IP Library Granted Patent US 11,755,760
Granted Patent B2
US 11,755,760 · App. 17/068,702 · Granted Sep 12, 2023

Systems and methods for secure policies-based information governance

Inventors: Sudhi Balan (Fairfield, CT); Randy Baiad (Brookfield, CT); Robert Russell (New Canaan, CT)
Assignee: ASG Technologies Group, Inc.
G06F21/6218G06F3/0482G06F3/0483G06F16/211G06F16/256G06F21/31G06F21/604G06F40/106G06N5/01H04L63/101H04L63/102H04L63/105H04L63/205G06F2221/2141
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,755,760
App. No.
17/068,702
Filed
Oct 12, 2020
Granted
Sep 12, 2023
Kind
B2
Art Unit
2499
USPC
726/1
Abstract

The disclosure is directed to systems and methods for secure policies-based information governance. In various embodiments exemplary methods include displaying a Graphical User Interface (GUI), the graphical user interface receiving a business rule input from a business user; receiving a policy from a policy engine based on the business rule input, the policy engine generating a policy hierarchy; and defining a plurality of domain objects and a plurality of domain object representations in the Graphical User Interface (GUI) based on the policy and the policy hierarchy. Furthermore, exemplary methods include defining an extensible hierarchical domain model definition using the policy hierarchy, the extensible hierarchical domain model definition being modified using the plurality of domain object representations in the Graphical User Interface (GUI); and defining a Policy Enforcement Point (PEP) in an application based on the extensible hierarchical domain model definition.

Claims (79)

1. A method for secure policies-based information governance, the method comprising:

displaying a Graphical User Interface (GUI), the graphical user interface receiving a business rule input from a business user;

receiving a policy from a policy engine based on the business rule input and at least one guardrail policy comprising a rule having a level of precedence higher than the business rule of the business rule input, the policy engine generating a policy hierarchy;

defining a plurality of domain objects and a plurality of domain object representations in the Graphical User Interface (GUI) based on the policy, the at least one guardrail policy, and the policy hierarchy;

defining an extensible hierarchical domain model definition using the policy hierarchy, the extensible hierarchical domain model definition being modified using the plurality of domain object representations in the Graphical User Interface (GUI);

defining a Policy Enforcement Point (PEP) in an application based on the extensible hierarchical domain model definition;

providing a mapping from the Policy Enforcement Point (PEP) in the application to the plurality of domain object representations in the Graphical User Interface (GUI);

receiving, by the Policy Enforcement Point (PEP), a user request to access a resource on the application, the user request comprising attributes of the business user;

sending, by the Policy Enforcement Point (PEP), the user request to access the resource on the application to a Policy Decision Point (PDP);

evaluating, by the Policy Decision Point (PDP), the user request to access the resource on the application, the evaluating using the extensible hierarchical domain model definition;

generating, by the Policy Decision Point (PDP), a decision regarding the user request to access the resource on the application based on the evaluating; and

enforcing, by the Policy Enforcement Point (PEP), the decision regarding the user request to access the resource on the application.

2. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the evaluating, by the Policy Decision Point (PDP), the user request to access the resource further comprises:

sending, by the Policy Decision Point (PDP), an attribute evaluation request regarding the attributes of the business user to a Policy Information Point (PIP);

evaluating, using the Policy Information Point (PIP), the attributes of the business user, the evaluating using the extensible hierarchical domain model definition; and replying, by the Policy Information Point (PIP), to the attribute evaluation request based on the evaluating, using the Policy Information Point (PIP), of the attributes of the business user.

3. The method as recited in claim 2 , wherein the evaluating, using the Policy Information Point (PIP), the attributes of the business user comprises using at least one of a decision model template, a decision table template, and a domain.

4. The method as recited in claim 3 , wherein the evaluating, using the Policy Information Point (PIP), the attributes of the business user comprises using the decision table template, the decision table template comprising:

information for presenting the decision table template to the business user using the Graphical User Interface (GUI);

attributes of the plurality of domain objects; and

formatting of the attributes of the plurality of domain objects for displaying on the Graphical User Interface (GUI).

5. The method as recited in claim 2 , further comprising generating a custom domain model;

wherein the evaluating, using the Policy Information Point (PIP), the attributes of the business user comprises using the custom domain model.

6. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the graphical user interface further comprises a policy designer screen for the business user, the policy designer screen receiving a disable policy enforcement point input, the disable policy enforcement point input disabling the Policy Enforcement Point (PEP) preventing the Policy Enforcement Point (PEP) from enforcing the policy.

7. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the graphical user interface further comprises a policy designer screen for the business user, the policy designer screen receiving an enable policy enforcement point input, the enable policy enforcement point input enabling the Policy Enforcement Point (PEP) allowing the Policy Enforcement Point (PEP) to enforce the policy.

8. The method as recited in claim 1 ,

wherein the decision regarding the user request to access the resource on the application is to deny access to the resource based on the policy and the at least one guardrail policy; and

wherein the enforcing, by the Policy Enforcement Point (PEP), the decision regarding the user request to access the resource is denying access to the resource on the application.

9. The method as recited in claim 1 ,

wherein the decision regarding the user request to access the resource on the application is to grant access to the resource based on the policy and the at least one guardrail policy; and

wherein the enforcing, by the Policy Enforcement Point (PEP), the decision regarding the user request to access the resource on the application is granting access to the resource on the application.

10. A system for secure policies-based information governance, the system comprising:

a Graphical User Interface (GUI), the graphical user interface receiving a business rule input from a business user;

a policy engine generating a policy based on the business rule input and at least one guardrail policy comprising a rule having a level of precedence higher than the business rule of the business rule input, the policy engine generating a policy hierarchy;

at least one processor; and

a memory storing processor-executable instructions, wherein the at least one processor is configured to implement the following operations upon executing the processor-executable instructions:

defining a plurality of domain objects and a plurality of domain object representations in the Graphical User Interface (GUI) based on the policy, the at least one guardrail policy, and the policy hierarchy;

defining an extensible hierarchical domain model definition using the policy hierarchy, the extensible hierarchical domain model definition being modified using the plurality of domain object representations in the Graphical User Interface (GUI);

defining a Policy Enforcement Point (PEP) in an application based on the extensible hierarchical domain model definition;

providing a mapping from the Policy Enforcement Point (PEP) in the application to the plurality of domain object representations in the Graphical User Interface (GUI);

receiving, by the Policy Enforcement Point (PEP), a user request to access a resource on the application, the user request comprising attributes of the business user;

sending, by the Policy Enforcement Point (PEP), the user request to access the resource on the application to a Policy Decision Point (PDP);

evaluating, by the Policy Decision Point (PDP), the user request to access the resource on the application, the evaluating using the extensible hierarchical domain model definition;

generating, by the Policy Decision Point (PDP), a decision regarding the user request to access the resource on the application based on the evaluating; and

enforcing, by the Policy Enforcement Point (PEP), the decision regarding the user request to access the resource on the application.

11. The system as recited in claim 10 , wherein the evaluating, by the Policy Decision Point (PDP), the user request to access the resource further comprises:

sending, by the Policy Decision Point (PDP), an attribute evaluation request regarding the attributes of the business user to a Policy Information Point (PIP);

evaluating, using the Policy Information Point (PIP), the attributes of the business user, the evaluating using the extensible hierarchical domain model definition; and

replying, by the Policy Information Point (PIP), to the attribute evaluation request based on the evaluating, using the Policy Information Point (PIP), of the attributes of the business user.

12. The system as recited in claim 11 , wherein the evaluating, using the Policy Information Point (PIP), the attributes of the business user comprises using at least one of a decision model template, a decision table template, and a domain.

13. The system as recited in claim 12 , wherein the evaluating, using the Policy Information Point (PIP), the attributes of the business user comprises using the decision table template, the decision table template comprising:

information for presenting the decision table template to the business user using the Graphical User Interface (GUI);

attributes of the plurality of domain objects; and

formatting of the attributes of the plurality of domain objects for displaying on the Graphical User Interface (GUI).

14. The system as recited in claim 11 , wherein the at least one processor is further configured to implement the following operations upon executing the processor-executable instructions:

generating a custom domain model;

wherein the evaluating, using the Policy Information Point (PIP), the attributes of the business user comprises using the custom domain model.

15. The system as recited in claim 10 , wherein the graphical user interface further comprises a policy designer screen for the business user, the policy designer screen receiving a disable policy enforcement point input, the disable policy enforcement point input disabling the Policy Enforcement Point (PEP) preventing the Policy Enforcement Point (PEP) from enforcing the policy.

16. The system as recited in claim 10 , wherein the graphical user interface further comprises a policy designer screen for the business user, the policy designer screen receiving an enable policy enforcement point input, the enable policy enforcement point input enabling the Policy Enforcement Point (PEP) allowing the Policy Enforcement Point (PEP) to enforce the policy.

17. The system as recited in claim 10 ,

wherein the decision regarding the user request to access the resource on the application is to deny access to the resource based on the policy and the at least one guardrail policy; and

wherein the enforcing, by the Policy Enforcement Point (PEP), the decision regarding the user request to access the resource is denying access to the resource on the application.

18. The system as recited in claim 10 ,

wherein the decision regarding the user request to access the resource on the application is to grant access to the resource based on the policy and the at least one guardrail policy; and

wherein the enforcing, by the Policy Enforcement Point (PEP), the decision regarding the user request to access the resource on the application is granting access to the resource on the application.

19. A non-transitory computer readable medium having embodied thereon instructions being executable by at least one processor to perform operations for secure policies-based information governance, the operations comprising:

displaying a Graphical User Interface (GUI), the graphical user interface receiving a business rule input from a business user;

receiving a policy from a policy engine based on the business rule input and at least one guardrail policy comprising a rule having a level of precedence higher than the business rule of the business rule input, the policy engine generating a policy hierarchy;

defining a plurality of domain objects and a plurality of domain object representations in the Graphical User Interface (GUI) based on the policy, the at least one guardrail policy, and the policy hierarchy;

defining an extensible hierarchical domain model definition using the policy hierarchy, the extensible hierarchical domain model definition being modified using the plurality of domain object representations in the Graphical User Interface (GUI);

defining a Policy Enforcement Point (PEP) in an application based on the extensible hierarchical domain model definition;

providing a mapping from the Policy Enforcement Point (PEP) in the application to the plurality of domain object representations in the Graphical User Interface (GUI);

receiving, by the Policy Enforcement Point (PEP), a user request to access a resource on the application, the user request comprising attributes of the business user;

sending, by the Policy Enforcement Point (PEP), the user request to access the resource on the application to a Policy Decision Point (PDP);

evaluating, by the Policy Decision Point (PDP), the user request to access the resource on the application, the evaluating using the extensible hierarchical domain model definition;

generating, by the Policy Decision Point (PDP), a decision regarding the user request to access the resource on the application based on the evaluating; and

enforcing, by the Policy Enforcement Point (PEP), the decision regarding the user request to access the resource on the application.

20. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 19 ,

wherein the decision regarding the user request to access the resource on the application is to deny access to the resource based on the policy and the at least one guardrail policy; and

wherein the enforcing, by the Policy Enforcement Point (PEP), the decision regarding the user request to access the resource is denying access to the resource on the application.

Assignments (6)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded May 17, 2024
From: ASG TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.
To: ROCKET SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 067456/0863 →
CHANGE OF ADDRESS Recorded Dec 27, 2022
From: ASG TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC. DBA ASG TECHNOLOGIES
To: ASG TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC. DBA ASG TECHNOLOGIES
Reel/Frame 062714/0198 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT (SUPPLEMENT - FIRST LIEN) Recorded Sep 13, 2022
From: ASG TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.
To: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH, AS THE COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 061419/0384 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 21, 2021
From: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: ASG TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.
Reel/Frame 056312/0291 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 16, 2020
From: ASG TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.
To: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 054379/0327 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 29, 2020
From: BALAN, SUDHI; BAIAD, RANDY; RUSSELL, ROBERT
To: ASG TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC. DBA ASG TECHNOLOGIES
Reel/Frame 054209/0135 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62923381 · Oct 18, 2019
Related Publication 20210120044A1 · Apr 22, 2021
Cited By (3)
US 12,259,989 US 12,675,592 US 12,700,486