IP Library Granted Patent US 11,774,924
Granted Patent B2
US 11,774,924 · App. 17/111,374 · Granted Oct 3, 2023

Method and system for process schedule reconciliation using algebraic model optimization

Inventors: Nihar Sahay (Houston, TX); Dimitrios Varvarezos (Houston, TX)
Assignee: AspenTech Corporation
G05B13/042G05B13/0265
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,774,924
App. No.
17/111,374
Granted
Oct 3, 2023
Kind
B2
Abstract

A computer-implemented method and system for process schedule reconciliation receives a scheduling model and an initial schedule for reconciliation, where the initial schedule includes projected plant data. Current plant data is imported into the system. The current plant data and projected plant data is processed using mathematical modeling techniques to identify event boundaries, stream flowrates associated with tanks and process units. The system builds an optimization model applying identified event boundaries, stream flowrates and pre-determined constraints along a period of time that includes priority slots to reconcile the projected plant data of the initial schedule with the current plant data, and then solves the optimization model to develop a reconciled schedule.

Claims (23)

1. A computer-implemented method of process control and schedule reconciliation, comprising:

receiving by at least one digital processor a scheduling model formed of an initial schedule for reconciliation, the initial schedule having projected plant data;

importing current plant data into a model of a plant process;

processing the current plant data and projected plant data using mathematical modeling techniques that identify event boundaries, and stream flowrates and properties associated with tanks and process units, wherein the identified event boundaries may be calculated event boundaries from processing the current plant data;

building an optimization model that mathematically represents a schedule reconciliation problem of the plant process, the optimization model applying penalties for deviating from: (i) a trend defined by the identified event boundaries, (ii) and the identified stream flowrates, (ii) pre-determined constraints, and (iii) the initial schedule along a period of time that includes priority slots such that solving the optimization model results in a reconciled schedule that aligns projected plant data of a succeeding schedule to the initial schedule with the current plant data;

solving the optimization model to develop the reconciled schedule, the reconciled schedule, comprising a sequence of events, consistent with the identified event boundaries and the identified stream flowrates and providing a current event status, said importing, processing, building, and solving being automatically performed by the at least one digital processor;

automatically building a future schedule in computer memory, using the reconciled schedule; and

controlling the plant process using the built future schedule by automatically adjusting start time, stop time, and flow rates of tank to tank transfers and of operating modes of the process units.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein the pre-determined constraints include operation constraints.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein the pre-determined constraints include scheduling constraints.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein the pre-determined constraints are further applied across multiple periods.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 4 wherein reconciling the projected plant data further includes determining the timing of the priority slots within period boundaries.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein processing further incudes using mathematical modeling techniques to identify event boundaries and stream flowrates to build the optimization model.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein the scheduling model and optimization model consist of different types of resources, including transportation modes, tanks, mixers, splitters and production units, that represent the corresponding resources in the refinery scheduling operations system.

8. A computer-based process modeling and simulation system, comprising:

a modeling subsystem executed by one or more digital processors automatically performing schedule reconciliation on a chemical process of a subject industrial plant, the modeling subsystem (i) receiving a scheduling model and an initial schedule for reconciliation, the initial schedule having projected plant data, (ii) importing current plant data into a model of the chemical process, (iii) processing the current plant data and projected plant data using mathematical modeling techniques to identify event boundaries and stream flowrates associated with tanks and process units, wherein the identified event boundaries may be calculated event boundaries from processing the current plant data (iv) building an optimization model that mathematically represents a schedule reconciliation problem of the chemical process, the optimization model applying penalties for deviating from the identified event boundaries, a trend defined by the identified stream flowrates, pre-determined constraints, and the initial schedule along a period of time that includes priority slots such that solving the optimization model results in a reconciled schedule that aligns projected plant data of a succeeding schedule to the initial schedule with the current plant data, and (v) solving the optimization model to develop the reconciled schedule comprising a sequence of events, the reconciled schedule consistent with the identified event boundaries and the identified stream flowrates and providing a current event status and;

an interface coupled to the modeling subsystem in a manner that enables improvements in performance of the chemical process at the subject industrial plant based on a future schedule, built using the reconciled schedule, that controls the chemical process by automatically adjusting start time, stop time, and flow rates of tank to tank transfers and of operating modes of the process units.

9. The computer-based process modeling and simulation system of claim 8 wherein the pre-determined constraints include operation constraints.

10. The computer-based process modeling and simulation system of claim 8 wherein the pre-determined constraints include scheduling constraints.

11. The computer-based process modeling and simulation system of claim 8 wherein the pre-determined constraints are further applied across multiple periods.

12. The computer-based process modeling and simulation system of claim 11 wherein reconciling the projected plant data further includes determining the timing of the priority slots within period boundaries.

13. The computer-based process modeling and simulation system of claim 8 wherein processing further incudes using mathematical modeling techniques to identify event boundaries and stream flowrates to build the optimization model.

14. The computer-based process modeling and simulation system of claim 8 wherein the scheduling model and optimization model consist of different types of resources, including transportation modes, tanks, mixers, and production units, that represent the corresponding resources in the refinery scheduling operations system.

Assignments (4)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 18, 2024
From: ASPENTECH CORPORATION; ASPEN PARADIGM HOLDING LLC
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 068424/0341 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 12, 2022
From: ASPENTECH CORPORATION F/K/A ASPEN TECHNOLOGY, INC.; EMERSON PARADIGM HOLDINGS LLC; PARADIGM GEOPHYSICAL CORP.; OPEN SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 061161/0782 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jul 29, 2022
From: ASPEN TECHNOLOGY, INC.
To: ASPENTECH CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 061006/0171 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 4, 2021
From: SAHAY, NIHAR; VARVAREZOS, DIMITRIOS
To: ASPEN TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Reel/Frame 055490/0919 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20220179372A1 · Jun 9, 2022
Cited By (1)
US 12,217,198