IP Library Granted Patent US 11,323,472
Granted Patent B2
US 11,323,472 · App. 17/033,146 · Granted May 3, 2022

Identifying automated responses to security threats based on obtained communication interactions

Inventors: Sourabh Satish (Fremont, CA); Oliver Friedrichs (Woodside, CA); Atif Mahadik (Fremont, CA); Govind Salinas (Sunnyvale, CA)
Assignee: Splunk Inc.
H04L63/1441G06F16/285G06F21/554H04L63/0236H04L63/1416H04L63/1425H04L63/1433H04L63/20H04L47/2425
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,323,472
App. No.
17/033,146
Granted
May 3, 2022
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems, methods, and software described herein provide security actions based on related security threat communications. In one example, a method of operating an advisement system includes identifying a security threat within the computing environment, wherein the computing environment comprises a plurality of computing assets. The method further provides obtaining descriptor information for the security threat, and retrieving related communication interactions based on the descriptor information. The method also includes generating a response to the security threat based on the related communication interactions.

Claims (64)

1. A computer-implemented method comprising:

receiving, from a first computing asset of a computing environment comprising a plurality of computing assets, data indicating a security threat affecting the computing environment, wherein the data identifies a first communication interaction associated with the security threat;

identifying a characteristic of the first communication interaction;

obtaining, from a second computing asset of the computing environment, one or more second communication interactions related to the first communication interaction, wherein the one or more second communication interactions are identified using the characteristic of the first communication interaction;

identifying a network location contained in the one or more second communication interactions;

obtaining enrichment information for the network location from a service external to the computing environment, the enrichment information indicating whether the network location is malicious;

identifying an automated response based at least in part on the enrichment information;

identifying a connector associated with a computing asset involved in the first communication interaction;

using the connector to translate the automated response into an action to be performed by the computing asset in the computing environment; and

causing the computing asset in the computing environment to perform the action, wherein completion of the action mitigates the security threat.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the characteristic of the first communication interaction includes at least one of: a username, an Internet Protocol (IP) address, a domain name, or a type of message content.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

identifying a suggested action to be implemented in at least one computing asset of the plurality of computing assets;

providing the suggested action to an administrator of the computing environment;

identifying a selection of the suggested action by the administrator of the computing environment; and

initiating implementation of the suggested action in the computing environment.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the data indicating the security threat within the computing environment includes data received from a security information and event management (STEM) system.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the data indicating the security threat within the computing environment includes a user-generated notification of the security threat affecting the computing environment.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising identifying the automated response based at least in part on a number of the one or more second communication interactions.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising identifying the automated response based at least in part on a type of content contained in the one or more second communication interactions.

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining, based on the one or more second communication interactions, a type of the security threat; and

identifying the automated response based on the determination of the type of the security threat associated with the one or more second communication interactions.

9. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining, based on a type of content contained in the one or more second communication interactions, that the security threat involves a phishing attempt; and

identifying the automated response based on the determination that the security threat involves the phishing attempt.

10. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

receiving a request to monitor future communications associated with the characteristic of the first communication interaction; and

identifying a future communication associated with the characteristic of the first communication interaction.

11. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the first computing asset and the second computing asset are the same computing asset.

12. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the action is specific to a hardware or software configuration of the computing asset.

13. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein initiating the automated response to the security threat in the computing environment includes using a first connector to translate at least a first portion of the automated response into one or more first actions used by a first computing asset at which the one or more first actions are to be performed and using a second connector to translate at least a second portion of the automated response into one or more second actions used by a second computing asset at which the one or more second actions are to be performed, wherein the one or more first actions are different from the one or more second actions.

14. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the enrichment information is first enrichment information, wherein the method further comprises obtaining second enrichment information from a computing asset within the computing environment, and wherein the automated response to the security threat in the computing environment is initiated based at least in part on the first enrichment information and the second enrichment information.

15. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the automated response includes at least one of: blocking receipt of future emails interactions related to the one or more second communication interactions, or blocking an internet protocol (IP) address.

16. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the automated response is a first automated response, and wherein the method further comprises:

determining that at least one of the one or more second communication interactions includes a link to download a file;

determining that the file is malicious; and

initiating a second automated response in the computing environment based on determining that the file is malicious.

17. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the network location is a Uniform Resource Locator (URL) link.

18. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining, based on the enrichment information, a severity of the security threat; and

identifying the automated response based at least in part on the severity of the security threat.

19. An apparatus comprising:

a processor;

a non-transitory computer readable storage medium storing instructions which, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to:

receive, from a first computing asset of a computing environment comprising a plurality of computing assets, data indicating a security threat affecting the computing environment, wherein the data identifies a first communication interaction associated with the security threat;

identify a characteristic of the first communication interaction;

obtain, from a second computing asset of the computing environment, one or more second communication interactions related to the first communication interaction, wherein the one or more second communication interactions are identified using the characteristic of the first communication interaction;

identify a network location contained in the one or more second communication interactions;

obtain enrichment information for the network location from a service external to the computing environment, the enrichment information indicating whether the network location is malicious;

identify an automated response based at least in part on the enrichment information; and

identify a connector associated with a computing asset involved in the first communication interaction;

use the connector to translate an automated response into an action to be performed by the computing asset in the computing environment; and

cause the computing asset in the computing environment to perform the action, wherein completion of the action mitigates the security threat.

20. A non-transitory computer readable storage medium storing instructions which, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform operations comprising:

receiving, from a first computing asset of a computing environment comprising a plurality of computing assets, data indicating a security threat affecting the computing environment, wherein the data identifies a first communication interaction associated with the security threat;

identifying a characteristic of the first communication interaction;

obtaining, from a second computing asset of the computing environment, one or more second communication interactions related to the first communication interaction, wherein the one or more second communication interactions are identified using the characteristic of the first communication interaction;

identifying a network location contained in the one or more second communication interactions;

obtaining enrichment information for the network location from a service external to the computing environment, the enrichment information indicating whether the network location is malicious;

identifying an automated response based at least in part on the enrichment information; and

identifying a connector associated with a computing asset involved in the first communication interaction;

using the connector to translate an automated response into an action to be performed by the computing asset in the computing environment; and

causing the computing asset in the computing environment to perform the action, wherein completion of the action mitigates the security threat.

Assignments (4)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jul 22, 2025
From: SPLUNK INC.
To: SPLUNK LLC
Reel/Frame 072170/0599 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 22, 2025
From: SPLUNK LLC
To: CISCO TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Reel/Frame 072173/0058 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 11, 2021
From: SATISH, SOURABH; FRIEDRICHS, OLIVER; MAHADIK, ATIF; SALINAS, GOVIND
To: PHANTOM CYBER CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 055237/0899 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 11, 2021
From: PHANTOM CYBER CORPORATION
To: SPLUNK INC.
Reel/Frame 055237/0916 →
Continuity (5)
Continuation 14868553 · Sep 29, 2015
Provisional Application 62106837 · Jan 23, 2015
Provisional Application 62106830 · Jan 23, 2015
Provisional Application 62087025 · Dec 3, 2014
Related Publication 20210092152A1 · Mar 25, 2021