IP Library Granted Patent US 12,372,525
Granted Patent B2
US 12,372,525 · App. 17/527,524 · Granted Jul 29, 2025

Methods and kits for the diagnosis of influenza

Inventors: Robert Campbell (Bullock, NC); Kevin G. Dolan (Holly Springs, NC); Eric Fallows (Apex, NC); Randal A. Hoke (Cary, NC); Ross Jacobson (Hillsborough, NC); J. Bruce Pitner (Durham, NC); Glenn P. Vonk (Fuquay Varina, NC); Rajashaker Kache (Cary, NC); Upma Gulati (Cary, NC); Herman D. Himel, IV (Cary, NC); Rosemary B. Evans-Storms (Durham, NC)
Assignee: Becton, Dickinson and Company
G01N33/56983C07H15/203G01N33/54388G01N2333/11G01N2333/924G01N2500/02
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,372,525
App. No.
17/527,524
Granted
Jul 29, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Some embodiments provided herein relate to combined assays. In some embodiments, an assay for identifying influenza type A or influenza type B is combined with an assay for determining the sensitivity of an influenza neuraminidase to an antiviral drug.

Claims (31)

1. A method for detecting an influenza virus comprising:

(a) contacting a sample with an immunoassay buffer, wherein the immunoassay buffer inhibits neuraminidase activity and is adapted for an immunoassay for detecting an influenza virus type A or an influenza virus type B, thereby obtaining an immunoassay test sample;

(b) contacting a first portion of the immunoassay test sample to a test comprising an immunoassay for detecting an influenza type A or type B, thereby detecting the presence or absence of influenza type A or type B in the sample;

(c) contacting a second portion of the immunoassay test sample with a matrix comprising a neuraminidase assay buffer, thereby obtaining a neuraminidase test sample; and

(d) contacting the neuraminidase test sample with a neuraminidase assay adapted to detect neuraminidase activity, wherein the neuraminidase assay comprises a reagent selected from the group consisting of 1,1,1-Trifluro-4-(4-hydroxyphenyl)butan-2-one (para), 1,1,1-Trifluro-4-(3-hydroxyphenyl)butan-2-one (meta), and 1,1,1-Trifluro-4-(2-hydroxyphenyl)butan-2-one (ortho), thereby detecting the presence of a neuraminidase in the sample.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein steps (c) and (d) are performed in the same vessel.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the vessel comprises a chamber comprising the matrix, and a chamber comprising reagents for the neuraminidase assay.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein detecting the presence of a neuraminidase in the sample comprises detecting a signal with a photomultiplier.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining the sensitivity of a neuraminidase to a test compound, comprising:

(a) obtaining an inhibition value ratio, wherein the ratio comprises the level of neuraminidase activity in the presence of a test compound compared to the level of neuraminidase activity in the absence of the test compound; and

(b) comparing the inhibition value ratio to an inhibition threshold, thereby determining the sensitivity of the neuraminidase activity to the test compound.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the inhibition threshold is determined by the detection of a type A or a type B virus.

7. The method of claim 5 , further comprising selecting the test compound for treating the influenza, wherein the test compound is an antiviral drug.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein the antiviral drug selected from the group consisting of Oseltamivir, Zanamivir, Lanamivir, and Peramivir.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the neuraminidase assay comprises a dual enzyme assay comprising a signaling enzyme and a substrate for the signaling enzyme.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the signaling enzyme comprises luciferase, and the substrate for the signaling enzyme comprises a conjugate of a N-acetylneuraminic acid and luciferin, or a derivative of a N-acetylneuraminic acid and luciferin.

11. A method for detecting an influenza virus comprising:

(a) contacting a sample with a neuraminidase assay buffer, wherein the neuraminidase assay buffer inhibits specific binding of an antibody to an antigen selected from the group consisting of influenza type A and influenza type B and is adapted for a neuraminidase assay, thereby obtaining a neuraminidase test sample;

(b) contacting a first portion of the neuraminidase test sample to a test comprising an immunoassay for detecting an influenza type A or type B by specific binding of an antibody to the antigen, wherein the neuraminidase test sample contacts a matrix comprising immunoassay buffer, thereby obtaining an immunoassay test sample and detecting the presence or absence of influenza type A or type B in the sample; and

(c) contacting a second portion of the neuraminidase test sample with a neuraminidase assay, wherein the neuraminidase assay comprises a reagent selected from the group consisting of 1,1,1-Trifluro-4-(4-hydroxyphenyl)butan-2-one (para), 1,1,1-Trifluro-4-(3-hydroxyphenyl)butan-2-one (meta), and 1,1,1-Trifluro-4-(2-hydroxyphenyl)butan-2-one (ortho), thereby detecting the presence of a neuraminidase in the sample.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein steps (c) and (d) are performed in the same vessel.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the vessel comprises a chamber comprising the matrix, and a chamber comprising reagents for the neuraminidase assay.

14. The method of claim 11 , wherein detecting the presence of a neuraminidase in the sample comprises detecting a signal with a photomultiplier.

15. The method of claim 11 , further comprising determining the sensitivity of a neuraminidase to a test compound, comprising:

(a) obtaining an inhibition value ratio, wherein the ratio comprises the level of neuraminidase activity in the presence of a test compound compared to the level of neuraminidase activity in the absence of the test compound; and

(b) comparing the inhibition value ratio to an inhibition threshold, thereby determining the sensitivity of the neuraminidase activity to the test compound.

16. The method of claim 15 , wherein the inhibition threshold is determined by the detection of a type A or a type B virus.

17. The method of claim 15 , further comprising selecting the test compound for treating the influenza, wherein the test compound is an antiviral drug.

18. The method of claim 17 , wherein the antiviral drug selected from the group consisting of Oseltamivir, Zanamivir, Lanamivir, and Peramivir.

19. The method of claim 15 , wherein the neuraminidase assay comprises a dual enzyme assay comprising a signaling enzyme, and a substrate for the signaling enzyme.

20. The method of claim 19 , wherein the signaling enzyme comprises luciferase, and the substrate for the signaling enzyme comprises a conjugate of a N-acetylneuraminic acid and luciferin, or a derivative of a N-acetylneuraminic acid and luciferin.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 24, 2025
From: CAMPBELL, ROBERT; DOLAN, KEVIN G.; FALLOWS, ERIC; HOKE, RANDAL A.; JACOBSON, ROSS; PITNER, J. BRUCE; VONK, GLENN P.; KACHE, RAJASHAKER; GULATI, UPMA; HIMEL, HERMAN; EVANS-STORMS, ROSEMARY B.
To: BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY
Reel/Frame 071502/0775 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 16384020 · Apr 15, 2019
Division 14781008
Provisional Application 61807185 · Apr 1, 2013
Related Publication 20220146514A1 · May 12, 2022
References Cited (58)
US 4590169A · Cragle · 1986 [cited by applicant]
US 4810631A · Perlman · 1989 [cited by applicant]
US 4835099A · Mize · 1989 [cited by applicant]
US 4904583A · Mapes · 1990 [cited by applicant]
US 5017473A · Wagner · 1991 [cited by applicant]
US 5314801A · Nycz · 1994 [cited by applicant]
US 5457027A · Nadeau · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5470723A · Walker · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5518884A · Spears · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5561044A · Walker · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5639428A · Cottingham · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5736365A · Walker · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5998221A · Malick · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6194220B1 · Malick · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6267722B1 · Anderson · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6303764B1 · Srivastava · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6394952B1 · Anderson · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6420552B1 · Srivastava · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6680054B1 · Reece · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6867051B1 · Anderson · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7291488B2 · Wolfe · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7595152B2 · Lu et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7642060B2 · Nagar · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7893272B2 · Li · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7947820B2 · Wolfe · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8007999B2 · Holmes et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8163237B2 · Crawford · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8221976B2 · Wolfe · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8298757B2 · Takahashi et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 10317404B2 · Campbell et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 11209433B2 · Campbell et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20040086849A1 · Shimasaki et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20070264629A1 · Holmes et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20090280504A1 · Lu et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20110189655A1 · Li · 2011 [cited by applicant]
CN 101437550A · 2009 [cited by applicant]
EA 14533B1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
EP 0369657A2 · 1990 [cited by applicant]
EP 2063270 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
JP 2002541858A · 2002 [cited by applicant]
JP 2008014751 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
WO WO1991009972 · 1991 [cited by applicant]
WO WO1998013372 · 1998 [cited by applicant]
WO WO1999031280 · 1999 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2007053487 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2007134166 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2009014787 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2010139047 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014165536 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
Golightly et al, Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy and Homeland Security: A Perfect Match?, ACS Nano, 209 3(1):2859-2869 (2009). [cited by applicant]
Mize et al., Dual Enzyme Cascade—An Amplified Method for the Detection of Alkaline Phosphate, Analytical Biochemistry, 179:229-235 (1989). [cited by applicant]
Peci et al., Community-acquired respiratory viruses and co-infection among patients of Ontario sentinel practices, Apr. 2009 to Feb. 2010, Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses 7(4):559-566 (2013). [cited by applicant]
Peters et al., 2013, Evaluation of the limit of detection of the BD Veritor system flue A+B test and two rapid influenza detection tests for influenza virus, Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 75:200-202. [cited by applicant]
Sheu, et al, Surveillance for Neuraminidase Inhibitor Resistance among Human Influenza A and B Viruses Circulating Worldwide from 2004 to 2008, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 52(9)9:3284-3292 (2008). [cited by applicant]
Sidwell et al., In vitro and in vivo assay systems for study of influenza virus inhibitors, Antiviral Res. (2000) 48:1-16. [cited by applicant]
Shimasaki et al., Rapid Diagnostics: the detection of neuraminidase activity as a technology for high-specificity targets, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B, 356:1925-1931 (2001). [cited by applicant]
Wang et al., Influenza and Bacterial Pathogen Coinfections in the 20 [cited by applicant]
Yang et al., Regioselective intramolecular oxidation of phenols and anisoles by dioxiranes generated in situ. The Journal of organic chemistry, (2000).65(13), 4179-4184. [cited by applicant]