Situational awareness, vehicle control, and/or contingency planning for aircraft actuator failure

1. A method of aircraft operation, the method comprising:

autonomously flying an aircraft in a first flight mode;

while autonomously flying the aircraft in the first flight mode:

sampling a first dataset at a first sensor, the first dataset indicative of a condition associated with a flight control element of the aircraft, wherein the flight control element is a flight control surface and the condition comprises an actuation failure of the flight control surface that causes a directional bias during flight of the aircraft; and

sampling a second dataset at a second sensor different than the first sensor, the second dataset indicative of the actuation failure of the flight control surface;

based on the first and second datasets, determining a presence of the actuation failure of the flight control surface; and

in response to determining the presence of the actuation failure of the flight control surface, flying the aircraft in a modified mode, wherein flying the aircraft in the modified mode comprises:

sampling a set of flight data;

determining the directional bias caused by the actuation failure;

determining a modified flight plan based on the determined directional bias caused by the actuation failure; and

autonomously controlling the aircraft to fly based on the modified flight plan and the set of flight data.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

the condition further comprises failure of a powerplant of the aircraft;

the modified flight plan is associated with a glidepath to an emergency landing site; and

autonomously controlling the aircraft based on the modified flight plan comprises:

autonomously flying the aircraft substantially along the glidepath; and

autonomously landing the aircraft at the emergency landing site.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the aircraft does not contain and does not receive control inputs from a licensed pilot.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

the condition further comprises a propulsion failure of a powerplant of the aircraft;

the aircraft comprises a backup powerplant configured to propel the aircraft;

further comprising: determining that the aircraft is undergoing the propulsion failure;

further comprising: determining the aircraft is within an unsafe operation parameters region of a height-velocity curve, wherein the aircraft is not expected to be able to perform a safe deadstick landing; and

autonomously controlling the aircraft to fly based on the modified flight plan and the set of flight data comprises controlling the backup powerplant to alter operation parameters of the aircraft.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising, while autonomously controlling the aircraft to fly:

determining safety information associated with a region of airspace; and

based on the safety information, an aircraft location of the aircraft, and a destination of the aircraft, determining a safety corridor within the region, the safety corridor comprising the aircraft location;

wherein auxiliary guidance is associated with aircraft traversal within the safety corridor.

6. The method of claim 5 , further comprising determining a set of emergency landing zones, wherein the safety corridor is determined based further on the set of emergency landing zones, such that, for all space within the safety corridor, at least one emergency landing zone of the set of emergency landing zones is accessible to the aircraft via deadstick landing.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein autonomously controlling the aircraft to fly based on the modified flight plan and the set of flight data comprises:

selecting an emergency landing zone of the set of emergency landing zones; and

autonomously controlling the aircraft to land within the emergency landing zone.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein: the second sensor is a flight control surface position sensor associated with the flight control surface.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

the condition further comprises a vibration;

the first sensor is an audio sensor; and

the first dataset comprises audio data indicative of the vibration.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein:

the aircraft is a rotorcraft comprising a rotor; and

the vibration is associated with the rotor.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

determining the modified flight plan comprises determining an emergency landing location based on the directional bias; and

autonomously controlling the aircraft to fly based on the modified flight plan and the set of flight data comprises autonomously controlling the aircraft to land at the emergency landing location.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein:

the aircraft is a rotorcraft;

the condition further comprises failure of a propulsion mechanism of the aircraft; and

autonomously controlling the aircraft to land at the emergency landing location comprises autonomously controlling the aircraft to perform an autorotation maneuver.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

autonomously flying the aircraft in the first flight mode comprises autonomously flying the aircraft based on a flight plan associated with a planned destination;

determining the modified flight plan comprises determining a modified destination different than the planned destination; and

autonomously controlling the aircraft to fly based on the modified flight plan and the set of flight data comprises autonomously controlling the aircraft to land at the modified destination.

14. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining the presence of a powerplant failure; and

in response to determining the presence of the powerplant failure:

sampling a second set of flight data;

determining the aircraft is within an unsafe operational parameters region of a height-velocity curve;

determining that the aircraft is unable to perform a safe deadstick landing based on the aircraft being within the unsafe operational parameters region of the height-velocity curve;

determining a second modified flight plan including controlling a backup powerplant to alter operational parameters of the aircraft; and

autonomously controlling the aircraft to fly based on the second modified flight plan and the second set of flight data.

15. A non-transitory computer readable medium configured to store program code instructions, when executed by a set of one or more processors, cause the set of one or more processors to perform steps comprising:

autonomously flying an aircraft in a first flight mode;

while autonomously flying the aircraft in the first flight mode:

sampling a first dataset at a first sensor, the first dataset indicative of a condition associated with a flight control element of the aircraft, wherein the flight control element is a flight control surface and the condition comprises an actuation failure of the flight control surface that causes a directional bias during flight of the aircraft; and

sampling a second dataset at a second sensor different than the first sensor, the second dataset indicative of the actuation failure of the flight control surface;

based on the first and second datasets, determining a presence of the actuation failure of the flight control surface; and

in response to determining the presence of the actuation failure of the flight control surface, flying the aircraft in a modified mode, wherein flying the aircraft in the modified mode comprises:

sampling a set of flight data;

determining the directional bias caused by the actuation failure;

determining a modified flight plan based on the determined directional bias caused by the actuation failure; and

autonomously controlling the aircraft to fly based on the modified flight plan and the set of flight data.