IP Library Granted Patent US 11,653,629
Granted Patent B2
US 11,653,629 · App. 17/361,458 · Granted May 23, 2023

Proactive detection of invasive species

Inventors: Alison Antonio Silva (Atibaia, BR); Ariane Hernandes Amadeu (Nova Odessa, BR); Douglas Cristiano Alves (Timóteo, BR); Marcos Vinicius L. Paraiso (Campinas, BR)
Assignee: KYNDRYL, INC.
A01K11/008A01K11/006G06V10/255G06V20/13
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,653,629
App. No.
17/361,458
Granted
May 23, 2023
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system may include a memory and a processor in communication with the memory. The processor may be configured to perform operations to accept ecosystem data and detect, analyze, and notify a user about a species in an environment. The system analysis and notification may include impact determination of the species on the environment and shall learn from the received and analyzed data, bringing intelligence to the system.

Claims (69)

1. A system, comprising:

a processor that when executing instructions stored in an associated memory is configured to:

receive, from an online data source, ecosystem data associated with an ecosystem of an environment;

analyze the ecosystem data;

detect a species in the environment based on the analysis;

cross-check the ecosystem data with a remote data source that is different than the online data source to identity a probability that the species is an invasive species and to determine whether additional ecosystem data is required;

in response to an identification that the species is invasive, identify a severity of an impact of the species on the environment;

identify a type of intervention based on the severity, wherein different severity levels are associated with a corresponding different type of intervention; and

notify a user of the species, the type and severity of the impact, and the type of intervention.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the processor is further configured to:

determine that the impact exceeds a threshold;

cause the system to generate a report about the impact of the species; and

submit the report to a user.

3. The system of claim 2 , wherein the processor is further configured to:

develop a recommendation to remediate the impact at least one remediation recommendation; and

transmit the recommendation to the user.

4. The system of claim 1 , wherein, when the processor cross-checks the ecosystem data, the processor is further configured to:

compare an amount of details of the ecosystem data to a threshold; and

collect additional ecosystem data when the amount of details is less than the threshold.

5. The system of claim 4 , wherein the processor is further configured to:

automatically dispatch a data collector to collect the additional ecosystem data.

6. The system of claim 5 , wherein the data collector is a satellite.

7. The system of claim 1 , wherein, when the processor is configured to analyze the ecosystem data, the processor is further configured to:

compare the ecosystem data ecosystem data against reference data in a database.

8. A method, comprising:

receiving, from an online data source, ecosystem data associated with an ecosystem of an environment;

analyzing the ecosystem data;

detecting a species in the environment based on the analyzing;

cross-checking the ecosystem data with a remote data source that is different than the online data source to identity a probability that the species is an invasive species and to determine whether additional ecosystem data is required;

in response to identifying that the species is invasive, identifying a type and a severity of an impact of the species on the environment;

identifying a type of intervention based on the severity, wherein different severity levels are associated with a corresponding different type of intervention; and

notifying a user of the species, the type and severity of the impact, and the type of intervention.

9. The method of claim 8 , further comprising:

determining that the impact exceeds a threshold;

generating a report about the impact of the species; and

submitting the report to a user.

10. The method of claim 9 , further comprising:

developing a recommendation to remediate the impact; and

transmitting the recommendation to the user.

11. The method of claim 8 , wherein the cross-checking the ecosystem data further comprises:

comparing an amount of details of the ecosystem data to a threshold; and

collecting additional ecosystem data when the amount of details is less than the threshold.

12. The method of claim 11 , further comprising:

dispatching a data collector to collect the additional ecosystem data.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the data collector is a satellite.

14. The method of claim 8 , wherein, the analyzing the ecosystem data further comprises:

comparing the ecosystem data ecosystem data against reference data in a database.

15. A nontransitory computer readable medium comprising instructions that when executed by a processor cause the processor to perform:

receiving, from an online data source, ecosystem data associated with an ecosystem of an environment;

analyzing the ecosystem data;

detecting a species in the environment based on the analyzing;

cross-checking the ecosystem data with a remote data source that is different than the online data source to identity a probability that the species is an invasive species and to determine whether additional ecosystem data is required;

in response to identifying that the species is invasive, identifying a type and a severity of an impact of the species on the environment;

identifying a type of intervention based on the severity, wherein different severity levels are associated with a corresponding different type of intervention; and

notifying a user of the species, the type and severity of the impact, and the type of intervention.

16. The nontransitory computer readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the instruction further cause the processor to perform:

determining that the impact exceeds a threshold;

generating a report about the impact of the species; and

submitting the report to a user.

17. The nontransitory computer readable medium of claim 16 , wherein the instruction further cause the processor to perform:

developing a recommendation to remediate the impact; and

transmitting the recommendation to the user.

18. The nontransitory computer readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the cross-checking the ecosystem data further comprises:

comparing an amount of details of the ecosystem data to a threshold; and

collecting additional ecosystem data when the amount of details is less than the threshold.

19. The nontransitory computer readable medium of claim 18 , wherein the instruction further cause the processor to perform:

dispatching a data collector to collect the additional ecosystem data.

20. The nontransitory computer readable medium of claim 15 , wherein, the analyzing the ecosystem data further comprises:

comparing the ecosystem data ecosystem data against reference data in a database.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 18, 2021
From: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
To: KYNDRYL, INC.
Reel/Frame 058213/0912 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 29, 2021
From: SILVA, ALISON ANTONIO; AMADEU, ARIANE HERNANDES; ALVES, DOUGLAS CRISTIANO; PARAISO, MARCOS VINICIUS L.
To: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 056698/0810 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20220408692A1 · Dec 29, 2022