IP Library Granted Patent US 11,546,042
Granted Patent B1
US 11,546,042 · App. 17/382,686 · Granted Jan 3, 2023

Selecting between MIMO and carrier aggregation

Inventors: Hemanth Pawar (Brambleton, VA); Krishna Sitaram (Chantilly, VA); Shilpa Kowdley Srinivas (Brambleton, VA)
Assignee: T-Mobile Innovations LLC
H04B7/0814H04B1/005H04B7/0413H04L5/001H04L5/0023H04W72/0453
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,546,042
App. No.
17/382,686
Granted
Jan 3, 2023
Kind
B1
Abstract

Monitoring a MIMO pairing efficiency of a sector to determine whether or not to enable/disable inter-band carrier aggregation. If the pairing efficiency (whether predicted or actual) is high, inter-band carrier aggregation is disabled, and if the pairing efficiency is low, then inter-band carrier aggregation is enabled. The inter-band carrier aggregation utilizes a low-frequency carrier as a primary component carrier and a high-frequency carrier as a secondary component carrier. The MIMO mode of operation utilizes the high-frequency carrier for control transmissions.

Claims (22)

1. A method for selecting between a multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) mode of operation and an inter-band carrier aggregation mode of operation in a wireless network, the method comprising:

determining that a MIMO pairing efficiency of a sector in the wireless network falls below a threshold; and

enabling the inter-band carrier aggregation mode of operation in the sector.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising disabling the MIMO mode of operation.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the MIMO pairing efficiency is based on one or more of: a quantity of MIMO-eligible wireless devices within the sector, a size of MIMO groups within the sector, a spectral efficiency of MIMO groups within the sector, or historical trends of MIMO pairing efficiency within the sector.

4. The method of claim 3 , further comprising generating a MIMO pairing efficiency metric, and comparing the MIMO pairing efficiency metric to the threshold.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the inter-band carrier aggregation mode of operation utilizes a low-frequency carrier and a high-frequency carrier.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein, in the inter-band carrier aggregation mode of operation, control transmissions use the low-frequency carrier and, in the MIMO operating mode, control transmissions use the high-frequency carrier.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the MIMO pairing efficiency is periodically monitored using a time period.

8. The method of claim 7 , further comprising determining, after the time period, that the MIMO pairing efficiency meets the threshold; and disabling the inter-band carrier aggregation mode of operation in the sector.

9. The method of claim 8 , further comprising enabling the MIMO mode of operation.

10. A method for selecting between a multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) mode of operation and an inter-band carrier aggregation mode of operation in a wireless network, the method comprising:

determining that a MIMO pairing efficiency of a sector in the wireless network meets a threshold; and

disabling the inter-band carrier aggregation mode of operation in the sector.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the MIMO pairing efficiency comprises a predicted MIMO pairing efficiency, the method further comprising enabling the MIMO mode of operation.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the predicted MIMO pairing efficiency is based on one or more of: a quantity of MIMO-eligible wireless devices within the sector, a potential size of MIMO groups within the sector, a predicted spectral efficiency of MIMO groups within the sector, or historical trends of MIMO pairing efficiency within the sector.

13. The method of claim 12 , further comprising generating a MIMO pairing efficiency metric, and comparing the MIMO pairing efficiency metric to the threshold.

14. The method of claim 10 , wherein the inter-band carrier aggregation mode of operation utilizes a low-frequency carrier and a high-frequency carrier.

15. The method of claim 14 , wherein, in the inter-band carrier aggregation mode of operation, control transmissions use the low-frequency carrier and, in the MIMO operating mode, control transmissions use the high-frequency carrier.

16. The method of claim 10 , wherein the MIMO pairing efficiency is periodically monitored using a time period.

17. The method of claim 16 , further comprising determining, after the time period, that the MIMO pairing efficiency falls below the threshold; and enabling the inter-band carrier aggregation mode of operation in the sector.

18. The method of claim 17 , further comprising disabling the MIMO mode of operation.

Assignments (2)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Feb 11, 2022
From: SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P.
To: SPRINT SPECTRUM LLC
Reel/Frame 059044/0022 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 22, 2021
From: PAWAR, HEMANTH; SITARAM, KRISHNA; SRINIVAS, SHILPA KOWDLEY
To: T-MOBILE INNOVATIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 056946/0932 →
Continuity (1)
Continuation 16787684 · Feb 11, 2020