IP Library Granted Patent US 12,488,702
Granted Patent B2
US 12,488,702 · App. 17/378,980 · Granted Dec 2, 2025

Method of and system for one-engine-inoperative training in aircraft with dissimilar engines

Inventors: Aaron Alexander Acee (Highland Village, TX); Timothy McClellan Mosig (Richland Hills, TX); Michael Seifert (Southlake, TX)
Assignee: Textron Innovations Inc.
G09B9/18B64C27/006B64C27/12B64D31/12G09B9/08
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,488,702
App. No.
17/378,980
Granted
Dec 2, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method of simulating an aircraft one-engine inoperative (“OEI”) event includes operating a supplemental power unit (“SPU”) at a first SPU power level less than an SPU contingency power rating, operating a primary engine at a first primary-engine power level, reducing the primary-engine power level to less than the first primary-engine power level, and maintaining a sum of the primary-engine power level and the SPU power level at a power level substantially equal to the SPU contingency power rating.

Claims (30)

1 . A method of simulating a one-engine inoperative (“OEI”) event in a multi-engine aircraft that does not employ identical engines, the method comprising:

operating a supplemental power unit (“SPU”) at a first SPU power level less than an SPU contingency power rating, wherein the SPU contingency power rating is a power level after which the SPU must be inspected to assess a need for an overhaul of the SPU;

operating a primary engine at a first primary-engine power level;

simulating the OEI inoperative event by reducing the primary-engine power level to less than the first primary-engine power level; and

maintaining a sum of the primary-engine power level and the SPU power level at a power level substantially equal to the SPU contingency power rating.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first SPU power level is a power level at which the SPU can be operated continuously without damage.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first SPU power level is a non-zero power level.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first SPU power level is zero.

5 . The method of claim 1 , comprising operating the SPU at a second SPU power level greater than the first SPU power level and less than the SPU contingency power rating.

6 . The method of claim 1 , comprising operating the SPU at a second SPU power level less than the first SPU power level.

7 . A system for simulating an aircraft one-engine inoperative (“OEI”) event in a multi-engine aircraft that does not employ identical engines, the system comprising:

a supplemental power unit (“SPU”) operable at a first SPU power level less than an SPU contingency power rating, wherein the SPU contingency power rating is a power level after which the SPU must be inspected to assess a need for an overhaul of the SPU;

a primary engine operable at a first primary-engine power level;

a flight control system (“FCS”) that controls the SPU and the primary engine, wherein the FCS is operable to:

simulate the OEI inoperative event by reducing the primary-engine power level to less than the first primary-engine power level; and

maintain a sum of the primary-engine power level and the SPU power level at a power level substantially equal to the SPU contingency power rating.

8 . The system of claim 7 , wherein the first SPU power level is a power level at which the SPU can be operated continuously without damage.

9 . The system of claim 7 , wherein the first SPU power level is a non-zero power level.

10 . The system of claim 7 , wherein the first SPU power level is zero.

11 . The system of claim 7 , wherein the SPU is operable at a second SPU power level greater than the first SPU power level and less than the SPU contingency power rating.

12 . The system of claim 7 , wherein the SPU is operable at a second SPU power level less than the first SPU power level.

13 . A computer-program product comprising a non-transitory computer-usable medium having computer-readable program code embodied therein, the computer-readable program code adapted to be executed to implement a method comprising:

operating a supplemental power unit (“SPU”) of a multi-engine aircraft that does not employ identical engines at a first SPU power level less than an SPU contingency power rating, wherein the SPU contingency power rating is a power level after which the SPU must be inspected to assess a need for an overhaul of the SPU;

operating a primary engine of the multi-engine aircraft at a first primary-engine power level;

simulating the OEI inoperative event by reducing the primary-engine power level to less than the first primary-engine power level; and

maintaining a sum of the primary-engine power level and the SPU power level at a power level substantially equal to the SPU contingency power rating.

14 . The computer-program product of claim 13 , wherein the first SPU power level is a power level at which the SPU can be operated continuously without damage.

15 . The computer-program product of claim 13 , wherein the first SPU power level is a non-zero power level.

16 . The computer-program product of claim 13 , wherein the first SPU power level is zero.

17 . The computer-program product of claim 13 , the method comprising operating the SPU at a second SPU power level greater than the first SPU power level and less than the SPU contingency power rating.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 11, 2022
From: BELL TEXTRON INC.
To: BELL TEXTRON RHODE ISLAND INC.
Reel/Frame 058987/0726 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 11, 2022
From: BELL TEXTRON RHODE ISLAND INC.
To: TEXTRON INNOVATIONS INC.
Reel/Frame 058987/0900 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 19, 2021
From: ACEE, AARON ALEXANDER; MOSIG, TIMOTHY MCCLELLAN; SEIFERT, MICHAEL
To: BELL TEXTRON INC.
Reel/Frame 056900/0719 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230019379A1 · Jan 19, 2023
References Cited (6)
US 20110138817A1 · Vialle · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20130203021A1 · Beaud · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20150176488A1 · Borchers · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160237917A1 · Marconi · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170025032A1 · Dumar · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20200247553A1 · Prater · 2020 [cited by examiner]