Methods and apparatuses for engagement management of aerial threats

1. An active protection system comprising:

a controller comprising:

at least one processor; and

at least one computer-readable storage medium storing instructions thereon that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the active protection system to:

deploy a first intercept vehicle and a second intercept vehicle, each carried by a platform, from the platform and cause each of the first intercept vehicle and the second intercept vehicle to exit a vicinity of the platform;

cause each of the first intercept vehicle and the second intercept vehicle to perform a pitch maneuver to align the first intercept vehicle and the second intercept vehicle along an intercept vector pointed substantially toward a projected intercept point with an identified aerial threat after the first intercept vehicle and the second intercept vehicle exit the vicinity of the platform; and

cause each of the first intercept vehicle and the second intercept vehicle to perform a thrust maneuver to accelerate the first intercept vehicle and the second intercept vehicle along the intercept vector.

2. The active protection system of claim 1 , further comprising instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the active protection system to cause one or more of the first intercept vehicle or the second intercept vehicle to perform a divert maneuver with one or more divert thrusters of one or more of the first intercept vehicle or the second intercept vehicle in order to divert one or more of the first intercept vehicle or the second intercept vehicle from the intercept vector one or more times to adjust a course of one or more of the first intercept vehicle or the second intercept vehicle.

3. The active protection system of claim 1 , further comprising instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the active protection system to receive, from one or more of the first intercept vehicle or the second intercept vehicle, data regarding one or more conditions observed by sensors of one or more of the first intercept vehicle or the second intercept vehicle during flight of one or more of the first intercept vehicle or the second intercept vehicle.

4. The active protection system of claim 3 , further comprising instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the active protection system to:

analyze the data regarding the one or more conditions; and

responsive to the data regarding the one or more conditions, cause one or more of the first intercept vehicle or the second intercept vehicle to adjust a respective flight path.

5. The active protection system of claim 1 , further comprising instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the active protection system to:

receive, from one or more of the first intercept vehicle or the second intercept vehicle, data observed by sensors of one or more of the first intercept vehicle or the second intercept vehicle during flight of one or more of the first intercept vehicle or the second intercept vehicle; and

control a flight path of one or more of the first intercept vehicle or the second intercept vehicle based at least partially on data.

6. The active protection system of claim 1 , further comprising instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the active protection system to:

receive laser data associated with a target; and

initiate a divert maneuver by one or more of the first intercept vehicle or the second intercept vehicle based at least partially on the laser data.

7. The active protection system of claim 1 , further comprising instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the active protection system to:

transmit at least one communication to one or more of the first intercept vehicle or the second intercept vehicle indicating an updated intercept vector; and

cause one or more of the first intercept vehicle or the second intercept vehicle to perform a divert maneuver to laterally divert the one or more of the first intercept vehicle or the second intercept vehicle to adjust a respective flight path to align the one or more of the first intercept vehicle or the second intercept vehicle along the updated intercept vector.

8. The active protection system of claim 1 , further comprising instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the active protection system to:

transmit at least one communication to one or more of the first intercept vehicle or the second intercept vehicle indicating a closest point of approach of one or more of the first intercept vehicle or the second intercept vehicle and the identified aerial threat; and

cause one or more of the first intercept vehicle or the second intercept vehicle to gather data via one or more sensors when the one or more of the first intercept vehicle or the second intercept vehicle reaches the closest point of approach.

9. An intercept vehicle comprising:

one or more sensors configured to acquire data regarding conditions during a flight of the intercept vehicle; and

a controller operably coupled to the one or more sensors, the controller comprising:

at least one processor; and

at least one computer-readable storage medium storing instructions thereon that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the at least one processor to:

receive data from the one or more sensors; and

responsive to the received data and a sensed rotation of the intercept vehicle about a longitudinal axis thereof, cause the intercept vehicle to effectuate an adjustment to a flight path of the intercept vehicle by causing one or more divert thrusters of the intercept vehicle to fire.

10. The intercept vehicle of claim 9 , further comprising instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the at least one processor to transmit the received data from the one or more sensors to an active protection system on a platform.

11. The intercept vehicle of claim 10 , when the platform comprises an aircraft.

12. The intercept vehicle of claim 11 , wherein the aircraft comprises an unmanned airborne vehicle, a light aircraft, a low speed aircraft, a remotely piloted vehicle, a helicopter, or a hovering platform.

13. The intercept vehicle of claim 9 , further comprising instructions configured to, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the at least one processor to effectuate a two-stage process for aligning the intercept vehicle with an intercept vector and cause the intercept vehicle to execute an azimuth rotation and an elevation rotation.

14. The intercept vehicle of claim 9 , further comprising a payload configured to emit energy upon detonation.

15. The intercept vehicle of claim 9 , further comprising a payload configured to emit a force upon detonation.

16. The intercept vehicle of claim 9 , further comprising instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the at least one processor to effectuate an alignment process to align the intercept vehicle with a vector for engaging a target.

17. An intercept vehicle comprising:

alignment thrusters configured to rotate the intercept vehicle about an axis orthogonal to a longitudinal axis of the intercept vehicle to at least substantially align the longitudinal axis of the intercept vehicle with an intercept vector via a pitch maneuver;

one or more sensors configured to acquire data regarding conditions during flight of the intercept vehicle; and

a controller operably coupled to the alignment thrusters and the one or more sensors, the controller comprising:

at least one processor; and

at least one computer-readable storage medium storing instructions thereon that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the at least one processor to:

receive data from the one or more sensors; and

responsive to the received data, adjust a flight path of the intercept vehicle by causing one or more of the alignment thrusters to fire.

18. The intercept vehicle of claim 17 , further causing a warhead of the vehicle to detonate when the vehicle reaches a closest point of approach to the target comprising determining an intercept time that the vehicle will reach the closest point of approach to the target of interest and detonating the vehicle at the intercept time.

19. The intercept vehicle of claim 17 , further comprising instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the at least one processor to effectuate emission of a magnetic field by the intercept vehicle.

20. The intercept vehicle of claim 17 , further comprising:

a rocket motor configured to accelerate the intercept vehicle along the intercept vector after the intercept vehicle performs the pitch maneuver;

divert thrusters configured to divert the intercept vehicle in a direction transverse to a flight path of the intercept vehicle; and

an energy emission device.

21. The intercept vehicle of claim 17 , wherein the intercept vehicle is configured to be released from a carrier on a platform.

22. The intercept vehicle of claim 21 , wherein the platform is a mobile platform.

23. The intercept vehicle of claim 21 , wherein the platform is a stationary platform.

24. A vehicle, comprising:

a controller comprising:

at least one processor; and

at least one computer-readable storage medium storing instructions thereon that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the vehicle to:

perform a first action of a launch sequence to leave a platform;

perform a second action of the launch sequence after the first action of the launch sequence, the second action comprising causing a plurality of pitch thrusters of the vehicle to fire to perform a pitch maneuver to align the vehicle along a vector pointed substantially toward a target;

accelerate by causing a rocket motor of the vehicle to fire;

transmit data regarding one or more conditions observed by sensors of the vehicle during flight of the vehicle; and

detonate a warhead of the vehicle when the vehicle reaches a closest point of approach to the target.

25. The vehicle of claim 24 , further comprising instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the vehicle to:

transmit at least one communication indicating the closest point of approach of the vehicle to the target; and

cause the warhead of the vehicle to detonate.

26. The vehicle of claim 24 , further comprising instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the vehicle to perform a divert maneuver with one or more divert thrusters of the vehicle to divert the vehicle from the intercept vector one or more times after commencement of accelerating the vehicle to adjust a course of the vehicle to align the vehicle along an updated vector.

27. The vehicle of claim 26 , further comprising instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the vehicle to:

receive at least one communication indicating an updated vector for the vehicle; and

perform the divert maneuver to laterally divert the vehicle to adjust a flight path of the vehicle to align the vehicle along the updated vector responsive to a rotation of the vehicle about a longitudinal axis thereof.

28. The vehicle of claim 24 , further comprising instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the vehicle to perform the second action of the launch sequence after the vehicle is a certain distance away from the platform.

29. The vehicle of claim 24 , further comprising instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the vehicle to receive at least one communication indicating a closest point of approach of the vehicle and the target.

30. The vehicle of claim 29 , further comprising instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the vehicle to transmit data regarding one or more conditions observed by sensors of the vehicle at the closest point of approach of the vehicle and the target.

31. The vehicle of claim 24 , wherein causing the vehicle to detonate a warhead of the vehicle when the vehicle reaches the closest point of approach to the target comprises determining an intercept time that the vehicle will reach the closest point of approach to the target of interest and detonating the vehicle at the intercept time.

32. A method of controlling a vehicle, comprising:

releasing the vehicle from a carrier disposed on a platform;

subsequent to releasing the vehicle, causing the vehicle to substantially align along a vector via a pitch maneuver;

causing a motor of the vehicle to fire after causing the vehicle to substantially align along the vector via the pitch maneuver;

causing the vehicle to accelerate along a flight path substantially aligned with the vector;

transmitting, from the platform, at least one communication to the vehicle indicating the closest point of approach of the vehicle and the target of interest;

receiving, at the platform and from the vehicle, data regarding one or more observed conditions at the closest point of approach of the vehicle and the target of interest; and

causing the vehicle to detonate at a closest point of approach of the vehicle to a target of interest on the vector.

33. The method of claim 32 , further comprising receiving, at the platform and from the vehicle, data regarding one or more observed conditions during flight of the vehicle.

34. The method of claim 32 , wherein causing the vehicle to detonate at the closest point of approach of the vehicle to the target of interest on the vector comprises determining an intercept time that the vehicle will reach the closest point of approach to the target of interest and causing the vehicle to detonate at the intercept time.