IP Library Granted Patent US 12,391,946
Granted Patent B2
US 12,391,946 · App. 17/088,303 · Granted Aug 19, 2025

Use of a Janus kinase inhibitor and a telomerase inhibitor for the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms

Inventors: Xiaoli Wang (New York, NY); Fei Huang (Foster City, CA)
Assignee: Geron Corporation
C12N15/1137A61K31/506A61K31/519A61K31/529A61K31/5377C12N2310/315C12N2310/3515
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,391,946
App. No.
17/088,303
Granted
Aug 19, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Aspects of the disclosure include methods for treating a myeloproliferative neoplasm. Methods according to certain embodiments include co-administering to a subject a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor and a telomerase inhibitor comprising an oligonucleotide and a lipid moiety linked to the 5′ and/or 3′ end of the oligonucleotide. Methods for inducing apoptosis of a myeloproliferative neoplasm cell by contacting the cell with an amount of a JAK inhibitor and a telomerase inhibitor sufficient to induce apoptosis are also described. Compositions having a JAK inhibitor and a telomerase inhibitor for practicing the subject methods are also provided.

Claims (24)

1. A method of treating a subject having a myeloproliferative neoplasm, the method comprising sequentially administering to the subject ruxolitinib or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, followed by imetelstat or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.

2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the method comprises:

administering on a first day a dosage of ruxolitinib or pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof and a dosage of imetelstat or pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof; and

administering a dosage of ruxolitinib or pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof once or twice per day for a duration of from about 20 days to about 27 days after the first day.

3. The method according to claim 2 , wherein the dosage of ruxolitinib or pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof is administered twice on the first day.

4. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the method comprises:

administering to the subject ruxolitinib or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof once or twice per day for a duration of from about 14 days to 21 days; and

administering to the subject one or more doses of imetelstat or pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof during the period from about 1 day to about 7 days after the last administered dosage of the ruxolitinib or pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.

5. The method according to claim 1 , wherein ruxolitinib or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof is administered to the subject at a dosage of about 10 mg/day to about 400 mg/day.

6. The method according to claim 1 , wherein imetelstat or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof is administered to the subject at a dosage of from about 7.5 mg/kg to about 9.4 mg/kg.

7. The method according to claim 1 , wherein imetelstat or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof is administered to the subject by intravenous infusion over a duration of from about 1 hour to about 3 hours.

8. The method according to claim 1 , wherein ruxolitinib or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof is administered to the subject once per day.

9. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the ruxolitinib or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof is administered to a subject at a dosage of:

5 mg twice per day when the subject has a baseline platelet count of less than about 100×10 9 /L platelets;

15 mg twice per day when the subject has a baseline platelet count of from about 100×10 9 /L platelets to about 200×10 9 /L platelets; and

20 mg twice per day when the subject has a baseline platelet count of greater than about 200×10 9 /L platelets.

10. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the telomerase inhibitor is imetelstat sodium.

11. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the method comprises:

administering to the subject ruxolitinib or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof once or twice per day for a duration of 0 days to 21 days; and

administering to the subject one dose or more of imetelstat or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof within 7 days of the last administered dosage of ruxolitinib or pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.

12. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the myeloproliferative neoplasm is selected from myelofibrosis (MF), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), Essential Thrombocythemia (ET), Polycythemia vera (PV), Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML), chronic neutrophilic leukemia, chronic eosinophilic leukemia and acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

13. A method of inducing apoptosis of a myeloproliferative neoplasm cell, the method comprising sequentially contacting the cell with ruxolitinib or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, followed by imetelstat or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof sufficient to induce apoptosis.

14. The method according to claim 13 , wherein the myeloproliferative neoplasm cell is a myelofibrosis hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) or a malignant hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC).

15. The method according to claim 13 , wherein the ruxolitinib or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof and the imetelstat or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof are contacted with the myeloproliferative neoplasm cell in vitro.

Assignments (4)
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Nov 20, 2025
From: GERON CORPORATION
To: BIOPHARMA CREDIT PLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 073679/0773 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Nov 12, 2024
From: GERON CORPORATION
To: BIOPHARMA CREDIT PLC [COLLATERAL AGENT]
Reel/Frame 069341/0832 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 26, 2022
From: WANG, XIAOLI
To: ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI
Reel/Frame 058781/0735 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 20, 2022
From: HUANG, FEI
To: GERON CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 058709/0039 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62930251 · Nov 4, 2019
Related Publication 20210269807A1 · Sep 2, 2021
References Cited (53)
US 20140135350A1 · Ni · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150342982A1 · Stuart · 2015 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2013067043 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014088785 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
Harrison et al., Current treatment algorithm for the management of patients with myelofibrosis, JAK inhibitors, and beyond, Hematology, pp. 489-497. (Year: 2017). [cited by examiner]
Doherty et al., Life, death and autophagy, Nature Cell Biology, vol. 20, pp. 1110-1117. (Year: 2018). [cited by examiner]
Sergei M. Gryaznov, Oligonucleotide N3′ → P5′ phosphoramidates and thio-phosphoramidates as potential therapeutic agents, Chemistry & Biodiversity, vol. 7, pp. 477-493. (Year: 2010). [cited by examiner]
Jackson et al., Antiadhesive effects of GRN163L—an oligonucleotide N3′ → P5′ thio-phosphoramidate targeting telomerase, Cancer Research, vol. 67, pp. 1121-1129. (Year: 2007). [cited by examiner]
Østergaard et al., Conjugation of hydrophobic moieties enhances potency of antisense oligonucleotides in the muscle of rodents and non-human primates, Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 47, pp. 6045-6058. (Year: 2019). [cited by examiner]
Prakash et al., Fatty acid conjugation enhances potency of antisense oligonucleotides in muscle, Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 47, pp. 6029-6044. (Year: 2019). [cited by examiner]
Caocci et al., Ruxolitinib restores normal telomere length in patients with myelofibrosis, Blood, vol. 128, issue 22, p. 3116, abstract No. 634. (Year: 2016). [cited by examiner]
Hao et al., (2019) “Cotargeting the JAK/STAT signaling pathway and histone deacetylase by ruxolitinib and vorinostat elicits synergistic effects against myeloproliferative neoplasms”, Investigational New Drugs, vol. 38,… [cited by applicant]
Hu et al., (2019) “Combination Treatment with Imetelstat, a Telomerase Inhibitor, and Ruxolitinib Depletes Myelofibrosis Hematopoietic Stem Cells and Progenitor Cells”, Blood, vol. 134, Suppl. 1, p. 1 of 1. [cited by applicant]
Rampal et al., (2018) “Safety and efficacy of combined ruxolitinib and decitabine in accelerated and blast-phase myeloproliferative neoplasms”, Blood Advances, vol. 2, No. 24, pp. 3572-3580. [cited by applicant]
Tefferi et al. (2015) “A pilot study of the telomerase inhibitor imetelstat for myelofibrosis,” N. Engl. J. Med., vol. 373, No. 10, pp. 908-919. [cited by applicant]
Wang et al., (2018) “Imetelstat, a telomerase inhibitor, is capable of depleting myelofibrosis stem and progenitor cells”, Blood Advances, vol. 2, No. 18, pp. 2378-2388. [cited by applicant]
Baerlocher et al., (2012) “Imetelstat rapidly Induces and Maintains Substantial Hematologic and Molecular Responses in Patients with Essential Thrombocythemia (ET) who are Refractory or Intolerant to Prior Therapy: Prel… [cited by applicant]
Barosi et al., (2004) “Spleen neoangiogenesis in patients with myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia. British Journal Haematol”, vol. 124, pp. 618-625. Erratum in: Br J Haematol. 2004; 126: 284-5. [cited by applicant]
Brennan et al., (2010) “Telomerase inhibition targets clonogenic multiple myeloma cells through telomere length-dependent and independent mechanisms”, PLoS One, vol. 5, Issue 9, e12487, pp. 1-8. [cited by applicant]
Brunold et al., (2011) “Imetelstat, A Potent Telomerase Inhibitor, Inhibits the Spontaneous Growth of CFU-Meg In Vitro From Essential Thrombocythemia Patients but Not From Healthy Individuals”, Blood (ASH Annual Meeting… [cited by applicant]
Greider and Blackburn, (1985) “Identification of a specific telomere terminal transferase activity in Tetrahymena extracts”, Cell, vol. 43, pp. 405-413. [cited by applicant]
Hoffmanand BenzJr E, Silberstein L, Heslop H, Weitz J and Anastasi J. Chapter 53—Progress in the Classification of Myeloid Neoplasms: Clinical Implications In: Hoffman R, et al. Hematology: Basic Principles and Practice… [cited by applicant]
Joseph et al., (2010) “The telomerase inhibitor Imetelstat depletes cancer stem cells in breast and pancreatic cancer cell lines”, Cancer Research., vol. 70, pp. 9494-9504. [cited by applicant]
Kim et al., (1994) “Specific association of human telomerase activity with immortal cells and cancer”, Science, vol. 266, pp. 2011-2015. [cited by applicant]
Kralovics and Skoda, (2005) “Molecular pathogenesis of Philadelphia chromosome negative myeloproliferative disorders”, Blood Reviews, vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 1-13. [cited by applicant]
Marian et al., (2010) “The effects of telomerase inhibition on prostate tumor-initiating cells”, International Journal of Cancer, vol. 127, 321-331. [cited by applicant]
Marian et al., (2010) “The telomerase antagonist, Imetelstat, efficiently targets glioblastoma tumor-initiating cells leading to decreased proliferation and tumor Growth”, Clinical Cancer Research., 16: 154-163. [cited by applicant]
Mesa, Ruben A., (2002) “Clinical and scientific advances in the Philadelphia-chromosome negative chronic myeloproliferative disorders”, Int J Hematol., vol. 76, Sup. II, pp. 193-203. [cited by applicant]
Nussenzveig et al., (2007) “Polycythemia vera is not initiated by JAK2 [cited by applicant]
Prchal JF, and Prchal JT., (1999) “Molecular basis for polycythemia”, Current Opinion Hematology, vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 100-109. [cited by applicant]
Shay and Bacchetti, (1997) “A survey of telomerase activity in human cancer”, European Journal of Cancer, vol. 33, No. 5, pp. 787-791. [cited by applicant]
Shay and Wright, (1996) “Telomerase activity in human cancer”, Curr Opin Oncol., vol. 8, pp. 66-71. [cited by applicant]
Shea-Herbert et al., (2002) “Oligonucleotide N3′→P5' phosphoramidates as efficient telomerase inhibitors”, Oncogene, vol. 21, pp. 638-642. [cited by applicant]
Spivak, Jerry L., (2002) “Polycythemia vera: myths, mechanisms, and management”, Blood, vol. 100, No. 13, pp. 4272-4290. [cited by applicant]
Tefferi A, et al. Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts), Nov. 2013; 122:662. [cited by applicant]
Wang et al. (2010) “Sequential treatment of CD34+ cells from patients with primary myelofibrosis with chromatin-modifying agents eliminate JAK2V617F-positive NOD/SCID marrow repopulating cells”, Blood, vol. 116, No. 26,… [cited by applicant]
Wang et al., (2014) “JAK2 Inhibitors Do Not Affect Stem Cells Present in the Spleens of Patients with Myelofibrosis. Blood” vol. 124, No. 19, pp. 2987-2995. [cited by applicant]
Wang X, Hu C, Li Y, et al. 56th ASH Annual Meeting. Dec. 5-9, 2014, San Francisco, CA, 1 page. [cited by applicant]
Yu et al., (1990) “In vivo alteration of telomere sequences and senescence caused by mutated Tetrahymena telomerase RNAs”, Nature, vol. 344, pp. 126-132. [cited by applicant]
Asai et al., (2003) “A Novel Telomerase Template Antagonist (GRN163) as a Potential Anticancer Agent”, Cancer Research, vol. 63, No. 14. pp. 3931-3939. [cited by applicant]
Herbert et al., (2005) “Lipid Modification of GRN163, an N3′→ P5′ Thio-Phosphoramidate Oligonucleotide, Enhances the Potency of Telomerase Inhibition”, Oncogene, vol. 24, No. 33, pp. 5262-5268. [cited by applicant]
Kuykendall et al., (2018) “Between a Rux and a Hard Place: Evaluating Salvage Treatment and Outcomes in Myelofibrosis After Ruxolitinib Discontinuation”, Annals of Hematology, vol. 97, pp. 435-441. [cited by applicant]
Liu and Yuan, (2015) “Bayesian Optimal Interval Designs for Phase I Clinical Trials”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C: Applied Statistics, pp. 507-523. [cited by applicant]
Mascarenhas et al., (2020) “Patient Characteristics and Outcomes After Ruxolitinib Discontinuation in Patients with Myelofibrosis”, Journal of Medical Economics, vol. 23, No. 7, pp. 721-727. [cited by applicant]
Mascarenhas et al., (2020) “Potential Disease-Modifying Activity of Imetelstat Demonstrated by Reduction in Cytogenetically Abnormal Clones and Mutation Burden Leads to Clinical Benefits in Relapsed/Refractory Myelofibr… [cited by applicant]
Mascarenhas et al., (2021) “Randomized, Single-Blind, Multicenter Phase II Study of Two Doses of Imetelstat in Relapsed or Refractory Myelofibrosis”, Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 39, No. 26, pp. 2881-2892. [cited by applicant]
Newberry et al., (2017) “Clonal Evolution and Outcomes in Myelofibrosis After Ruxolitinib Discontinuation”, Blood, vol. 130, No. 9, pp. 1125-1131. [cited by applicant]
Ross et al., (2021) “Persistence of Myelofibrosis Treated with Ruxolitinib: Biology and Clinical Implications”, Haematologica, vol. 106, No. 5, 1244-1253. [cited by applicant]
Schieber et al., (2019) “Myelofibrosis in 2019; Moving Beyond JAK2 Inhibition”, Blood Cancer Journal, vol. 9, No. 9, No. 74, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Tefferi et al. (2021) “Primary Myelofibrosis: 2021 Update on Diagnosis, Risk-Stratification and Management”, American Journal of Hematology, vol. 96, No. 1, pp. 145-162. [cited by applicant]
Vachhani et al., (2022) “Disease Modification in Myelofibrosis: An Elusive Goal?”, Journal of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal of The American Society of Clinical Oncology, vol. 40, No. 11, pp. 1147-1154. [cited by applicant]
Xiao, et al., (2014) “Advances in clinical research on chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms”, J. Diagn Concepts Pract, vol. 13, No. 6, pp. 628-631. [cited by applicant]
Hobbs et al., (2016) “New drugs for myelofibrosis”, Expert Opinion on Orphan Drugs, 4(5):521-529. [cited by applicant]