IP Library Granted Patent US 12,599,776
Granted Patent B2
US 12,599,776 · App. 17/233,042 · Granted Apr 14, 2026

Magnetic stimulation coils and ferromagnetic components for treatment and diagnostic procedures

Inventor: Kenneth Marc Ghiron (Malvern, PA)
Assignee: Neuronetics, Inc.
A61N2/02A61N2/006H01F1/15325H01F7/064H01F7/20H01F27/255H01F27/28
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,599,776
App. No.
17/233,042
Granted
Apr 14, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

An example system may include an electromagnet, a drive circuit electrically coupled to the electromagnet, and a controller configured to control the drive circuit to provide current to the electromagnet to generate a pulsing magnetic field. The electromagnet may include a first conductive winding, a second conductive winding, and a magnetic core. The first conductive winding may be crescent shaped. The first conductive winding may define an inner surface and an outer surface. The outer surface of the first conductive winding may include a convex portion and a concave portion. The second conductive winding may reside proximate to the concave portion of the outer surface of the first conductive winding. The outer concave segment of the first conductive winding may define a concavity, and at least a portion of the second conductive winding may reside within the concavity of the first conductive winding.

Claims (25)

1 . A system for treating or diagnosing a patient, the system comprising:

an electromagnet comprising a first conductive winding, a second conductive winding, and a third conductive winding;

a drive circuit electrically coupled to the electromagnet; and

a controller configured to control the drive circuit to provide current to the electromagnet to generate a pulsing magnetic field;

wherein the electromagnet defines an asymmetric figure eight coil, wherein the first and second conductive windings define a first loop of the figure eight coil, and the third conductive winding defines a second loop of the figure eight coil such that the first loop of the figure eight coil comprises more conductive windings than the second loop of the figure eight coil, wherein the first and third conductive windings do not overlap each other, wherein the first conductive winding is disposed closer to the third conductive winding than the second conductive winding, and wherein the pulsing magnetic field is not centered on an area directly between the second and third conductive windings.

2 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the second conductive winding resides within an aperture defined by the first conductive winding.

3 . The system of claim 1 , wherein a central axis of the second conductive winding is offset from a central axis of the first conductive winding.

4 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the first and second conductive windings are not concentric.

5 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the first and second conductive windings are fabricated from different pieces of material.

6 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the first and second conductive windings do not contact the third conductive winding, and wherein a gap is located between proximate sides of the first and third conductive windings.

7 . The system of claim 1 , wherein proximate sides of the first and third conductive windings are in contact with one another.

8 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the first, second, and third conductive windings are circular, elliptical, or oval in shape.

9 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the electromagnet is disposed so that an area where the first conductive winding is most proximate to the third conductive winding is placed above a target stimulation zone of the patient.

10 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the electromagnet is configured such that, when driven, currents circulate through the first and second conductive windings in a first direction, while currents circulate through the third conductive winding in a second, opposite direction.

11 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the first conductive winding defines a single loop, the second conductive winding defines a single loop, and the third conductive winding defines a single loop.

12 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the electromagnet further comprises a fourth conductive winding residing within an aperture of the second conductive winding, and a fifth conductive winding residing within an aperture of the third conductive winding, wherein the fourth conductive winding is not concentric with the second conductive winding, and the fifth conductive winding is not concentric with the third conductive winding.

13 . The system of claim 1 , further comprising:

a ferromagnetic component located within an aperture of the first conductive winding, wherein a center of the ferromagnetic component is offset from a central axis of the first conductive winding.

14 . The system of claim 13 , wherein the ferromagnetic component is further located within an aperture of the second conductive winding, wherein the center of the ferromagnetic component is offset from a central axis of the second conductive winding.

15 . The system of claim 1 , further comprising:

a ferromagnetic component that defines a recess that is configured to receive at least a portion of the electromagnet, such that when the electromagnet is disposed in the recess, the ferromagnetic component at least partially surrounds portions of two or more of the first, second, and third conductive windings.

16 . The system of claim 1 , wherein one or more of the first, second, or third conductive windings comprises a bend that defines an angle that, when the electromagnet is driven, allows return currents to be raised from away from the patient.

17 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the system is configured to perform transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) on the patient.

18 . The system of claim 1 , wherein a diameter of the first conductive winding is larger than a diameter of the third conductive winding.

19 . The system of claim 18 , wherein a diameter of the second conductive winding is the same as the diameter of the third conductive winding.

Assignments (1)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 26, 2024
From: NEURONETICS, INC.
To: PERCEPTIVE CREDIT HOLDINGS IV, LP, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 068174/0177 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 15900477 · Feb 20, 2018
Related Publication 20210228898A1 · Jul 29, 2021
References Cited (58)
US 4985089A · Yoshizawa et al. · 1991 [cited by applicant]
US 5738625A · Gluck · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 6179771B1 · Mueller · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6425852B1 · Epstein et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6500110B1 · Davey et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6527695B1 · Davey et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6663556B2 · Barker · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6827681B2 · Tanner et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 7008370B2 · Tanner et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7087008B2 · Fox et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7239910B2 · Tanner · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7407478B2 · Zangen et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7520848B2 · Schneider et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7591776B2 · Phillips et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7854232B2 · Aho et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7857746B2 · Riehl · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7998053B2 · Aho · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8267850B2 · Schneider et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8777831B2 · Aho · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8845508B2 · Schneider et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8956274B2 · Schneider et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9533168B2 · Zangen et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9675815B1 · Fischell et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9724533B1 · Fischell et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9744373B2 · Hernandez-Garcia et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9802058B2 · Zangen et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9808642B2 · Zangen et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20010031906A1 · Ishikawa et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 20020097125A1 · Davey · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20030050527A1 · Fox et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20060019992A1 · Wu et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060094924A1 · Riehl · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070260107A1 · Mishelevich et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080058581A1 · Aho · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080058582A1 · Aho et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20100286470A1 · Schneider et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110015464A1 · Riehl et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110039700A1 · Fischer · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110125203A1 · Simon et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20140031785A1 · Schwagten · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140235926A1 · Zangen et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140235928A1 · Zangen et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140276182A1 · Helekar et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150025297A1 · Pan · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150165226A1 · Simon et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150196772A1 · Ghiron et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160067516A1 · Schneider et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160206895A1 · Zangen et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160346562A1 · Saitoh et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20180071545A1 · Saitoh · 2018 [cited by examiner]
CN 102727997A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
JP 2008518677A · 2008 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2008070001A2 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
Deng, et al., “Coil Design Consideration For Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation”, Clinical Neurophysiology, Elsevier Science, IE, vol. 125, No. 6, Dec. 22, 2013, 1202-1212. [cited by applicant]
Aron Tendler, Noam Barnea Ygael, Yiftach Roth & Abraham Zangen (2016) Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (dTMS)—beyond depression, Expert Review ofMedical Devices, 13:10, 987-1000. [cited by applicant]
Zhi-De Deng, Sarah H. Lisanby, Angel V. Peterchev. Electric field depth-focality tradeoff in transcranial magnetic stimulation: Simulation comparison of 50 coil designs. 2013 Elsevier Inc. www.brainstimi rnl.com. [cited by applicant]
Zhi-De Deng, Sarah H. Lisanby, Angel V. Peterchev. Electric field depth-focality tradeoff in transcranial magnetic stimulation: Simulation comparison of 50 coil designs. NIH Public Access. Brain Stimul. Author manuscrip… [cited by applicant]
Davey, K. R., “Suppressing the Surface Field During Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation”, IEEE Transaction on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 53, No. 2. Feb. 2006, pp. 190-194. [cited by applicant]