IP Library Granted Patent US 12,111,389
Granted Patent B2
US 12,111,389 · App. 17/027,501 · Granted Oct 8, 2024

Radar elevation angle validation

Inventors: Jonathan C. Berry (San Jose, CA); Duc H. Vu (Sunnyvale, CA)
Assignee: Argo AI, LLC
G01S13/865G01S13/58G01S13/931
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,111,389
App. No.
17/027,501
Granted
Oct 8, 2024
Kind
B2
Abstract

Devices, systems, and methods are provided for radar elevation angle validation. A radar elevation angle validation device transmit, from a radar, one or more signals towards a corner reflector situated in a direction of the radar. The radar elevation angle validation device may receive, at the radar, reflected signals from the corner reflector. The radar elevation angle validation device may measure signal energy of at least one of the reflected signals. The radar elevation angle validation device may access a baseline dataset based on the measured signal energy. The radar elevation angle validation device may retrieve a radar elevation angle from the baseline dataset corresponding to the measured signal energy. The radar elevation angle validation device may compare the radar elevation angle to a validation threshold. The radar elevation angle validation device may determine a radar validation status based on the comparison.

Claims (55)

1. A device, the device comprising processing circuitry coupled to storage, the processing circuitry configured to:

transmit, from a radar, one or more signals towards a corner reflector situated in a direction of the radar;

receive, at the radar, reflected signals from the corner reflector;

measure signal energy of at least one of the reflected signals;

access a baseline dataset stored in a datastore, the baseline dataset comprising a plurality of radar elevation angles indexed in the datastore by different sets of signal energy values, corner reflector elevation values, and radar-to-reflector distances;

compare the measured signal energy to one or more of the plurality of signal energy values contained in the baseline dataset;

retrieve a radar elevation angle from the plurality of radar elevation angles contained in the baseline dataset that is associated with a signal energy value of the plurality of signal energy values matching to the measured signal energy;

compare the radar elevation angle retrieved from the baseline dataset to a validation threshold;

determine whether the radar is pitched upwards or downwards based on a deviation of the radar elevation angle of the baseline dataset from the validation threshold; and

determine a radar validation status based on the comparison;

wherein the baseline dataset correlates signal energy values with an average energy pattern based on measurements associated with a plurality of other radars.

2. The device of claim 1 , wherein the baseline dataset further comprises an elevation of the corner reflector or a distance between the radar and the corner reflector so as to be associated with a respective one of the plurality of signal energy values and a respective one of the plurality of radar elevation angles.

3. The device of claim 1 , wherein the validation threshold is predefined and the radar validation status is a pass or a fail.

4. The device of claim 1 , wherein the processing circuitry is further configured to:

verify the radar elevation angle is greater than the validation threshold; and

establish that the radar validation status is a fail.

5. The device of claim 1 , wherein the processing circuitry is further configured to:

verify the radar elevation angle is less than or equal to the validation threshold;

establish that the radar validation status is a pass.

6. The device of claim 1 , wherein a peak signal energy value indicates an optimal radar ranging.

7. A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing computer-executable instructions which when executed by one or more processors result in performing operations comprising:

transmitting, from a radar, one or more signals towards a corner reflector situated in a direction of the radar;

receiving, at the radar, reflected signals from the corner reflector at the radar;

measuring signal energy of at least one of the reflected signals;

accessing a baseline dataset stored in a datastore, the baseline dataset comprising a plurality of radar elevation angles indexed in the datastore by different sets of signal energy values, corner reflector elevation values, and radar-to-reflector distances;

comparing the measured signal energy to one or more of the plurality of signal energy values contained in the baseline dataset;

retrieving a radar elevation angle from the plurality of radar elevation angles contained in the baseline dataset that is associated with a signal energy value of the plurality of signal energy values matching to the measured signal energy;

comparing the radar elevation angle retrieved from the baseline dataset to a validation threshold;

determining whether the radar is pitched upwards or downwards based on a deviation of the radar elevation angle of the baseline dataset from the validation threshold; and

determining a radar validation status based on the comparison.

8. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 7 , wherein the baseline dataset further comprises an elevation of the corner reflector or a distance between the radar and the corner reflector so as to be associated with a respective one of the plurality of signal energy values and a respective one of the plurality of radar elevation angles.

9. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 7 , wherein the validation threshold is predefined and the radar validation status is a pass or a fail.

10. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 7 , wherein the operations further comprise:

verifying the radar elevation angle is greater than the validation threshold; and

establishing that the radar validation status is a fail.

11. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 7 , wherein the operations further comprise:

verifying the radar elevation angle is less than or equal to the validation threshold;

establishing that the radar validation status is a pass.

12. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 7 , wherein a peak signal energy value indicates an optimal radar ranging.

13. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 7 , wherein the baseline dataset comprises averages of one or more measurements using a plurality of radars.

14. A method comprising:

transmitting, from a radar, one or more signals towards a corner reflector situated in a direction of the radar;

receiving, at the radar, reflected signals from the corner reflector at the radar;

measuring signal energy of at least one of the reflected signals;

accessing a baseline dataset stored in a datastore, the baseline dataset comprising a plurality of radar elevation angles indexed in the datastore by different sets of signal energy values, corner reflector elevation values, and radar-to-reflector distances;

comparing the measured signal energy to one or more of the plurality of signal energy values contained in the baseline dataset;

retrieving a radar elevation angle from the plurality of radar elevation angles contained in the baseline dataset that is associated with a signal energy value of the plurality of signal energy values matching the measured signal energy;

comparing the radar elevation angle retrieved from the baseline dataset to a validation threshold;

determining whether the radar is pitched upwards or downwards based on a deviation of the radar elevation angle of the baseline dataset from the validation threshold; and

determining a radar validation status based on the comparison.

15. The method of claim 14 , wherein the baseline dataset further comprises an elevation of the corner reflector or a distance between the radar and the corner reflector so as to be associated with a respective one of the plurality of signal energy values and a respective one of the plurality of radar elevation angles.

16. The method of claim 14 , wherein the validation threshold is predefined and the radar validation status is a pass or a fail.

17. The method of claim 14 , further comprising:

verify the radar elevation angle is greater than the validation threshold; and

establishing that the radar validation status is a fail.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 9, 2024
From: ARGO AI, LLC
To: VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA INVESTMENTS, LLC
Reel/Frame 069177/0099 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 26, 2020
From: BERRY, JONATHAN C.; VU, DUC H.
To: ARGO AI, LLC
Reel/Frame 054165/0355 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20220091254A1 · Mar 24, 2022