IP Library Granted Patent US 11,960,046
Granted Patent B2
US 11,960,046 · App. 17/155,803 · Granted Apr 16, 2024

Method for determining in-situ maximum horizontal stress

Inventor: Yanhui Han (Houston, TX)
Assignee: SAUDI ARABIAN OIL COMPANY
G01V20/00E21B47/04E21B49/00G06F30/20E21B2200/20G06F2111/10
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,960,046
App. No.
17/155,803
Granted
Apr 16, 2024
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for obtaining a maximum horizontal stress at a depth of a geological formation, includes: setting an estimate S Hmax of the maximum horizontal stress; conducting an elastoplastic modeling simulation of the geological formation around a wellbore with the estimate S Hmax and obtaining a simulated value ϕ b,1 of a breakout angle, wherein the breakout angle is a half-width of a breakout region; and upon determining that the estimate ϕ b,1 is greater than or equal to a prescribed value and is different from a measured breakout angle ϕ b,m at the depth by more than a threshold value, repeatedly changing the estimate S Hmax and conducting the elastoplastic modeling simulation.

Claims (262)

1. A method for obtaining a maximum horizontal stress at a depth of a geological formation, comprising:

setting an estimate S Hmax of the maximum horizontal stress;

conducting an elastoplastic modeling simulation of the geological formation around a wellbore with the estimate S Hmax and obtaining a simulated value ϕ b,1 of a breakout angle, wherein the breakout angle is a half-width of a breakout region,

wherein conducting the elastoplastic modeling simulation comprises:

setting up a calculation region, wherein the calculation region has a boundary that corresponds to a wall of the wellbore;

setting a uniform stress condition for an entirety of the calculation region, wherein the uniform stress condition is represented by the estimate S Hmax , a minimum horizontal stress, and a pore pressure of the geological formation at the depth; and

repeatedly reducing a normal stress that acts perpendicular to the boundary at the boundary by an amount while the uniform stress condition far away from the boundary is maintained and a shear stress at the boundary is maintained to be zero and calculating stress conditions in the calculation region until the normal stress at the boundary is substantially equal to a wellbore pressure above the pore pressure, and

wherein the estimate S Hmax comprises calculating the estimate S Hmax as

S

Hmax

=

ucs

+

Δ

P

W

+

2

P

p

1

-

2

cos

2

θ

b

-

s

hmin

1

+

2

cos

2

θ

b

1

-

2

cos

2

θ

b

,

where

θ b is equal to 90°−ϕ b,m and obtained from a caliper log,

P p is the pore pressure of the geological formation at the depth,

ΔP w is a wellbore pressure P w at the depth above P p ,

S hmin is the minimum horizontal stress at the depth,

ucs is an unconfined compressive strength calculated as

ucs

=

2

c

cos

φ

1

-

sin

φ

,

c is a cohesion of the geological formation at the depth, and

φ is a friction angle of the geological formation at the depth; and

upon determining that the simulated value ϕ b,1 is greater than or equal to a prescribed value and is different from a measured breakout angle ϕ b,m at the depth by more than a threshold value, repeatedly changing the estimate S Hmax and conducting the elastoplastic modeling simulation.

2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the setting the estimate S Hmax comprises calculating the estimate S Hmax based on an elastic modeling simulation of the geological formation around the wellbore.

3. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the changing the estimate S Hmax comprises:

in response to ϕ b,m >ϕ b,1 , increasing the estimate S Hmax by a first prescribed amount; and

in response to ϕ b,m <ϕ b,1 , decreasing the estimate S Hmax by a second prescribed amount.

4. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising:

determining a safe mud weight window in a drilling of the wellbore based on the estimate S Hmax .

5. A system, comprising:

a logging system coupled to a plurality of logging tools; and

a formation breakout simulator comprising a computer processor, wherein the formation breakout simulator is coupled to the logging system, the formation breakout simulator comprising functionality for:

setting an estimate S Hmax of a maximum horizontal stress;

conducting an elastoplastic modeling simulation of a geological formation around a wellbore with the estimate S Hmax and obtaining a simulated value ϕ b,1 of a breakout angle, wherein the breakout angle is a half-width of a breakout region,

wherein conducting the elastoplastic modeling simulation comprises:

setting up a calculation region, wherein the calculation region has a boundary that corresponds to a wall of the wellbore;

setting a uniform stress condition for an entirety of the calculation region, wherein the uniform stress condition is represented by the estimate S Hmax , a minimum horizontal stress, and a pore pressure of the geological formation at the depth; and

repeatedly reducing a normal stress that acts perpendicular to the boundary at the boundary by an amount while the uniform stress condition far away from the boundary is maintained and a shear stress at the boundary is maintained to be zero and calculating stress conditions in the calculation region until the normal stress at the boundary is substantially equal to a wellbore pressure above the pore pressure, and

wherein the estimate S Hmax comprises calculating the estimate S Hmax as

s

Hmax

=

ucs

+

Δ

P

W

+

2

P

p

1

-

2

cos

2

θ

b

-

S

hmin

1

+

2

cos

2

θ

b

1

-

2

cos

2

θ

b

,

where

θ b is equal to 90°−ϕ b,m and obtained from a caliper log,

P p is the pore pressure of the geological formation at the depth,

ΔP w is a wellbore pressure P w at the depth above P p ,

S hmin is the minimum horizontal stress at the depth,

ucs is an unconfined compressive strength calculated as

ucs

=

2

c

cos

φ

1

-

sin

φ

,

c is a cohesion of the geological formation at the depth, and

φ is a friction angle of the geological formation at the depth; and

upon determining that the simulated value ϕ b,1 is greater than or equal to a prescribed value and is different from a measured breakout angle ϕ b,m at the depth by more than a threshold value, repeatedly changing the estimate S Hmax and conducting the elastoplastic modeling simulation.

6. The system according to claim 5 , wherein the setting the estimate S Hmax comprises calculating the estimate S Hmax based on an elastic modeling simulation of the geological formation around the wellbore.

7. The system according to claim 5 , wherein the changing the estimate S Hmax comprises:

in response to ϕ b,m >ϕ b,1 , increasing the estimate S Hmax by a first prescribed amount; and

in response to ϕ b,m <ϕ b,1 , decreasing the estimate S Hmax by a second prescribed amount.

8. The system according to claim 5 , wherein the formation breakout simulator further comprises functionality for:

determining a safe mud weight window in a drilling of the wellbore based on the estimate S Hmax .

9. A non-transitory computer readable medium storing instructions executable by a computer processor, the instructions comprising functionality for:

setting an estimate S Hmax of a maximum horizontal stress;

conducting an elastoplastic modeling simulation of a geological formation around a wellbore with the estimate S Hmax and obtaining a simulated value ϕ b,1 of a breakout angle,

wherein the breakout angle is a half-width of a breakout region,

wherein conducting the elastoplastic modeling simulation comprises:

setting up a calculation region, wherein the calculation region has a boundary that corresponds to a wall of the wellbore;

setting a uniform stress condition for an entirety of the calculation region, wherein the uniform stress condition is represented by the estimate S Hmax , a minimum horizontal stress, and a pore pressure of the geological formation at the depth; and

repeatedly reducing a normal stress that acts perpendicular to the boundary at the boundary by an amount while the uniform stress condition far away from the boundary is maintained and a shear stress at the boundary is maintained to be zero and calculating stress conditions in the calculation region until the normal stress at the boundary is substantially equal to a wellbore pressure above the pore pressure, and

wherein the estimate S Hmax comprises calculating the estimate S Hmax as

s

Hmax

=

ucs

+

Δ

P

W

+

2

P

p

1

-

2

cos

2

θ

b

-

s

hmin

1

+

2

cos

2

θ

b

1

-

2

cos

2

θ

b

,

where

θ b is equal to 90°−ϕ b,m and obtained from a caliper log,

P p is the pore pressure of the geological formation at the depth,

ΔP w is a wellbore pressure P w at the depth above P p ,

S hmin is the minimum horizontal stress at the depth,

ucs is an unconfined compressive strength calculated as

ucs

=

2

c

cos

φ

1

-

sin

φ

,

c is a cohesion of the geological formation at the depth, and

φ is a friction angle of the geological formation at the depth; and

upon determining that the simulated value ϕ b,1 is greater than or equal to a prescribed value and is different from a measured breakout angle ϕ b,m at the depth by more than a threshold value, repeatedly changing the estimate S Hmax and conducting the elastoplastic modeling simulation.

10. The non-transitory computer readable medium according to claim 9 , wherein the setting the estimate S Hmax comprises calculating the estimate S Hmax based on an elastic modeling simulation of the geological formation around the wellbore.

11. The non-transitory computer readable medium according to claim 9 , wherein the changing the estimate S Hmax comprises:

in response to ϕ b,m >ϕ b,1 , increasing the estimate S Hmax by a first prescribed amount; and

in response to ϕ b,m <ϕ b,1 , decreasing the estimate S Hmax by a second prescribed amount.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 18, 2023
From: SAUDI ARAMCO UPSTREAM TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY
To: SAUDI ARABIAN OIL COMPANY
Reel/Frame 065268/0033 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 17, 2023
From: ARAMCO SERVICES COMPANY
To: SAUDI ARAMCO UPSTREAM TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY
Reel/Frame 065255/0383 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 21, 2021
From: HAN, YANHUI
To: ARAMCO SERVICES COMPANY
Reel/Frame 056934/0078 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20220236446A1 · Jul 28, 2022