IP Library Granted Patent US 12,433,681
Granted Patent B2
US 12,433,681 · App. 17/388,682 · Granted Oct 7, 2025

Systems and methods for magnetic sensing and docking with a trocar

Inventors: Bernhard A. Fuerst (Sunnyvale, CA); Dennis Moses (Hollywood, FL); Miguel Piedrahita (Mountain View, CA); Michael Wong (Mountain View, CA); Pablo Garcia Kilroy (Menlo Park, CA); Jose Luis Cordoba (Malaga, ES)
Assignee: Verb Surgical Inc.
A61B34/20A61B17/3423A61B34/35B25J13/088B25J15/0019A61B2017/00477A61B2034/2051A61B2562/0223B25J9/1689
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,433,681
App. No.
17/388,682
Granted
Oct 7, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A surgical robotic system has a tool drive coupled to a distal end of a robotic arm that has a plurality of actuators. The tool drive has a docking interface to receive a trocar. One or more sensors in the docking interface sense a magnetic field generated by the trocar. One or more processors are configured to determine a position and orientation of the trocar based on the sensed magnetic field, and then drive the actuators to orient the docking interface to the determined orientation of the trocar, or otherwise guide the robotic arm toward the determined position of the trocar. Other aspects are also described and claimed.

Claims (39)

1. A surgical robotic system, comprising:

a robotic arm;

a docking interface coupled to the robotic arm to receive a trocar;

one or more sensors operable to sense a magnetic field generated by the trocar wherein the one more sensors are coupled to the robotic arm and the magnetic field is generated by a plurality of magnets embedded in the trocar and wherein the one or more sensors are at least three sensors positioned in a chamber of the docking interface at respective different depths measured from a frontal opening of the docking interface; and

one or more processors configured to:

determine a position of the trocar based on the sensed magnetic field, and

guide the robotic arm toward the determined position of the trocar while the robotic arm is being manually guided by a user, by controlling a plurality of actuators of the robotic arm so as to resist the user's manual guidance of the robotic arm that is directing the robotic arm away from the determined position of the trocar.

2. The surgical robotic system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to guide the robotic arm by automatically controlling a plurality of actuators of the robotic arm to drive the arm toward the determined position of the trocar.

3. The surgical robotic system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to guide the robotic arm by automatically controlling a plurality of actuators of the robotic arm to assist a user who is manually guiding the robotic arm toward the determined position of the trocar.

4. The surgical robotic system of claim 1 , wherein the docking interface defines a chamber, and one or more clamp components are disposed in the chamber.

5. The surgical robotic system of claim 4 , wherein the one or more clamp components is movably coupled to the docking interface and configured to move to secure an attachment portion of the trocar to the docking interface.

6. The surgical robotic system of claim 5 , wherein the attachment portion of the trocar is a protrusion extending from an upper portion of the trocar.

7. The surgical robotic system of claim 1 wherein the at least three sensors are positioned on a plurality of sensor boards in the chamber of the docking interface, and the one or more processors are configured to:

produce estimated sensor readings that are output from a physical or deterministic model of a position and arrangement of the sensor boards in response to an estimated pose of the trocar that is input to the model; and

compute a similarity measure that compares the estimated sensor readings with measured sensor readings from the at least three sensors.

8. The surgical robotic system of claim 7 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to:

determine whether the similarity measure is within an acceptable range, and if not then adjusting the estimated pose of the trocar resulting in an updated estimated pose and producing updated estimated sensor readings that are output from the physical or deterministic model in response to the updated estimated pose that is input to the model.

9. The surgical robotic system of claim 7 wherein the one or more processors are configured to:

determine whether the similarity measure is within an acceptable range, and if so then providing a transform for guiding the robotic arm wherein the transform comprises the estimated pose of the trocar or the estimated sensor readings and a current pose of the docking interface.

10. The surgical robotic system of claim 1 , wherein each of the plurality of magnets in the trocar has a different axis of polarization and the plurality of magnets are obliquely arranged relative to one another.

11. The surgical robotic system of claim 10 , wherein the at least three sensors are positioned on a plurality of sensor boards in the chamber of the docking interface, and the one or more processors produce estimated sensor readings that are output from a physical or deterministic model of a position and arrangement of the sensor boards in response to an estimated pose of the trocar that is input to the model.

12. The surgical robotic system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more sensors comprises a first plurality of sensors coupled to a first sensor board and a second plurality of sensors coupled to a second sensor board, and wherein the docking interface further comprises an inertial measurement unit that the one or more processors use to compensate for the magnetic field of the Earth or vibrations of the robotic arm.

13. The surgical robotic system of claim 1 wherein the one or more processors are configured to guide the robotic arm so that the docking interface moves toward the trocar until an attachment portion of the trocar is at least partially disposed in a chamber of the docking interface, wherein the attachment portion of the trocar is a protrusion extending from an upper portion of the trocar.

14. The surgical robotic system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to determine an orientation of the trocar based on the sensed magnetic field, and guide the robotic arm by automatically controlling a plurality of actuators of the robotic arm to re-orient the docking interface.

15. The surgical robotic system of claim 1 , further comprising a switch mounted on the docking interface and communicatively coupled to the one or more processors.

16. The surgical robotic system of claim 15 , wherein the one or more processors respond to the switch by determining the position or orientation of the trocar based on the sensed magnetic field, and guiding the robotic arm toward the determined position-the lever moving in one direction into contact with the switch, by processing a measured sensor reading, and the docking interface becomes locked to the trocar in response to the lever moving in another direction.

17. A method performed by a processor in a surgical robotic system, the method comprising:

the processor determining a position of a trocar based on a sensed magnetic field, wherein the magnetic field is generated by a plurality of magnets embedded in the trocar and sensed by one or more sensors that are coupled to a surgical robotic arm, wherein the one or more sensors are at least three magnetometers positioned in a docking interface of the robotic arm, and the position of the trocar is determined based on the processor processing at least three output electrical signals from the at least three magnetometers, respectively; and

the processor guiding the surgical robotic arm toward the determined position of the trocar, wherein guiding the surgical robotic arm comprises:

while the robotic arm is being manually guided by a user and the user's manual guidance is directing the robotic arm away from the determined position of the trocar, the processor is controlling a plurality of actuators of the robotic arm so as to resist the user's manual guidance of the robotic arm that is directing the robotic arm away from the determined position of the trocar.

18. The method of claim 17 wherein guiding the surgical robotic arm further comprises automatically controlling the plurality of actuators of the surgical robotic arm to drive the surgical robotic arm toward the determined position of the trocar.

19. The method of claim 17 wherein guiding the robotic arm further comprises automatically controlling the plurality of actuators to assist the user who is manually guiding the surgical robotic arm toward the trocar.

20. A surgical robotic system, comprising:

a robotic arm;

a docking interface coupled to the robotic arm to receive a trocar;

at least three sensors, in a chamber of the docking interface and positioned at respective different depths measured from a frontal opening of the docking interface, to sense a magnetic field generated by one or more magnets in the trocar; and

one or more processors configured to

determine a position of the trocar based on the sensed magnetic field, and

guide the robotic arm toward the determined position of the trocar.

Assignments (1)
MERGER Recorded Jan 26, 2026
From: VERB SURGICAL INC.
To: AURIS HEALTH, INC.
Reel/Frame 073583/0369 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 16285001 · Feb 25, 2019
Related Publication 20210353369A1 · Nov 18, 2021
References Cited (88)
US 4773815A · Lemelson · 1988 [cited by examiner]
US 5919120A · Pumphrey · 1999 [cited by examiner]
US 6876198B2 · Watanabe · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 10786317B2 · Zhou et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11090122B2 · Fuerst · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20060119572A1 · Lanier · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20070265527A1 · Wohlgemuth · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20080269694A1 · Pieringer · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090043246A1 · Dominguez · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090281386A1 · Acosta et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090322278A1 · Franks · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20090326553A1 · Mustufa · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20100010504A1 · Simaan · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20100010672A1 · Wang · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20100063514A1 · Maschke · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20100081882A1 · Hess et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100174410A1 · Greer · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20100211713A1 · Waldhoff · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20100288307A1 · Chung · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20110022762A1 · Waldhoff · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110043537A1 · Dellon · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20120253515A1 · Coste-Maniere et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130006267A1 · Odermatt · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130046438A1 · Summer · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130066335A1 · Barwinkel · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130096570A1 · Solar et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130298715A1 · Valdastri et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140275796A1 · McGrogan · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140275955A1 · Crawford et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150141755A1 · Tesar · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150366624A1 · Kostrzewski · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160045269A1 · Elhawary et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160089181A1 · Johnson · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160113728A1 · Piron et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160361128A1 · Seeber · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170020615A1 · Koenig · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170086927A1 · Auld · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170086932A1 · Auld et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170143435A1 · Scholan · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170231702A1 · Crawford et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180014890A1 · Stanton et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180042686A1 · Peine · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180049814A1 · Overmyer · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180049824A1 · Harris · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180078332A1 · Mozes et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180250084A1 · Kopp · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180283842A1 · Rueb et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180289431A1 · Draper · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180296289A1 · Rodriguez-Navarro · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190053824A1 · Scheib · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190175286A1 · Zhou et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190183585A1 · Rafii-Tari et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190201104A1 · Shelton, IV · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190321115A1 · Anderson et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200268453A1 · Fuerst · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200405403A1 · Shelton, IV · 2020 [cited by examiner]
CN 104271068A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
CN 104736097A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
DE 102010040987 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
JP 2016520345A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2014185334A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO 2015044184A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018064566A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2019/021465 mailed Sep. 2, 2021, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2019/021465 mailed Oct. 29, 2019, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Wahlstrom, Niklas, et al., “Tracking Position and Orientation of Magnetic Objects Using Magnetometer Networks,” Linkoping University Post Print, <http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-122395>, 2015, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Song, Shuang, et al., “An Improved 6-D Pose Detection Method Based on Opposing-Magnet Pair System and Constraint Multiple Magnets Tracking Algorithm,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 17, No. 20, Oct. 15, 2017, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action received for Chinese Patent Application No. 201980093019.6, mailed on Oct. 28, 2023, 14 pages (7 pages of English Translation and 7 pages of Original Document). [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 19916951.7 mailed Oct. 19, 2022, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action received for Chinese Patent Application No. 201980093019.6, mailed on May 10, 2024, 10 pages (5 pages of English Translation and 5 pages of Original Document). [cited by applicant]
Advisory Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/959,137, mailed on Jan. 21, 2021, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Drouin, Simon, et al., “Interaction-Based Registration Correction for Improved Augmented Reality Overlay in Neurosurgery,” Conference Paper in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Oct. 2015, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 18915510.4 mailed Mar. 10, 2022, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 17/350,835, mailed on Nov. 7, 2023, 28 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2018/030862 mailed Oct. 29, 2020, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/959,137, mailed on Jul. 8, 2020, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 17/350,835, mailed on May 17, 2023, 30 pages. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/959,137, mailed on Feb. 23, 2021, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/285,001, mailed on Apr. 19, 2021, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance received for U.S. Appl. No. 17/350,835, mailed on Dec. 20, 2023, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Notification of Reasons for Refusal for Japanese Application No. 2020-557299 mailed Jan. 4, 2022, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Partial Supplementary European Search Report for European Application No. 18915510.4 mailed Dec. 6, 2021, 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 18, 2019, for related PCT Appln. No, PCT/US2018/030862 18 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Requirement for Restriction/Election received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/959,137, mailed on Feb. 21, 2020, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Requirement for Restriction/Election received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/285,001, mailed on Jan. 1, 2021, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action including Search Report received for Chinese Patent Application No. 201880092582.7, mailed on May 21, 2024, 13 pages (6 pages of English Translation and 7 pages of Original Document). [cited by applicant]
Decision to Grant received for Chinese Patent Application No. 201880092582.7, mailed on Dec. 13, 2024, 6 pages (4 pages of Original Document and 2 pages of English Translation). [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 18/434,447, mailed on Aug. 25, 2025, 25 pages. [cited by applicant]