IP Library Granted Patent US 11,867,496
Granted Patent B2
US 11,867,496 · App. 17/493,745 · Granted Jan 9, 2024

Measurement system, measurement support method, and computer-readable medium

Inventors: Yosuke Tani (Tokyo, JP); Hirofumi Hori (Tokyo, JP); Takahiro Furukawa (Tokyo, JP); Tsukasa Nittono (Tokyo, JP); Takayuki Komiya (Tokyo, JP)
Assignee: Evident Corporation
G01B11/0608G01B11/303G06T7/40G06T2207/10056
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,867,496
App. No.
17/493,745
Granted
Jan 9, 2024
Kind
B2
Abstract

A measurement system includes: an optical measurement instrument that measures a surface of a specimen; and a control apparatus that controls the measurement instrument. The control apparatus includes: one or more non-transitory computer-readable media that include an instruction; and one or more processors that execute the instruction. The instruction is configured to cause the one or more processors to execute an operation. The operation includes: causing the measurement instrument to repetitively measure the surface of the specimen without changing the setting; and evaluating appropriateness of the setting for measuring surface texture of the specimen, based on comparison between a measurement value of the surface texture of the specimen calculated from a measurement data item output from the measurement instrument, and a degree of variation in measurement by the measurement instrument calculated from a plurality of measurement data items output from the measurement instrument.

Claims (57)

1. A measurement system, comprising:

an optical measurement instrument that measures a surface of a specimen, the measurement instrument comprising an objective lens; and

a control apparatus that controls the measurement instrument,

wherein the control apparatus includes:

at least one non-transitory computer-readable media that includes an instruction; and

at least one processor that executes the instruction,

wherein the instruction is executable to cause the at least one processor to execute an operation,

wherein the operation includes:

causing the measurement instrument to repetitively measure the surface of the specimen without changing a setting; and

evaluating an appropriateness of the setting for measuring a surface texture of the specimen, based on a comparison between a measurement value of the surface texture of the specimen calculated from a measurement data item output from the measurement instrument, and a degree of variation in measurement by the measurement instrument calculated from a plurality of measurement data items output from the measurement instrument,

wherein the setting includes a setting of the objective lens, and

wherein the evaluating the appropriateness of the setting includes evaluating an appropriateness of the objective lens for the surface texture of the specimen, based on the measurement value of the surface texture of the specimen, the degree of variation in measurement by the measurement instrument, and a measurement mode indicating a priority degree of measurement precision over a measurement speed.

2. The measurement system according to claim 1 , wherein the evaluating the appropriateness of the setting includes:

calculating a height data item on the specimen, based on each of the measurement data items;

calculating a height parameter value of the surface texture of the specimen, based on the calculated height data item;

calculating a degree of variation in height measured by the measurement instrument, based on a plurality of the calculated height data items; and

evaluating the appropriateness of the setting, based on a comparison between the height parameter value of the surface texture, and the degree of variation in height.

3. The measurement system according to claim 2 , wherein the calculating the degree of variation in height measured by the measurement instrument includes compensating for a variation in position during repetitive measurement by the measurement instrument, based on the plurality of height data items.

4. The measurement system according to claim 3 , wherein the compensating for the variation in position includes:

compensating for the variation in position in a direction intersecting with a height direction, based on the plurality of height data items; and

compensating for the variation in position in the height direction, based on the plurality of height data items, after compensating for the variation in position in the direction intersecting with the height direction.

5. The measurement system according to claim 1 , wherein the operation further includes issuing a notification of an evaluation result about the appropriateness of the setting.

6. The measurement system according to claim 5 , wherein the issuing the notification of the evaluation result includes causing a display device to display whether the setting is appropriate or not, or to display a degree of the appropriateness of the setting, as the evaluation result.

7. The measurement system according to claim 5 , wherein the issuing the notification of the evaluation result includes causing a display device to display, with the evaluation result, auxiliary information that includes at least one of information indicating a determination ground for the evaluation result and information indicating a coping method that a user can take with respect to the evaluation result.

8. The measurement system according to claim 7 , wherein the information indicating the determination ground includes at least one of the measurement value of the surface texture of the specimen, the degree of variation in measurement by the measurement instrument, and a time period required for the measurement.

9. The measurement system according to claim 1 , wherein:

the measurement instrument further comprises at least one objective lens different from the objective lens, and

the evaluating the appropriateness of the setting further includes evaluating an appropriateness of the at least one objective lens.

10. The measurement system according to claim 9 , wherein the operation further includes causing a display device to display an evaluation result about the appropriateness of the at least one objective lens depending on an evaluation result about the appropriateness of the objective lens.

11. The measurement system according to claim 1 , wherein:

the measurement instrument further comprises at least one objective lens different from the objective lens, and

the operation further includes causing a display device to display, as a recommended objective lens, an objective lens from among the at least one objective lens having a higher numerical aperture than the objective lens, depending on an evaluation result about the appropriateness of the objective lens.

12. The measurement system according to claim 1 , wherein the measurement instrument comprises a confocal microscope apparatus.

13. A measurement system, comprising:

an optical measurement instrument that measures a surface of a specimen; and

a control apparatus that controls the measurement instrument,

wherein the control apparatus includes:

at least one non-transitory computer-readable media that includes an instruction; and

at least one processor that executes the instruction,

wherein the instruction is executable to cause the at least one processor to execute an operation, and

wherein the operation includes:

causing the measurement instrument to repetitively measure the surface of the specimen without changing a setting;

evaluating an appropriateness of the setting for measuring a surface texture of the specimen, based on a comparison between a measurement value of the surface texture of the specimen calculated from a measurement data item output from the measurement instrument, and a degree of variation in measurement by the measurement instrument calculated from a plurality of measurement data items output from the measurement instrument;

changing the setting depending on an evaluation result of the appropriateness of the setting;

causing the measurement instrument to repetitively measure the surface of the specimen with the changed setting;

evaluating an appropriateness of the changed setting for measuring the surface texture of the specimen, based on a comparison between a measurement value of the surface texture of the specimen calculated from a measurement data item output from the measurement instrument after the setting is changed, and a degree of variation in measurement by the measurement instrument calculated from a plurality of measurement data items output from the measurement instrument after the setting is changed; and

fixing the setting when the evaluation result satisfies a predetermined reference.

14. A measurement support method, including:

repetitively measuring a surface of a specimen without changing a setting of a measurement instrument, the measurement instrument comprising an objective lens; and

evaluating an appropriateness of the setting for measuring a surface texture of the specimen, based on a comparison between a measurement value of the surface texture of the specimen calculated from a measurement data item output from the measurement instrument, and a degree of variation in measurement by the measurement instrument calculated from a plurality of measurement data items output from the measurement instrument,

wherein the setting includes a setting of the objective lens, and

wherein the evaluating the appropriateness of the setting includes evaluating an appropriateness of the objective lens for the surface texture of the specimen, based on the measurement value of the surface texture of the specimen, the degree of variation in measurement by the measurement instrument, and a measurement mode indicating a priority degree of measurement precision over a measurement speed.

15. A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing a program, the program being executable to cause a computer to execute processes comprising:

causing a measurement instrument comprising an objective lens to repetitively measure a surface of a specimen without changing a setting; and

evaluating an appropriateness of the setting for measuring a surface texture of the specimen, based on a comparison between a measurement value of the surface texture of the specimen calculated from a measurement data item output from the measurement instrument, and a degree of variation in measurement by the measurement instrument calculated from a plurality of measurement data items output from the measurement instrument,

wherein the setting includes a setting of the objective lens, and

wherein the evaluating the appropriateness of the setting includes evaluating an appropriateness of the objective lens for the surface texture of the specimen, based on the measurement value of the surface texture of the specimen, the degree of variation in measurement by the measurement instrument, and a measurement mode indicating a priority degree of measurement precision over a measurement speed.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 7, 2022
From: OLYMPUS CORPORATION
To: EVIDENT CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 061008/0214 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 4, 2021
From: TANI, YOSUKE; HORI, HIROFUMI; FURUKAWA, TAKAHIRO; NITTONO, TSUKASA; KOMIYA, TAKAYUKI
To: OLYMPUS CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 057696/0075 →
Priority Claims (1)
JP 2020-169375 · Oct 6, 2020 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20220107169A1 · Apr 7, 2022