product and computing system for: a computer-implemented method is executed on a computing device and includes: rendering a threat mitigation user interface that identifies objects within a computing platform in response to a security event; monitoring actions taken by a third-party when investigating the security event; and providing suggestions to the third-party concerning additional actions to be taken by the third-party concerning the investigation of the security event.

Claims (81)

1 . A computer-implemented method, executed on a computing device, comprising:

rendering a threat mitigation user interface that identifies objects within a computing platform in response to a security event;

monitoring actions taken by a third-party when investigating the security event; and

providing suggestions to the third-party concerning additional actions to be taken by the third-party concerning the investigation of the security event.

2 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein monitoring actions taken by a third-party when investigating the security event include:

monitoring artifacts gathered by the third-party when investigating the security event.

3 . The computer-implemented method of claim 2 wherein the artifacts include one or more of:

raw data;

screen shots;

graphics;

notes;

annotations;

audio recordings; and

video recordings.

4 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein monitoring actions taken by a third-party when investigating the security event include:

monitoring objects reviewed by the third-party when investigating the security event.

5 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein providing suggestions to the third-party concerning additional actions to be taken by the third-party concerning the investigation of the security event includes:

providing suggestions to the third-party concerning additional objects to be reviewed by the third-party when investigating the security event.

6 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein providing suggestions to the third-party concerning additional actions to be taken by the third-party concerning the investigation of the security event includes:

providing suggestions to the third-party concerning additional artifacts to be gathered by the third-party when investigating the security event.

7 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein providing suggestions to the third-party concerning additional actions to be taken by the third-party concerning the investigation of the security event includes:

providing suggestions to the third-party concerning a remedial action to be taken by the third-party when investigating the security event.

8 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 further comprising:

enabling the third-party to select an object within the threat mitigation user interface, thus defining a selected object; and

rendering an inspection window that defines object information concerning the selected object.

9 . The computer-implemented method of claim 8 wherein the inspection window is a popup inspection window.

10 . The computer-implemented method of claim 8 wherein the inspection window is a slide out inspection window.

11 . A computer program product residing on a computer readable medium having a plurality of instructions stored thereon which, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform operations comprising:

rendering a threat mitigation user interface that identifies objects within a computing platform in response to a security event;

monitoring actions taken by a third-party when investigating the security event; and

providing suggestions to the third-party concerning additional actions to be taken by the third-party concerning the investigation of the security event.

12 . The computer-implemented method of claim 11 wherein monitoring actions taken by a third-party when investigating the security event include:

monitoring artifacts gathered by the third-party when investigating the security event.

13 . The computer-implemented method of claim 12 wherein the artifacts include one or more of:

raw data;

screen shots;

graphics;

notes;

annotations;

audio recordings; and

video recordings.

14 . The computer-implemented method of claim 11 wherein monitoring actions taken by a third-party when investigating the security event include:

monitoring objects reviewed by the third-party when investigating the security event.

15 . The computer-implemented method of claim 11 wherein providing suggestions to the third-party concerning additional actions to be taken by the third-party concerning the investigation of the security event includes:

providing suggestions to the third-party concerning additional objects to be reviewed by the third-party when investigating the security event.

16 . The computer-implemented method of claim 11 wherein providing suggestions to the third-party concerning additional actions to be taken by the third-party concerning the investigation of the security event includes:

providing suggestions to the third-party concerning additional artifacts to be gathered by the third-party when investigating the security event.

17 . The computer-implemented method of claim 11 wherein providing suggestions to the third-party concerning additional actions to be taken by the third-party concerning the investigation of the security event includes:

providing suggestions to the third-party concerning a remedial action to be taken by the third-party when investigating the security event.

18 . The computer-implemented method of claim 11 further comprising:

enabling the third-party to select an object within the threat mitigation user interface, thus defining a selected object; and

rendering an inspection window that defines object information concerning the selected object.

19 . The computer-implemented method of claim 18 wherein the inspection window is a popup inspection window.

20 . The computer-implemented method of claim 18 wherein the inspection window is a slide out inspection window.

21 . A computing system including a processor and memory configured to perform operations comprising:

rendering a threat mitigation user interface that identifies objects within a computing platform in response to a security event;

monitoring actions taken by a third-party when investigating the security event; and

providing suggestions to the third-party concerning additional actions to be taken by the third-party concerning the investigation of the security event.

22 . The computer-implemented method of claim 21 wherein monitoring actions taken by a third-party when investigating the security event include:

monitoring artifacts gathered by the third-party when investigating the security event.

23 . The computer-implemented method of claim 22 wherein the artifacts include one or more of:

raw data;

screen shots;

graphics;

notes;

annotations;

audio recordings; and

video recordings.

24 . The computer-implemented method of claim 21 wherein monitoring actions taken by a third-party when investigating the security event include:

monitoring objects reviewed by the third-party when investigating the security event.

25 . The computer-implemented method of claim 21 wherein providing suggestions to the third-party concerning additional actions to be taken by the third-party concerning the investigation of the security event includes:

providing suggestions to the third-party concerning additional objects to be reviewed by the third-party when investigating the security event.

26 . The computer-implemented method of claim 21 wherein providing suggestions to the third-party concerning additional actions to be taken by the third-party concerning the investigation of the security event includes:

providing suggestions to the third-party concerning additional artifacts to be gathered by the third-party when investigating the security event.

27 . The computer-implemented method of claim 21 wherein providing suggestions to the third-party concerning additional actions to be taken by the third-party concerning the investigation of the security event includes:

providing suggestions to the third-party concerning a remedial action to be taken by the third-party when investigating the security event.

28 . The computer-implemented method of claim 21 further comprising:

enabling the third-party to select an object within the threat mitigation user interface, thus defining a selected object; and

rendering an inspection window that defines object information concerning the selected object.

29 . The computer-implemented method of claim 28 wherein the inspection window is a popup inspection window.

30 . The computer-implemented method of claim 28 wherein the inspection window is a slide out inspection window.

Assignments (4)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 1, 2024
From: SIXTH STREET SPECIALTY LENDING, INC.
To: RELIAQUEST HOLDINGS, LLC
Reel/Frame 067277/0607 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 30, 2024
From: RELIAQUEST HOLDINGS, LLC
To: GOLUB CAPITAL LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 067274/0381 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 15, 2022
From: MURPHY, BRIAN P.; PARTLOW, JOE; O'CONNOR, COLIN; PFEIFFER, JASON; MURPHY, BRIAN PHILIP
To: RELIAQUEST HOLDINGS, LLC
Reel/Frame 060524/0829 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 8, 2020
From: RELIAQUEST HOLDINGS, LLC
To: SIXTH STREET SPECIALTY LENDING, INC., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 054013/0548 →