IP Library Granted Patent US 12,705,678
Granted Patent B2
US 12,705,678 · App. 17/478,640 · Granted Aug 11, 2026

Intellectual-property analysis platform

Inventors: Lewis C. Lee (Atherton, CA); Samuel Cameron Fleming (Spokane, WA); Adam Parish (Spokane, WA); Timothy Seegan (Spokane, WA); Rohitasva Dutta (New York, NY); Joseph Dumoulin (Spokane, WA)
Assignee: Moat Metrics, Inc.
G06Q50/184G06Q30/0201
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,705,678
App. No.
17/478,640
Granted
Aug 11, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and methods for generation and use of intellectual-property (IP) analysis platform architectures are disclosed. A scoring component may be utilized to produce scores for IP assets using user seeded searches in varying areas of interest, such as, for example, target technical fields, targeted publications, targeted products, and/or competitor entity portfolios. The scoring component may be further utilized to produce an interactive graphical element including a spatial representation of the scoring of IP assets. The interactive graphical element may include various functionalities and/or information associated with the of IP assets. The scoring component may utilize data from a coverage component, an opportunity component and/or an exposure component to assess a comprehensive score associated with a group of IP assets of a targeted entity.

Claims (72)

1 . A method comprising:

receiving, via a network protocol, a seeded search query from a computing device;

identifying intellectual-property assets associated with an entity based on the seeded search query;

identifying one or more technology areas associated with the entity;

identifying one or more revenue streams of the entity that are associated with the one or more technology areas, wherein the one or more revenue streams include a percentage of revenue generated in a market of a total amount of revenue generated by the entity between a first date and a second date and the one or more technology areas are identified from a taxonomy of market sets;

identifying a number of the intellectual-property assets associated with the entity and the one or more technology areas, wherein the number of the intellectual-property assets include a percentage of intellectual-property assets directed to the one or more technology areas from among an additional intellectual-property assets filed by the entity between the first date and the second date;

determining a breadth score associated with individual ones of the number of intellectual-property assets;

generating an alignment metric based at least in part on i) the number of the intellectual-property assets associated with the one or more technology areas, ii) the one or more revenue streams associated with the one or more technology areas, and iii) the breadth score associated with individual ones of the number of intellectual-property assets;

determining a first percentage of revenue generated by the entity in a market based at least in part on comparing the revenue generated by the entity in the market with a total revenue generated by the entity;

determining a second percentage of intellectual-property assets directed to the one or more technology areas based at least in part on comparing the number of intellectual-property assets directed to the one or more technology areas with a total number of intellectual-property assets associated with the entity, wherein the alignment metric includes a comparison of the first percentage and the second percentage;

generating a graphical user interface (GUI) with associated access controls;

refraining from displaying the GUI based on the access controls being associated with the GUI;

authenticating a user requesting the GUI;

displaying to the user, based on the user being authenticated, the GUI configured to display at least the alignment metric and one or more actionable items;

sending, via the network protocol over a network to the computing device, the alignment metric;

causing, in response to receipt of the alignment metric, the GUI of the computing device to display, without user input, the alignment metric; and

causing, in response to receipt of the alignment metric, the GUI of the computing device to display dynamic animation sequences in association with the alignment metric, the dynamic animation sequences causing animation sequences corresponding to asset indicators and alignment indicators displayed via the GUI to be dynamically displayed on-the-fly and in real time.

2 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining that a first percentage of revenue generated by the entity in the market is less than a second percentage of intellectual-property assets directed to the one or more technology areas.

3 . A method comprising:

receiving, via a network protocol, a seeded search query from a computing device;

identifying intellectual-property assets associated with an entity based on the seeded search query;

identifying one or more technology areas associated with the entity;

identifying one or more revenue streams of the entity that are associated with the one or more technology areas;

identifying a number of the intellectual-property assets associated with the entity and the one or more technology areas;

generating an alignment metric based at least in part on the number of the intellectual-property assets associated with the one or more technology areas and the one or more revenue streams associated with the one or more technology areas;

determining that the entity has a first percentage of revenue generated by the entity in a market that is greater than a second percentage of intellectual-property assets directed to the one or more technology areas;

determining a first percentage of revenue generated by the entity in a market based at least in part on comparing the revenue generated by the entity in the market with a total revenue generated by the entity;

determining a second percentage of intellectual-property assets directed to the one or more technology areas based at least in part on comparing the number of intellectual-property assets directed to the one or more technology areas with a total number of intellectual-property assets associated with the entity, wherein the alignment metric includes a comparison of the first percentage and the second percentage;

generating a graphical user interface (GUI) with associated access controls;

refraining from displaying the GUI based on the access controls being associated with the GUI;

authenticating a user requesting the GUI;

displaying to the user, based on authenticating the user, the GUI configured to display at least the alignment metric and one or more actionable items;

sending, via the network protocol over a network to the computing device, the alignment metric and an indication that the first percentage of revenue generated by the entity in the market is greater than the second percentage of intellectual-property assets directed to the one or more technology areas;

causing, in response to receipt of the alignment metric and the indication, the GUI of the computing device to display, without user input, the alignment metric and the indication; and

causing, in response to receipt of the alignment metric, the GUI of the computing device to display dynamic animation sequences in association with the alignment metric, the dynamic animation sequences causing animation sequences corresponding to asset indicators and alignment indicators displayed via the GUI to be dynamically displayed on-the-fly and in real time.

4 . The method of claim 3 , wherein the one or more technology areas are identified from a taxonomy of market sets.

5 . The method of claim 3 , wherein the one or more revenue streams associated with the one or more technology areas includes a percentage of revenue generated in a market of a total amount of revenue generated by the entity between a first date and a second date.

6 . The method of claim 3 , wherein the number of the intellectual-property assets associated with the one or more technology areas includes a percentage of intellectual-property assets directed to the one or more technology areas from among an additional intellectual-property assets filed by the entity between a first date and a second date.

7 . The method of claim 3 , wherein the alignment metric comprises a first alignment metric, and the method further comprising:

determining additional entities generating revenue in the one or more technology areas;

identifying additional intellectual-property assets associated with the additional entities, the additional intellectual-property assets associated with the additional entities being associated with the one or more technology areas;

generating a second alignment metric associated with the additional entity based at least in part on the additional intellectual-property assets associated with the additional entities and the revenue generated by the additional entities in the one or more technology areas; and

presenting the second alignment metric on the GUI.

8 . The method of claim 3 , further comprising determining a breadth score associated with individual ones of the number of intellectual-property assets, wherein identifying the alignment metric is based at least in part on the breadth score.

9 . The method of claim 3 , further comprising generating a coverage metric based at least in part on the alignment metric that indicating a coverage related to the intellectual-property assets.

10 . A system comprising:

one or more processors; and

one or more non-transitory computer-readable media comprising instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform operations comprising:

receiving, via a network protocol, a seeded search query from a computing device;

vectorizing intellectual-property assets;

identifying intellectual-property assets associated with an entity based on the seeded search query and the vectorized intellectual-property assets;

identifying one or more technology areas associated with the entity;

identifying one or more revenue streams of the entity and associated with the one or more technology areas;

identifying a number of the intellectual-property assets associated with the entity and the one or more technology areas;

generating a first alignment metric based at least in part on the number of the intellectual-property assets associated with the one or more technology areas and the one or more revenue streams associated with the one or more technology areas;

determining a first percentage of revenue generated by the entity in a market based at least in part on comparing the revenue generated by the entity in the market with a total revenue generated by the entity;

determining a second percentage of intellectual-property assets directed to the one or more technology areas based at least in part on comparing the number of intellectual-property assets directed to the one or more technology areas with a total number of intellectual-property assets associated with the entity, wherein the first alignment metric includes a comparison of the first percentage and the second percentage;

generating a graphical user interface (GUI) with associated access controls;

refraining from displaying the GUI based on the access controls being associated with the GUI;

authenticating a user requesting the GUI;

displaying to the user, based on authenticating the user, the GUI configured to display at least the first alignment metric, a second alignment metric, and one or more actionable items;

determining additional entities generating revenue in the one or more technology areas;

identifying additional intellectual-property assets associated with the additional entities, the additional intellectual-property assets associated with the additional entities being associated with the one or more technology areas;

generating the second alignment metric associated with the additional entity based at least in part on the additional intellectual-property assets associated with the additional entities and the revenue generated by the additional entities in the one or more technology areas;

sending, via the network protocol over a network to the computing device, the second alignment metric;

causing, in response to receipt of the second alignment metric, the GUI of the computing device to display, without user input, the second alignment metric; and

causing, in response to receipt of the alignment metric, the GUI of the computing device to display dynamic animation sequences in association with the alignment metric, the dynamic animation sequences causing animation sequences corresponding to asset indicators and alignment indicators displayed via the GUI to be dynamically displayed on-the-fly and in real time.

11 . The system of claim 10 , wherein the one or more technology areas are identified from a taxonomy of market sets.

12 . The system of claim 10 , wherein the intellectual-property assets include at least one of a patent, a trademark, or a copyright.

13 . The system of claim 10 , further comprising determining a percentage of the intellectual-property assets associated with the one or more technology areas is based at least in part on a training model applied to text included in at least one of the number of the intellectual-property assets.

14 . The system of claim 10 , further comprising determining that a first percentage of revenue generated by the entity in the market is greater than a second percentage of intellectual-property assets directed to the one or more technology areas.

15 . The system of claim 10 , further comprising determining that a first percentage of revenue generated by the entity in the market is less than a second percentage of intellectual-property assets directed to the one or more technology areas.

Assignments (3)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE INCORRECT APPLICATION NUMBER 18600587 TO 18600577 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 68257 FRAME 644. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded May 29, 2025
From: AON RISK SERVICES, INC. OF MARYLAND
To: MOAT METRICS, INC. DBA MOAT
Reel/Frame 071480/0571 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 9, 2024
From: AON RISK SERVICES, INC. OF MARYLAND
To: MOAT METRICS, INC. DBA MOAT
Reel/Frame 068257/0644 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 29, 2022
From: LEE, LEWIS; FLEMING, SAMUEL CAMERON; PARISH, ADAM; SEEGAN, TIMOTHY; DUTTA, ROHITASVA; DUMOULIN, JOSEPH
To: AON RISK SERVICES, INC. OF MARYLAND
Reel/Frame 061911/0349 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230086930A1 · Mar 23, 2023
References Cited (197)
US 5754840A · Rivette et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 6175824B1 · Breitzman et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6389418B1 · Boyack et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6556992B1 · Barney · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 7346518B1 · Frank · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 7493262B2 · Hagelin · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7546265B1 · Donner · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7606757B1 · Poltorak · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7657476B2 · Barney · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7676375B1 · Neifeld et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7684965B2 · Sekine et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7792728B2 · Poltorak · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7840460B2 · Williams · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7949581B2 · Barney · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8095581B2 · Stobbs et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8121852B2 · Frank et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8145639B2 · Williams · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8145640B2 · Williams · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8160947B2 · Oey · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8161049B2 · Williams · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8341063B1 · Cernyar · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8355932B2 · Malackowski et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8538794B2 · Marko et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8620800B1 · Micaelian · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8650108B1 · Schram et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8924237B2 · Herz et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9075849B2 · Barney · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9251243B2 · Stec · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9305278B2 · Gross et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9633403B2 · Mohanty · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 9846694B1 · Cook · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10013726B1 · Jung · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 10366461B2 · Edmund et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10528609B2 · Crouse et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10579651B1 · Nagai · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10657368B1 · Edmund · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10755045B2 · Crouse et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11069011B1 · Jung et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11461862B2 · Lundberg · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11509540B2 · Bernardi et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11676231B1 · Crouse et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11861528B1 · Brager · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20020032659A1 · Waters · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 20020046038A1 · Prokoski · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020077835A1 · Hagelin · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020077942A1 · Wilkinson · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 20020099637A1 · Wilkinson · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 20020111821A1 · Kunikiyo · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020178015A1 · Zee · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020184130A1 · Blasko · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20030036945A1 · Del Vecchio · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20040181427A1 · Stobbs · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20040220842A1 · Barney · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050149420A1 · Hagelin · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20050209946A1 · Ballow et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050261927A1 · Bilak et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060080136A1 · Frank · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20060200395A1 · Masuyama et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070073625A1 · Shelton · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20070073748A1 · Barney · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070136206A1 · Kwok · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070156478A1 · Breene et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070198320A1 · Lloyd · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20070208669A1 · Rivette · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20070250487A1 · Reuther · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20070276796A1 · Sampson · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20070294232A1 · Gibbs · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20080086503A1 · Frank et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080114668A1 · Peters · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20080133338A1 · Frank et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080201187A1 · Ng et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080249957A1 · Masuyama et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090037342A1 · Kennedy · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090259506A1 · Barney · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20100070522A1 · Nazar · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20100100491A1 · Frank et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100131513A1 · Lundberg · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20100180223A1 · Speier · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20100191564A1 · Lee · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20100250340A1 · Lee et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110047085A1 · Ottosen · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110047166A1 · Stading · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110184884A1 · Lyons et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110246473A1 · Stec · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110276396A1 · Rathod · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110289096A1 · Barney · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120010925A1 · Mitra · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120109642A1 · Stobbs et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120191757A1 · Gross et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120278244A1 · Lee · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130085964A1 · Marais · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130166460A1 · Mohanty et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130204799A1 · Curtis · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130282571A1 · Lundberg · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130339088A1 · Olsen · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130346323A1 · Lundberg · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140075004A1 · Van Dusen et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140156544A1 · Sabattini et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140164262A1 · Graham · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140201193A1 · Kim et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140258153A1 · Lundberg · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140279583A1 · Surdeanu · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140279584A1 · Lee et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140289675A1 · Stading · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140304176A1 · Radding et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140351252A1 · Stec · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140368511A1 · Baumgartner et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150012800A1 · Yang · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150026079A1 · Walker et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150033301A1 · Pianese et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150178847A1 · Tabata et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150248738A1 · Pullman · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150339605A1 · Reville et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150347489A1 · Sherwin · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160004768A1 · Barney · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160042460A1 · Hudak et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160048936A1 · Perkowski et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160148327A1 · Buchholz · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160314146A1 · Carothers et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160350886A1 · Jessen et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170154337A1 · Wingate-Whyte et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180144421A1 · Williams et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180189909A1 · Zellner et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180240209A1 · Malherek · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180253810A1 · Edmund · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180285996A1 · Ma · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180300323A1 · Lee et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180300829A1 · Crabtree et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190005595A1 · Tautenhan et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190079979A1 · Chan · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200192727A1 · Savenkov et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200301672A1 · Li et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200334773A1 · Spangenberg et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210004918A1 · Lee et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210004919A1 · Lee et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210004920A1 · Lee et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210004921A1 · Lee et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210004922A1 · Lee et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210034960A1 · Khapali et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210044439A1 · Yang · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210056304A1 · Mikami · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210201339A1 · Ahlgren et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210350484A1 · Crouse et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210390644A1 · Chen et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210398223A1 · Lee et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220100358A1 · Tobias et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220101464A1 · Lee et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220103586A1 · Shao et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220180317A1 · Andrews · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220245378A1 · Bradley, III · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220292607A1 · Davies et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230032564A1 · Ishii et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230044901A1 · Spangenberg · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230080680A1 · Cochrane et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230086106A1 · Andrews · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230087206A1 · Lee · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230089425A1 · Lee · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230090090A1 · Dutta · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20240104419A1 · Meng et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
CN 105677727A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
JP 2004500617A · 2004 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2016157214A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2020072033A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2021003187A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
Peter Cowan “How an innovation and IP value-chain view can transform portfolio value” (2016) (https://www.iam-media.com/article/how-innovation-and-ip-value-chain-view-can-transform-portfolio-value) (Year: 2016). [cited by examiner]
The PCT Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Jan. 11, 2023 for PCT application No. PCT/US22/43258, 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/478,664, mailed on May 26, 2023, Dutta, “Intellectual-Property Analysis Platform ”, 27 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Bringing additional value to your firm, aon webpages, retrieved at <<https://www.aon.com/getmedia/ea62d0de-6fd6-4c89-8cc3-87a605dd3871/Slide-deck-Intellectual-Property-Solutions-Webinar-10-12-2020-gecomprimeerd.aspx>>, … [cited by applicant]
Insurance Risk Study, Fourteenth Edition, Global Risk, Profitability, and Growth Metrics, acturialpost co uk, aon plc 2019, retrieved at <<https://www.acturialpost.co.uk/downloads/cat_1/Aon%20Insurance%20Risk%20Study%20… [cited by applicant]
Intellectual Property—Risk Landscape, aon webpages, aon plc 2019, retrieved at <<https://www.aon.com/getmedia/3732fc66-11a9-45a3-911c-b2b33d41d302/Aon_IP-Risk-Landscape-Whitepaper_20190215.aspx, 2019, 8 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Intellectual Property Solutions for M&A and Market Transactions, aon webpages, aon plc 2019, retrieved at <<https://www.aon.com/getmedia/73c1aed6-b976-4755-902b-c56025449457/IP-for-MA-Transactions-Brochure.aspx>>, 2 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/478,506, mailed on Sep. 21, 2023, Lee, “Intellectual-Property Analysis Platform ”, 77 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/478,576, mailed on Oct. 20, 2024, Lee, “Intellectual-Property Analysis Platform”, 48 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/478,576, mailed on Sep. 19, 2023, Lee, “Intellectual-Property Analysis Platform”, 51 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/478,603, mailed on Sep. 15, 2023, David Craig Andrews, “Intellectual- Property Analysis Platform”, 31 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/478,664, mailed on Sep. 20, 2023, Rohitasva Dutta, “Intellectual-Property Analysis Platform”, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Realize IP Data, Aon Quality of Intellectual Property Report, Aon webpages, Aon plc 2020, retrieved at <<https://www.aon.comgetmedia/ced6ab71-16b5-49ea-9914-935e5c1f8f2e/Qolp-Brochure_Jan21.pdf.aspx?ext=pdf>>, 2020, 8 p… [cited by applicant]
Unlock the Value of Intellectual Property, aon webpages, aon plc 2020, retrieved at <<https://www.aon.com/getmedia/e39260a9-53c0-4044-bcb9-Oc4f0258dfbe/IP-Fund-Brochure-Revisions_non-insurance-version_v03.pdf.aspx>>, 20… [cited by applicant]
Aon launches Quality of Intellectual Property Solution, intelligentinsurer webpages, retrieved at <<https://www.imtelligentinsurer.com/news/aon-launches-quality-of-intellectual-property-solution-24096>>, 2020, 1 pg. [cited by applicant]
Aon, Intellectual Property Solutions, aon webpages, aon plc 2020, retrieved at <<https://aon-tech.com?jet_download=7121>>, 2020, 2 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Aon's New Quality of Intellectual Property Solution Helps Companies Realize Full Value of Their IP Portfolio, aon mediaroomwebpages, Nov. 10, 2020, retrieved at <<https://aon.mediaroom.com/2020-11-10-Aons-New-Quality-of… [cited by applicant]
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/478,664, mailed on Jun. 5, 2024, Dutta, “Intellectual-Property Analysis Platform ”, 11 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/478,506, Dated Jul. 31, 2024, 97 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/457,603, mailed on Sep. 20, 2024, Andrews, “Intellectual-Property Analysis Platform”, 48 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/478,603, dated Feb. 7, 2025, 21 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action for US Patent Application Feb. 12, 2024, Andrews, “Intellectual-Property Analysis Platform”, 39 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/478,664, mailed on Dec. 21, 2023, Dutta, “Intellectual-Property Analysis Platform”, 11 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/478,576, mailed on Dec. 27, 2024, Lee, “Intellectual-Property Analysis Platform”, 44 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/478,640, mailed on Dec. 28, 2023, Lee, “Intellectual-Property Analysis Platform”, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/478,576, mailed on Feb. 1, 2024, Lee, “Intellectual-Property Analysis Platform”, 48 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/478,664, mailed on Feb. 27, 2024, Dutta, “Intellectual-Property Analysis Platform”, 12 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/478,506, mailed on Feb. 8, 2024, Lee, “Intellectual-Property Analysis Platform”, 92 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/478,576, dated Apr. 11, 2025, 58 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/478,603, dated May 21, 2025, 22 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/478,603, dated Oct. 21, 2025, 10 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/478,576, dated Mar. 6, 2026, 64 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/478,576, dated Nov. 14, 2025, 68 Pages. [cited by applicant]