Repair/replace and labour hours determination
The present invention relates to the determination of repair operations for a damaged vehicle. More particularly, the present invention relates to determining repair operations, for example whether to repair or replace parts of a damaged vehicle and associated labour time required, for a damaged vehicle using images of the damage to the vehicle. Aspects and/or embodiments seek to provide a computer-implemented method for determining repair operations that are required to repair a damaged vehicle, using images of the damage to the damaged vehicle.
1. A computer-implemented method for determining repair operations to a damaged vehicle, comprising: receiving a plurality of images of the vehicle; determining, per part, one or more classifications for each of the plurality of images using one or more trained models, wherein each classification comprises at least one indication of damage to at least one part; determining a confidence value for each of the one or more classifications; determining, using the confidence value for each of the one or more classifications and a pre-determined confidence value threshold, one or more repair operations for each of the parts of the vehicle; and outputting the determined one or more repair operations for each of the parts of the vehicle.
2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:
receiving vehicle input data, wherein the vehicle input data comprises details of one or more proposed parts and labor operations for repairing the damage to the vehicle; and
determining the parts and labor operations of the vehicle input data that are relevant to each of the plurality of normalized parts of the vehicle.
3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising determining one or more scores indicative of a damage value based each of the one or more classifications indicating damage to at least one part.
4. The computer-implemented method of claim 3 , wherein determining one or more repair operations for each of the parts of the vehicle comprises comparing the one or more scores to a pre-determined threshold.
5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising the use of any or any combination of: a computer vision damage assessment model; a repair/replace prediction model; a labor hours prediction model; and/or a remove and install model.
6. The computer-implemented method of claim 5 , wherein the any or any combination of: a computer vision damage assessment model; a repair/replace prediction model; a labor hours prediction model; and/or a remove and install model are used as one or more secondary models that receive input from said one or more trained models.
7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more repair operations for each of the parts of the vehicle comprise replacing or repairing the damaged part of the vehicle.
8. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising determining repair or replace labor hours based on the one or more classifications.
9. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the pre-determined threshold is adjustable based on one or more jurisdictional requirements.
10. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising determining a plurality of parts of the damaged vehicle that are represented in the plurality of images of the damaged vehicle comprising the use of a plurality of classifiers.
11. The computer-implemented method of claim 10 , wherein each one of the plurality of classifiers is operable to detect each of the parts of the damaged vehicle.
12. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising determining one or more sets of relevant images of each of the plurality of parts from the plurality of images of the vehicle.
13. The computer-implemented method of claim 12 , further comprising determining a damage state of each of the parts of the vehicle using the one or more relevant images of each of the plurality of parts of the vehicle, the one or more damage states being determined as one or more quantitative values.
14. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more trained models comprise one or more of: a neural network; a convolutional neural network; and/or a recurrent neural network.
15. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising querying one or more databases to determine any of: pre-painted vehicle part costs; additional cost for a pre-painted part; total paint time for a pre-painted part; paint labor cost; material cost; and/or total paint cost.