IP Library Patent Application 17284559
Patent Application
App. No. 17/284,559

MONTE CARLO METHOD FOR THE AUTOMATED AND HIGHLY EFFICIENT CALCULATION OF KINETIC DATA OF CHEMICAL REACTIONS

Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US None
App. No.
17/284,559
Abstract

The present invention relates to a computer-implemented method for calculating transition states of a chemical reaction, and to a system for data processing comprising means for carrying out the method, to a computer program comprising instructions which cause a computer to execute the method and to the use of the computer program.

Claims (69)

1 . A computer-implemented method of calculating transition states of a chemical reaction, comprising the steps of;

A Generating a starting geometry by

A1 providing the three-dimensional representation of at least one molecule at ground state energy,

A2 selecting at least one bond of the at least one molecule and selecting a length of the bond, where the selected length does not correspond to the length of the bond at ground state energy of the molecule, such that a starting geometry for the chemical reaction is obtained, and

A3 representing the starting geometry in three dimensions in Cartesian and/or internal coordinates,

B Ascertaining an optimized starting geometry by

B1 defining a function space encompassing the at least one bond from step A2 and the atoms joined by this bond,

B2 optimizing the geometry of the starting geometry on the basis of the function space selected in step B1 by means of a quantum-chemical method and with the boundary condition that the length of the at least one bond selected in step A2 is kept constant, such that an optimized starting geometry is obtained,

B3 ascertaining the gradient norm B3 for the optimized starting geometry, where the gradient norm is obtained via the first derivative of a function E=f(x) by means of the quantum-chemical method, with E=total energy of the optimized starting geometry and x=nuclear coordinates of the molecule in the optimized starting geometry, and

B4.1 when the gradient norm B3 ∇ is 0≤∇≤0.07 E h a 0 −1 , classifying the optimized starting geometry as a precursor to the transition state of the chemical reaction and continuing the method with step D1, or

B4.2 when the gradient norm B3 ∇ is >0.07 E h a 0 −1 , ascertaining the precursor to the transition state of the chemical reaction proceeding from the optimized starting geometry by a method comprising the following steps:

C Ascertaining the precursor to the transition state of the chemical reaction by

C1 varying the optimized starting geometry using a Monte Carlo algorithm,

C1.1 wherein at least one atom from the function space selected in step B1 is selected at random,

C1.2 wherein a vector for a deflection of the atom chosen in step C1.1 is selected at random,

C1.3 wherein the atom selected in step C1.1 is deflected from its position in the optimized starting geometry using the vector from step C1.2, so as to obtain a precursor to the transition state of the chemical reaction, and

C2 optimizing the geometry of the precursor to the transition state by means of the quantum-chemical method and with the boundary condition that the at least one bond from step A2 has the length that was ascertained in step C1.3, and

C3 ascertaining the gradient norm C3 for the precursor to the transition state from step C2, where the gradient norm is obtained via the first derivative of the function E=f(x) by means of the quantum-chemical method, with E=total energy of the precursor to the transition state and x=nuclear coordinates of the molecule in the precursor to the transition state, and

C4.1 when the gradient norm C3 ∇ is 0≤∇≤0.07 E h a 0 −1 , continuing the method with step D1, or

C4.2 when the gradient norm C3 ∇ is >0.07 E h a 0 −1 , repeating steps C1 to C3 until a gradient norm C3 of 0≤∇≤0.07 E h a 0 −1 is obtained, wherein

(a) if steps C1 to C3 have been performed once, the geometry of the precursor to the transition state is varied in step C1 when the value of its gradient norm C3 is lower than the value of the gradient norm B3 of the optimized starting geometry, or

(b) if steps C1 to C3 have been performed more than once, the geometry of the optimized starting geometry or that precursor to the transition state from the preceding repetitions that has the lowest value for the gradient norm C3 or B3 compared to all the gradient norms C3 and B3 previously obtained is varied in step C1,

D Ascertaining the transition state by

D1 relaxing the precursor from step C4.1 or the precursor from step B4.1 by means of the quantum-chemical method and a pseudo-Newton-Raphson algorithm, such that the transition state is obtained, and

D2 optionally ascertaining an equilibrium state by deflecting the transition state, such that a deflected transition state is obtained, and relaxing the deflected transition state by means of the quantum-chemical method, such that an equilibrium state is obtained.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the quantum-chemical method from steps B2, B3, C2, C3, D1 and D2 is a semiempirical method, density functional theory method or an approximation of the Schrödinger equation.

3 . The method claim 1 , wherein the chemical reaction is a synthesis selected from the group consisting of polymer syntheses, polyurethane syntheses, syntheses of monomers for polymerization reactions, industrially required commodity chemicals, additives, surfactants and active pharmacological ingredients.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein, in step A1, at least two molecules I and II are provided and, in step A2, alternatively or additionally to the at least one bond, at least one distance between at least one atom from molecule I and at least one atom from molecule II and the length of the at least one distance may also be selected, where the length of the distance is especially not more than 230 pm.

5 . The method of claim 4 , wherein molecule I is a catalyst for the chemical reaction, and molecule II is a reactant in the chemical reaction.

6 . The method of claim 4 , wherein molecule I has a size of ≤100 atoms and molecule II has a size of ≤100 atoms, and the sum total of the atoms from molecule I and from molecule II should preferably be ≤100 atoms.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein information about the transition state ascertained according to step D.1 or the equilibrium state ascertained according to step D.2 is communicated to a user.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein information about the transition state ascertained according to step D.1 and/or the equilibrium state ascertained according to step D.2 is received by a user.

9 . The method of claim 5 , wherein the molecule I is synthesized after step D.1 or after step D.2.

10 . The method of claim 5 , wherein under a chemical reaction with the molecule I as catalyst is performed after step D.1 or after step D.2.

11 . The method of claim 5 , wherein under a chemical reaction with the molecule II as co-reactant is performed after step D.1 or after step D.2.

12 . A system for data processing, comprising means of executing a method comprising the steps of:

A Generating a starting geometry by

A1 providing the three-dimensional representation of at least one molecule at ground state energy,

A2 selecting at least one bond of the at least one molecule and selecting a length of the bond, where the selected length does not correspond to the length of the bond at ground state energy of the molecule, such that a starting geometry for the chemical reaction is obtained, and

A3 representing the starting geometry in three dimensions in Cartesian and/or internal coordinates,

B Ascertaining an optimized starting geometry by

B1 defining a function space encompassing the at least one bond from step A2 and the atoms joined by this bond,

B2 optimizing the geometry of the starting geometry on the basis of the function space selected in step B1 by means of a quantum-chemical method and with the boundary condition that the length of the at least one bond selected in step A2 is kept constant, such that an optimized starting geometry is obtained,

B3 ascertaining the gradient norm B3 for the optimized starting geometry, where the gradient norm is obtained via the first derivative of a function E=f(x) by means of the quantum-chemical method, with E=total energy of the optimized starting geometry and x=nuclear coordinates of the molecule in the optimized starting geometry, and

B4.1 when the gradient norm B3 ∇ is 0≤∇≤0.07 E h a 0 −1 , classifying the optimized starting geometry as a precursor to the transition state of the chemical reaction and continuing the method with step D1, or

B4.2 when the gradient norm B3 ∇ is >0.07 E h a 0 −1 , ascertaining the precursor to the transition state of the chemical reaction proceeding from the optimized starting geometry by a method comprising the following steps:

C Ascertaining the precursor to the transition state of the chemical reaction

C1 varying the optimized starting geometry using a Monte Carlo algorithm,

C1.1 wherein at least one atom from the function space selected in step B1 is selected at random,

C1.2 wherein a vector for a deflection of the atom chosen in step C1.1 is selected at random,

C1.3 wherein the atom selected in step C1.1 is deflected from its position in the optimized starting geometry using the vector from step C1.2, so as to obtain a precursor to the transition state of the chemical reaction, and

C2 optimizing the geometry of the precursor to the transition state by means of the quantum-chemical method and with the boundary condition that the at least one bond from step A2 has the length that was ascertained in step C1.3, and

C3 ascertaining the gradient norm C3 for the precursor to the transition state from step C2, where the gradient norm is obtained via the first derivative of the function E=f(x) by means of the quantum-chemical method, with E=total energy of the precursor to the transition state and x=nuclear coordinates of the molecule in the precursor to the transition state, and

C4.1 when the gradient norm C3 ∇ is 0≤∇≤0.07 E h a 0 −1 , continuing the method with step D1, or

C4.2 when the gradient norm C3 ∇ is >0.07 E h a 0 −1 , repeating steps C1 to C3 until a gradient norm C3 of 0≤∇≤0.07 E h a 0 −1 is obtained, wherein

(a) if steps C1 to C3 have been performed once, the geometry of the precursor to the transition state is varied in step C1 when the value of its gradient norm C3 is lower than the value of the gradient norm B3 of the optimized starting geometry, or

(b) if steps C1 to C3 have been performed more than once, the geometry of the optimized starting geometry or that precursor to the transition state from the preceding repetitions that has the lowest value for the gradient norm C3 or B3 compared to all the gradient norms C3 and B3 previously obtained is varied in step C1,

D Ascertaining the transition state by

D1 relaxing the precursor from step C4.1 or the precursor from step B4.1 by means of the quantum-chemical method and a pseudo-Newton-Raphson algorithm, such that the transition state is obtained, and

D2 optionally ascertaining an equilibrium state by deflecting the transition state, such that a deflected transition state is obtained, and relaxing the deflected transition state by means of the quantum-chemical method, such that an equilibrium state is obtained.

13 .- 15 . (canceled)

16 . The system of claim 12 , wherein the quantum-chemical method from steps B2, B3, C2, C3, D1 and D2 is a semiempirical method, density functional theory method or an approximation of the Schrödinger equation.

17 . The system of claim 12 , wherein the chemical reaction is a synthesis selected from the group consisting of polymer syntheses, polyurethane syntheses, syntheses of monomers for polymerization reactions, industrially required commodity chemicals, additives, surfactants and active pharmacological ingredients.

18 . The system of claim 12 , wherein, in step A1, at least two molecules I and II are provided and, in step A2, alternatively or additionally to the at least one bond, at least one distance between at least one atom from molecule I and at least one atom from molecule II and the length of the at least one distance may also be selected, where the length of the distance is especially not more than 230 pm.

19 . The system of claim 18 , wherein molecule I is a catalyst for the chemical reaction, and molecule II is a reactant in the chemical reaction.

20 . The system of claim 18 , wherein molecule I has a size of ≤100 atoms and molecule II has a size of ≤100 atoms, and the sum total of the atoms from molecule I and from molecule II should preferably be ≤100 atoms.

21 . The system of claim 12 , wherein information about the transition state ascertained according to step D.1 or the equilibrium state ascertained according to step D.2 is communicated to a user.

22 . The method of claim 12 , wherein information about the transition state ascertained according to step D.1 and/or the equilibrium state ascertained according to step D.2 is received by a user.

23 . The system of claim 19 , wherein the molecule I is synthesized after step D.1 or after step D.2.

Assignments (2)
MERGER Recorded Oct 29, 2024
From: COVESTRO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GMBH & CO. KG
To: COVESTRO DEUTSCHLAND AG
Reel/Frame 069272/0414 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 12, 2021
From: GAMEZ, JOSE; LEVEN, MATTHIAS
To: COVESTRO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GMBH & CO. KG
Reel/Frame 055891/0215 →