IP Library Granted Patent US 12,630,878
Granted Patent B2
US 12,630,878 · App. 17/253,195 · Granted May 19, 2026

Method for stratifying the risk of BK virus nephropathy after a kidney transplant

Inventors: Yassine Taoufik (Paris, FR); Antoine Durrbach (Paris, FR); Manon Dekeyser (Paris, FR)
Assignees: Universite Paris-Saclay; Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale (INSERM); Assistance Publique—Hopitaux de Paris
C12Q1/6883C12Q1/686C12Q1/701C12Q2600/156
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,630,878
App. No.
17/253,195
Granted
May 19, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present application describes and claims a novel method for identifying and stratifying the risk of developing a BK virus nephropathy (“Nx BK-v” below) in patients having undergone a kidney transplant. This method uses an index combining at least three bio-markers: i) the intensity of the anti-BK-v memory T lymphocyte response (memory T lymphocytes which are specific to BK-v, hereinafter “LTm anti-BK-v”), ii) the number of occurrences of incompatibility in the HLA alleles of class I and class II between the donor and the recipient of the graft, taking into account iii) the viral charge of the BK-v virus in the whole blood of the patient. The present method allows a very precise evaluation of the risk of developing an Nx BK-v during the months following the test with the aim of optimising the immuno-suppressive treatment in order to better preserve the transplanted kidney.

Claims (29)

1 . A method for assessing the risk of developing a BK virus (BKV) nephropathy in a patient who had kidney transplantation from a kidney donor, said method comprising the following steps:

a) measuring the viral load of BKV in a biological sample of said patient,

b) measuring the normalized intensity of the CD4 + or CD8 + memory T cell response specific for BKV in a biological sample from said patient, said normalization being performed relative to the BKV viral load measured in step a), and

c) determining the number of HLA allele differences between the kidney donor and said patient,

wherein a high risk of developing BKV nephropathy is concluded when:

in relation with a viral load of 10 3 copies of BK virus per mL of blood,

the normalized intensity of the CD4 + or CD8 + memory T cell response specific for BKV is less than or equal to 100 intensity measurement units, and

the number of differences between said patient and the donor of the transplanted kidney is less than or equal to 5.

2 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the three parameters a), b) and c) are then compiled to create a stratification index for the risk that the patient will develop BK virus nephropathy.

3 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the BKV viral load is measured in step a) by quantitative PCR from a sample of whole blood or plasma from said patient.

4 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the response of the BKV specific CD4 + or CD8 + memory T cells measured in step b) is determined by contacting peripheral blood mononuclear cells from said patient with BKV peptides, and by assessing the proliferation of T cells present in said mononuclear cells after 4 to 7 days of culture.

5 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the response of the BKV specific CD4 + or CD8 + memory T cells measured in step b) is determined by contacting peripheral blood mononuclear cells from said patient with BKV peptides, and by assessing the proliferation of T cells present in said mononuclear cells after 4 to 7 days of culture by determining the proportion of CD4 + T cells having diluted a proliferation marker after 4 to 7 days of culture in the presence of said peptides.

6 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein the response of the BKV specific CD4 + or CD8 + memory T cells measured in step b) is determined by contacting peripheral blood mononuclear cells from said patient with BKV peptides, and by assessing the proliferation of T cells present in said mononuclear cells after 4 to 7 days of culture by determining the proportion of CD8 + T cells having diluted a proliferation marker after 4 to 7 days of culture in the presence of said peptides.

7 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein a low risk of developing BK virus (BKV) nephropathy is concluded when:

a) in relation with a viral load of 10 3 copies of BK virus per mL of blood,

b) the normalized intensity of the CD4 + or CD8 + memory T cell response specific for BKV is greater than 100 intensity measurement units, and

c) the number of differences between said patient and the transplant donor is greater than 5.

8 . An in vitro method for assessing the response of a kidney transplant patient to blood replication of BKV comprising providing said patient immunosuppressive treatment, modifying said patient's immunosuppressive treatment, and then performing the method of claim 1 repeatedly at regular time intervals after said kidney transplant.

9 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein said method is an in vitro method for assessing the response of a kidney transplant patient to blood replication of BKV after modification of immunosuppressive treatment, and wherein said method is repeated before and after each treatment modification.

10 . The method according to claim 1 , wherein said method is an in vitro method for assessing the response of a kidney transplant patient to blood replication of BKV after modification of immunosuppressive treatment, and wherein said method is repeated approximately every 3 to 6 months.

11 . A kit containing:

a) reagents for conducting BK virus quantitative PCR, and

b) reagents for conducting the immunological method described in claim 4 on whole blood.

12 . The kit according to claim 11 , wherein the reagents b) contain BKV peptide sequences or polyclonal lymphocyte stimulation peptide sequences and, optionally, lymphocyte labeling reagents.

13 . The kit according to claim 11 containing:

a) specific primers for amplifying portions of the BKV genome, and

b) BKV peptide sequences, and, optionally

c) the reagents necessary for conducting quantitative PCR with DNA extraction and/or

d) the reagents for lymphocyte labeling.

Assignments (3)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNEE ADDRESS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 058630 FRAME: 0874. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE MERGER. Recorded May 4, 2022
From: UNIVERSITÉ PARIS-SUD
To: UNIVERSITÉ PARIS-SACLAY
Reel/Frame 059952/0787 →
MERGER Recorded Jan 12, 2022
From: UNIVERSITÉ PARIS-SUD
To: UNIVERSITÉ PARIS-SACLAY
Reel/Frame 058630/0874 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 28, 2021
From: TAOUFIK, YASSINE; DURRBACH, ANTOINE; DEKEYSER, MANON
To: UNIVERSITE PARIS-SACLAY; INSTITUT NATIONAL DE LA SANTE ET DE LA RECHERCHE MEDICALE (INSERM); ASSISTANCE PUBLIQUE - HOPITAUX DE PARIS
Reel/Frame 056380/0153 →
Priority Claims (1)
FR 1855342 · Jun 18, 2018 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20210301344A1 · Sep 30, 2021
References Cited (59)
US 7892795B2 · Chen · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20090246754A1 · Kiefer · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20110091866A1 · Iwaki · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20160348174A1 · Sarwal · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20180127838A1 · Mehta · 2018 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2017060283A1 · 2017 [cited by examiner]
Sawinski et al., (Nephrol Dial Transplant (2015) 30: 209-217 (Year: 2015). [cited by examiner]
Schaenman et al., [cited by applicant]
Smith et al., [cited by applicant]
Van Aalderen et al., [cited by applicant]
Awadalla et al., [cited by applicant]
Batal et al., [cited by applicant]
Chung et al., [cited by applicant]
Comoli et al., [cited by applicant]
Comoli et al., [cited by applicant]
Couchoud et al., [cited by applicant]
Dalianis et al., [cited by applicant]
Dekeyser et al., [cited by applicant]
Dekeyser, M., [cited by applicant]
Drachenberg et al., [cited by applicant]
Eckardt et al., [cited by applicant]
Egli et al., [cited by applicant]
Godinho Pinto et al., [cited by applicant]
Hässig et al., [cited by applicant]
Helanterä et al., [cited by applicant]
Hirsch et al., [cited by applicant]
Hirsch et al., [cited by applicant]
Hirsch et al., [cited by applicant]
International Search Report issued in International Application No. PCT/EP2019/066100 (Aug. 2, 2019). [cited by applicant]
Johnston et al., [cited by applicant]
Lanot et al., [cited by applicant]
Limaye et al., [cited by applicant]
Pello et al., [cited by applicant]
Ramos et al., [cited by applicant]
Rapport Annuel 2016, 380 pages (2016). [cited by applicant]
Restifo et al., [cited by applicant]
Schachtner et al., [cited by applicant]
Schachtner et al., [cited by applicant]
Sester et al., [cited by applicant]
Sharma et al., [cited by applicant]
Stankoff et al., [cited by applicant]
Suleiman et al., [cited by applicant]
Thangaraju et al., [cited by applicant]
Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/EP2019/066100 (Aug. 2, 2019). [cited by applicant]
Brennan, D. C. et al. Incidence of BK with tacrolimus versus cyclosporine and impact of preemptive immunosuppression reduction. Am. J. Transplant. 5, 582-594 (2005). [cited by applicant]
Cleenders, E. et al. An observational cohort study of histological screening for BK polyomavirus nephropathy following viral replication in plasma. Kidney Int 104, 1018-1034 (2023). [cited by applicant]
Dekeyser et al., [cited by applicant]
Dekeyser, M., François, H., Beaudreuil, S. & Durrbach, A. Polyomavirus-Specific Cellular Immunity: From BK-Virus-Specific Cellular Immunity to BK-Virus-Associated Nephropathy? Front Immunol 6, 307 (2015). [cited by applicant]
Drachenberg, C. B. et al. Negative impact of human leukocyte antigen matching in the outcome of polyomavirus nephropathy. Transplantation 80, 276-278 (2005). [cited by applicant]
Egli, A., Köhli, S., Dickenmann, M. & Hirsch, H. H. Inhibition of polyomavirus BK-specific T-Cell responses by immunosuppressive drugs. Transplantation 88, 1161-1168 (2009). [cited by applicant]
Freitas, M. C. S. Kidney transplantation in the US: an analysis of the OPTN/UNOS registry. Clin Transpl 1-16 (2011). [cited by applicant]
Ginevri, F. et al. Prospective monitoring of polyomavirus BK replication and impact of pre-emptive intervention in pediatric kidney recipients. Am. J. Transplant. 7, 2727-2735 (2007). [cited by applicant]
Hirsch, H. H., Yakhontova, K., Lu, M. & Manzetti, J. Bk Polyomavirus Replication in Renal Tubular Epithelial Cells Is Inhibited by Sirolimus, but Activated by Tacrolimus Through a Pathway Involving FKBP-12. Am J Transpl… [cited by applicant]
Hirsch, HH. et al. Polyomavirus BK replication in de novo kidney transplant patients receiving tacrolimus or cyclosporine: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. Am. J. Transplant. 13, 136-145 (2013). [cited by applicant]
Kaech, S. M. & Ahmed, R. Immunology. CD8 T cells remember with a little help. Science 300, 263-265 (2003). [cited by applicant]
Leboeuf, C. et al. BK Polyomavirus-Specific 9mer CD8 T Cell Responses Correlate With Clearance of BK Viremia in Kidney Transplant Recipients: First Report From the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study. Am. J. Transplant. (2017… [cited by applicant]
Opelz, G., Döhler, B., Middleton, D., Süsal, C., & A Collaborative Transplant Study Report. HLA Matching in Pediatric Kidney Transplantation: HLA Poorly Matched Living Donor Transplants Versus HLA Well-Matched Deceased … [cited by applicant]
Schachtner, T et al. BK virus-specific immunity kinetics: a predictor of recovery from polyomavirus BK-associated nephropathy. Am. J. Transplant. 11, 2443-2452 (2011). [cited by applicant]
Thangaraju, S. et al. Risk Factors for BK Polyoma Virus Treatment and Association of Treatment With Kidney Transplant Failure: Insights From a Paired Kidney Analysis. Transplantation 100, 854-861 (2016). [cited by applicant]