IP Library Granted Patent US 11,534,119
Granted Patent B2
US 11,534,119 · App. 17/081,564 · Granted Dec 27, 2022

Analysis apparatus and analysis program

Inventors: Shunsuke Fujiwara (Utsunomiya, JP); Yasuo Sakurai (Nasushiobara, JP); Ming-Rong Zhang (Chiba, JP); Lin Xie (Chiba, JP); Masayuki Fujinaga (Chiba, JP); Masayuki Hanyu (Chiba, JP); Cheng-Long Huang (Nagoya, JP); Masakazu Fukushima (Nagoya, JP); Hiromi Wada (Nagoya, JP)
Assignees: CANON MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORPORATION; National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology; General Incorporated Association The Japan-Multinational Trial Organization
A61B6/4057A61B6/508A61B6/037
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,534,119
App. No.
17/081,564
Granted
Dec 27, 2022
Kind
B2
Abstract

An analysis apparatus according to an embodiment includes an extraction unit, a calculation unit, and an evaluation unit. The extraction unit extracts a detection value in a tumor region, a blood region, and a muscle region from a nuclear medicine image of a subject administered with a drug containing a radiolabeled anticancer drug that works by accumulating in a tumor. The calculation unit calculates a first comparison value that is a comparison result between the detection value in the blood region and the detection value in the tumor region, and a second comparison value that is a comparison result between the detection value in the muscle region and the detection value in the tumor region. The evaluation unit evaluates an accumulation of the drug in the tumor, based on the first comparison value and the second comparison value calculated by the calculation unit.

Claims (26)

1. An analysis apparatus, comprising:

processing circuitry configured to

extract first, second, and third detection values in a tumor region, a blood region, and a muscle region, respectively, from a nuclear medicine image of a subject administered with a drug containing a radiolabeled anticancer drug that works by accumulating in a tumor;

calculate a first comparison value that is a comparison result between the second detection value in the blood region and the first detection value in the tumor region; and a second comparison value that is a comparison result between the third detection value in the muscle region and the first detection value in the tumor region; and

evaluate a specificity of accumulation of the drug in the tumor, based on the first comparison value and the second comparison value, wherein the specificity of accumulation of the drug in the tumor is evaluated based on (1) a first comparison result between the first comparison value and a threshold, and (2) a second comparison result between the second comparison value and the threshold.

2. The analysis apparatus according to claim 1 , wherein the first comparison value is a ratio between the second detection value in the blood region and the first detection value in the tumor region.

3. The analysis apparatus according to claim 1 , wherein the second comparison value is a ratio between the third detection value in the muscle region and the first detection value in the tumor region.

4. The analysis apparatus according to claim 1 , wherein the processing circuitry is further configured to evaluate the specificity of the accumulation of [ 18 F]5-FU in the tumor.

5. The analysis apparatus according to claim 1 , wherein the processing circuitry is further configured to (1) evaluate that the drug is easily accumulated in the tumor when the first comparison value and the second comparison value are both greater than the threshold, and (2) evaluate that the drug is not easily accumulated in the tumor when at least one of the first comparison value and the second comparison value is smaller than the threshold.

6. The analysis apparatus according to claim 1 , wherein the processing circuitry is further configured to (1) evaluate that the drug is easily accumulated in the tumor when the first comparison value and the second comparison value are both greater than the threshold, (2) evaluate that the drug is moderately accumulated in the tumor when one of the first comparison value and the second comparison value is smaller than the threshold, and (3) evaluate that the drug is not easily accumulated in the tumor when both of the first comparison value and the second comparison value are smaller than the threshold.

7. A non-transitory computer-readable medium having stored thereon instructions that, when executed by a computer, cause the computer to perform:

extracting first, second, and third detection values in a tumor region, a blood region, and a muscle region, respectively, from a nuclear medicine image of a subject administered with a drug containing a radiolabeled anticancer drug that works by accumulating in a tumor;

calculating a first comparison value that is a comparison result between the second detection value in the blood region and the first detection value in the tumor region, and a second comparison value that is a comparison result between the third detection value in the muscle region and the first detection value in the tumor region; and

evaluating a specificity of accumulation of the drug in the tumor, based on the first comparison value and the second comparison value, wherein the specificity of accumulation of the drug in the tumor is evaluated based on (1) a first comparison result between the first comparison value and a threshold, and (2) a second comparison result between the second comparison value and the threshold.

8. The non-transitory computer readable medium according to claim 7 , wherein the instructions further cause the computer to evaluate the specificity of the accumulation of [ 18 F]5-FU in the tumor.

9. The non-transitory computer readable medium according to claim 7 , wherein the instructions further cause the computer to (1) evaluate that the drug is easily accumulated in the tumor when the first comparison value and the second comparison value are both greater than the threshold, and (2) evaluate that the drug is not easily accumulated in the tumor when at least one of the first comparison value and the second comparison value is smaller than the threshold.

10. The non-transitory computer readable medium according to claim 7 , wherein the instructions further cause the computer to (1) evaluate that the drug is easily accumulated in the tumor when the first comparison value and the second comparison value are both greater than the threshold, (2) evaluate that the drug is moderately accumulated in the tumor when one of the first comparison value and the second comparison value is smaller than the threshold, and (3) evaluate that the drug is not easily accumulated in the tumor when both of the first comparison value and the second comparison value are smaller than the threshold.

11. An analysis method executed by a computer, comprising:

extracting first, second, and third detection values in a tumor region, a blood region, and a muscle region, respectively, from a nuclear medicine image of a subject administered with a drug containing a radiolabeled anticancer drug that works by accumulating in a tumor;

calculating a first comparison value that is a comparison result between the second detection value in the blood region and the first detection value in the tumor region, and a second comparison value that is a comparison result between the third detection value in the muscle region and the first detection value in the tumor region; and

evaluating a specificity of accumulation of the drug in the tumor, based on the first comparison value and the second comparison value, wherein the specificity of accumulation of the drug in the tumor is evaluated based on (1) a first comparison result between the first comparison value and a threshold, and (2) a second comparison result between the second comparison value and the threshold.

12. The analysis method according to claim 11 , wherein the first comparison value is a ratio between the second detection value in the blood region and the first detection value in the tumor region.

13. The analysis method according to claim 11 , wherein the second comparison value is a ratio between the third detection value in the muscle region and the first detection value in the tumor region.

14. The analysis method according to claim 11 , wherein evaluating the specificity comprises evaluating the specificity of the accumulation of [ 18 F]5-FU in the tumor.

15. The analysis method according to claim 11 , wherein evaluating the specificity comprises (1) evaluating that the drug is easily accumulated in the tumor when the first comparison value and the second comparison value are both greater than the threshold, and (2) evaluating that the drug is not easily accumulated in the tumor when at least one of the first comparison value and the second comparison value is smaller than the threshold.

16. The analysis method according to claim 11 , wherein evaluating the specificity comprises (1) evaluating that the drug is easily accumulated in the tumor when the first comparison value and the second comparison value are both greater than the threshold, (2) evaluating that the drug is moderately accumulated in the tumor when one of the first comparison value and the second comparison value is smaller than the threshold, and (3) evaluating that the drug is not easily accumulated in the tumor when both of the first comparison value and the second comparison value are smaller than the threshold.

Assignments (6)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 1, 2026
From: CANON MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORPORATION
To: CANON KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Reel/Frame 075315/0598 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 4, 2024
From: GENERAL INCORPORATED ASSOCIATION THE JAPAN-MULTINATIONAL TRIAL ORGANIZATION
To: CANON MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 067615/0407 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNEE'S NAME INSIDE THE ASSIGNMENT DOCUMENT AND ON THE COVER SHEET PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 055389 FRAME: 0464. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Nov 3, 2022
From: ZHANG, MING-RONG; XIE, LIN; FUJINAGA, MASAYUKI; HANYU, MASAYUKI
To: NATIONAL INSTITUTES FOR QUANTUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Reel/Frame 061871/0300 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 24, 2021
From: FUJIWARA, SHUNSUKE; SAKURAI, YASUO
To: CANON MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 055389/0444 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 24, 2021
From: ZHANG, MING-RONG; XIE, LIN; FUJINAGA, MASAYUKI; HANYU, MASAYUKI
To: NATIONAL INSTITUTES FOR QUANTUM AND RADIOLOGICAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Reel/Frame 055389/0464 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 24, 2021
From: HUANG, CHENG-LONG; FUKUSHIMA, MASAKAZU; WADA, HIROMI
To: GENERAL INCORPORATED ASSOCIATION THE JAPAN-MULTINATIONAL TRIAL ORGANIZATION
Reel/Frame 055389/0569 →