Infrastructure base model API
Embodiments of apparatus, systems, and methods are described for creating and managing an abstract, API-based infrastructure base model. The API-based model can abstract infrastructure assets, such as infrastructure components or connections between components, into a metadata model using standardized syntax and interfaces, for defining and building an infrastructure. Using a modeling document, connections and components of an infrastructure can be abstracted into an API-based model having semantics that covers them all. Connections and infrastructure components can be made available for selection, arrangement, and grouping to build complex infrastructure models without requiring complex API coding by the user. Other infrastructure models having different API definitions can be by abstracted to standardize the assets for building new APIs. The APIs can be further modified and exported to another or the same implementation project.
1. A method, comprising:
displaying, by one or more processors, a graphical user interface that allows a user to define an infrastructure base model that represents an infrastructure comprising components and connections between the components;
querying, by the one or more processors, a metadata graph to determine infrastructure assets available for selection in the graphical user interface, wherein the metadata graph provides an aggregate infrastructure definition of a first infrastructure-as-code solution and a second infrastructure-as-code solution, and wherein the aggregate infrastructure definition enables a migration of the infrastructure base model between a first implementation project that provisions the infrastructure using the first infrastructure-as-code solution and a second implementation project that provisions the infrastructure using the second infrastructure-as-code solution;
receiving, by the one or more processors, a selected available asset from the infrastructure assets available for selection and a command that connects the selected available asset with a selected component in the components; and
creating, by the one or more processors, a selectable connection between the selected component and the selected available asset in the infrastructure base model, wherein parameters of the selectable connection are modifiable in the graphical user interface.
2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: translating, by the one or more processors, the first implementation project to the second infrastructure-as-code solution.
3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the infrastructure assets available for selection are displayed in a menu of categories.
4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the graphical user interface further provides an infrastructure template representing a complex infrastructure pattern for importing as the infrastructure base model.
5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the graphical user interface further provides a summary report of infrastructure requirements for the infrastructure template.
6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the connections between the components invoke system application programming interfaces.
7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
providing a validation application in the graphical user interface that determines whether the infrastructure base model is invalid due to errors in a schema or semantics.
8. A system, comprising:
a memory; and
at least one processor coupled to the memory and configured to:
display a graphical user interface that allows a user to define an infrastructure base model that represents an infrastructure comprising components and connections between the components;
query a metadata graph to determine infrastructure assets available for selection in the graphical user interface, wherein the metadata graph provides an aggregate infrastructure definition of a first infrastructure-as-code solution and a second infrastructure-as-code solution, and wherein the aggregate infrastructure definition enables a migration of the infrastructure base model between a first implementation project that provisions the infrastructure using the first infrastructure-as-code solution and a second implementation project that provisions the infrastructure using the second infrastructure-as-code solution;
receive a selected available asset from the infrastructure assets available for selection and a command that connects the selected available asset with a selected component in the components; and
create a selectable connection between the selected component and the selected available asset in the infrastructure base model, wherein parameters of the selectable connection are modifiable in the graphical user interface.
9. The system of claim 8 , the at least one processor further configured to:
translate the first implementation project to the second infrastructure-as-code solution.
10. The system of claim 8 , wherein the infrastructure assets available for selection are displayed in a menu of categories.
11. The system of claim 8 , wherein the graphical user interface further provides an infrastructure template representing a complex infrastructure pattern for importing as the infrastructure base model.
12. The system of claim 11 , wherein the graphical user interface further provides a summary report of infrastructure requirements for the infrastructure template.
13. The system of claim 8 , wherein the connections between the components invoke system application programming interfaces.
14. The system of claim 8 , the at least one processor further configured to:
provide a validation application in the graphical user interface that determines whether the infrastructure base model is invalid due to errors in a schema or semantics.
15. A non-transitory computer-readable medium having instructions stored thereon that, when executed by at least one computing device, causes the at least one computing device to perform operations comprising:
displaying a graphical user interface that allows a user to define an infrastructure base model that represents an infrastructure comprising components and connections between the components;
querying a metadata graph to determine infrastructure assets available for selection in the graphical user interface, wherein the metadata graph provides an aggregate infrastructure definition of a first infrastructure-as-code solution and a second infrastructure-as-code solution, and wherein the aggregate infrastructure definition enables a migration of the infrastructure base model between a first implementation project that provisions the infrastructure using the first infrastructure-as-code solution and a second implementation project that provisions the infrastructure using the second infrastructure-as-code solution;
receiving a selected available asset from the infrastructure assets available for selection and a command that connects the selected available asset with a selected component in the components; and
creating a selectable connection between the selected component and the selected available asset in the infrastructure base model, wherein parameters of the selectable connection are modifiable in the graphical user interface.
16. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15 , the operations further comprising:
translating the first implementation project to the second infrastructure-as-code solution.
17. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the infrastructure assets available for selection are displayed in a menu of categories.
18. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the graphical user interface further provides an infrastructure template representing a complex infrastructure pattern for importing as the infrastructure base model.
19. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 18 , wherein the graphical user interface further provides a summary report of infrastructure requirements for the infrastructure template.
20. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15 , the operations further comprising:
providing a validation application in the graphical user interface that determines whether the infrastructure base model is invalid due to errors in a schema or semantics.