IP Library Granted Patent US 11,549,708
Granted Patent B2
US 11,549,708 · App. 16/947,342 · Granted Jan 10, 2023

Systems and methods for checking status of a pressure transducer

Inventors: John F. Broker (Warrenton, MO); Lily Wan (St. Louis, MO); Bradley C. Zikes (St. Louis, MO)
Assignee: Emerson Electric Co.
F24F11/38F24F11/49G05B15/02G05B19/048F24D19/1084F24D2220/046G05B2219/24015G05B2219/2614G05B2219/2642
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,549,708
App. No.
16/947,342
Granted
Jan 10, 2023
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method of controlling a gas furnace system includes controlling a motor of a draft inducer coupled to a conduit to increase a speed of the motor from a stopped condition in response to a call for heat, and receiving pressure signals output by a pressure transducer responsive to pressure in the conduit. Signals indicating whether a pressure switch responsive to pressure in the conduit is in a first state or a second state are received. A first status of the pressure transducer is determined based on the received pressure signals from the pressure transducer and the signals indicating whether the pressure switch is in the first state or the second state. The method includes continuing to operate the motor when the first status does not indicate that the pressure transducer is unreliable, and stopping the motor when the first status indicates that the pressure transducer is unreliable.

Claims (82)

1. A gas furnace system comprising:

a combustion chamber;

a conduit in fluid communication with the combustion chamber and operable as an air inlet for the combustion chamber;

a draft inducer including a motor, the draft inducer in fluid communication with the conduit;

a pressure transducer positioned to sense a pressure within the conduit and output signals proportional to the sensed pressure;

a pressure switch positioned to sense the pressure within the conduit, the pressure switch having a first state and a second state, and configured to be in the first state when the sensed pressure is below a predetermined pressure and to switch to the second state when the sensed pressure reaches or exceeds the predetermined pressure; and

a controller connected to the draft inducer, the pressure transducer, and the pressure switch, the controller comprising a processor programmed to:

control the motor of the draft inducer in response to a call for heat;

receive pressure signals output by the pressure transducer;

receive signals indicating whether the pressure switch is in the first state or the second state;

determine a first pressure corresponding to the pressure signals output by the pressure transducer when the pressure switch switches from the first state to the second state;

compare the first pressure to a first threshold a first amount different from the predetermined pressure and a second threshold a second amount different from the predetermined pressure, where the second amount is greater than the first amount;

determine a first status of the pressure transducer as unreliable when the first pressure is greater than or equal to the second threshold;

determine the first status of the pressure transducer as questionable when the first pressure is greater than the first threshold and less than the second threshold;

determine the first status of the pressure transducer as reliable when the first pressure is less than or equal to the first threshold;

continue operating the motor of the draft inducer when the first status of the pressure transducer is determined to be reliable or questionable;

generate an alert when the first status of the pressure transducer is determined to be questionable or unreliable; and

stop operation of the motor of the draft inducer when the first status of the pressure transducer is determined to be unreliable.

2. The gas furnace system of claim 1 , wherein the processor is programmed to:

control the motor of the draft inducer after determining the first pressure to decrease the speed of the motor until the pressure switch switches from the second state to the first state;

determine a second pressure in the conduit from the signals output by the pressure transducer when the pressure switch switches from the second state to the first state;

compare the second pressure to the first threshold and the second threshold; and

determine a second status of the pressure transducer as reliable, questionable, or unreliable based on the comparison of the second pressure to the first threshold and the second threshold.

3. The gas furnace system of claim 2 , wherein the processor is programmed to:

control the motor to increase the speed of the motor at least until the pressure switch again switches from the first state to the second state when the second status and the first status of the pressure transducer are both questionable or reliable; and

stop the motor when the second status or the first status of the pressure transducer is unreliable.

4. The gas furnace system of claim 1 , wherein the processor is programmed to:

control the motor of the draft inducer after determining the first pressure to decrease the speed of the motor until the pressure switch switches from the second state to the first state;

determine a second pressure in the conduit from the signals output by the pressure transducer when the pressure switch switches from the second state to the first state;

compare the second pressure to a third threshold a third amount different from the predetermined pressure and a fourth threshold a fourth amount different from the predetermined pressure, where the fourth amount is greater than the third amount and the third and fourth thresholds are different than the first and second thresholds; and

determine a second status of the pressure transducer as reliable, questionable, or unreliable based on the comparison of the second pressure to the third threshold and the fourth threshold.

5. A controller for a gas furnace system including a combustion chamber, a conduit in fluid communication with the combustion chamber and operable as an air inlet for the combustion chamber, a draft inducer having a motor, a pressure transducer positioned to sense a pressure within the conduit and output signals proportional to the sensed pressure, and a pressure switch positioned to sense the pressure within the conduit, the pressure switch having a first state and a second state, and configured to be in the first state when the sensed pressure is below a predetermined pressure and to switch to the second state when the sensed pressure reaches or exceeds the predetermined pressure, the controller comprising a processor programmed to:

control the motor of the draft inducer in response to a call for heat;

receive pressure signals output by the pressure transducer;

receive signals indicating whether the pressure switch is in the first state or the second state;

determine a first pressure corresponding to the pressure signals output by the pressure transducer when the pressure switch switches from the first state to the second state;

compare the first pressure to a first threshold a first amount different from the predetermined pressure and a second threshold a second amount different from the predetermined pressure, where the second amount is greater than the first amount;

and

determine the first status of the pressure transducer as unreliable when the first pressure is greater than or equal to the second threshold;

determine the first status of the pressure transducer as questionable when the first pressure is greater than the first threshold and less than the second threshold; and

determine the first status of the pressure transducer as reliable when the first pressure is less than or equal to the first threshold.

6. The controller of claim 5 , wherein the processor is programmed to:

continue operating the motor of the draft inducer when the first status of the pressure transducer is determined to be reliable or questionable;

generate an alert when the first status of the pressure transducer is determined to be questionable or unreliable; and

stop operation of the motor of the draft inducer when the pressure transducer is determined to be unreliable.

7. The controller of claim 5 , wherein the processor is programmed to:

control the motor of the draft inducer after determining the first pressure to decrease the speed of the motor until the pressure switch switches from the second state to the first state;

determine a second pressure in the conduit from the signals output by the pressure transducer when the pressure switch switches from the second state to the first state;

compare the second pressure to the first threshold and the second threshold; and

determine a second status of the pressure transducer as reliable, questionable, or unreliable based on the comparison of the second pressure to the first threshold and the second threshold.

8. The controller of claim 7 , wherein the processor is programmed to:

control the motor to increase the speed of the motor at least until the pressure switch again switches from the first state to the second state when the second status and the first status of the pressure transducer are both questionable or reliable; and

stop the motor when the second status or the first status of the pressure transducer is unreliable.

9. The controller of claim 5 , wherein the processor is programmed to:

control the motor of the draft inducer after determining the first pressure to decrease the speed of the motor until the pressure switch switches from the second state to the first state;

determine a second pressure in the conduit from the signals output by the pressure transducer when the pressure switch switches from the second state to the first state;

compare the second pressure to a third threshold a third amount different from the predetermined pressure and a fourth threshold a fourth amount different from the predetermined pressure, where the fourth amount is greater than the third amount and the third and fourth thresholds are different than the first and second thresholds; and

determine a second status of the pressure transducer as reliable, questionable, or unreliable based on the comparison of the second pressure to the third threshold and the fourth threshold.

10. A method of controlling a gas furnace system comprising:

controlling a motor of a draft inducer coupled to a conduit to increase a speed of the motor from a stopped condition in response to a call for heat, wherein the conduit is in fluid communication with a combustion chamber and operates as an air inlet for the combustion chamber;

receiving pressure signals output by a pressure transducer responsive to pressure in the conduit;

receiving signals indicating whether a pressure switch responsive to pressure in the conduit is in a first state or a second state;

determining a first pressure corresponding to the pressure signals output by the pressure transducer when the pressure switch switches from the first state to the second state;

comparing the first pressure to a first threshold a first amount different from the predetermined pressure and a second threshold a second amount different from the predetermined pressure, where the second amount is greater than the first amount;

determining a first status of the pressure transducer as unreliable when the first pressure is greater than or equal to the second threshold;

determining the first status of the pressure transducer as questionable when the first pressure is greater than the first threshold and less than the second threshold; and

determining the first status of the pressure transducer as reliable when the first pressure is less than or equal to the first threshold;

continuing to operate the motor when the first status of the pressure transducer is determined to be reliable or questionable; and

stopping the motor when the first status of the pressure transducer is determined to be unreliable.

11. The method of claim 10 , further comprising:

controlling the motor of the draft inducer after determining the first pressure to decrease the speed of the motor until the pressure switch switches from the second state to the first state;

determining a second pressure in the conduit from the signals output by the pressure transducer when the pressure switch switches from the second state to the first state;

comparing the second pressure to the first threshold and the second threshold; and

determining a second status of the pressure transducer as reliable, questionable, or unreliable based on the comparison of the second pressure to the first threshold and the second threshold.

12. The method of claim 11 , further comprising:

controlling the motor to increase the speed of the motor at least until the pressure switch again switches from the first state to the second state when the second status and the first status of the pressure transducer are both questionable or reliable; and

stopping the motor when the second status or the first status of the pressure transducer is unreliable.

13. The method of claim 10 , further comprising:

controlling the motor of the draft inducer after determining the first pressure to decrease the speed of the motor until the pressure switch switches from the second state to the first state;

determining a second pressure in the conduit from the signals output by the pressure transducer when the pressure switch switches from the second state to the first state;

comparing the second pressure to a third threshold a third amount different from the predetermined pressure and a fourth threshold a fourth amount different from the predetermined pressure, where the fourth amount is greater than the third amount and the third and fourth thresholds are different than the first and second thresholds; and

determining a second status of the pressure transducer as reliable, questionable, or unreliable based on the comparison of the second pressure to the third threshold and the fourth threshold.

Assignments (6)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 9, 2024
From: COPELAND COMFORT CONTROL LP
To: U.S. BANK TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 068255/0466 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 17, 2023
From: COPELAND COMFORT CONTROL LP
To: ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 064278/0165 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 17, 2023
From: COPELAND COMFORT CONTROL LP
To: U.S. BANK TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 064280/0333 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 17, 2023
From: COPELAND COMFORT CONTROL LP
To: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 064286/0001 →
SUPPLEMENTAL IP ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT Recorded May 30, 2023
From: EMERSON ELECTRIC CO.
To: COPELAND COMFORT CONTROL LP
Reel/Frame 063804/0611 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 5, 2022
From: BROKER, JOHN F.; WAN, LILY; ZIKES, BRADLEY C.
To: EMERSON ELECTRIC CO.
Reel/Frame 059506/0366 →