IP Library Granted Patent US 11,392,679
Granted Patent B2
US 11,392,679 · App. 17/394,134 · Granted Jul 19, 2022

Certificate verification

Inventor: Mingyu Guo (Hangzhou, CN)
Assignee: Advanced New Technologies Co., Ltd.
G06F21/33G06N5/04G06T7/001G06T7/136
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,392,679
App. No.
17/394,134
Granted
Jul 19, 2022
Kind
B2
Abstract

A computer-implemented certificate verification method includes: obtaining, by a certificate verification module, at least two images of a certificate, in which the at least two images are acquired under different acquisition conditions; obtaining, from the at least two images, at least two target images that correspond to respective images of the at least two images and that each include an image of a light-reflective coating of the certificate; and determining, based on the at least two target images, a probability that the certificate is an original.

Claims (71)

1. A computer-implemented certificate verification method, comprising:

obtaining at least two images of a certificate, wherein the at least two images are acquired under different acquisition conditions;

obtaining, from the at least two images, at least two target images that correspond to respective images of the at least two images and that each comprise an image of a light-reflective coating of the certificate;

extracting values corresponding to the light-reflective coating from the at least two target images;

determining, based on the extracted values corresponding to the light-reflective coating from the at least two target images, that the certificate is authentic or that the certificate is inauthentic; and

verifying identify information of the certificate based at least on determining that the certificate is authentic or that the certificate is inauthentic.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the different acquisition conditions comprise at least one of:

different acquisition angles and different lighting environments.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein obtaining the at least two images of the certificate comprises:

obtaining the at least two images from a video of the certificate.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein obtaining the at least two target images comprises:

performing image binarization processing on the at least two images to obtain binarized images corresponding to the at least two images; and

obtaining the at least two target images from the binarized images.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein obtaining the at least two target images comprises:

performing image alignment processing on the at least two images to obtained aligned images corresponding to the at least two images; and

obtaining the at least two target images from the aligned images.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein determining that the certificate is authentic or that the certificate is inauthentic comprises:

dividing each of the at least two target images into areas;

comparing corresponding areas between the at least two target images, to obtain comparison scores; and

determining, based on the comparison scores, that the certificate is authentic or that the certificate is inauthentic.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein determining that the certificate is authentic or that the certificate is inauthentic comprises:

performing normalization processing on the extracted values to obtain a normalized value corresponding to the light-reflective coating; and

determining, based on the normalized value and a predetermined decision policy, that the certificate is authentic or that the certificate is inauthentic, wherein the predetermined decision policy comprises a decision relationship between the normalized value and a decision that the certificate is authentic or inauthentic.

8. A non-transitory, computer-readable medium storing one or more instructions that, when executed by a computer system, cause the computer system to perform operations comprising:

obtaining at least two images of a certificate, wherein the at least two images are acquired under different acquisition conditions;

obtaining, from the at least two images, at least two target images that correspond to respective images of the at least two images and that each comprise an image of a light-reflective coating of the certificate;

extracting values corresponding to the light-reflective coating from the at least two target images;

determining, based on the extracted values corresponding to the light-reflective coating from the at least two target images, that the certificate is authentic or that the certificate is inauthentic; and

verifying identify information of the certificate based at least on determining that the certificate is authentic or that the certificate is inauthentic.

9. The computer-readable medium of claim 8 , wherein the different acquisition conditions comprise at least one of: different acquisition angles and different lighting environments.

10. The computer-readable medium of claim 8 , wherein obtaining the at least two images of the certificate comprises:

obtaining the at least two images from a video of the certificate.

11. The computer-readable medium of claim 8 , wherein obtaining the at least two target images comprises:

performing image binarization processing on the at least two images to obtain binarized images corresponding to the at least two images; and

obtaining the at least two target images from the binarized images.

12. The computer-readable medium of claim 8 , wherein obtaining the at least two target images comprises:

performing image alignment processing on the at least two images to obtained aligned images corresponding to the at least two images; and

obtaining the at least two target images from the aligned images.

13. The computer-readable medium of claim 8 , wherein determining that the certificate is authentic or that the certificate is inauthentic comprises:

dividing each of the at least two target images into areas;

comparing corresponding areas between the at least two target images, to obtain comparison scores; and

determining, based on the comparison scores, that the certificate is authentic or that the certificate is inauthentic.

14. The computer-readable medium of claim 8 , wherein determining that the certificate is authentic or that the certificate is inauthentic comprises:

performing normalization processing on the extracted values to obtain a normalized value corresponding to the light-reflective coating; and

determining, based on the normalized value and a predetermined decision policy, that the certificate is authentic or that the certificate is inauthentic, wherein the predetermined decision policy comprises a decision relationship between the normalized value and a decision that the certificate is authentic or inauthentic.

15. A computer-implemented system, comprising:

one or more computers; and

one or more computer memory devices interoperably coupled with the one or more computers and having tangible, non-transitory, machine-readable media storing one or more instructions that, when executed by the one or more computers, cause the one or more computers to perform one or more operations comprising:

obtaining at least two images of a certificate, wherein the at least two images are acquired under different acquisition conditions;

obtaining, from the at least two images, at least two target images that correspond to respective images of the at least two images and that each comprise an image of a light-reflective coating of the certificate;

extracting values corresponding to the light-reflective coating from the at least two target images;

determining, based on the extracted values corresponding to the light-reflective coating from the at least two target images, that the certificate is authentic or that the certificate is inauthentic; and

verifying identify information of the certificate based at least on determining that the certificate is authentic or that the certificate is inauthentic.

16. The computer-implemented system of claim 15 , wherein the different acquisition conditions comprise at least one of: different acquisition angles and different lighting environments.

17. The computer-implemented system of claim 15 , wherein

obtaining the at least two images of the certificate comprises:

obtaining the at least two images from a video of the certificate.

18. The computer-implemented system of claim 15 , wherein

obtaining the at least two target images comprises:

performing image binarization processing on the at least two images to obtain binarized images corresponding to the at least two images; and

obtaining the at least two target images from the binarized images.

19. The computer-implemented system of claim 15 , wherein obtaining the at least two target images comprises:

performing image alignment processing on the at least two images to obtained aligned images corresponding to the at least two images; and

obtaining the at least two target images from the aligned images.

20. The computer-implemented system of claim 15 , wherein determining that the certificate is authentic or that the certificate is inauthentic comprises:

dividing each of the at least two target images into areas;

comparing corresponding areas between the at least two target images, to obtain comparison scores; and

determining, based on the comparison scores, that the certificate is authentic or that the certificate is inauthentic.

21. The computer-implemented system of claim 15 , wherein determining that the certificate is authentic or that the certificate is inauthentic comprises:

performing normalization processing on the extracted values to obtain a normalized value corresponding to the light-reflective coating; and

determining, based on the normalized value and a predetermined decision policy, that the certificate is authentic or that the certificate is inauthentic, wherein the predetermined decision policy comprises a decision relationship between the normalized value and a decision that the certificate is authentic or inauthentic.

Assignments (4)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 31, 2025
From: ADVANCED NEW TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.
To: ZOLOZ PTE. LTD.
Reel/Frame 070080/0648 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 7, 2021
From: GUO, MINGYU
To: ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LIMITED
Reel/Frame 057725/0881 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 7, 2021
From: ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LIMITED
To: ADVANTAGEOUS NEW TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.
Reel/Frame 057747/0194 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 7, 2021
From: ADVANTAGEOUS NEW TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.
To: ADVANCED NEW TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.
Reel/Frame 057747/0242 →