IP Library Granted Patent US 11,468,422
Granted Patent B2
US 11,468,422 · App. 16/997,849 · Granted Oct 11, 2022

Systems and methods for determining a provider-specific likelihood of payment acceptance

Inventor: Lee Haripko (San Diego, CA)
Assignee: Mitchell International, Inc.
G06Q20/24G06Q20/102G06Q20/382
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,468,422
App. No.
16/997,849
Granted
Oct 11, 2022
Kind
B2
Abstract

Embodiments of the application are directed toward a method comprising: receiving, by a transaction management computing apparatus, an electronic payment estimate via a secure communication channel for services rendered by a provider; receiving determining a likelihood of payment acceptance by generating, by the transaction management computing apparatus, an payment amount acceptable to the provider computing device based on data associated with the provider computing device, a type of service provided, or a number of days to make the payment; determining, by the transaction management computing apparatus, whether the generated exact amount is acceptable to the provider computing device; and completing, by the transaction management computing apparatus, a payment transaction with the generated exact amount when the generated exact amount is determined to be acceptable to the provider computing device.

Claims (29)

1. A method comprising:

receiving, by a transaction management computing apparatus, an electronic payment estimate via a secure communication channel for services rendered by a provider associated with a provider computing device, wherein the payment estimate is specified by an invoice generated by the provider computing device;

determining, by the transaction management computing apparatus, a likelihood of payment acceptance by the provider for a payment amount acceptable to the provider by applying a machine learning algorithm, wherein the machine learning algorithm is trained on historical contextual information for the provider;

determining that the likelihood of payment acceptance exceeds a threshold, and generating, by the transaction management computing apparatus, an exact amount acceptable to the provider computing device comprising the payment amount acceptable to the provider;

determining, by the transaction management computing apparatus, whether the generated exact amount is acceptable to the provider computing device; and

completing, by the transaction management computing apparatus, a payment transaction with the generated exact amount when the generated exact amount is determined to be acceptable to the provider computing device.

2. The method as set forth in claim 1 wherein the historical payment acceptance data for the provider comprises negotiation data associated with the provider computing device.

3. The method as set forth in claim 1 wherein the payment amount acceptable to the provider computing device comprises applying a likelihood of acceptance tool to a type of pending invoice.

4. The method as set forth in claim 1 further comprising, generating a new exact amount for the provider computing device when the generated exact amount is unacceptable to the provider computing device.

5. A non-transitory computer readable medium having stored thereon instructions for completing a transaction comprising executable code, which when executed by at least one processor, cause the processor to:

receive a payment estimate for a provider computing device via a secure communication channel for services rendered by a provider associated with a provider computing device, wherein the payment estimate is specified by an invoice generated by the provider computing device;

determining a likelihood of payment acceptance by the provider for a payment amount acceptable to the provider by applying a machine learning algorithm, wherein the machine learning algorithm is trained on historical contextual information for the provider;

determining that the likelihood of payment acceptance exceeds a threshold, and generate an exact amount acceptable to the provider computing device comprising the payment amount acceptable to the provider;

determine when the generated exact amount is acceptable to the provider computing device; and

complete a payment transaction with the exact amount when the generated exact amount is determined to be acceptable to the provider computing device.

6. The medium as set forth in claim 5 wherein the historical payment acceptance data for the provider comprises negotiation data associated with the provider computing device.

7. The medium as set forth in claim 5 wherein the payment amount acceptable to the provider computing device comprises applying a likelihood of acceptance tool to a type of pending invoice.

8. The medium as set forth in claim 5 further comprising, generating a new exact amount for the provider computing device when the generated exact amount is unacceptable to the provider computing device.

9. A transaction management computing apparatus comprising:

a processor; and

a memory coupled to the processor which is configured to be capable of executing programmed instructions comprising and stored in the memory to:

receive a payment estimate for a provider computing device via a secure communication channel for services rendered by a provider associated with a provider computing device, wherein the payment estimate is specified by an invoice generated by the provider computing device;

determine a likelihood of payment acceptance by the provider for a payment amount acceptable to the provider by applying a machine learning algorithm, wherein the machine learning algorithm is trained on historical contextual information for the provider;

determining that the likelihood of payment acceptance exceeds a threshold, and generate an exact amount acceptable to the provider computing device comprising the determined payment amount acceptable to the provider;

determine when the generated exact amount is acceptable to the provider computing device; and

complete a payment transaction with the generated exact amount when the generated exact amount is determined to be acceptable to the provider computing device.

10. The apparatus as set forth in claim 9 wherein the historical payment acceptance data for the provider comprises negotiation data associated with the provider computing device.

11. The apparatus as set forth in claim 9 wherein the payment amount acceptable to the provider computing device comprises applying a likelihood of acceptance tool to a type of pending invoice.

12. The apparatus as set forth in claim 11 wherein the processor is further configured to be capable of executing the stored programmed instructions to generate a new exact amount for the provider computing device when the generated exact amount is unacceptable to the provider computing device.

Assignments (3)
SECOND LIEN SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Oct 18, 2021
From: MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL, INC.
To: GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA
Reel/Frame 057842/0170 →
FIRST LIEN SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Oct 18, 2021
From: MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL, INC.
To: GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA
Reel/Frame 058014/0629 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 8, 2021
From: HARIPKO, LEE
To: MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Reel/Frame 055525/0267 →