IP Library Granted Patent US 11,635,220
Granted Patent B2
US 11,635,220 · App. 16/947,341 · Granted Apr 25, 2023

Systems and methods for checking status of a pressure transducer

Inventors: John F. Broker (Warrenton, MO); Lily Wan (St. Louis, MO); Bradley C. Zikes (St. Louis, MO)
Assignee: Emerson Electric Co.
F24F11/38F24F11/49G05B15/02G05B19/048G05B2219/24015G05B2219/2614G05B2219/2642
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,635,220
App. No.
16/947,341
Granted
Apr 25, 2023
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method of controlling a gas furnace system includes determining a first pressure in a conduit coupled to a draft inducer from signals output by a pressure transducer positioned to sense a pressure within the conduit with a motor of the draft inducer in a stopped condition. A first status of the pressure transducer is determined based at least in part on the first pressure. The motor of the draft inducer is controlled to increase a speed of the motor from the stopped condition in response to a call for heat when the first status does not indicate that the pressure transducer is unreliable, and the motor is maintained in a stopped condition when the first status indicates that the pressure transducer is unreliable.

Claims (86)

1. A gas furnace system comprising:

a draft inducer including a motor, the draft inducer in fluid communication with a conduit;

a pressure transducer positioned to sense a pressure within the conduit and output signals proportional to the sensed pressure;

a controller connected to the draft inducer and the pressure transducer, the controller comprising a processor programmed to:

determine a first pressure in the conduit from the signals output by the pressure transducer with the motor in a stopped condition;

determine a first status of the pressure transducer based at least in part on the first pressure;

control the motor of the draft inducer to increase a speed of the motor from the stopped condition in response to a call for heat when the first status does not indicate that the pressure transducer is unreliable; and

maintain the motor in a stopped condition when the first status indicates that the pressure transducer is unreliable,

wherein the processor is programmed to determine the first status by:

determining that the pressure transducer is not unreliable when the first pressure is within an expected range of pressures;

determining that the pressure transducer is not unreliable when the first pressure is not within an expected range of pressures, but controlling the motor of the draft inducer to increase the speed of the motor causes the signals output by the pressure transducer to change in an expected manner; and

otherwise determining that the pressure transducer is unreliable.

2. The gas furnace system of claim 1 , wherein the processor is programmed to:

determine a second pressure in the conduit from the signals output by the pressure transducer after the controller has begun increasing the speed of the motor from the stopped condition in response to a call for heat;

determine a second status of the pressure transducer based at least in part on the second pressure;

continue operating the motor when the second status does not indicate that the pressure transducer is unreliable; and

stop the motor when the second status indicates that the pressure transducer is unreliable.

3. The gas furnace system of claim 2 , wherein the processor is programmed to:

determine a slope of the signals output by the pressure transducer; and

determine the second status of the pressure transducer pressure based at least in part on the determined slope.

4. The gas furnace system of claim 3 , wherein the processor is programmed to:

determine a speed of the motor of the draft inducer when the second pressure is determined; and

determine the second status of the pressure transducer based on the determined slope and the determined speed.

5. The gas furnace system of claim 2 , wherein the processor is programmed to:

determine a speed of the motor of the draft inducer when the second pressure is determined; and

determine the second status of the pressure transducer based on the second pressure and the determined speed of the motor of the draft inducer when the second pressure is determined.

6. The gas furnace system of claim 2 , wherein the processor is programmed to:

determine the second pressure before a desired pressure set point for the call for heat is expected by the controller to have been reached;

determine a third pressure in the conduit from the signal output by the pressure transducer after desired pressure set point for the call for heat is expected by the controller to have been reached;

determine a speed of the motor of the draft inducer when the third pressure is determine;

determine a third status of the pressure transducer based at least in part on the third pressure and the speed of the motor of the draft inducer when the third pressure is determined;

continue operating the motor when the third status does not indicate that the pressure transducer is unreliable; and

stop the motor when the third status indicates that the pressure transducer is unreliable.

7. A controller for a gas furnace system including a draft inducer having a motor, and a pressure transducer positioned to sense a pressure within a conduit and output signals proportional to the sensed pressure, the controller, the controller comprising a processor programmed to:

determine a first pressure in the conduit from the signals output by the pressure transducer with the motor in a stopped condition;

determine a first status of the pressure transducer based at least in part on the first pressure;

control the motor of the draft inducer to increase a speed of the motor from the stopped condition in response to a call for heat when the first status does not indicate that the pressure transducer is unreliable; and

maintain the motor in a stopped condition when the first status indicates that the pressure transducer is unreliable,

wherein the processor is programmed to determine the first status by:

determining that the pressure transducer is not unreliable when the first pressure is within an expected range of pressures;

determining that the pressure transducer is not unreliable when the first pressure is not within an expected range of pressures, but controlling the motor of the draft inducer to increase the speed of the motor causes the signals output by the pressure transducer to change in an expected manner; and

otherwise determining that the pressure transducer is unreliable.

8. The controller of claim 7 , wherein the processor is programmed to:

determine a second pressure in the conduit from the signals output by the pressure transducer after the controller has begun increasing the speed of the motor from the stopped condition in response to a call for heat;

determine a second status of the pressure transducer based at least in part on the second pressure;

continue operating the motor when the second status does not indicate that the pressure transducer is unreliable; and

stop the motor when the second status indicates that the pressure transducer is unreliable.

9. The controller of claim 8 , wherein the processor is programmed to:

determine a slope of the signals output by the pressure transducer;

determine a speed of the motor of the draft inducer when the second pressure is determined; and

determine the second status of the pressure transducer based on the determined slope and the determined speed.

10. The controller of claim 8 , wherein the processor is programmed to:

determine a speed of the motor of the draft inducer when the second pressure is determined; and

determine the second status of the pressure transducer based on the second pressure and the determined speed of the motor of the draft inducer when the second pressure is determined.

11. The controller of claim 8 , wherein the processor is programmed to:

determine the second pressure before a desired pressure set point for the call for heat is expected by the controller to have been reached;

determine a third pressure in the conduit from the signal output by the pressure transducer after desired pressure set point for the call for heat is expected by the controller to have been reached;

determine a third status of the pressure transducer based at least in part on the third pressure;

continue operating the motor when the third status does not indicate that the pressure transducer is unreliable; and

stop the motor when the third status indicates that the pressure transducer is unreliable.

12. The controller of claim 11 , wherein the processor is programmed to:

determine a speed of the motor of the draft inducer when the third pressure is determined; and

determine the third status of the pressure transducer based on the third pressure and the speed of the motor of the draft inducer when the third pressure is determined.

13. A method of controlling a gas furnace system comprising:

determining a first pressure in a conduit coupled to a draft inducer from signals output by a pressure transducer positioned to sense a pressure within the conduit with a motor of the draft inducer in a stopped condition;

determining a first status of the pressure transducer based at least in part on the first pressure;

controlling the motor of the draft inducer to increase a speed of the motor from the stopped condition in response to a call for heat when the first status does not indicate that the pressure transducer is unreliable; and

maintaining the motor in a stopped condition when the first status indicates that the pressure transducer is unreliable,

wherein determining the first status comprises:

determining that the pressure transducer is not unreliable when the first pressure is within an expected range of pressures;

determining that the pressure transducer is not unreliable when the first pressure is not within an expected range of pressures, but controlling the motor of the draft inducer to increase the speed of the motor causes the signals output by the pressure transducer to change in an expected manner; and

otherwise determining that the pressure transducer is unreliable.

14. The method of claim 13 , further comprising:

determining a second pressure in the conduit from the signals output by the pressure transducer after the controller has begun increasing the speed of the motor from the stopped condition in response to a call for heat;

determining a second status of the pressure transducer based at least in part on the second pressure;

continuing operating the motor when the second status does not indicate that the pressure transducer is unreliable; and

stopping the motor when the second status indicates that the pressure transducer is unreliable.

15. The method of claim 14 , further comprising:

determining a slope of the signals output by the pressure transducer; and

determining a speed of the motor of the draft inducer when the second pressure is determined, wherein determining the second status of the pressure transducer comprises determining the second status of the pressure transducer based on the determined slope and the determined speed.

16. The method of claim 14 , wherein the second pressure is determined determine before a desired pressure set point for the call for heat is expected by the controller to have been reached, and the method further comprises:

determining a third pressure in the conduit from the signal output by the pressure transducer after desired pressure set point for the call for heat is expected by the controller to have been reached;

determining a third status of the pressure transducer based at least in part on the third pressure;

continuing operating the motor when the third status does not indicate that the pressure transducer is unreliable; and

stopping the motor when the third status indicates that the pressure transducer is unreliable.

17. The method of claim 14 , further comprising determine a speed of the motor of the draft inducer when the third pressure is determined, wherein determining the third status comprises determining the third status of the pressure transducer based on the third pressure and the speed of the motor of the draft inducer when the third pressure is determined.

Assignments (6)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 9, 2024
From: COPELAND COMFORT CONTROL LP
To: U.S. BANK TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 068255/0466 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 17, 2023
From: COPELAND COMFORT CONTROL LP
To: ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 064278/0165 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 17, 2023
From: COPELAND COMFORT CONTROL LP
To: U.S. BANK TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 064280/0333 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 17, 2023
From: COPELAND COMFORT CONTROL LP
To: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 064286/0001 →
SUPPLEMENTAL IP ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT Recorded May 30, 2023
From: EMERSON ELECTRIC CO.
To: COPELAND COMFORT CONTROL LP
Reel/Frame 063804/0611 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 2, 2021
From: BROKER, JOHN F.; WAN, LILY; ZIKES, BRADLEY C.
To: EMERSON ELECTRIC CO.
Reel/Frame 055108/0032 →