IP Library Granted Patent US 12,205,488
Granted Patent B2
US 12,205,488 · App. 17/479,770 · Granted Jan 21, 2025

Systems and methods to mimic target food items using artificial intelligence

Inventors: Karim Pichara (San Francisco, CA); Pablo Zamora (Melipilla, CL); Matias Muchnick (NY, NY); Orlando Vasquez (Santiago, CL)
Assignee: Notco Delaware, LLC
G09B19/0092G01N33/025G01N33/12G06F16/9035G06N3/04G06N3/08
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,205,488
App. No.
17/479,770
Granted
Jan 21, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and methods to mimic a target food item using artificial intelligence are disclosed. The system can learn from open source and proprietary databases. A prediction model can be trained using features of the source ingredients to match those of the given target food item. A formula comprising a combination of most relevant source ingredients and their proportions can be determined using the trained prediction model. A set of existing recipes can be used as a dataset to train a recurrent neural network (RNN) and/or other suitable models. The RNN can be used to determine a recipe to mimic the target food item. The recipe may comprise a cooking process for the set of ingredients in the formula and can be cooked by a chef. The recipe may be further modified as necessary based on human feedback on sensorial descriptors.

Claims (67)

1. A computer-implemented method to generate a recipe using plant-based ingredients to mimic a given animal-based food item, the method comprising:

receiving matching plant-based source ingredients from a plurality of plant-based source ingredients that match an animal-based target food item in a feature space of the plurality of plant-based source ingredients;

applying a machine learning generator model to the at least the matching plant-based source ingredients to generate a recipe that uses the matching plant-based source ingredients to mimic the animal-based target food item, the recipe comprising a cooking process,

wherein the machine learning generator model is trained using a training set, the training set comprising a set of processed existing recipes stored in an existing recipes database, each existing recipe in the set of processed existing recipes including a list of ingredients and a list of instructions for cooking the ingredients in the list of ingredients.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

retrieving, from a target database, a set of data features associated with the animal-based target food item, the set of data features for the animal-based target food item comprising at least one of:

physiochemical data features of the animal-based target food item,

nutritional data features of the animal-based target food item, or

molecular data features of the animal-based target food item;

retrieving, from a source ingredients database, a respective set of data features for each of the plurality of plant-based source ingredients, the respective set of data features for each of the plant-based source ingredients comprising at least one of:

physiochemical data features of the plant-based source ingredient,

nutritional data features of the plant-based source ingredient, or

molecular data features of the plant-based source ingredient;

creating a different training set from the respective set of data features for each of the plurality of plant-based source ingredients;

training a machine learning prediction model by using the different training set to generate the feature space of the plurality of plant-based source ingredients.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 2 , further comprising:

executing a computer-implemented feature compression method on the respective set of data features for each of the plurality of plant-based source ingredients, to determine a compact representation of the respective set of data features for each of the plurality of plant-based source ingredients, wherein the different training set comprises the compact representation of the respective set of data features for each of the plurality of plant-based source ingredients.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 2 , wherein the set of data features associated with the animal-based target food item and the respective set of data features for each of the plurality of plant-based source ingredients are each associated with a same set of data feature types, and wherein the same set of data feature types comprises at least one of:

a nutritional descriptor feature type,

a physiochemical descriptor feature type, or

a molecular descriptor feature type.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 2 , wherein the machine learning prediction model is based on gradient boosting trees, and wherein the machine learning generation model is based on a recurrent neural network.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the cooking process includes a list of actions to be performed using the matching plant-based source ingredients.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

representing each source ingredient of the plurality of plant-based source ingredients in a D-dimensional space based on the respective set of data features identified for the source ingredient, the representation of the source ingredient in the D-dimensional space comprising at least one of: physiochemical, nutritional, or molecular descriptors of the source ingredient.

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining a formula and a corresponding similarity score, wherein the formula combines the-matching plant-based source ingredients in specific proportions and the similarity score indicates how similar the formula is to the animal-based target food item in the feature space, wherein determining the formula includes executing an optimization process to determine the specific proportions for combining the matching plant-based source ingredients in the formula using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) regression.

9. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the training set is created by:

obtaining a set of existing recipes, each existing recipe comprising a respective list of ingredients, respective quantities and respective instructions for cooking the respective list of ingredients; and

obtaining the set of processed existing recipes based on modifying each of the existing recipes, in the set of existing recipes, to include respective atomic directions for cooking the respective list of ingredients of the existing recipe.

10. One or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media storing one or more instructions programmed for generating a recipe using plant-based ingredients to mimic a given animal-based food item, when executed by one or more computing devices, cause:

receiving matching plant-based source ingredients from a plurality of plant-based source ingredients that match an animal-based target food item in a feature space of the plurality of plant-based source ingredients;

applying a machine learning generator model to the at least the matching plant-based source ingredients to generate a recipe that uses the matching plant-based source ingredients to mimic the animal-based target food item, the recipe comprising a cooking process,

wherein the machine learning generator model is trained using a training set, the training set comprising a set of processed existing recipes stored in an existing recipes database, each existing recipe in the set of processed existing recipes including a list of ingredients and a list of instructions for cooking the ingredients in the list of ingredients.

11. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 10 , wherein the one or more instructions, when executed by the one or more computing devices, further cause:

retrieving, from a target database, a set of data features associated with the animal-based target food item, the set of data features for the animal-based target food item comprising at least one of:

physiochemical data features of the animal-based target food item,

nutritional data features of the animal-based target food item, or

molecular data features of the animal-based target food item;

retrieving, from a source ingredients database, a respective set of data features for each of the plurality of plant-based source ingredients, the respective set of data features for each of the plant-based source ingredients comprising at least one of:

physiochemical data features of the plant-based source ingredient,

nutritional data features of the plant-based source ingredient, or

molecular data features of the plant-based source ingredient;

creating a different training set from the respective set of data features for each of the plurality of plant-based source ingredients;

training a machine learning prediction model by using the different training set to generate the feature space of the plurality of plant-based source ingredients.

12. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 11 , wherein the one or more instructions, when executed by the one or more computing devices, further cause:

executing a computer-implemented feature compression method on the respective set of data features for each of the plurality of plant-based source ingredients, to determine a compact representation of the respective set of data features for each of the plurality of plant-based source ingredients, wherein the different training set comprises the compact representation of the respective set of data features for each of the plurality of plant-based source ingredients.

13. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 11 , wherein the set of data features associated with the animal-based target food item and the respective set of data features for each of the plurality of plant-based source ingredients are each associated with a same set of data feature types, and wherein the same set of data feature types comprises at least one of:

a nutritional descriptor feature type,

a physiochemical descriptor feature type, or

a molecular descriptor feature type.

14. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 11 , wherein the machine learning prediction model is based on gradient boosting trees, and wherein the machine learning generation model is based on a recurrent neural network.

15. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 10 , wherein the cooking process includes a list of actions to be performed using the matching plant-based source ingredients.

16. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 10 , wherein the one or more instructions, when executed by the one or more computing devices, further cause:

representing each source ingredient of the plurality of plant-based source ingredients in a D-dimensional space based on the respective set of data features identified for the source ingredient, the representation of the source ingredient in the D-dimensional space comprising at least one of: physiochemical, nutritional, or molecular descriptors of the source ingredient.

17. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 10 , wherein the one or more instructions, when executed by the one or more computing devices, further cause:

determining a formula and a corresponding similarity score, wherein the formula combines the-matching plant-based source ingredients in specific proportions and the similarity score indicates how similar the formula is to the animal-based target food item in the feature space, wherein determining the formula includes executing an optimization process to determine the specific proportions for combining the matching plant-based source ingredients in the formula using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) regression.

18. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 10 , wherein the training set is created by:

obtaining a set of existing recipes, each existing recipe comprising a respective list of ingredients, respective quantities and respective instructions for cooking the respective list of ingredients; and

obtaining the set of processed existing recipes based on modifying each of the existing recipes, in the set of existing recipes, to include respective atomic directions for cooking the respective list of ingredients of the existing recipe.

19. A computing system comprising:

one or more computer systems comprising one or more hardware processors and storage media; and

instructions stored in the storage media and which, when executed by the computing system, cause the computing system to perform:

receiving matching plant-based source ingredients from a plurality of plant-based source ingredients that match an animal-based target food item in a feature space of the plurality of plant-based source ingredients, wherein the feature space is generated by a machine learning prediction model;

applying a machine learning generator model to the at least the matching plant-based source ingredients to generate a recipe that uses the matching plant-based source ingredients to mimic the animal-based target food item, the recipe comprising a cooking process,

wherein the machine learning generator model is trained using a training set, the training set comprising a set of processed existing recipes stored in an existing recipes database, each existing recipe in the set of processed existing recipes including a list of ingredients and a list of instructions for cooking the ingredients in the list of ingredients.

20. The computing system of claim 19 , wherein each of the plurality of plant-based source ingredients is represented in a D-dimensional space based on their respective set of features comprising at least one of physiochemical descriptors, nutritional descriptors, or molecular descriptors.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 11, 2026
From: NOTCO DELAWARE, LLC
To: NOTCO DELAWARE AI, LLC
Reel/Frame 073762/0459 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 16416095 · May 17, 2019
Related Publication 20220005376A1 · Jan 6, 2022
References Cited (152)
US 5305076A · Inoue et al. · 1994 [cited by applicant]
US 8044354B2 · Werner et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8419433B2 · Do et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8647121B1 · Witlin · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8775341B1 · Commons · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9513167B2 · Hargreaves et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9519620B1 · Pinel et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9841897B2 · Palmer et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10325181B2 · Xu · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10515715B1 · Pappas et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10915818B1 · Patel et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10957424B1 · Navon et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10962473B1 · O'Hara et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10970621B1 · Pichara et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10984145B1 · Hutchinson et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10993465B2 · Pichara et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11048976B2 · Tian et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11164069B1 · Korsunsky et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11164478B2 · Pichara et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11348664B1 · Kaneko et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11373107B1 · Clavero et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11404144B1 · Kang et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11514350B1 · Kaneko et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11631034B2 · Pichara · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 11644416B2 · O'Hara · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 11685928B2 · Lanquar · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 11741383B2 · Clavero · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 11819041B2 · Varadan · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 11840717B2 · Lanquar · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 11982661B1 · Estay · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 12029225B2 · Hazell · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20020184167A1 · McClanahan · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20030157725A1 · Franzen et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20040153250A1 · Hurst et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050143936A1 · Laughlin et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20070139667A1 · Russell et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20090055247A1 · Jackson · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20110020518A1 · Delort et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120082362A1 · Diem et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120328178A1 · Remiszewski et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130149679A1 · Tokuda et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130221222A1 · Baiz et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130222406A1 · Wolfe et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20150199608A1 · Pinel et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160025569A1 · Hargreaves et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160110584A1 · Remiszewski et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160358043A1 · Mu · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170116517A1 · Chee · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170139902A1 · Byron · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170220558A1 · Pinel et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170238590A1 · Bansal-Mutalik et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170345185A1 · Byron et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180101784A1 · Rolfe et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180192680A1 · Fraser · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180203921A1 · Privault et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180293489A1 · Eyster · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180357299A1 · Miranda et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190171707A1 · Rapaport · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190200797A1 · Diao et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190228855A1 · Leifer · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190228856A1 · Leifer · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190295440A1 · Hadad · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200268032A1 · Okuyama · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200309746A1 · Sakai · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200365053A1 · Pichara et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210027379A1 · Zhu et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210117665A1 · Simantov et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
CN 106844738A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
CN 108509601A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2004083451A1 · 2004 [cited by applicant]
WO 2013052824A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016010097A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017070605A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020237214 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021026083A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021071756A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2022010503A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO 2022010544A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO 2022035464A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO 2022098381A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO 2022235326A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO 2022240439A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO 2022265698A · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO 2023080922A1 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
WO 2023080923A1 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
Hahladakis et al., “An Overview of Chemical Additives Present in Plastics: Migration, Release, Fate and Environmental Impact During Their Use, Disposal and Recycling”, Journal of Hazardous Materials 344 (2018), pp. 179-… [cited by applicant]
Mexico Patent Office, “The Granting Proceeds”, in application No. MX/a/2020/006079, dated Aug. 24, 2022, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
UK Patent Office, “Office Action”, in application No. GB2118119.3, dated Aug. 16, 2022, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Fromm et al., “A Vector Space model for Neural Network Functions: Inspirations from Similarities between the Theory of Connectivity and the Logarithmic Time Course of Word Production”, Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience,… [cited by applicant]
UK Patent Office, “Intention to Grant”, in application No. GB2118119.3, dated Dec. 20, 2022, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Searching Authority, “International Preliminary Report” in application No. PCT/US2020/034385, dated Dec. 2, 2021, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Canada Patent Office, “Commissioner's Notice—Application Found Allowable”, in application No. 3,083,036, dated Feb. 24, 2022, 1 page. [cited by applicant]
UK Patent Office, “Office Action”, in application No. GB2118119.3, dated Feb. 8, 2022, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
The International Searching Authority, “Search Report” in application No. PCT/US2020/043330, dated Sep. 18, 2020, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
The International Searching Authority, “Search Report” in application No. PCT/US2020/034385, dated Jul. 20, 2020, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Rudinger et al., “Skip-Prop: Representing Sentences with One Vector Pre Proposition”, 12th International Conference on Computational Semantics, dated 2017, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Kramanolakis et al., “Item Recommendation with Variational Autoencoders and Heterogeneous Priors”, DLRS, dated Oct. 18, , 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Hui Zou et al., “Regularization and Variable Selection Via the Elastic Net”, Department of Statistics, Stanford University, dated Dec. 5, 2003, 29 pages. [cited by applicant]
Current Claims in Canada application No. 3,083,036, dated Jun. 9, 2020, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Canada Patent Office, “Office Action”, in application No. 3,083,036, dated Jul. 7, 2021, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Eating Bird Food, “Vegan “Chicken” Salad”, https://www.eatingbirdsfood.com/simple-vegan-mock-chicken-salad/, Apr. 5, 2017, download Mar. 11, 2021, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
Current Claims in application No. PCT/US2020/043330, dated Sep. 2020, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Bowman et al., “Generating Sentences from a Continuous Space”, dated May 2016, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Current Claims in application No. PCT/US2020/034385, dated Jul. 2020, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Statement Regarding Pre-Filing Activities, dated Dec. 10, 2020, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
Patel, U.S. Appl. No. 16/924,006, filed Jul. 8, 2020, Notice of Allowance. [cited by applicant]
Navon U.S. Appl. No. 16/989,413, filed Aug. 10, 2020, Notice of Allowance. [cited by applicant]
UK Patent Office, “Notification of Grant”, in application No. GB2118119.3, dated Jan. 31, 2023, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
Mexico Patent Office, “Office Action”, in application No. MX/a/2020/006079, dated Jun. 1, 2022, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
UK Patent Office, “Office Action”, in application No. GB2118119.3, dated May 13, 2022, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
springwise.com, “Artificial Intelligence Uses Algorithms to Make Nutritious Vegan Meat,” https;//springwise.com/artificial-intelligence-algorithms-vegan-meat/, last viewed May 5, 2023, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
Malav et al. “Meat analogue: A Review, Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition,” DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2012.689381, 2013, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
bbc.com, “ Could AI help to create a meat-free world?”, https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20171214-could-ai-help-create-a-meat-free-world, last viewed May 5, 2023, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Indian Patent Office, “Examination Report”, in application No. 202014037032, dated Mar. 14, 2023, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Paul, Rahl, “Classifying Cooking Object's State using a Tuned VGG Convolutional Neural Netwrok,” May 2018, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Rong, Xin. word2vec Parameter Learning Explained. arXiv:1411.2738v4 [cs.CL] Jun. 5, 2016. (Year: 2016). [cited by applicant]
Salvador, Amaia, et al. “Learning cross-modal embeddings for cooking recipes and food images.” Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2017. (Year: 2017). [cited by applicant]
David Xu, “Machine Learning for Flavor Development,” Bachelor's Thesis, Harvard College, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Apr. 5, 2019, 69 pages. [cited by applicant]
Hattab et al., Application of an Inverse Neural Network Model for the Identification of Optimal Amendment to Reduce Copper Toxicity in Phytoremediated Contaminated Soils, Journal of Geochemical Exploration, Elsevier, 20… [cited by applicant]
Kieaibi E., Determination of Protein Secondary Structure from Infrared Spectra Using Partial Least-Squares Regression, 9 pages, 2016 (Year: 2016). [cited by applicant]
Yang et al., “Obtaining information about protein secondary structures in aqueous solution using Fourier transform IR spectroscopy”, Published online Feb. 5, 2015, nature protocols, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
XGBoost, “Python Package Introduction”, https://xgboost.readthedocs.io/en/latest/python/python_intro.html, last viewed on Nov. 5, 2020, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Github.com, “CMBI/DSSP”, https://github.com/cmbi/dssp, last viewed on Nov. 5, 2020. 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Wilcox et al., “Determination of Protein Secondary Structure from Infrared Spectra Using Partial Least-Squares Regression”, dated 2016 American Chemical Society, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Sigma-Aldrich, “IR Spectrum Table and Chart”, https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/technical-documents/articles/biology/ir-spectrum-table.html, last viewed on Nov. 5, 2020, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Scipy.org, “scipy.signal.savgol_filter”, https://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/generated/scipy.signal.savgol_filter.html, last viewed on Nov. 5, 2020, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
SciPy.org, “scipy.integrate.simps”, https://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/generated/scipy.integrate.simps.html, last viewed on Nov. 5, 2020, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
Scikitlearn.org, “sklearn.neighbors.KNeighborsRegressor”, https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.neighbors.KNeighborsRegressor.html, last viewed on Nov. 5, 2020, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Scikitlearn.org, “sklearn.model_selection.GridSearchCV”, https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.model_selection.GridSearchCV.html, last viewed on Nov. 5, 2020, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Scikitlearn.org, “sklearn.linear_model.lasso”, https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.linear_model.Lasso.html, last viewed on Nov. 5, 2020, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Scikitlearn.org, “sklearn.cross_decomposition.PLSRegression”, https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.cross_decomposition.PLSRegression.html , last viewed on Nov. 5, 2020, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Scikitlearn.org, “3.2.4.1.3. sklearn.linear_model.LassoCV”, https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.linear_model.LassoCV.html, last viewed on Nov. 5, 2020, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
ProDry, “DSSP Tools”, http://prody.csb.pitt.edu/manual/reference/proteins/dssp.html, last viewed on Nov. 5, 2020, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
Cao et al.,“Optimization of Formulations Using Robotic Experiments Driven by Machine Learning DoE”, Cell Reports Physical Science, Jan. 20, 2021, 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Searching Authority, “Search Report” in application No. PCT/US2020/034385, dated Jul. 20, 2020, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent Office, “Office Action”, in U.S. Appl. No. 16/416,095, dated Jul. 29, 2019, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent Office, “Office Action”, in U.S. Appl. No. 16/416,095, dated Dec. 16, 2019, 21 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent Office, “Office Action”, in U.S. Appl. No. 16/416,095, dated Nov. 4, 2020, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent Office, “Office Action”, in U.S. Appl. No. 16/416,095, dated Mar. 16, 2021, 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent Office, “Notice of Allowance”, in U.S. Appl. No. 16/416,095, dated Jul. 21, 2021, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Yuan et al., “An Inductive Content-Augmented Network Embedding Model for Edge Artificial Intelligence”, IEEE Transaction on Industrial Informatics, vol. 15 No. 7, Jul. 2019, pp. 4295-4305. [cited by applicant]
Hodgkin, “The Castlemaine Project: Development of an AI-based Drug Design Support System”, Molecular Modelling and Drug Design, 1994, pp. 137-169. [cited by applicant]
Peiretti et al., “Artificial Intelligence: The Future for Organic Chemistry?”, ACS Omega, 2018, 3 (10), pp. 13263-13266. [cited by applicant]
De Clercq et al., “Data-Driven Recipe Completion Using Machine Learning Methods, ” Trends in Food Science & Technology 49 (2016), Dec. 2015, p. 1-13. [cited by applicant]
Pinel et al., Chapter 16: A Culinary Computational Creativity System, Computational Creativity Research: Towards Creative Machines, Jan. 2014, pp. 327-346. [cited by applicant]
Cromwell et al., “Computational Creativity in the Culinary Arts”, Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, dated 2015, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Silva et al, “An expert system for automated flavour matching—Prioritizer”, DOI: 10.1002/ffj.3386, 2017, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Severcan et al., “Estimation of protein secondary structure from FTIR spectra using neural networks”, Journal of Molecular Structure 565-566 (2001) 383-397, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Hering et al., “An alternative method for rapid quantification of protein secondary structure from FTIR spectra using neural networks”, Spectroscopy 16 (2002) 53-69, 18 pages. [cited by applicant]
Akkas et al., “Effects of lipoic acid supplementation on rat brain tissue: An FTIR spectroscopic and neural network study”, Food Chemistry 105 (2007) 1281-1288, DOI:10.1016/j.foodchem.2007/03.015, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Indian Patent Office, “Search Report and Technical Examination Report”, in application No. BR102020011594-4, dated Apr. 28, 2023, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Park et al., “FlavorGraph: a large-scale food-chemical grpah for generating food representations and recommending food pairings”, Scientific Reports: nature Research, vol. 11, Jan. 13, 2021, 13 pages. [cited by applicant]