IP Library Granted Patent US 12,421,839
Granted Patent B2
US 12,421,839 · App. 17/279,969 · Granted Sep 23, 2025

Multi-objective optimization on modeling and optimizing scaling and corrosion in a wellbore

Inventors: Da Pang (Beijing, CN); Srinath Madasu (Houston, TX); Xinli Jia (Sugar Land, TX); Keshava Prasad Rangarajan (Sugar Land, TX)
Assignee: Landmark Graphics Corporation
E21B47/006E21B37/06E21B41/02E21B47/07E21B47/10E21B49/0875G05B13/027G05B13/041E21B2200/20E21B2200/22
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,421,839
App. No.
17/279,969
Granted
Sep 23, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

System for optimizing operation of an oil and gas well employs multi-objective Bayesian optimization of wellbore parameters to minimize scaling and corrosion. The system may contain instrumentation for measuring temperature, pressure, at least one production parameter and at least one ion concentration of the fluid in the wellbore. The system may also have a processor for performing a calculation procedure to determine an anticipated corrosion rate (“Vbase”) and a scaling index (“Is”) reflecting a tendency of scale to form in the wellbore based on the measurements provided by the instrumentation, where Vbase and Is are calculated along the length of the wellbore. Based on a selected set of optimization points taken from the calculations of Vbase and Is, the system may control the alkalinity and flow rate of the fluid based on the multi-objective optimization to simultaneously optimize scaling and corrosion.

Claims (44)

1. A method for optimizing scaling and corrosion in an oil field tubular, comprising:

obtaining a set of input parameters related to a fluid flowing in the oil field tubular;

performing a base calculation procedure to determine a corrosion rate and a scaling index reflecting a tendency of scale to form in the oil field tubular based on the set of input parameters, wherein the base calculation procedure yields a range of values for the corrosion rate and the scaling index along the oil field tubular;

selecting optimization points from the ranges of the corrosion rate and the scaling index obtained from the base calculation procedure, wherein the optimization points are selected at particular depths along the oil field tubular, and wherein at least one of the selected optimization points is selected at a depth that has a maximum value for the corrosion rate or the scaling index;

performing a multi-objective optimization for the selected optimization points of the corrosion rate and the scaling index; and

controlling an alkalinity and flow rate of the fluid based on the multi-objective optimization.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of obtaining the set of input parameters comprises obtaining a temperature and pressure of the fluid in the oil field tubular.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of obtaining the set of input parameters comprises obtaining an ion concentration present in the fluid.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the oil field tubular comprises one or more of a production tubing in a wellbore and a section of pipe in a pipeline.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the step of obtaining the set of input parameters comprises:

obtaining a temperature and pressure of the fluid in the oil field tubular;

obtaining a BWPD, BOPD, flow rate, API gravity, and production tubing inner diameter of the wellbore; and

obtaining ion concentrations of at least one of calcite, barium, strontium, iron, magnesium, weak organic acids, total alkalinity, sulfate, or chloride.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of performing the base calculation procedure comprises using an empirical model to determine the corrosion rate and the scaling index.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of performing the base calculation procedure comprises using machine learning to determine the corrosion rate and the scaling index.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein the step of using machine learning comprises using a Deep Neural Network.

9. A system for optimizing scaling and corrosion in an oil field tubular, comprising:

a processor; and

a memory unit storing computer-readable instructions that, when executed by the processor, causes the system to,

obtain a set of input parameters related to fluid flowing in the oil field tubular;

perform a base calculation procedure to determine a corrosion rate and a scaling index reflecting a tendency of scale to form in the oil field tubular based on the set of input parameters, wherein the base calculation procedure yields a range of values for the corrosion rate and the scaling index along the oil field tubular;

select optimization points from the ranges of the corrosion rate and the scaling index obtained from the base calculation procedure, wherein the optimization points are selected at particular depths along the oil field tubular, and wherein at least one of the selected optimization points is selected at a depth that has a maximum value for the corrosion rate or the scaling index;

perform a multi-objective optimization for the selected optimization points of the corrosion rate and the scaling index; and

control an alkalinity and flow rate of the fluid based on the multi-objective optimization.

10. The system of claim 9 , wherein the set of input parameters comprises temperature and pressure of the fluid in the oil field tubular.

11. The system of claim 9 , wherein the set of input parameters comprises ion concentrations present in the fluid.

12. The system of claim 9 , wherein the oil field tubular comprises one or more of a production tubing in a wellbore and a section of pipe in a pipeline.

13. The system of claim 12 , wherein the computer-readable instructions cause the system to obtain the set of input parameters by:

obtaining a temperature and pressure of the fluid in the oil field tubular;

obtaining a BWPD, BOPD, flow rate, API gravity, and production tubing inner diameter of the wellbore; and

obtaining ion concentrations of at least one of calcite, barium, strontium, iron, magnesium, weak organic acids, total alkalinity, sulfate, or chloride.

14. The system of claim 9 , wherein the computer-readable instructions cause the system to perform the base calculation procedure using an empirical model to determine the corrosion rate and the scaling index.

15. The system of claim 9 , wherein the computer-readable instructions cause the system to perform the base calculation procedure using machine learning to determine the corrosion rate and the scaling index.

16. The system of claim 15 , wherein the computer-readable instructions cause the system to use machine learning by using a Deep Neural Network.

17. A system for operating an oil and gas well to minimize scaling and corrosion, comprising:

instrumentation located about a wellbore of the oil and gas well for measuring temperature, pressure, at least one production parameter and at least one ion concentration of a fluid in the wellbore; and

a processor for performing a base calculation procedure to determine a corrosion rate and a scaling index reflecting a tendency of scale to form in the wellbore based on the measurements provided by the instrumentation, wherein the corrosion rate and the scaling index are calculated along a length of the wellbore,

wherein, based on a selected set of optimization points taken from the calculations of the corrosion rate and the scaling index that are selected at particular depths along the wellbore, wherein at least one of the selected optimization points is selected at a depth that has a maximum value for the corrosion rate or the scaling index, the processor is adapted to perform a multi-objective optimization for the selected optimization points of the corrosion rate and the scaling index and control an alkalinity and flow rate of the fluid based on the multi-objective optimization.

18. The system of claim 17 , wherein the processor performs the base calculation procedure using a Deep Neural Network.

19. The system of claim 17 , wherein the processor performs the multi-objective optimization using Bayesian optimization.

20. The system of claim 19 , wherein the processor is adapted to control, based on the Bayesian optimization, one or more of:

temperature and pressure of the fluid in the wellbore;

a BWPD, BOPD, flow rate, API gravity, and production tubing inner diameter of the wellbore; and

ion concentrations of at least one of calcite, barium, strontium, iron, magnesium, weak organic acids, total alkalinity, sulfate, or chloride.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 25, 2021
From: PANG, DA; MADASU, SRINATH; JIA, XINLI; RANGARAJAN, KESHAVA PRASAD
To: LANDMARK GRAPHICS CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 055722/0020 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20220112799A1 · Apr 14, 2022
References Cited (23)
US 9562844B2 · Chilukuri · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 9771795B2 · Knight · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 10436765B2 · Roberts · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 11112280B2 · Lewis · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20080262737A1 · Thigpen · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20090151936A1 · Greenaway · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100185401A1 · Hernandez et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110137704A1 · Mitra et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20130263667A1 · Volker et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20150356210A1 · Hamid et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20210246766A1 · Wilson, III · 2021 [cited by examiner]
Calle, Paul, “NSGA-II explained!,” Oct. 24, 2017, analytics lab @ OU, Available https://oklahomaanalytics.com/data-science-techniques/nsga-ii-explained/ (Year: 2017). [cited by examiner]
Khan et al., “Multi-objective bayesian optimization algorithm,” Jul. 9, 2002, GECCO'02: Proceedings of the 4th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, Available https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2955491.… [cited by examiner]
CA Application No. CA3111956, “Office Action”, May 20, 2022, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT application No. PCT/US2020/028013 issued on Dec. 21, 2020, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Snoek, Jasper, et al.; “Scalable Bayesian Optimization Using Deep Neural Networks”; Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning, JMLR: W&CP vol. 37 (arXiv:1502.05700v2 [stat.ML) Lille, France; J… [cited by applicant]
Berkenkamp, Felix, et al.; “Bayesian Optimization with Safety Constraints: Safe and Automatic Parameter Tuning in Robotics”; Sage Publications (arXiv:1602.4450v2 [cs.RO]); Mar. 2, 2018; 22 pages. [cited by applicant]
Knudde, Nicolas, et al.; “GPflowOpt: A Bayesian Optimization Library using TensorFlow”; (arXiv:1711.03845v1 [stat.ML]); Nov. 10, 2017; 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
De Waard, C. and Lotz, U.; “Prediction of CO2 Corrosion of Carbon Steel”; NACE International; Houston, TX; 1993; 18 pages. [cited by applicant]
Edwards, Mark A. and Cramer Ben; “Top of Line Corrosion—Diagnosis, Root Cause Analysis, and Treatment”; NACE International; Houston, TX; 2000; 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Oddo, J.E. and Tomson, M. B.; “The Prediction of Scale and CO2 Corrosion in Oil Field Systems”; NACE International; Houston, TX; 1999; 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
Oddo, J.E. and Tomson, M.B .; “Simplified Calculation of CaCO3 Saturation at High Temperatures and Pressures in Brine Solutions”; Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME; Jul. 1982; 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Oddo, J.E. and Tomson, M.B .; “Why Scale Forms and How to Predict It”; Society of Petroleum Engineers; SPE Production & Facilities, Feb. 1994; 8 pages. [cited by applicant]