IP Library Granted Patent US 12,419,723
Granted Patent B2
US 12,419,723 · App. 17/441,331 · Granted Sep 23, 2025

Automated process for intermediate orthodontic digital setup reuse due to treatment plan modifications

Inventors: Alexandra R. Cunliffe (St. Paul, MN); Guruprasad Somasundaram (Woodbury, MN); Benjamin D. Zimmer (Hudson, WI); Nitsan Ben-Gal Nguyen (Apple Valley, MN); Vera Shuman (St. Paul, MN); Nancy M. Amato (Champaign, IL); Shawna L. Thomas (College Station, TX)
Assignee: Solventum Intellectual Properties Company
A61C7/002G06T5/70G16H20/40G16H30/40G06T2207/30036
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,419,723
App. No.
17/441,331
Granted
Sep 23, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for generating and reusing digital setups for an orthodontic treatment path. The method receives a digital 3D model of teeth, optionally performs interproximal reduction on the model, and generates an initial treatment path with stages including an initial, final, and intermediate setups. The method divides the initial treatment path into initial steps of feasible motion of the teeth resulting in a final treatment path with setups corresponding with the initial steps. For a treatment redesign, the method computes new steps of feasible motion for only a portion of the initial treatment path and based upon the initial steps, and generates the final path with new setups corresponding with the new steps. The setups can be used to make orthodontic appliances, such as clear tray aligners.

Claims (42)

1. A method for generating and reusing setups for an orthodontic treatment path using a system, the method comprising, comprising steps of:

receiving a digital 3D model of teeth;

receiving a plurality of successively increasing resolutions, wherein lower resolutions specify larger tooth movement step sizes in a treatment path and higher resolutions specify smaller tooth movement step sizes in a treatment path;

generating an initial treatment path with stages including an initial setup, a final setup, and a plurality of intermediate setups;

for each resolution in the plurality of successively increasing resolutions,

dividing the initial treatment path into steps of feasible motion of the teeth within a step size specified by the resolution resulting in a modified treatment path with setups corresponding with the steps of feasible motion;

computing new steps of feasible motion of the teeth for only a portion of the initial treatment path within the step size specified by the resolution;

updating the initial treatment path based at least on the modified treatment path or by adding the computed new steps to the initial treatment path within the step size specified by the resolution;

generating a final treatment path based on iteratively processing the initial treatment path at each resolution in the plurality of successively increasing resolutions; and

manufacturing one or more orthodontic aligners using a 3D printer coupled to the system, based on a final digital setup corresponding to the final treatment path.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the generating the initial treatment path step comprises generating the initial treatment path with key intermediate setups.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the dividing step further comprises generating one or more evaluation criteria that assigns scores to the setups and dividing the treatment path is based, at least in part on, the evaluation criteria.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein if the treatment path does not satisfy the evaluation criteria, generating a new treatment path.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the generating the new treatment path comprises applying a smoothing algorithm to the treatment path.

6. The method of claim 4 , wherein the generating the new treatment path comprises applying a region refinement algorithm to the treatment path.

7. The method of claim 4 , wherein the generating the new treatment path comprises finding a shortest treatment path that satisfies the evaluation criteria.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the dividing step comprises dividing the final treatment path based upon key frames.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the dividing step comprises generating multiple final treatment paths.

10. The method of claim 9 , further comprising reporting one or more scores for each of the multiple treatment paths.

11. The method of claim 9 , further comprising selecting the final treatment path among the multiple final treatment paths based upon user input.

12. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

performing interproximal reduction (IPR) on the digital 3D model;

computing IPR accessibility for each tooth at each stage of the initial treatment path; and

applying IPR throughout the initial treatment path based upon the computed IPR accessibility.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the applying step comprises applying an IPR batching algorithm to the treatment path.

14. A system configured to generate and reuse setups for an orthodontic treatment path, comprising:

one or more computer processors; and

non-transitory computer-readable storage communicatively coupled with the one or more computer processors and having instructions stored thereon that when executed cause the one or more computer processors to:

receive a digital 3D model of teeth;

receive a plurality of successively increasing resolutions, wherein lower resolutions specify larger tooth movement step sizes in a treatment path and higher resolutions specify smaller tooth movement step sizes in a treatment path;

generate an initial treatment path with stages including an initial setup, a final setup, and a plurality of intermediate setups;

for each resolution in the plurality of successively increasing resolutions,

divide the initial treatment path into steps of feasible motion of the teeth within a step size specified by the resolution resulting in a modified treatment path with setups corresponding with the steps of feasible motion;

compute new steps of feasible motion of the teeth for only a portion of the initial treatment path within the step size specified by the resolution;

update the initial treatment path based at least on the modified treatment path or by adding the computed new steps to the initial treatment path within the step size specified by the resolution;

generate a final treatment path based on iteratively processing the initial treatment path at each resolution in the plurality of successively increasing resolutions; and

manufacture one or more orthodontic aligners using a 3D printer coupled to the system, based on a final digital setup corresponding to the final treatment path.

15. The system of claim 14 , wherein the instructions further cause the one or more processors to:

perform interproximal reduction (IPR) on the digital 3D model;

compute IPR accessibility for each tooth at each stage of the initial treatment path; and

apply IPR throughout the initial treatment path based upon the computed IPR accessibility.

16. The system of claim 15 , wherein the applying step comprises applying an IPR batching algorithm to the treatment path.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 1, 2024
From: 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY
To: SOLVENTUM INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES COMPANY
Reel/Frame 066430/0149 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 21, 2021
From: CUNLIFFE, ALEXANDRA R.; SOMASUNDARAM, GURUPRASAD; ZIMMER, BENJAMIN D.; BEN-GAL NGUYEN, NITSAN; SHUMAN, VERA; AMATO, NANCY M.; THOMAS, SHAWNA L.
To: 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY
Reel/Frame 057541/0375 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62829065 · Apr 4, 2019
Related Publication 20220160469A1 · May 26, 2022
References Cited (22)
US 6488499B1 · Miller · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 6602070B2 · Miller · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6783360B2 · Chishti · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 7605817B2 · Zhang · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7956862B2 · Zhang · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 10595965B2 · Khardekar · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20020042038A1 · Miller · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 20050048432A1 · Choi · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20070238065A1 · Sherwood · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20080057461A1 · Cheng · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20080248443A1 · Chishti et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080306724A1 · Kitching · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20130309626A1 · Arunachalam · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20150351871A1 · Chishti · 2015 [cited by examiner]
CN 101006940A · 2007 [cited by applicant]
CN 101977564A · 2011 [cited by applicant]
CN 107530141A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
CN 109310488A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019069191A3 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2019069191 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
EESR, EP20782765.0, dated Nov. 30, 2022, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search report for PCT International Application No. PCT/IB2020/053060 mailed on Jul. 9, 2020, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]