IP Library Granted Patent US 12,417,843
Granted Patent B2
US 12,417,843 · App. 17/164,491 · Granted Sep 16, 2025

Methods and systems for confirming an advisory interaction with an artificial intelligence platform

Inventor: Kenneth Neumann (Lakewood, CO)
Assignee: KPN INNOVATIONS LLC
G16H50/20G06N20/00G16H70/20
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,417,843
App. No.
17/164,491
Granted
Sep 16, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system for confirming an advisory interaction with an artificial intelligence platform. The system includes a constitutional generator module configured to receive a first advisory input, retrieve an expert input, select a machine-learning process as a function of the expert input, and generate a therapeutic corrector. The system includes a constitutional advisory module configured to display a therapeutic corrector on a graphical user interface and receive a second advisory input. The system includes a best practices module the best practices module designed and configured to retrieve from an expert database a best practices training set, calculate an optimal vector output, generate an optimal vector output containing an expected therapeutic corrector implementation response, authenticate a second advisory input, and update the best practices module.

Claims (85)

1. A system for confirming an advisory interaction with an artificial intelligence platform the system comprising:

a processor connected to a memory, wherein the processor is further configured to:

receive a first advisory input containing a constitutional inquiry and a user identifier from an advisor client device operated by an informed advisor;

retrieve an expert input from an expert database operating on the processor and located within a best practice module as a function of the first advisory input and the user identifier;

select a machine-learning process as a function of the expert input;

generate a therapeutic corrector utilizing the machine-learning process and the first advisory input wherein the therapeutic corrector further comprises a response to the constitutional inquiry, wherein the therapeutic corrector comprises a recommendation for lab tests a user should analyze as a function of symptom complaints;

analyze lab work of a user to determine a diagnosis for an illness;

display the therapeutic corrector on a graphical user interface located on the processor;

receive a second advisory input from the advisor client device, wherein the second advisory input contains a therapeutic corrector implementation response, and wherein the therapeutic implementation response contains a description of at least one result as a function of implementing the therapeutic corrector;

retrieve from the expert database located in the best practices module a best practices training set wherein the best practices training set correlates therapeutic correctors to therapeutic corrector implementation responses;

update the best practices module to incorporate the therapeutic corrector implementation response as a training set entry in the best practices training set;

obtain an adherence input from the advisor client device;

calculate an inference model as a function of the adherence input; and

update the expert database as a function of the inference model and therapeutic corrector.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein generating a therapeutic corrector further comprises:

receiving therapeutic training data from an expert database wherein the therapeutic training data includes a plurality of data entries containing constitutional inquiries correlated to therapeutic correctors; and

generating, using a supervised machine-learning algorithm, a therapeutic model that outputs a therapeutic corrector utilizing the therapeutic training data and the first advisory input containing the constitutional inquiry.

3. The system of claim 1 , wherein generating a therapeutic corrector further comprises:

receiving a plurality of unclassified data entries from an expert database; and

generating using an unsupervised machine-learning algorithm the therapeutic corrector utilizing the plurality of unclassified data entries and the advisory input containing the constitutional inquiry.

4. The system of claim 1 , wherein obtaining the adherence input further comprises:

determining a therapeutic effect as a function of the therapeutic corrector; and

obtaining the adherence input as a function of the therapeutic effect.

5. The system of claim 4 , wherein determining the therapeutic effect further comprises:

establishing a therapeutic enumeration;

distinguishing a therapeutic divergence; and

determining the therapeutic effect as a function of the therapeutic enumeration, the therapeutic divergence, and a therapeutic threshold.

6. The system of claim 1 , wherein calculating the inference model further comprises:

retrieving an adherence training set, wherein the adherence training set correlates a monitoring element to a therapeutic adjustment; and

calculating the inference model as a function of the adherence input and the adherence training set using an adherence machine-learning model, wherein the adherence machine-learning model is trained as a function of the adherence training set.

7. The system of claim 1 , wherein calculating the inference model further comprises:

generating a physiological progression parameter; and

calculating the inference model as a function of the physiological progression parameter.

8. The system of claim 7 , wherein generating the physiological progression parameter further comprises:

identifying a status of the therapeutic corrector;

determining functional checkpoints as a function of the therapeutic corrector; and

generating the physiological progression parameter as a function of the functional checkpoints.

9. The system of claim 1 , wherein updating the expert database further comprises:

generating a therapeutic framework; and

updating the expert database as a function of the therapeutic framework.

10. The system of claim 9 , wherein generating the therapeutic framework further comprises:

producing a cryptographic identifier as a function of the user identifier; and

generating the therapeutic framework as a function of the cryptographic identifier.

11. A method for confirming an advisory interaction with an artificial intelligence platform comprising:

receiving, by a processor, a first advisory input containing a constitutional inquiry and a user identifier from an advisor client device operated by an informed advisor;

retrieving, by the processor, an expert input from an expert database operating on the processor and located within a best practices module as a function of the first advisory input and the user identifier;

selecting, by the processor, a machine-learning process as a function of the expert input;

generating, by the processor, a therapeutic corrector utilizing the machine-learning process and the first advisory input wherein the therapeutic corrector further comprises a response to the constitutional inquiry, wherein the therapeutic corrector comprises a recommendation for lab tests a user should analyze as a function of symptom complaints;

analyzing lab work of a user to determine a diagnoses for an illness;

displaying, by the processor, the therapeutic corrector on a graphical user interface located on the processor;

receiving, by the processor, a second advisory input from the advisor client device, wherein the second advisory input contains a therapeutic corrector implementation response, and wherein the therapeutic implementation response contains a description of at least one result as a function of implementing the therapeutic corrector;

retrieve from the expert database located in the best practices module a best practices training set wherein the best practices training set correlates therapeutic correctors to therapeutic corrector implementation responses;

update the best practices module to incorporate the therapeutic corrector implementation response as a training set entry in the best practices training set;

obtaining, by the processor, an adherence input from the advisor client device;

calculating, by the processor, an inference model as a function of the adherence input; and

updating, by the processor, the expert database as a function of the inference model and therapeutic corrector.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein generating a therapeutic corrector further comprises:

receiving therapeutic training data from an expert database wherein the therapeutic training data includes a plurality of data entries containing constitutional inquiries correlated to therapeutic correctors; and

generating using a supervised machine-learning algorithm a therapeutic model that outputs a therapeutic corrector utilizing the therapeutic training data and the first advisory input containing the constitutional inquiry.

13. The method of claim 11 , wherein generating a therapeutic corrector further comprises:

receiving a plurality of unclassified data entries from an expert database; and

generating using an unsupervised machine-learning the therapeutic corrector utilizing the plurality of unclassified data entries and the advisory input containing the constitutional inquiry.

14. The method of claim 11 , wherein obtaining the adherence input further comprises:

determining a therapeutic effect as a function of the therapeutic corrector; and

obtaining the adherence input as a function of the therapeutic effect.

15. The method of claim 14 , wherein determining the therapeutic effect further comprises:

establishing a therapeutic enumeration;

distinguishing a therapeutic divergence; and

determining the therapeutic effect as a function of the therapeutic enumeration, the therapeutic divergence, and a therapeutic threshold.

16. The method of claim 11 , wherein calculating the inference model further comprises:

retrieving an adherence training set wherein the adherence training set correlates a monitoring element to a therapeutic adjustment; and

calculating the inference model as a function of the adherence input and the adherence training set using an adherence machine-learning model; wherein the adherence machine-learning model is trained as a function of the adherence training set.

17. The method of claim 11 , wherein calculating the inference model further comprises:

generating a physiological progression parameter; and

calculating the inference model as a function of the physiological progression parameter.

18. The method of claim 17 , wherein generating the physiological progression parameter further comprises:

identifying a status of the therapeutic corrector;

determining functional checkpoints as a function of the therapeutic corrector; and

generating the physiological progression parameter as a function of the functional checkpoints.

19. The method of claim 11 , wherein updating the expert database further comprises:

generating a therapeutic framework; and

updating the expert database as a function of the therapeutic framework.

20. The method of claim 19 , wherein generating the therapeutic framework further comprises:

producing a cryptographic identifier as a function of the user identifier; and

generating the therapeutic framework as a function of the cryptographic identifier.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 9, 2024
From: NEUMANN, KENNETH
To: KPN INNOVATIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 068233/0150 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 3, 2021
From: NEUMANN, KENNETH
To: KPN INNOVATIONS, LLC.
Reel/Frame 055482/0883 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation In Part 17032050 · Sep 25, 2020
Continuation In Part 16671925 · Nov 1, 2019
Related Publication 20210183515A1 · Jun 17, 2021
References Cited (14)
US 9460400B2 · De Bruin et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 10332624B2 · Berdia · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20140279746A1 · De Bruin · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150120319A1 · Wilson · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20170124269A1 · McNair et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170277841A1 · Shankar · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180137941A1 · Chen · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180342323A1 · Shankar et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190043610A1 · Vaughan · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190295719A1 · Logan et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019155267 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
Yin, Hongxu, and Niraj K. Jha. “A health decision support system for disease diagnosis based on wearable medical sensors and machine learning ensembles.” IEEE Transactions on Multi-Scale Computing Systems 3.4 (2017): 22… [cited by examiner]
Jiang, Fei, et al. “Artificial intelligence in healthcare: past, present and future.” Stroke and vascular neurology 2.4 (2017): 230-243. Retrieved on Oct. 14, 2019 from https://svn.bmj.com/content/svnbmj/2/4/230.full.pd… [cited by applicant]
Diprose, William, and Nicholas Buist. “Artificial intelligence in medicine: humans need not apply?.” The New Zealand Medical Journal (Online) 129.1434 (2016): 73. Retrieved on Oct. 14, 2019 from https://www.researchgate… [cited by applicant]