Digital content management using sentiment driven and privacy prioritization adjustability
According to examples, a system for sentiment driven risk adjustable digital content management is provided herein. The system may include a processor and a memory storing instructions, which when executed by the processor, cause the processor to perform risk mitigating actions. These may include receiving sentiment data associated with a user and at least one of digital content, user group, or digital content provider. The processor may also aggregate the received sentiment data to measure and track sentiment associated with at least one of the user, the digital content, the user group, or the digital content provider. The processor may further determine sensitivity and risk metrics for at least one of the user, the digital content, the user group, or the digital content provider, based on the aggregated sentiment data. The processor may also provide data driven risk mitigation measures for privacy protection in digital content management based on the determined sensitivity and risk metrics.
1. A system, comprising:
a processor; and
a memory storing instructions, which when executed by the processor, cause the processor to:
receive sentiment data associated with a user and at least one of a digital content, a user group, or a digital content provider, wherein the sentiment data is received based on sentiment feedback associated with digital content impressions and user actions to find out why the digital content was presented to the user;
aggregate the received sentiment data to measure and track sentiment associated with at least one of the user, the digital content, the user group, or the digital content provider, wherein the aggregated sentiment data is used to manage risk and user privacy protection;
determine sensitivity and risk metrics, comprising determining a sensitivity ratio (SR), for at least one of the user, the digital content, the user group, or the digital content provider, the sensitivity and risk metrics determined based on the aggregated sentiment data, wherein the sensitivity ratio (SR) is determined based on the user actions to find out why the digital content was presented to the user divided by the digital content impressions; and
provide data driven risk mitigation measures for privacy protection in digital content management based on the determined sensitivity and risk metrics.
2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the sentiment data is received in real-time and wherein the sentiment feedback is further associated with at least one of the following: user actions to block the digital content provider, user actions to drop out of the user group, a drop-out ratio (DR), a signal-to-group mapping, or a group-to-digital content mapping.
3. The system of claim 2 , wherein the drop-out ratio (DR) is determined based on a sum of the user actions to block the digital content provider and the user actions to drop out of the user group divided by a sum of the user actions to find out why digital content was presented to the user.
4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the sensitivity ratio (SR) is determined based on a sum of the user actions to find out why digital content was presented to the user divided by a sum of the digital content impressions.
5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the sensitivity and risk metrics are determined based on sensitivity data and mapping among users, signals, digital contents, user groups, digital content providers and other entities.
6. The system of claim 1 , wherein the instructions that cause the processor to determine the sensitivity and risk metrics further comprise instructions that cause the processor to:
calculate risk vectors, wherein the risk vectors are calculated for at least one of users, signals, digital contents, user groups, or digital content providers.
7. The system of claim 6 , wherein the instructions that cause the processor to determine the sensitivity and risk metrics further comprise instructions that cause the processor to:
propagate the sentiment data back up a data flow chain to calculate the risk vectors.
8. A method, comprising:
receiving, by a processor, sentiment data associated with a user and at least one of digital content, user group, or digital content provider, wherein the sentiment data is received based on sentiment feedback associated with digital content impressions and user actions to find out why the digital content was presented to the user;
aggregating, by the processor, the received sentiment data to measure and track sentiment associated with at least one of the user, the digital content, the user group, or the digital content provider, wherein the aggregated sentiment data is used for user privacy protection and risk management;
determining, by the processor, sensitivity and risk metrics, comprising determining a sensitivity ratio (SR), for at least one of the user, the digital content, the user group, or the digital content provider, based on the aggregated sentiment data, wherein the sensitivity ratio (SR) is determined based on the user actions to find out why the digital content was presented to the user divided by the digital content impressions; and
providing, by the processor, data driven risk mitigation measures for privacy protection in digital content management based on the determined sensitivity and risk metrics.
9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the sentiment data is received in real-time and wherein the sentiment feedback is further associated with at least one of the following: user actions to block the digital content provider, user actions to drop out of the user group, a drop-out ratio (DR), a signal-to-group mapping, or a group-to-digital content mapping.
10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the drop-out ratio (DR) is determined based on a sum of the user actions to block the digital content provider and the user actions to drop out of the user group divided by a sum of the user actions to find out why digital content was presented to the user.
11. The method of claim 8 , wherein the sensitivity ratio (SR) is determined based on a sum of the user actions to find out why digital content was presented to the user divided by a sum of the digital content impressions.
12. The method of claim 8 , wherein the sensitivity and risk metrics are determined based on sensitivity data and mapping among users, signals, digital contents, user groups, digital content providers and other entities.
13. The method of claim 8 , wherein determining the sensitivity and risk metrics comprises:
propagating the sentiment data back up a data flow chain; and
calculating risk vectors for each of at least one of users, signals, digital contents, user groups, or digital content providers.
14. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing instructions, which when executed, cause a processor to:
receive sentiment data associated with a user and at least one of digital content, user group, or digital content provider, wherein the sentiment data is received based on sentiment feedback associated with digital content impressions and user actions to find out why the digital content was presented to the user;
aggregate the received sentiment data to measure and track sentiment associated with at least one of the user, the digital content, the user group, or the digital content provider, wherein the aggregated sentiment data is used for user privacy protection and risk management;
determine sensitivity and risk metrics, comprising determining a sensitivity ratio (SR), for at least one of the user, the digital content, the user group, or the digital content provider, based on the aggregated sentiment data, wherein the sensitivity ratio (SR) is determined based on the user actions to find out why the digital content was presented to the user divided by the digital content impressions; and
provide data driven risk mitigation measures for privacy protection in digital content management based on the determined sensitivity and risk metrics.
15. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 14 , wherein the sentiment data is received in real-time and wherein the sentiment feedback is associated with at least one of the following: user actions to block the digital content provider, user actions to drop out of the user group, a drop-out ratio (DR), a signal-to-group mapping, or a group-to-digital content mapping.
16. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 15 , wherein the drop-out ratio (DR) is determined based on a sum of the user actions to block the digital content provider and the user actions to drop out of the user group divided by a sum of the user actions to find out why digital content was presented to the user.
17. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 14 , wherein the sensitivity ratio (SR) is determined based on a sum of the user actions to find out why digital content was presented to the user divided by a sum of the digital content impressions.
18. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 14 , wherein the sensitivity and risk metrics are determined based on sensitivity data and mapping among users, signals, digital contents, user groups, digital content providers and other entities.
19. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 14 , wherein the instructions that cause the processor to determine the sensitivity and risk metrics further comprise instructions that cause the processor to:
calculate risk vectors, wherein the risk vectors are calculated for at least one of users, signals, digital contents, user groups, or digital content providers.
20. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 19 , wherein the instructions that cause the processor to determine the sensitivity and risk metrics further comprise instructions that cause the processor to:
propagate the sentiment data back up a data flow chain to calculate the risk vectors.