IP Library Granted Patent US 11,418,516
Granted Patent B2
US 11,418,516 · App. 17/486,350 · Granted Aug 16, 2022

Consent conversion optimization systems and related methods

Inventors: Jonathan Blake Brannon (Smyrna, GA); Kevin Jones (Atlanta, GA); Patrick Whitney (Atlanta, GA); Mithun Babu (Atlanta, GA); Sharath Chandra Chavva (Atlanta, GA)
Assignee: OneTrust, LLC
H04L63/104G06F11/3438G06F21/62G06F21/6245G06F21/6263G06Q30/0203H04L63/102
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,418,516
App. No.
17/486,350
Granted
Aug 16, 2022
Kind
B2
Abstract

In particular embodiments, a consent conversion optimization system is configured to test two or more test consent interfaces against one another to determine which of the two or more consent interfaces results in a higher conversion percentage (e.g., to determine which of the two or more interfaces lead to a higher number of end users and/or data subjects providing a requested level of consent for the creation, storage and use or cookies by a particular website). The system may, for example, analyze end user interaction with each particular test consent interface to determine which of the two or more user interfaces: (1) result in a higher incidence of a desired level of provided consent; (2) are easier to use by the end users and/or data subjects (e.g., take less time to complete, require a fewer number of clicks, etc.); (3) etc.

Claims (90)

1. A system comprising:

a non-transitory computer-readable medium storing instructions; and

processing hardware communicatively coupled to the non-transitory computer-readable medium, wherein the processing hardware is configured to execute the instructions and thereby perform operations comprising:

receiving a request to initiate a consent interface conversion test for a web domain for at least a first consent interface variant and a second consent interface variant based on a success criteria;

in response to receiving the request, initiating the consent interface conversion test for the web domain by:

providing the first consent interface variant for display on a first subset of user devices accessing the web domain; and

providing the second consent interface variant for display on a second subset of the user devices accessing the web domain;

receiving first consent data for the first consent interface variant and second consent data for the second consent interface variant;

analyzing the first consent data and the second consent data to determine a more successful consent interface based on the success criteria;

completing the consent interface conversion test;

providing the more successful consent interface for display on a third subset of user devices accessing the web domain after completing the consent interface conversion test;

receiving a subsequent request from a first user device; wherein:

the first user device is associated with one of the first subset of the user devices or the second subset of the user devices;

the first user device is associated with a first user that did not provide consent during the consent interface conversion test; and

the subsequent request is a request to perform a function at the web domain requiring the use of a cookie; and

in response to receiving the subsequent request, providing a third consent interface variant for display on the first user device, the third consent interface variant being configured to prompt the first user for the consent to the use of the cookie.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the third consent interface variant is a consent interface variant that was not part of the consent interface conversion test.

3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the third consent interface variant comprises the more successful consent interface.

4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the operations further comprise:

determining a user parameter for the first user; and

selecting the third consent interface variant based on the user parameter.

5. The system of claim 4 , wherein the third consent interface variant comprises an interface other than the more successful consent interface.

6. The system of claim 4 , wherein the user parameter comprises at least one of:

a location of the first user;

a time of day of the subsequent request;

an age of the first user; or

a gender of the first user.

7. The system of claim 1 , wherein the operations further comprise:

initiating a second consent interface conversion test at the web domain, the second consent interface conversion test including the third consent interface variant;

receiving third consent conversion data for the third consent interface variant during the second consent interface conversion test; and

modifying the more successful consent interface based on the third consent conversion data and the success criteria.

8. A method comprising:

causing, by computing hardware, initiation of a cookie consent interface conversion test at a web domain;

receiving, by the computing hardware, consent conversion data for each test interface of a plurality of test interfaces during the cookie consent interface conversion test;

generating, by the computing hardware, a set of rules based on the consent conversion data;

receiving, by the computing hardware, a subsequent request from a user device to perform a function at the web domain that requires a user of the user device to consent to a cookie type, wherein the user did not provide the consent during the cookie consent interface conversion test;

generating, by the computing hardware, a graphical user interface comprising a cookie consent interface based on the set of rules;

providing, by the computing hardware, the graphical user interface for display on the user device;

receiving, by the computing hardware via the cookie consent interface, the consent to the cookie type; and

responsive to receiving the consent to the cookie type, causing, by the computing hardware, the user device to perform the function at the web domain.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the cookie consent interface comprises an interface that was not included in the cookie consent interface conversion test.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein:

the cookie consent interface conversion test is a first cookie consent interface conversion test; and

the method further comprises:

causing, by the computing hardware, initiation of a second cookie consent interface conversion test at the web domain, the second cookie consent interface conversion test including the cookie consent interface;

receiving, by the computing hardware, second consent conversion data for each test interface during the second cookie consent interface conversion test; and

modifying, by the computing hardware, the set of rules based on the second consent conversion data.

11. The method of claim 8 , wherein:

the set of rules includes a first rule to provide a more successful interface from the cookie consent interface conversion test to devices accessing the web domain; and

the cookie consent interface comprises the more successful interface.

12. The method of claim 8 , wherein:

the set of rules includes a second rule to customize the cookie consent interface based on the user; and

the method further comprises:

identifying, by the computing hardware, a user parameter based on an application state of a web browser accessing the web domain on the user device; and

generating, by the computing hardware, the graphical user interface comprising the cookie type based on the user parameter and the set of rules.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the cookie consent interface comprises an interface from the cookie consent interface conversion test other than the more successful interface.

14. The method of claim 8 , wherein the set of rules comprises at least one of:

a first rule to select the cookie consent interface based on a location from which the subsequent request from the user device was received;

a second rule to select the cookie consent interface based on a time of day at which the subsequent request from the user device was received;

a third rule to select the cookie consent interface based on an age of the user; or

a fourth rule to select the cookie consent interface based on a gender of the user.

15. A system comprising:

a non-transitory computer-readable medium storing instructions; and

processing hardware communicatively coupled to the non-transitory computer-readable medium, wherein the processing hardware is configured to execute the instructions and thereby perform operations comprising:

initiating a cookie consent interface conversion test at a web domain;

receiving consent conversion data for each test interface of a plurality of test interfaces during the cookie consent interface conversion test;

generating a set of rules based on the consent conversion data;

receiving a subsequent request from a user device to perform a function at the web domain that requires a user of the user device to consent to a cookie type, wherein the user did not provide the consent during the cookie consent interface conversion test;

generating a graphical user interface comprising a cookie consent interface based on the set of rules;

providing the graphical user interface for display on the user device;

receiving, via the cookie consent interface, the consent to the cookie type; and

responsive to receiving the consent to the cookie type, causing the user device to perform the function at the web domain.

16. The system of claim 15 , wherein the operations further comprise:

determining a user parameter for the user; and

selecting the cookie consent interface from a set of interfaces tested under the cookie consent interface conversion test based on the user parameter and the set of rules.

17. The system of claim 16 , wherein the user parameter comprises at least one of:

a location of the user;

a time of day of the subsequent request;

an age of the user; or

a gender of the user.

18. The system of claim 15 , wherein the set of rules define selection criteria for selecting the cookie consent interface.

19. The system of claim 18 , wherein:

the set of rules includes a first rule to provide a more successful interface from the cookie consent interface conversion test to devices accessing the web domain; and

the cookie consent interface comprises the more successful interface.

20. The system of claim 15 , wherein:

the cookie consent interface conversion test is a first cookie consent interface conversion test; and

the operations further comprise:

initiating a second cookie consent interface conversion test at the web domain, the second cookie consent interface conversion test including the cookie consent interface;

receiving second consent conversion data for each test interface during the second cookie consent interface conversion test; and

modifying the set of rules based on the second consent conversion data.

Assignments (2)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 5, 2022
From: ONETRUST LLC
To: KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 060573/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 27, 2021
From: BRANNON, JONATHAN BLAKE; JONES, KEVIN; WHITNEY, PATRICK; BABU, MITHUN; CHAVVA, SHARATH CHANDRA
To: ONETRUST, LLC
Reel/Frame 057612/0233 →