Physics-aware automatic spatial planning for subtractive and hybrid manufacturing
A method includes receiving a representation of a near-net shape including a 3D part and a support volume. The method also includes calculating a measure of inaccessibility of the support volume by at least one subtractive tool assembly. The method also includes calculating a measure of change in a physical quantity of interest with respect to a change in the near-net shape. The method also includes constructing a physics-aware inaccessibility measure based at least partially upon the measure of inaccessibility, the measure of change, or both. The method also includes creating a plan to remove at least a portion of the support volume using the at least one subtractive tool assembly based at least partially upon the physics-aware inaccessibility measure.
1. A method, comprising:
receiving a representation of a near-net shape comprising a 3D part and a support volume;
calculating a measure of inaccessibility of the support volume by at least one subtractive tool
assembly; calculating a measure of change in a physical quantity of interest with respect to a change in the near-net shape;
constructing a physics-aware inaccessibility measure based at least partially upon a sum of the measure of inaccessibility and the measure of change;
creating a plan to remove at least a portion of the support volume using the at least one subtractive tool assembly based at least partially upon the physics-aware inaccessibility measures
building the near-net shape using a 3D printer; and
removing a region of the support volume from the near-net shape using the at least one subtractive tool assembly based at least partially upon the plan to yield the 3D part.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one subtractive tool assembly comprises a multi-axis machining tool.
3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the multi-axis machining tool comprises a 2-axis turning machine, a 3-axis milling machine, a 5-axis turn-milling machine, a sawing machine, a wire-cutting machine, a laser-cutting machine, or a combination thereof.
4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the measure of inaccessibility comprises a continuous, spatial field that quantifies to what extent different points in the initial design domain cannot be accessed by the at least one subtractive tool assembly.
5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the at least one subtractive tool assembly comprises a plurality of subtractive tool assemblies, and wherein the measure of inaccessibility is calculated for the plurality of subtractive tool assemblies as a minimum of the measure of inaccessibility for each of the plurality of subtractive tool assemblies.
6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the measure of inaccessibility for each of the plurality of subtractive tool assemblies at every query point of the initial design domain is calculated as a minimum of the measure of inaccessibility for different configurations at which the query point is removable by the plurality of subtractive tool assemblies.
7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the different configurations comprise:
at least one displacement that brings the at least one subtractive tool assembly in contact with the query points; and
one or more orientations that are available to the at least one subtractive tool assembly.
8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the measure of inaccessibility is at least partially defined by a volume of a collision between the at least one subtractive tool assembly and the 3D part.
9. The method of claim 1 , further comprising receiving a representation of at least one fixture for subtractive manufacturing and a build platform, and wherein the measure of inaccessibility is at least partially defined by a volume of a collision between the at least one subtractive tool assembly and the near-net shape, the build platform, the at least one fixturing device, or a combination thereof.
10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the measure of change in the physical quantity of interest is based at least partially upon a topological sensitivity field.
11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the topological sensitivity field is with respect to deformation or stress caused by a weight of the near-net shape.
12. The method of claim 10 , wherein the topological sensitivity field is with respect to deformation or stress caused by a contact force of the at least one subtractive tool assembly.
13. The method of claim 1 , wherein the physics-aware inaccessibility measure comprises a weighted sum of the measure of inaccessibility and the measure of change.
14. A method of planning for removal of a support volume in hybrid manufacturing, the method comprising:
providing a computer with a representation of:
a 3D part;
a near-net shape comprising the 3D part and the support volume; and
at least one subtractive tool assembly with a number of degrees of freedom;
calculating a measure of inaccessibility of the support volume by the at least one subtractive tool assembly using the computer;
calculating a measure of change in a physical quantity of interest with respect to a change in the near-net shape using the computer;
constructing a physics-aware inaccessibility measure by summing the measure of inaccessibility and the measure of change using the computer, wherein the physics-aware inaccessibility measure indicates a removability of a region of the support volume from the near-net shape;
creating a plan to remove the region of the support volume with the at least one subtractive tool assembly using the computer, wherein the plan is based at least partially upon the physics-aware inaccessibility measure;
building the near-net shape using a 3D printer; and
removing the region of the support volume from the near-net shape based at least partially upon the plan to yield the 3D part.
15. The method of claim 14 , wherein the change comprises a hypothetical change that is less than a predetermined size.
16. The method of claim 14 , wherein the physical quantity of interest comprises stress.
17. A method of planning for removal of a support volume in hybrid manufacturing where the support volume is added during an additive manufacturing process and subsequently removed through a subtractive manufacturing process, the method comprising:
providing a computer with a representation of:
a 3D part;
a near-net shape comprising the 3D part and the support volume; and
at least one subtractive tool assembly with a number of degrees of freedom;
calculating a measure of inaccessibility of the support volume by the at least one subtractive tool assembly using the computer;
calculating a measure of change in a physical quantity of interest with respect to a hypothetical change in the near-net shape, wherein the hypothetical change is less than a predetermined size;
constructing a physics-aware inaccessibility measure by summing the measure of inaccessibility and the measure of change using the computer, wherein the physics-aware inaccessibility measure indicates a removability of a region of the support volume from the near-net shape;
creating a plan to remove the region of the support volume with the at least one subtractive tool assembly using the computer, wherein the plan is based at least partially upon the physics-aware inaccessibility measure;
building the near-net shape via the additive manufacturing process using a 3D printer; and
removing the region of the support volume from the near-net shape via the subtractive manufacturing process based at least partially upon the plan to yield the 3D part.
18. The method of claim 17 , wherein the hypothetical change comprises a change that is less than a predetermined threshold.