IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,241,130
Granted Patent B2
US 12,241,130 · App. 17/193,597 · Granted Mar 4, 2025

Detection of infectious agents from environmental air dust

Inventors: Kenneth S. Henderson (Wilmington, MA); John M. Coiro (Princeton, NJ); Brian M. Bilecki (Medford, NJ); Thomas P. Schupsky (Cream Ridge, NJ)
Assignee: CHARLES RIVER LABORATORIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
C12Q1/6888A01K1/031C12Q1/6806C12Q1/689C12Q1/6893G01N1/2205G01N1/2247G01N1/2273
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,241,130
App. No.
17/193,597
Granted
Mar 4, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Embodiments of the present disclosure are directed to systems and methods for collection and analysis of environmental air dust (EAD) within an individually ventilated cage rack (IVR) environment for detecting pathogens. The method includes collection of an EAD sample by a collection media, isolation of a plurality of nucleic acids (e.g., RNA and/or DNA) representative of one or more infectious agents from the EAD sample, optional reverse transcription of RNA to cDNA if the isolated nucleic acids contain RNA, amplification of the cDNA and/or DNA (e.g., by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)), and assay interpretation. Optionally, the EAD sample may be analyzed with one or more other sample types (e.g., fecal pellets, oral swabs, body swabs, tissue, etc.) to improve detection of low-copy organisms.

Claims (37)

1. A system for providing a test sample comprising environmental air dust captured from an airflow path within an individually vented cage rack (IVR) comprising: at least one enclosure in the IVR configured for housing one or more non-sentinel animals; an actuation device in direct contact with or within the at least one enclosure for agitating the at least one enclosure and/or soiled bedding therein for releasing the environmental air dust therefrom; an IVR air supply in fluid communication with a source of sterile air; an IVR vacuum source; an IVR air intake in fluid communication with the IVP air supply; an IVP air return in fluid communication with the IVP vacuum source; wherein the airflow path flows intermediate the IVP air intake and the IVP air return and passing through the at least one enclosure; and at least one collection media disposed within the at least one enclosure for capturing the from the airflow path as the test sample, wherein the at least one collection media impinges at least a portion of the airflow path, and wherein the at least one collection media is positioned to capture EAD while not substantially interfering with airflow through the at least one enclosure.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one collection media is removable from the IVR.

3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one collection media is a graded filter.

4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one collection media comprises a filter selected from the group consisting of a mechanical filter, a chemical filter, a wet scrubber, and an electrostatic filter.

5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the actuation device is configured to move the at least one enclosure at least one of horizontally, vertically and rotationally.

6. The system of claim 5 , wherein the actuation device is configured to reversibly move the at least one enclosure at least one of horizontally, vertically and rotationally.

7. The system of claim 1 , wherein the actuation device is an ultrasonic device.

8. The system of claim 1 , wherein the test sample comprises environmental air dust captured from the airflow path over a time period of at least two weeks.

9. The system of claim 1 , wherein the IVR further comprises at least one cage for housing a test animal.

10. The system of claim 9 , wherein the test sample further comprises at least one of fecal pellets obtained from the test animal, biological material obtained from an oral swab of the test animal, biological material obtained from a body swab of the test animal, and tissue from the test animal.

11. The system of claim 10 , wherein the one or more pathogens is selected from the group consisting of: Staphylococcus spp., Pasteurella spp., Proteus spp., Klebsiella spp., Giardia spp., Cryptosporidium spp., Entamoeba spp., Spironucleus spp., Murine norovirus, Pseudomonas spp., and beta-hemolytic Streptococcus spp.

12. The system of claim 9 , wherein the enclosure comprises at least one cage, and the at least one collection media is at least one of disposed on an interior wall of the at least one cage and suspended within the at least one cage.

13. The system of claim 9 , wherein the at least one collection media is at least one of disposed on a wall of the at least one enclosure and suspended within the at least one enclosure-outside the at least one cage.

14. The system of claim 13 , wherein the enclosure comprises at least one cage, and the at least one collection media is at least one of on top of the at least one cage, adjacent to the at least one cage, and on an exterior side wall of the at least one cage.

15. The system of claim 1 , wherein the IVR does not comprise a cage housing a sentinel animal.

16. The system of claim 1 , wherein the IVR further comprises an exhaust plenum in the airflow path intermediate the IVR air intake and the IVR air return and wherein a second collection media is disposed within the exhaust plenum for capturing the environmental air dust from the airflow path.

17. The system of claim 16 , wherein a surface of the second collection media is oriented at an acute angle with respect to the airflow path within the exhaust plenum.

18. The system of claim 17 , wherein the angle of the second collection media during capture of the test sample is selected within the range from 15° to 25° with respect to the direction of the airflow path within the exhaust plenum.

19. The system of claim 1 , wherein pressure within the at least one enclosure varies by less than or equal to +10% due to reduced airflow caused by the second collection media in the IVR airflow path as compared to the pressure within the at least one enclosure absent the EAD collection media.

20. A system for providing a test sample comprising environmental air dust (EAD) captured from an individually vented cage rack (IVR) airflow path within an IVR comprising: an IVR air supply in fluid communication with a source of sterile air; an IVR vacuum source; at least one enclosure in the IVR comprising; an animal cage for housing one or more non-sentinel animals, each of the at least one enclosure comprising a cape-level air intake in fluid communication with the IVR air supply and a cage-level air return in fluid communication with the IVR vacuum source; an actuation device in direct contact with or within the at least one enclosure for agitating the at least one enclosure and/or soiled bedding within the animal cage for releasing the environmental air dust therefrom; at least one cage-level airflow path through the at least one enclosure in the IVR, the cage-level airflow path being intermediate the cage-level air intake and the cage-level air return; and at least one collection media disposed within the IVR for capturing the EAD from the cage-level airflow path as the test sample, wherein the at least one collection media impinges at least a portion of the cage-level airflow path, and wherein the at least one collection media is positioned to capture EAD while not substantially interfering with airflow through the IVR, and wherein the IVR airflow path comprises the cage-level airflow path.

21. The system of claim 20 , wherein the at least one collection media is removable from the IVR.

22. The system of claim 20 , wherein the at least one collection media is a graded filter.

23. The system of claim 20 , wherein the at least one collection media comprises a filter selected from the group consisting of a mechanical filter, a chemical filter, a wet scrubber, and an electrostatic filter.

24. The system of claim 20 , wherein the actuation device is configured to move the at least one enclosure at least one of horizontally, vertically and rotationally.

25. The system of claim 24 , wherein the actuation device is configured to reversibly move the at least one enclosure at least one of horizontally, vertically and rotationally.

26. The system of claim 20 , wherein the actuation device is an ultrasonic device.

27. The system of claim 20 , wherein the test sample comprises environmental air dust captured from the cage-level airflow path over a time period of at least two weeks.

28. The system of claim 20 , wherein the animal cage comprises a test animal, and the test sample further comprises at least one of fecal pellets obtained from the test animal, biological material obtained from an oral swab of the test animal, biological material obtained from a body swab of the test animal, and tissue from the test animal.

29. The system of claim 28 , wherein the one or more pathogens is selected from the group consisting of: Staphylococcus spp., Pasteurella spp., Proteus spp., Klebsiella spp., Giardia spp., Cryptosporidium spp., Entamoeba spp., Spironucleus spp., Murine norovirus, Pseudomonas spp., and beta-hemolytic Streptococcus spp.

30. The system of claim 20 , wherein the at least one collection media is at least one of disposed on an interior wall of the cage and suspended within the cage.

31. The system of claim 20 , wherein the at least one collection media is disposed outside the cage.

32. The system of claim 20 , wherein the at least one collection media is at least one of on top of the cage, adjacent to the cage, on an exterior side wall of the cage, on a wall of the at least one enclosure, and suspended within the at least one enclosure.

33. The system of claim 20 , wherein the IVR does not comprise a cage housing a sentinel animal.

34. The system of claim 20 , wherein the IVR further comprises an exhaust plenum in the IVR airflow path after the at least one enclosure and wherein [the] a second collection media is disposed within the exhaust plenum for capturing the environmental air dust from the IVR airflow path.

35. The system of claim 34 , wherein a surface of the second collection media is oriented at an acute angle with respect to the IVR airflow path within the exhaust plenum.

36. The system of claim 35 , wherein the angle of the second collection media during capture of the test sample is selected within the range from 15° to 25° with respect to the direction of the IVR airflow path within the exhaust plenum.

37. The system of claim 20 , wherein pressure within the at least one enclosure varies by less than or equal to +10% due to reduced airflow caused by the second collection media in the IVR airflow path as compared to the pressure within the at least one enclosure absent the EAD collection media.

Assignments (4)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 13, 2024
From: CHARLES RIVER LABORATORIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 069582/0600 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 9, 2022
From: BILECKI, BRIAN M.; COIRO, JOHN M.; SCHUPSKY, THOMAS P.
To: CHARLES RIVER LABORATORIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Reel/Frame 059209/0388 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 9, 2022
From: HENDERSON, KENNETH S.
To: CHARLES RIVER LABORATORIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Reel/Frame 059209/0640 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 21, 2021
From: CHARLES RIVER LABORATORIES, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 055994/0202 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 15170660 · Jun 1, 2016
Provisional Application 62280057 · Jan 18, 2016
Provisional Application 62169438 · Jun 1, 2015
Related Publication 20210189510A1 · Jun 24, 2021
References Cited (52)
US 4343261A · Thomas · 1982 [cited by examiner]
US 5749321A · Ikuse · 1998 [cited by examiner]
US 5778822A · Giffin · 1998 [cited by examiner]
US 5996535A · Semenuk · 1999 [cited by examiner]
US 6156089A · Stemmer et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6257171B1 · Rivard · 2001 [cited by examiner]
US 6394033B1 · Trogstam · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 6571738B2 · Rivard · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6782845B1 · Schmidt · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 6932850B1 · Welch et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 8211951B2 · Lloyd et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8936176B2 · Roe · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20030192485A1 · Opfel · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20030192816A1 · Opfel · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20090095697A1 · Gabriel · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20110005465A1 · Tamborini · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110041773A1 · Brielmeier et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120045752A1 · Ensor et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130068098A1 · Haslam · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130157870A1 · Pushkarev et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140165832A1 · Antoun · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150004679A1 · Conger · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150209708A1 · Ordakowski · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160348186A1 · Henderson · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170254827A1 · Walker · 2017 [cited by examiner]
CN 104056492A · 2014 [cited by applicant]
CN 104689654A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2005017181A2 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2007083147A2 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014018265A2 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
Brena Mauck, Cholinesterase inhibitors and stress: Effects on brain muscarinic receptor density in mice, NeuroToxicology, vol. 31, Issue 5, 2010,(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161813X1000121X) Jun.… [cited by examiner]
Abstracts of Scientific Presentations, 2016 AALAS National Meeting, Charlotte, North Carolina, Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science, 55(5):606-710, retrieved on Jun. 18, 2019 from https://ww… [cited by applicant]
Burton et al., “Physical Collection Efficiency of Filter Materials for Bacteria and Viruses”, [cited by applicant]
Compton et al., “Efficacy of Three Microbiological Monitoring Methods in a Ventilated Cage Rack”, [cited by applicant]
Compton et al., “Effect of Cage-Wash Temperature on the Removal of Infectious Agents from Caging and the Detection of Infectious Agents on the Filters of Animal Bedding-Disposal Cabinets”, [cited by applicant]
European Office Action issued for European Patent Application No. 16730597.8, dated Dec. 18, 2018 (4 pages). [cited by applicant]
Henderson et al., “Efficacy of Direct Detection of Pathogens in Naturally Infected Mice by Using a High-Density PCR Array”, [cited by applicant]
Henderson et al., “Environmental Monitoring for the Presence of Rodent Parvoviruses on Room Air Intake Filters via the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)”, [cited by applicant]
Henderson et al., “Environmental Monitoring for the Presence of Rodent Parvoviruses on Room Air Intake Filters via the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR),” Contemporary Topics by the American Association for Laboratory Ani… [cited by applicant]
Henderson et al., “A Guide to Integrating PCR Rodent Infectious Agent (PRIA) Panels in Rodent Quality Control Programs”, Charles River Laboratories International Inc., 2013. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report with Written Opinion corresponding to International Patent Application No. PCT/US2016/035311, mailed Aug. 30, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Jensen, “PCR Testing of a Ventilated Caging System to Detect Murine Fur Mites”, [cited by applicant]
Jurinke et al., “MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry”, [cited by applicant]
Mackay, “Real-time PCR in the microbiology laboratory”, [cited by applicant]
Mailhiot et al., “Comparing Mouse Health Monitoring Between Soiled-bedding Sentinel and Exhaust Air Dust Surveillance Programs”, [cited by applicant]
Nakao et al., “Mitochondrial genetic code in cestodes”, [cited by applicant]
Oyanagi et al., “Detection of MHV-RNAs in Mouse Intestines and in Filter Dust in Mouse Room Ventilation Duct by a Modified RT-Nested PCR”, [cited by applicant]
Phaneuf et al., “Validation of Exhaust Air Dust Testing Using a Prototype Plenum Attachment and Interceptor in an IVC System with Centralized Ventilation”, The Center for Phenogenomics Poster (2017). [cited by applicant]
Di Pinto et al., “A comparison of DNA extraction methods for food analysis”, Food Control 18(1):76-80 (2007). [cited by applicant]
Monts De Oca et al., “Evaluation of Exhaust Air Dust PCR Testing of the Bedding Sentinel Cage Filter”, Charles River, Research Models, Houston, TX, Animal Care Operations, University of Houston, TX Poster, No Date. [cited by applicant]
National Research Counsel, “Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals”, Eighth Edition, Washington D.C., National Academic Press (2011). [cited by applicant]
Lab Products, Inc., “AllerZone,” Web Page, accessed through WayBack Machine. https://labproductsinc.com/product/allerzone/ (Year: 2014). [cited by applicant]