IP Library Granted Patent US 11,598,711
Granted Patent B2
US 11,598,711 · App. 17/143,583 · Granted Mar 7, 2023

Method and apparatus for measuring stress dependency of shale permeability with steady-state flow

Inventors: Hui-Hai Liu (Houston, TX); Jilin Zhang (Houston, TX); Jewel Duncan (Houston, TX)
Assignee: SAUDI ARABIAN OIL COMPANY
G01N15/0826G01N15/0806G01N33/24
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,598,711
App. No.
17/143,583
Granted
Mar 7, 2023
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for determining stress-dependent permeability includes providing a core sample in a pressurized core container of a testing apparatus and generating a steady-state flow of gas from an upstream reservoir in the testing apparatus along an axial direction through the pressurized core container into a downstream reservoir in the testing apparatus. During the steady-state flow, an inlet pressure at an inlet to the core sample, an outlet pressure at an outlet of the core sample, and a midpoint pressure at a midpoint of the core sample are measured. The stress-dependent permeability is calculated from a flow rate of the gas through the core sample and the measurements of the inlet pressure, the outlet pressure, and the midpoint pressure.

Claims (145)

1. A testing apparatus, comprising:

a core container containing a core sample comprising:

an inlet;

an outlet; and

a pressure sensor positioned at a midpoint of the core sample;

an upstream reservoir fluidly connected to the inlet of the core sample;

an upstream pump connected to the upstream reservoir;

a downstream reservoir fluidly connected to the outlet of the core sample;

a downstream pump connected to the downstream reservoir;

a confining pump connected to the core container;

at least one flow meter;

an inlet pressure sensor positioned proximate the inlet of the core sample; and

an outlet pressure sensor positioned proximate the outlet of the core sample.

2. The apparatus of claim 1 , further comprising a temperature sensor positioned proximate the inlet and the outlet of the core sample.

3. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the at least one flow meter is provided on at least one of the upstream pump and the downstream pump.

4. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein a temperature sensor and a pressure sensor is provided on each of the upstream pump, the downstream pump, and the confining pump.

5. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the at least one flow meter is positioned downstream of the outlet of the core sample.

6. A method for determining stress-dependent permeability, comprising:

providing a core sample in a pressurized core container of a testing apparatus;

generating a steady-state flow of gas from an upstream reservoir in the testing apparatus along an axial direction through the core sample into a downstream reservoir in the testing apparatus;

during the steady-state flow, measuring an inlet pressure at an inlet to the core container, an outlet pressure at an outlet of the core container, and a midpoint pressure at a midpoint of the core sample; and

calculating the stress-dependent permeability from a flow rate of the gas through the core sample and the measurements of the inlet pressure, the outlet pressure, and the midpoint pressure.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein providing the core sample in the pressurized core container comprises:

wrapping at least one sleeve around the core sample;

loading the sleeved core sample into a sample cell in the core container;

using a confining pump to introduce a confining fluid into the core container;

continuing to flow confining fluid through the sample cell after the sample cell containing the core sample is filled with confining fluid;

locking the confining fluid and the core sample in the filled sample cell; and

applying a confining pressure to the sample cell using the confining pump.

8. The method of claim 6 , wherein an upstream pump in the testing apparatus pumps the gas from the upstream reservoir into the inlet of the core sample and a downstream pump in the testing apparatus pumps the gas from the outlet of the core sample to the downstream reservoir.

9. The method of claim 6 , wherein the testing apparatus is in an oven at a constant temperature during generating the steady-state flow and measuring.

10. The method of claim 6 , further comprising using the stress-dependent permeability to predict a formation permeability of a formation under a formation pressure different from a confining pressure in the pressurized core container.

11. A method for determining stress-dependent permeability, comprising:

loading a core sample into a core container;

generating a steady-state flow of gas through the core sample under a confining pressure;

taking a plurality of measurements during the steady-state flow of gas through the core container, comprising:

measuring a flow rate through the core sample;

measuring an inlet pressure at an inlet to the core sample;

measuring an outlet pressure at an outlet of the core sample; and

measuring a midpoint pressure at a midpoint of the core sample; and

calculating the stress-dependent permeability from the measurements of the inlet flow rate, the inlet pressure, the outlet pressure, and the midpoint pressure.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein generating the steady-state flow of gas comprises:

using an upstream pump to pump gas from an upstream reservoir into the inlet of the core sample;

using a downstream pump to control the outlet pressure of the gas out of the outlet of the core sample into a downstream reservoir; and

wherein a relative difference between an inlet flow rate and an outlet flow rate is less than 1 percent.

13. The method of claim 12 , further comprising increasing the inlet pressure of the gas to an initial inlet pressure using the upstream pump.

14. The method of claim 13 , further comprising:

applying the confining pressure within the core container using a confining pump fluidly connected to the core container; and

increasing the confining pressure while increasing the inlet pressure to maintain a constant pressure differential between the inlet pressure at the inlet of the core sample and the confining pressure in the core container.

15. The method of claim 11 , wherein after generating the steady-state flow of gas, further comprising:

increasing the inlet pressure to a final inlet pressure, wherein the difference between the confining pressure and final inlet pressure is greater than a selected range of effective stress pressures of interest; and

maintaining the final inlet pressure while taking the plurality of measurements.

16. The method of claim 11 , further comprising determining a stress sensitivity parameter, a, using a stress sensitivity equation:

L

L

x

=

1

+

p

o

p

x

exp

[

α

(

p

-

p

o

)

]

ρ

d

p

μ

p

x

p

i

exp

[

α

(

p

-

p

o

)

]

ρ

d

p

μ

where p i is the inlet pressure, p x is the midpoint pressure, p o is the outlet pressure, ρ is a density of the gas, μ is a viscosity of the gas, L is a length of the core sample, and L x is a midpoint distance from the inlet to the midpoint.

17. The method of claim 16 , further comprising determining an outlet permeability, k o , of the core sample at the outlet pressure using an outlet permeability equation:

k

o

=

Q

L

A

p

o

p

i

exp

[

α

(

p

-

p

o

)

]

ρ

d

p

μ

where Q is the flow rate measured during the steady-state flow of gas, and A is a cross-sectional area of the core sample.

18. The method of claim 17 , further comprising calculating a permeability, k, of the core sample at the confining pressure, p, using a permeability equation:

k=k o exp[α( p−p o )].

19. The method of claim 18 , further comprising predicting a formation permeability k f of a formation under a formation pressure different from the confining pressure, using a formation permeability equation:

k f =k o exp[−α(σ−σ o )]

wherein σ is a formation effective stress, the formation effective stress being equal to the formation pressure minus a pore pressure of the formation; and

wherein σ o is an effective stress of the core sample proximate to the outlet, the effective stress being equal to the confining pressure minus the outlet pressure.

20. The method of claim 18 , further comprising inputting the permeability equation into a reservoir simulator to predict a hydrocarbon production from a reservoir, the reservoir simulator comprising at least one computer implemented software application with instructions to simulate the reservoir on a computer.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 18, 2023
From: SAUDI ARAMCO UPSTREAM TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY
To: SAUDI ARABIAN OIL COMPANY
Reel/Frame 065268/0033 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 17, 2023
From: ARAMCO SERVICES COMPANY
To: SAUDI ARAMCO UPSTREAM TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY
Reel/Frame 065255/0383 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 12, 2021
From: LIU, HUI-HAI; ZHANG, JILIN; DUNCAN, JEWEL
To: ARAMCO SERVICES COMPANY
Reel/Frame 054893/0670 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20220214262A1 · Jul 7, 2022
Cited By (1)
US 12,560,521