IP Library Granted Patent US 11,656,296
Granted Patent B2
US 11,656,296 · App. 17/502,565 · Granted May 23, 2023

Battery analysis system and method

Inventors: Shyam Srinivasan (Oakland, CA); Evan Murphy (Oakland, CA); Jacqueline Maslyn (Oakland, CA); Dustin Summy (Oakland, CA); Brian Goodall (Oakland, CA); Sharon R. Kuo (Oakland, CA); Megan Pitcavage (Oakland, CA); Zachary Gima (Oakland, CA); John Stefanski (Oakland, CA)
Assignee: Zitara Technologies, Inc.
G01R31/396G01R31/374G01R31/3842H01M10/425H01M10/48H01M10/482H01M10/486H01M2010/4271H01M2010/4278H01M2220/20
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,656,296
App. No.
17/502,565
Granted
May 23, 2023
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system or method for determining a battery state can include generating a set of models based on a measured response of a plurality of batteries to an applied load, measuring battery properties of a battery, and using a state estimator to determine a battery state associated with a battery.

Claims (18)

1. A method comprising:

for each battery of a plurality of batteries:

applying a load profile to the respective battery; and

characterizing a response of the respective battery to the applied load;

generating a set of models based on the responses, wherein each model comprises at least one of:

a thermal model;

an electrochemical model; or

a heat generation model;

validating a model of the set of models;

measuring battery properties of a second battery using a sensor; and

using a state estimator to determine a state of the second battery based on the battery properties and the validated model.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein validating the model comprises validating the model by comparing historic battery data to simulated battery data generated using the model.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the model of the set of models is validated when the historic battery data and the simulated battery data match to within a threshold.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising, validating the state estimator.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein validating the state estimator comprises comparing a measured battery state to an estimated state determined using the state estimator.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the state estimator is validated when the measured battery state and the estimated battery state match to within a threshold.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the applied load comprises a chirped electrical load, wherein the response is measured during and after the chirped electrical load is applied.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the second battery is integrated into one of: an electric passenger vehicle, an electric bicycle, an electric power tool, an electric airplane, construction equipment, or a satellite.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 23, 2026
From: ZITARA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
To: FORTESCUE ZERO LIMITED
Reel/Frame 074158/0058 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 29, 2021
From: SRINIVASAN, SHYAM; MURPHY, EVAN; MASLYN, JACQUELINE; SUMMY, DUSTIN; GOODALL, BRIAN; KUO, SHARON R.; PITCAVAGE, MEGAN; GIMA, ZACHARY; STEFANSKI, JOHN
To: ZITARA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 057959/0176 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 17314867 · May 7, 2021
Provisional Application 63021604 · May 7, 2020
Provisional Application 63168015 · Mar 30, 2021
Related Publication 20220034974A1 · Feb 3, 2022