IP Library Granted Patent US 11,829,450
Granted Patent B2
US 11,829,450 · App. 17/214,282 · Granted Nov 28, 2023

Dual domain tracking of target structures

Inventors: Pascal Paysan (Steinhausen, CH); Michal Walczak (Steinhausen, CH); Liangjia Zhu (Palo Alto, CA); Toon Roggen (Steinhausen, CH); Stefan Scheib (Steinhausen, CH)
Assignee: SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS INTERNATIONAL AG
G06F18/2415G06N3/08G06N20/00G06T7/0012G06T11/006G06V10/462G06V10/751
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,829,450
App. No.
17/214,282
Granted
Nov 28, 2023
Kind
B2
Abstract

Embodiments described herein provide for determining a probability distribution of a three-dimensional point in a template feature map matching a three-dimensional point in space. A dual-domain target structure tracking end-to-end system receives projection data in one dimension or two dimensions and a three-dimensional simulation image. The end-to-end system extracts a template feature map from the simulation image using segmentation. The end-to-end system extracts features from the projection data, transforms the features of the projection data into three-dimensional space, and sequences the three-dimensional space to generate a three-dimensional feature map. The end-to-end system compares the template feature map to the generated three-dimensional feature map, determining an instantaneous probability distribution of the template feature map occurring in the three-dimensional feature map.

Claims (53)

1. A computer-implemented method of location prediction using an end-to-end target structure tracking system comprising:

executing, by a computer, a machine learning model to extract a set of features from imaging projection data associated with a target structure of a patient's anatomy;

executing, by the computer, a reconstruction algorithm to transform the extracted set of features into a set of features in three-dimensional space;

executing, by the computer, a recurrent neural network to obtain three-dimensional feature map data associated with the target structure, the recurrent neural network configured to sequence the imaging projection data using the set of features in three-dimensional space;

extracting, by the computer, a template feature map from a three-dimensional simulation image, the template feature map comprising the target structure;

comparing, by the computer, the template feature map to the three-dimensional feature map data; and

indicating, by the computer, a probability of a three-dimensional point in the template feature map matching a location of a three-dimensional point in the three-dimensional feature map data.

2. The computer-implemented method according to claim 1 , further comprising:

receiving, by the computer, segment information associated with the target structure; and

extracting, by the computer, the template feature map from the three-dimensional simulation image using the segment information and the three-dimensional simulation image.

3. The computer-implemented method according to claim 1 , further comprising:

executing, by the computer, a forward projection algorithm to transform the set of features in three-dimensional space into a set of features in two-dimensional space; and

feeding, by the computer, the set of features in two-dimensional space into the machine learning model.

4. The computer-implemented method according to claim 1 , wherein the reconstruction algorithm is a second machine learning model such that the end-to-end target structure tracking system is trained using a loss function considering a peak-to-sidelobe ratio of a probability distribution corresponding to the probability of a three-dimensional point in the template feature map matching a location of a three-dimensional point in the three-dimensional feature map data.

5. The computer-implemented method according to claim 1 , further comprising:

determining, by the computer, a deformation field associated with the target structure; and

indicating, by the computer, the probability of a three-dimensional point in the template feature map, using the deformation field, matching the location of a three-dimensional point in the three-dimensional feature map data.

6. The computer-implemented method according to claim 1 , further comprising determining, by the computer, a confidence value based on peaks and sidelobes associated with a probability distribution corresponding to the probability of a three-dimensional point in the template feature map matching a location of a three-dimensional point in the three-dimensional feature map data.

7. The computer-implemented method according to claim 1 , further comprising determining, by the computer, a classification for a point in the three-dimensional feature map data based on the probability of a three-dimensional point in the template feature map matching the location of a three-dimensional point in the three-dimensional feature map data satisfying a threshold.

8. The computer-implemented method according to claim 1 , wherein the imaging projection data is based on at least one of a stereo projection pair or a projection set generated using a multi-view imaging system.

9. The computer-implemented method according to claim 1 , further comprising:

extracting, by the computer, an additional template feature map from the three-dimensional simulation image associated with an additional target structure;

comparing, by the computer, the additional template feature map to the three-dimensional feature map data; and

generating, by the computer, a multi-channel probability distribution indicating the probability of a three-dimensional point in the template feature map matching the location of a three-dimensional point in the three-dimensional feature map data and the probability of a three-dimensional point in the additional template feature map matching the location of a three-dimensional point in the three-dimensional feature map data.

10. The computer-implemented method according to claim 1 , wherein comparing the template feature map to the three-dimensional feature map data comprises convolving each point of the template feature map with each point of the three-dimensional feature map data.

11. A system comprising:

a server comprising a processor and a non-transitory computer-readable medium containing instructions that when executed by the processor causes the processor to perform operations comprising:

execute a machine learning model to extract a set of features from imaging projection data associated with a target structure of a patient's anatomy;

execute a reconstruction algorithm to transform the extracted set of features into a set of features in three-dimensional space;

execute a recurrent neural network to obtain three-dimensional feature map data associated with the target structure, the recurrent neural network configured to sequence the imaging projection data using the set of features in three-dimensional space;

extract a template feature map from a three-dimensional simulation image, the template feature map comprising the target structure;

compare the template feature map to the three-dimensional feature map data; and

indicate a probability of a three-dimensional point in the template feature map matching a location of a three-dimensional point in the three-dimensional feature map data.

12. The system according to claim 11 , wherein the processor is further configured to perform operations comprising:

receive segment information associated with the target structure; and

extract the template feature map from the three-dimensional simulation image using the segment information and the three-dimensional simulation image.

13. The system according to claim 11 , wherein the processor is further configured to perform operations comprising:

execute a forward projection algorithm to transform the set of features in three-dimensional space into a set of features in two-dimensional space; and

feed the set of features in two-dimensional space into the machine learning model.

14. The system according to claim 11 , wherein the reconstruction algorithm is a second machine learning model.

15. The system according to claim 11 , wherein the processor is further configured to perform operations comprising:

determine a deformation field associated with the target structure; and

indicate the probability of a three-dimensional point in the template feature map, using the deformation field, matching the location of a three-dimensional point in the three-dimensional feature map data.

16. The system according to claim 11 , wherein the processor is further configured to perform operations comprising:

determine a confidence value based on peaks and sidelobes associated with a probability distribution corresponding to the probability of a three-dimensional point in the template feature map matching a location of a three-dimensional point in the three-dimensional feature map data.

17. The system according to claim 11 , wherein the processor is further configured to perform operations comprising:

determine a classification for a point in the three-dimensional feature map data based on the probability of a three-dimensional point in the template feature map matching the location of a three-dimensional point in the three-dimensional feature map data satisfying a threshold.

18. The system according to claim 11 , wherein the imaging projection data is based on at least one of a stereo projection pair or a projection set generated using a multi-view imaging system.

19. The system according to claim 11 , wherein the processor is further configured to perform operations comprising:

extract an additional template feature map from the three-dimensional simulation image associated with an additional target structure;

compare the additional template feature map to the three-dimensional feature map data; and

generate a multi-channel probability distribution indicating the probability of a three-dimensional point in the template feature map matching the location of a three-dimensional point in the three-dimensional feature map data and the probability of a three-dimensional point in the additional template feature map matching the location of a three-dimensional point in the three-dimensional feature map data.

20. The system according to claim 11 , wherein comparing the template feature map to the three-dimensional feature map data comprises convolving each point of the template feature map with each point of the three-dimensional feature map data.

Assignments (3)
MERGER AND CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Mar 15, 2023
From: VARIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL AG; SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS INTERNATIONAL AG
To: SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS INTERNATIONAL AG
Reel/Frame 063409/0731 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 20, 2022
From: VARIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
To: VARIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL AG
Reel/Frame 059316/0508 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 26, 2021
From: PAYSAN, PASCAL; WALCZAK, MICHAL; ZHU, LIANGJIA; ROGGEN, TOON; SCHEIB, STEFAN
To: VARIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
Reel/Frame 055737/0687 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20220309294A1 · Sep 29, 2022