IP Library Granted Patent US 12,290,652
Granted Patent B2
US 12,290,652 · App. 17/173,694 · Granted May 6, 2025

Treating tumors using TTFields combined with a PARP inhibitor

Inventors: Michael Story (Austin, TX); Debabrata Saha (Carrollton, TX); Narasimha Kumar Karanam (Dallas, TX)
Assignee: Novocure GmbH
A61M37/00A61K31/502A61N5/10A61P35/00A61M2037/0007A61M2205/051
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,290,652
App. No.
17/173,694
Granted
May 6, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Tumor-Treating Fields elicit a conditional vulnerability to PARP inhibitors (e.g., Olaparib) in certain cancer cells such as non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines. This conditional vulnerability is exploited in a method of killing cancer cells that comprises delivering a PARP inhibitor to the cancer cells and applying an alternating 80-300 kHz electric field to the cancer cells. At least a portion of the applying step is performed simultaneously with at least a portion of the delivering step. In some embodiments, an additional step of treating the cancer cells with a radiation therapy is added to the method. In some embodiments, the frequency of the alternating electric field is between 100 and 200 kHz.

Claims (25)

1. A method of killing cancer cells selected from the group consisting of pancreatic cancer cells and ovarian cancer cells, comprising:

delivering a PARP inhibitor to the cancer cells; and

applying an alternating electric field to the cancer cells, the alternating electric field having a frequency between 80 and 300 kHz, wherein at least a portion of the applying step is performed simultaneously with at least a portion of the delivering step.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the PARP inhibitor comprises olaparib, rucaparib, or niraparib.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the PARP inhibitor comprises olaparib.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the applying step has a duration of at least 72 hours.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the frequency of the alternating electric field is between 100 and 200 kHz.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the alternating electric field has a field strength of at least 1 V/cm in at least some of the cancer cells.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the applying step has a duration of at least 72 hours and wherein the frequency of the alternating electric field is between 100 and 200 kHz.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the concentration of the PARP inhibitor is from about 10 to about 50 μM.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the cancer cells comprise pancreatic cancer cells.

10. A method of killing cancer cells selected from the group consisting of pancreatic cancer cells and ovarian cancer cells, comprising:

delivering a PARP inhibitor to the cancer cells;

applying an alternating electric field to the cancer cells, the alternating electric field having a frequency between 80 and 300 kHz, wherein at least a portion of the applying step is performed simultaneously with at least a portion of the delivering step; and

treating the cancer cells with a radiation therapy.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the PARP inhibitor comprises olaparib, rucaparib, or niraparib.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the PARP inhibitor comprises olaparib.

13. The method of claim 10 , further comprising repeating the delivering, applying, and treating steps at least five times.

14. The method of claim 13 , wherein each repetition of the treating step comprises delivering at least 2 Gy of radiation to a target area.

15. The method of claim 13 , wherein each repetition of the treating step comprises delivering at least 4 Gy of radiation to a target area.

16. The method of claim 13 , wherein the frequency of the alternating electric field is between 100 and 200 kHz.

17. The method of claim 13 , wherein the treating step is performed immediately after the applying step in each repetition.

18. The method of claim 13 , wherein the applying step is performed immediately after the treating step in each repetition.

19. The method of claim 10 , wherein the concentration of the PARP inhibitor is from about 10 to about 50 μM.

20. The method of claim 10 , wherein the cancer cells comprise pancreatic cancer cells.

Assignments (2)
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded May 4, 2024
From: NOVOCURE GMBH (SWITZERLAND)
To: BIOPHARMA CREDIT PLC
Reel/Frame 067315/0399 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 12, 2022
From: STORY, MICHAEL; SAHA, DEBABRATA; KARANAM, NARASIMHA
To: BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM
Reel/Frame 059989/0035 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 15938088 · Mar 28, 2018
Related Publication 20210268247A1 · Sep 2, 2021
References Cited (98)
US 6868289B2 · Palti · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7016725B2 · Palti · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7089054B2 · Palti · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7136699B2 · Palti · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7146210B2 · Palti · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7333852B2 · Palti · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7467011B2 · Palti · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7519420B2 · Palti · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7565205B2 · Palti · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7565206B2 · Palti · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7599745B2 · Palti · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 7599746B2 · Palti · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7706890B2 · Palti · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7715921B2 · Palti · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7732491B2 · Sherman · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 7805201B2 · Palti · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7890183B2 · Palti et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7912540B2 · Palti · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7917227B2 · Palti · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8019414B2 · Palti · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8027738B2 · Palti · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8170684B2 · Palti · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8175698B2 · Palti et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8229555B2 · Palti · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US RE43618E · Palti · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8244345B2 · Palti · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8406870B2 · Palti · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8447395B2 · Palti et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8447396B2 · Palti et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8465533B2 · Palti · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8706261B2 · Palti · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8715203B2 · Palti · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8718756B2 · Palti · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8764675B2 · Palti · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9023090B2 · Palti · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9023091B2 · Palti · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9039674B2 · Palti et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9056203B2 · Palti et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9440068B2 · Palti et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9655669B2 · Palti et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9750934B2 · Palti et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10188851B2 · Wenger et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20120035244A1 · Chinnaiyan · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20140186468A1 · Gonzalo · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150198597A1 · Vens · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160000796A1 · Takaori · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170093277A1 · Wasserman et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170215939A1 · Palti et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170281934A1 · Giladi et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180001075A1 · Kirson et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180001078A1 · Kirson et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180008708A1 · Giladi et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180050200A1 · Wasserman et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180160933A1 · Urman et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180202991A1 · Giladi et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
Kim EH, Kim YJ, Song HS, Jeong YK, Lee JY, Sung J, Yoo SH, Yoon M. Biological effect of an alternating electric field on cell proliferation and synergistic antimitotic effect in combination with ionizing radiation. Aug.… [cited by examiner]
Kirson ED, Schneiderman RS, Dbaly V, Tovarys F, Vymazal J, Itzhaki A, Mordechovich D, Gurvich Z, Shmueli E, Goldsher D, Wasserman Y, Palti Y. Chemotherapeutic treatment efficacy and sensitivity are increased by adjuvant… [cited by examiner]
Vishveswaran Jothi, Vishak Raman, Rajnish Sharma, Ignacio Camarillo, and Raji Sundararajan. “Electroporation-based enhanced anti-cancer effect of Veliparib on triple negative breast cancer cells.” Proceedings 2016 Elect… [cited by examiner]
Evans T and Matulonis U. PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancer: evidence, experience and clinical potential. 2017. The Adv Med Oncol vol. 9(4) 253-267. (Year: 2017). [cited by examiner]
Cavanagh et al., “The role of BRCA1 and BRACA2 mutations in prostate, pancreatic and stomach cancers,” Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice, vol. 13, No. 16, 2015. [cited by applicant]
Cescutti et al., “TopBP1 functions with 53BP1 in the G1 DNA damage checkpoint,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 29, pp. 3723-3732, 2010. [cited by applicant]
Chan et al., “Replication stress induces sister-chromatid bridging at fragile site loci in mitosis,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 11, No. 6, pp. 753-775, May 2009. [cited by applicant]
Das et al., “Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers with Kinase Domain Mutations in the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor are Sensitive to Ionizing Radiation,” Cancer Res., vol. 66, No. 19, pp. 9601-9608, Oct. 2006. [cited by applicant]
Davies et al., “Tumor treating fields: a new frontier in cancer therapy,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1291, pp. 86-95, 2013. [cited by applicant]
Ding et al., “Enhanced identification and biological validation of differential gene expression via Illumina whole-genome expression arrays through the use of the model-based background correction methodology,” Nucleic … [cited by applicant]
Foucquier et al., “Analysis of drug combinations: current methodological landscape,” Pharmacology Research & Perspectives, vol. 3, Issue 3, p. e00149, 2015. [cited by applicant]
Geary et al., “Understanding synergy,” Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab., vol. 304, pp. E237-E253, Dec. 2012. [cited by applicant]
Gera et al., “Tumor Treating Fields Perturb the Localization of Septins and Cause Aberrant Mitotic Exit,” Plos One, DOI:10.371, May 2015. [cited by applicant]
Giladi et al., “Alternating Electric Fields (Tumor-Treating Fields Therapy) Can Improve Chemotherapy Treatment Efficacy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Both In Vitro and In Vivo,” Seminars in Oncology, vol. 41, No. 5, Sup… [cited by applicant]
Giladi et al., “Mitotic disruption and reduced clonogenicity of pancreatic cancer cells in vitro and in vivo by tumor treating fields,” Pancreatology, vol. 14, pp. 54-63, 2014. [cited by applicant]
Giladi et al., “Mitotic Spindle Disruption by Alternating Electric Fields Leads to Improper Chromosome Segregation and Mitotic Catastrophe in Cancer Cells,” Scientific Reports, vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 1-16, Dec. 2015. [cited by applicant]
Gonzalez et al., “Harnessing dielectric forces for separations of cells, fine particles and macromolecules,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 1079, pp. 59-68, Apr. 2005. [cited by applicant]
Huyen et al., “Methylated lysine 79 of histone H3 targets 53BP1 to DNA double-strand breaks,” Nature, vol. 432, pp. 106-411, Nov. 2004. [cited by applicant]
Inui et al., “Case Report: A Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patient Treated with GcMAF, Sonodynamic Therapy and Tumor Treating Fields,” Anticancer Research, vol. 36, pp. 3767-3770, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Kaelin, “The Concept of Synthetic Lethality in the Context of Anticancer Therapy,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 5, pp. 689-698, Sep. 2005. [cited by applicant]
Kan et al., “BRCA1 Mutation: A Predictive Marker for Radiation Therapy?,” Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., vol. 93, No. 2, pp. 281-293, Oct. 2015. [cited by applicant]
Kim et al., “Bilogical effect of an alternating electric field on cell proliferation and synergistic antimitotic effect in combination with ionizing radiation,” Oncotarget, vol. 7, No. 38, pp. 62267-62279, Aug. 2016. [cited by applicant]
Kirson et al, “Alternating electric fields (TTFields) inhibit metastatic spread of solid tumors to the lungs,” Clin. Exp. Metastasis, vol. 26, pp. 633-640, Apr. 2009. [cited by applicant]
Kirson et al., “Alternating electric fields arrest cell proliferation in animal tumor models and human brain tumors,” PNAS, vol. 104, No. 24, pp. 10152-10157, Jun. 2007. [cited by applicant]
Kirson et al., “Chemotherapeutic treatment efficacy and sensitivity are increased by adjuvant alternating electric fields (TTFields),” BMC Medical Physics, vol. 9, No. 1, Jan. 2009. [cited by applicant]
Kirson et al., “Disruption of Cancer Cell Replication by Alternating Electric Fields,” Cancer Research, vol. 64, pp. 3288-3295, May 2004. [cited by applicant]
Lehar et al., “Chemical combination effects predict connectivity in biological systems,” Molecular Systems Biology, vol. 3, No. 80, 2007. [cited by applicant]
McPherson et al., “A role for Brca1 in chromosome end maintenance,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 15, No. 6, pp. 831-838, Jan. 2006. [cited by applicant]
Patel et al., “Involvement of Brca2 in DNA Repair,” Molecular Cell, vol. 1, pp. 347-357, Feb. 1998. [cited by applicant]
Phillips et al., “Epidermal Growth Factor and Hypoxia-induced Expression of CXC Chemokine Receptor 4 on Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Cells is Regulated by the Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/PTEN/AKT/Mammalian Target of Rap… [cited by applicant]
Roy et al., “BRCA1 and BRCA2: different roles in a common pathway of genome protection,” Nat. Rev. Cancer, vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 68-78, Aug. 2016. [cited by applicant]
Schneiderman et al., “TTFields alone and in combination with chemotherapeutic agents effectively reduce the viablity of MDR cell sub-lines that over-express ABC transporters,” BMC Cancer, vol. 10, No. 229, 2010. [cited by applicant]
Schultz et al., “p53 Binding Protein 1 (53BP1) is an Early Participant in the Cellular Response to DNA Double-Strand Breaks,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 151, pp. 1381-13890, 2000. [cited by applicant]
Sichc et al., :“Telomeres and Telomerase in the Radiation Response: Implications for Instability, Reprograming, and Carcinogenesis,” Frontiers in Oncology, vol. 5, Article 257, Nov. 2015. [cited by applicant]
Sirbu et al., “Analysis of protein dynamics at active, stalled, and collapsed replication forks,” Genes & Development, vol. 25, pp. 1320-1327, 2011. [cited by applicant]
Stupp et al., “Maintenance Therapy With Tumor-Treating Fields Plus Temozolomide vs. Temozolomide Alone for Glioblastoma—A Randomized Clinical Trial,” JAMA, vol. 314, No. 23, pp. 2535-2543, Dec. 2015. [cited by applicant]
Su et al., “Replication stress induced site-specific phosphorylation targets WRN to the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway,” Oncotarget, vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 46-65, Dec. 2015. [cited by applicant]
Turner et al., “Hallmarks of ‘BRCAness’ in sporadic cancers,” Nature Reviews, vol. 4, pp. 1-6, Oct. 2004. [cited by applicant]
Venere et al., “Phosphorylation of ATR-Interacting Protein on Ser239 Mediates and Interaction with Breast-Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility 1 and Checkpoint Function,” Cancer Res., vol. 67, No. 13, pp. 6100-6105, Jul. 2007. [cited by applicant]
Voloshin et al., “Alternating electric fields (TTFields) in combination with paclitaxel are therapeutically effective against ovarian cancer cells in vitro and in vivo,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 139, pp. 28… [cited by applicant]
Vymazal et al., “Response Patterns of Recurrent Glioblastomas Treated with Tumor-Treating Fields,” Seminars in Oncology, vol. 41, No. 5, pp. S14-S24, Oct. 2014. [cited by applicant]
Wong et al., “Response assessment of NovoTTF-100A versus best physician's choice chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma,” Cancer Medicine, vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 592-602, 2014. [cited by applicant]
Berckmans et al., “Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) induce homologous recombination deficiency in ovarian cancer cells, thus mitigating drug resistance,” Frontiers in Oncology, vol. 14, p. 1402851, Jun. 2024. [cited by applicant]