IP Library Granted Patent US 12,696,892
Granted Patent B2
US 12,696,892 · App. 17/396,193 · Granted Aug 4, 2026

Preventing damage by farming machine

Inventors: Kent Anderson (Signal Mountain, TN); Ben Chostner (San Francisco, CA); Bryon Majusiak (Incline Village, NV); Divya Sharma (Incline Village, NV); Lee Redden (Palo Alto, CA)
Assignee: Deere & Company
A01M7/0089A01B79/005G01N33/246G01N33/245
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,696,892
App. No.
17/396,193
Filed
Aug 6, 2021
Granted
Aug 4, 2026
Kind
B2
Art Unit
3669
USPC
701/50
Abstract

A farming machine moves through a field and performs one or more farming actions (e.g., treating one or more plants) in the field. Portions of the field may include moisture, such as puddles or mud patches. A control system associated with the farming machine may include a traversability model and/or a moisture model to help the farming machine operate in the field with the moisture. In particular, the control system may employ the traversability model to reduce the likelihood of the farming machine attempting to traverse an untraversable portion of the field, and the control system may employ the moisture model to reduce the likelihood of the farming machine performing an action that will damage a portion of the field.

Claims (47)

1 . A method for operating in a field with moisture by a farming machine with a wheel or track and a treatment mechanism configured to perform treatment actions to one or more plants in the field, the method comprising:

moving, by the farming machine, along a route in the field by the wheel or track;

identifying a first farming action to perform by the farming machine at a portion of the field, the identified first farming action to be performed as the farming machine moves through the portion along the route;

determining, by applying a traversability model to an image of the wheel or track of the farming machine, a traversability difficulty value for the portion of the field, the traversability model configured to:

determine, based on the image, a mud buildup on the wheel or track;

determine a measure of moisture for the portion of the field based on the determined mud buildup; and

determine the traversability difficulty value based on the measure of moisture;

determining a traversability capability value of the farming machine;

determining whether the traversability difficulty value is above the traversability capability value of the farming machine,

in response to the traversability difficulty value being above the traversability capability value of the farming machine, determining a second farming action for a next portion of the field, the second farming action modifying the first farming action; and

performing the second farming action in the field.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the second farming action is performed instead of the first farming action.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the second farming action comprises nullifying the first farming action such that the first farming action is not performed as the farming machine moves along the route.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the second farming action includes at least one of: modifying the route or modifying a driving parameter of the farming machine.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the measure of moisture is further based on diagnostic information from one or more sensors of the farming machine.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the traversability capability value of the farming machine is based on characteristics describing the farming machine, the characteristics including at least one of: a wheel type, a wheel size, a tread type, an engine/motor type, a drive type, a make, a model, a weight, a fuel level, the treatment mechanism, and/or a coupling mechanism of the farming machine.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the traversability difficulty value is further based on one or more types of soil in the portion of the field and a gradient of the portion of the field.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the farming machine is autonomous.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the traversability model is a weighted model.

10 . A farming machine comprising a wheel or track and a treatment mechanism configured to perform treatment actions to one or more plants in a field, the farming machine configured to:

move along a route in the field by the wheel or track;

identify a first farming action to perform at a portion of the field, the identified first farming action to be performed as the farming machine moves through the portion along the route;

determine, by applying a traversability model to an image of the wheel or track of the farming machine, a traversability difficulty value for the portion of the field, the traversability model configured to;

determine, based on the image, a mud buildup on the wheel or track;

determine a measure of moisture for the portion of the field based on the determined mud buildup; and

determine the traversability difficulty value based on the measure of moisture;

determine a traversability capability value of the farming machine;

determine whether the traversability difficulty value is above the traversability capability value of the farming machine,

in response to the traversability difficulty value being above the traversability capability value of the farming machine, determining a second farming action for a next portion of the field, the second farming action modifying the first farming action; and

perform the second farming action in the field.

11 . The farming machine of claim 10 , wherein the second farming action is performed instead of the first farming action.

12 . The farming machine of claim 10 , wherein the second farming action comprises nullifying the first farming action such that the first farming action is not performed as the farming machine moves along the route.

13 . The farming machine of claim 10 , wherein the second farming action includes at least one of: modifying the route or modifying a driving parameter of the farming machine.

14 . The farming machine of claim 10 , wherein determining the traversability difficulty value is further based on diagnostic information from one or more sensors of the farming machine.

15 . The farming machine of claim 10 , wherein determining the traversability capability value of the farming machine is based on characteristics describing the farming machine, the characteristics including at least one of: a wheel type, a wheel size, a tread type, an engine/motor type, a drive type, a make, a model, a weight, a fuel level, the treatment mechanism, and/or a coupling mechanism of the farming machine.

16 . The farming machine of claim 10 , wherein determining the traversability difficulty value is further based on one or more types of soil in the portion of the field and a gradient of the portion of the field.

17 . One or more non-transitory computer-readable storage mediums storing instructions that, when executed by a set of one or more processors, causes the set of one or more processors to:

cause a farming machine to move along a route in a field, the farming machine comprising a wheel or track and a treatment mechanism configured to perform treatment actions to one or more plants in the field;

identify a first farming action to perform at a portion of the field, the identified first farming action to be performed as the farming machine moves through the portion along the route;

determine, by applying a traversability model to an image of the wheel or track of the farming machine, a traversability difficulty value for the portion of the field, the traversability model configured to:

determine, based on the image, a mud buildup on the wheel or track;

determine a measure of moisture for the portion of the field based on the determined mud buildup; and

determine the traversability difficulty value based on the measure of moisture;

determine a traversability capability value of the farming machine;

determine whether the traversability difficulty value is above the traversability capability value of the farming machine,

in response to the traversability difficulty value being above the traversability capability value of the farming machine, determine a second farming action for a next portion of the field, the second farming action modifying the first farming action; and

perform the second farming action in the field.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 11, 2024
From: BLUE RIVER TECHNOLOGY INC.
To: DEERE & COMPANY
Reel/Frame 069164/0195 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 6, 2022
From: ANDERSON, KENT; CHOSTNER, BEN; MAJUSIAK, BRYON WILLIAM; SHARMA, DIVYA; REDDEN, LEE KAMP
To: BLUE RIVER TECHNOLOGY INC.
Reel/Frame 059864/0864 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230039092A1 · Feb 9, 2023
References Cited (69)
US 5751576A · Monson · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5884224A · Mcnabb et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6427781B1 · Buhler et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 9139998B1 · Conner et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9658201B2 · Redden et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10912251B2 · Pickett et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11479213B1 · Kentley-Klay · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20080131202A1 · Slater · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20120237083A1 · Lange et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120323452A1 · Green · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20140236431A1 · Hendrickson · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150338848A1 · Kumar et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160108606A1 · Strutynsky · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170101103A1 · Foster · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180025560A1 · Matsuzaki et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180050704A1 · Tascione et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180070527A1 · Richt · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180092295A1 · Sugumaran et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180257657A1 · Blank et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180268532A1 · Wang · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180271015A1 · Redden et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190129435A1 · Madsen et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190150357A1 · Wu · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190217864A1 · Kusukame et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190362146A1 · Polzounov et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200029490A1 · Bertucci et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200093054A1 · Aesaert · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200107490A1 · Zemenchik · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200114843A1 · Foster et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200128734A1 · Brammeier · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200193589A1 · Peshlov et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200236834A1 · Balani et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200236836A1 · Barrick et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200344939A1 · Sporrer et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210029865A1 · Smith et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210120730A1 · Anderson · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210149406A1 · Javault et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210173399A1 · Richard · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210191409A1 · Ready-Campbell et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210192294A1 · Stanhope et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210251128A1 · Rupp et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210321568A1 · Garton et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210404812A1 · Yuasa · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220026921A1 · Halder · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220117215A1 · Sibley et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220183209A1 · Scott-Robinson et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220269282A1 · Ascherl et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220327335A1 · Thopalli · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220406104A1 · Maeder et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230039092A1 · Anderson et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230040430A1 · Redden et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230121070A1 · Kanai · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230255137A1 · Mcmahan et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230256972A1 · Roy · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20240026655A1 · Stander et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
JP 2007099110A · 2007 [cited by examiner]
JP 2016190607A · 2016 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2019089853A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
Furuya Shimpei—English description of JP-2016190607-A via Espacenet Patent Translate, retrieved Nov. 6, 2025 (Year: 2025). [cited by examiner]
Obara Masaaki—English description of JP-2007099110-A via Espacenet Patent Translate, Mar. 3, 2026. (Year: 2026). [cited by examiner]
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT Application No. PCT/US2022/39462, Feb. 7, 2023, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT Application No. PCT/US22/39085, Oct. 31, 2022, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Rankin, A.L. et al., “Daytime Water Detection by Fusing Multiple Cues for Autonomous Off-Road Navigation,” 24th Army Science Conference, Nov. 2004, pp. 1-8. [cited by applicant]
United States Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 17/396,170, filed Aug. 25, 2023, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report and Written Opinion issued in European Patent Application No. 22853778.3 dated Jan. 16, 2025, in 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report, European Patent Application No. 22853778.3, Jan. 16, 2025, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report and Written Opinion issued in European Patent Application No. 22853921.9 dated May 21, 2025, in 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
PCT Invitation to Pay Additional Fees, PCT Application No. PCT/US22/39462, Nov. 23, 2022, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 17/881,436, filed Nov. 25, 2024, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]