IP Library Granted Patent US 12,485,485
Granted Patent B2
US 12,485,485 · App. 17/455,590 · Granted Dec 2, 2025

Metal drop ejecting three-dimensional (3D) object printer and improved method for operating the printer

Inventors: Joseph C. Sheflin (Macedon, NY); Chu-Heng Liu (Penfield, NY); Paul J. McConville (Webster, NY); Peter Knausdorf (Henrietta, NY); Alexander J. Fioravanti (Penfield, NY); Palghat S. Ramesh (Pittsford, NY)
Assignee: Additive Technologies LLC
B22F10/22B22D23/003B22F10/85B22F12/50B33Y10/00B33Y30/00B33Y50/02
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,485,485
App. No.
17/455,590
Granted
Dec 2, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A three-dimensional (3D) metal object manufacturing apparatus is configured to eject melted metal drops from an ejector head at different velocities to form different portions of metal object layers with different measurable values of a same physical property. The different velocities are achieved by operating the ejector head with two different electrical voltages. The greater voltage that achieves the higher velocity is about 25% greater than the voltage used to achieve the lesser velocity. By operating the ejector head with the two different voltages different portions of the object can be formed with different physical property characteristics.

Claims (27)

1 . A melted metal drop ejecting apparatus comprising:

an ejector head configured to eject melted metal drops;

an electrical power supply configured to supply selectively electrical power to the ejector head at a first voltage level and a second voltage level, the first voltage level being greater than the second voltage level; and

a controller operatively connected to the ejector head and the electrical power supply, the controller being configured to operate the electrical power supply to supply electrical power at the first voltage level when the melted metal drops ejected by the ejector head are forming a first portion of a layer of a metal object and to operate the electrical power supply to supply electrical power at the second voltage level when the melted metal drops ejected by the ejector head are forming a second portion of the layer of the metal object, the first portion of the layer having a first measurable value for tensile strength that is at least 10 percent greater than a second measurable value for tensile strength in the second portion of the layer, the controller being further configured to:

operate the ejector head to eject melted metal drops at a first velocity when the ejector head is supplied with electrical power at the first voltage level to form the first portion of the layer; and

operate the ejector head to eject melted metal drops at a second velocity when the ejector head is supplied with electrical power at the second voltage level to form the second portion with a surface smoothness that is greater than a surface smoothness of the first portion of the layer, wherein the first voltage level is greater than the second voltage level and the first velocity is greater than the second velocity.

2 . The apparatus of claim 1 , the controller being further configured to operate the ejector head to form the first portion of the layer as an interior portion of the layer and to form the second portion of the layer as a perimeter of the layer, the perimeter of the layer having a surface smoothness that is greater than a surface smoothness of the interior portion of the layer.

3 . The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the first voltage level is 25% greater than the second voltage level.

4 . The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the first velocity is 3.2 meters/second and the second velocity is 2.4 meters/second.

5 . The apparatus of claim 1 , the controller being further configured to operate the ejector head to eject melted metal drops having a same mass.

6 . The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the second velocity is at least 2.4 meters/second.

7 . The apparatus of claim 3 wherein the first voltage level is 200 V and the second level is 160 V.

8 . The apparatus of claim 5 wherein the same mass is approximately 1.5 grams.

9 . A method for operating a melted metal drop ejecting apparatus comprising:

operating an electrical power supply to supply electrical power at a first voltage level to an ejector head when melted metal drops ejected by the ejector head are forming a first portion of a layer of a metal object to have a tensile strength with a first measurable value and a surface smoothness with a first measurable value; and

operating the electrical power supply to supply electrical power at a second voltage level when the melted metal drops ejected by the ejector head are forming a second portion of the layer of the metal object to have a tensile strength with a second measurable value and a surface smoothness with a second measurable value, the first voltage level being greater than the second voltage level, the first measurable value of the tensile strength is at least 10 percent greater than the second measurable value of the tensile strength, and the second measurable value of the surface smoothness of the second portion being greater than the first measurable value of the surface smoothness of the first portion.

10 . The method of claim 9 wherein the second portion of the layer is formed as a perimeter of the layer and the first portion of the layer is formed as an interior portion of the layer.

11 . The method of claim 9 further comprising:

operating the ejector head to eject melted metal drops at a first velocity when the ejector head is supplied with electrical power at the first voltage level; and

operating the ejector head to eject melted metal drops at a second velocity when the ejector head is supplied with electrical power at the second voltage level to form the second portion with a surface smoothness that is greater than a surface smoothness of the first portion.

12 . The method of claim 9 further comprising:

operating the ejector head to eject melted metal drops having a same mass.

13 . The method of claim 10 wherein the first voltage level is 25% greater than the second voltage level.

14 . The method of claim 13 wherein the first voltage level is 200 V and the second level is 160 V.

15 . The method of claim 11 wherein the first velocity is 3.2 meters/second and the second velocity is 2.4 meters/second.

16 . The method of claim 11 wherein the second velocity is at least 2.4 meters/second.

17 . The method of claim 12 wherein the same mass is approximately 1.5 grams.

Assignments (5)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 1, 2023
From: XEROX CORPORATION
To: ELEM ADDITIVE, LLC
Reel/Frame 065734/0413 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 1, 2023
From: ELEM ADDITIVE, LLC
To: ADDITIVE TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Reel/Frame 065743/0267 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS AT R/F 062740/0214 Recorded May 18, 2023
From: CITIBANK, N.A., AS AGENT
To: XEROX CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 063694/0122 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 10, 2022
From: XEROX CORPORATION
To: CITIBANK, N.A., AS AGENT
Reel/Frame 062740/0214 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 18, 2021
From: SHEFLIN, JOSEPH C.; LIU, CHU-HENG; MCCONVILLE, PAUL J.; KNAUSDORF, PETER; FIORAVANTI, ALEXANDER J.; RAMESH, PALGHAT S.
To: XEROX CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 058154/0539 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230150026A1 · May 18, 2023
References Cited (12)
US 9616494B2 · Vader et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10040119B2 · Vader et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20150273577A1 · Vader · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20170252821A1 · Sachs et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170252830A1 · Sachs · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180141151A1 · Liang et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190283136A1 · Ruppenthal et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200324486A1 · Mantell · 2020 [cited by examiner]
Furumoto, Tatsuaki, et al. “Permeability and strength of a porous metal structure fabricated by additive manufacturing.” Journal of Materials Processing Technology 219 (2015): 10-16. (Year: 2015). [cited by examiner]
Qiu, Chunlei, et al. “On the role of melt flow into the surface structure and porosity development during selective laser melting.” Acta Materialia 96 (2015): 72-79. (Year: 2015). [cited by examiner]
Gibson, Ian, et al. Additive manufacturing technologies. 2nd Ed. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2015. (Year: 2015). [cited by examiner]
Sukhotskiy, Viktor. Computational Analysis of Liquid Metal Drop-on-Demand Jetting and Solidification Using a Contactless Magnetohydrodynamic Actuator. Diss. State University of New York at Buffalo, 2021. (Year: 2021). [cited by examiner]