IP Library Granted Patent US 12,284,523
Granted Patent B2
US 12,284,523 · App. 17/534,127 · Granted Apr 22, 2025

Identifying spoofed maritime signals using information from other vessels

Inventors: Dror Salzman (Tel Aviv, IL); Shay Amram (Herzliya, IL)
Assignee: Windward LTD.
H04W12/122G08G3/00
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,284,523
App. No.
17/534,127
Granted
Apr 22, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method, system and product for identifying spoofed maritime signals using information from other vessels. The method comprises obtaining one or more location-reporting signals of a maritime vessel, wherein the one or more location-reporting signals comprise one or more respective sets of geographical coordinates, each of which having a timestamp. The method further comprises determining that the one or more location-reporting signals are at least partially fabricated, wherein said determining is based on a contradiction between a content of the one or more location-reporting signals and information derived from location-reporting signals received from other maritime vessels. The method further comprises performing a responsive action.

Claims (31)

1. A method comprising:

obtaining one or more location-reporting signals of a maritime vessel, wherein the one or more location-reporting signals comprise one or more respective sets of geographical coordinates, each of which having a timestamp;

determining that the one or more location-reporting signals are at least partially fabricated, wherein said determining is based on identifying a contradiction between a content of the one or more location-reporting signals and external data, wherein the external data comprises information derived from location-reporting signals received from entities external to the maritime vessel, wherein the entities comprise, at least, other maritime vessels; and

in response to said determining, performing a responsive action, wherein the responsive action is configured to perform:

verifying or refuting a determination of a potential location fabrication event based on said determining, wherein said verifying or refuting is performed by analyzing images depicting the one or more respective sets of geographical coordinates during a period of their timestamps, wherein the potential location fabrication event is verified in case the images do not depict objects that can represent the maritime vessel; and

mitigating a risk from the potential location fabrication event by disassociating from the maritime vessel.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the other maritime vessels are located within a predetermined range from the reported one or more locations of the one or more location-reporting signals at a time indicated by the one or more location-reporting signals.

3. The method of claim 1 , the one or more location-reporting signals comprise a plurality of Automatic Identification System (AIS) signals, wherein each AIS signal of the plurality of AIS signals comprises a valuation of a set of parameters, the set of parameters is measurable by one or more sensors of the maritime vessel, wherein the one or more sensors of the maritime vessel comprise at least one of: a positioning system, an electronic navigation sensor, or a rate of turn indicator, wherein based on the information derived from the location-reporting signals received from the other maritime vessels, determining that a likelihood of following a maritime path of the maritime vessel as reported by the one or more location-reporting signals is below a threshold.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein based on the information derived from the location-reporting signals received from the other maritime vessels, determining that a likelihood of following a maritime path of the maritime vessel as reported by the one or more location-reporting signals, while having heading and speed information as reported by the one or more location-reporting signals, is below a threshold.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein said determining is based on environmental conditions as indirectly measured by the other maritime vessels.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein said analyzing the images comprises applying one or more computer vision techniques on the images to extract one or more attributes of depicted vessels, wherein said verifying or refuting of the location fabrication event is utilized to improve an accuracy of a classifier by re-training the classifier using a result of said verifying or refuting as a label of a data point.

7. A non-transitory computer readable medium retaining instructions, which instructions, wherein read by a processor, cause the processor to perform:

obtaining one or more location-reporting signals of a maritime vessel, wherein the one or more location-reporting signals comprise one or more respective sets of geographical coordinates, each of which having a timestamp;

determining that the one or more location-reporting signals are at least partially fabricated, wherein said determining is based on identifying a contradiction between a content of the one or more location-reporting signals and external data, wherein the external data comprises information derived from location-reporting signals received from entities external to the maritime vessel, wherein the entities comprise, at least, other maritime vessels; and

in response to said determining, performing a responsive action, wherein the responsive action is configured to perform:

verifying or refuting a determination of a potential location fabrication event based on said determining, wherein said verifying or refuting is performed by analyzing images depicting the one or more respective sets of geographical coordinates during a period of their timestamps, wherein the potential location fabrication event is verified in case the images do not depict objects that can represent the maritime vessel; and

mitigating a risk from the potential location fabrication event by disassociating from the maritime vessel.

8. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 7 , wherein the other maritime vessels are located within a predetermined range from the reported one or more locations of the one or more location-reporting signals at a time indicated by the one or more location-reporting signals.

9. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 7 , wherein based on the information derived from the location-reporting signals received from the other maritime vessels, determining that a likelihood of following a maritime path of the maritime vessel as reported by the one or more location-reporting signals is below a threshold.

10. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 7 , wherein based on the information derived from the location-reporting signals received from the other maritime vessels, determining that a likelihood of following a maritime path of the maritime vessel as reported by the one or more location-reporting signals, while having heading and speed information as reported by the one or more location-reporting signals, is below a threshold.

11. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 7 , wherein said determining is based on environmental conditions as indirectly measured by the other maritime vessels.

12. A system comprising: a processor and a memory, wherein the processor is configured to perform:

obtaining one or more location-reporting signals of a maritime vessel, wherein the one or more location-reporting signals comprise one or more respective sets of geographical coordinates, each of which having a timestamp;

determining that the one or more location-reporting signals are at least partially fabricated, wherein said determining is based on identifying a contradiction between a content of the one or more location-reporting signals and external data, wherein the external data comprises information derived from entities external to the maritime vessel, wherein the information derived from the entities comprise, at least, location-reporting signals received from other maritime vessels; and

in response to said determining, performing a responsive action, wherein the responsive action is configured to perform:

verifying or refuting a determination of a potential location fabrication event based on said determining, wherein said verifying or refuting is performed by analyzing images depicting the one or more respective sets of geographical coordinates during a period of their timestamps, wherein the potential location fabrication event is verified in case the images do not depict objects that can represent the maritime vessel; and

mitigating a risk from the potential location fabrication event by disassociating from the maritime vessel.

13. The system of claim 12 , wherein the other maritime vessels are located within a predetermined range from the reported one or more locations of the one or more location-reporting signals at a time indicated by the one or more location-reporting signals.

14. The system of claim 12 , wherein based on the information derived from the location-reporting signals received from the other maritime vessels, determining that a likelihood of following a maritime path of the maritime vessel as reported by the one or more location-reporting signals is below a threshold.

15. The system of claim 12 , wherein based on the information derived from the location-reporting signals received from the other maritime vessels, determining that a likelihood of following a maritime path of the maritime vessel as reported by the one or more location-reporting signals, while having heading and speed information as reported by the one or more location-reporting signals, is below a threshold.

16. The system of claim 12 , wherein said determining is based on environmental conditions as indirectly measured by the other maritime vessels.

Assignments (2)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 18, 2025
From: WINDWARD LTD
To: GLAS TRUST CORPORATION LIMITED, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 070550/0088 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 24, 2021
From: SALZMAN, DROR; AMRAM, SHAY
To: WINDWARD LTD.
Reel/Frame 058206/0161 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230164564A1 · May 25, 2023
References Cited (21)
US 20080164984A1 · Sheffer · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20170285178A1 · Platzer et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180201348A1 · Delay · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20200184828A1 · Mazor et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200264268A1 · Moore et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210109235A1 · Anderson et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220057528A1 · Bennett · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220268585A1 · Tulgara · 2022 [cited by examiner]
CN 110221319A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CN 112991820A · 2021 [cited by applicant]
EP 3109659A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020115731A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
International Search Report issued for International Patent Application No. PCT/IL2022/051170 dated Feb. 14, 2023. [cited by applicant]
Iphar et al., “An expert-based method for the risk assessment of anomalous maritime transportation data” Applied Ocean Research, Nov. 30, 2020; vol. 104, No. 102337; pp. 1-51; Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http:″//… [cited by applicant]
Shahir et al., “Mining Vessel Trajectories for Illegal Fishing Detection”; IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data); IEEE, Dec. 12, 2019; pp. 1917-1927; Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: https://ieeexplore.… [cited by applicant]
Mazzarella et al., “AIS Reception Characterisation for AIS on/off Anomaly Detection”; 19th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION); Jul. 2016 ; pp. 1-8; IEEE; Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: https://w… [cited by applicant]
Papi et al., “Radiolocation and Tracking of Automatic Identification System Signals for Maritime Situational Awareness.” IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation 9.5 (2015): pp. 568-580; Retrieved from the Internet: < RL: https/ie… [cited by applicant]
Iphar et al., “Uses and misuses of the automatic identification system” OCeAnS 2019—Marseille, IEEE, 2019; Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: https://hal-mines-paristech.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03736713/document>, Oct.… [cited by applicant]
Obradovic et al., “Machine leaning approaches to maritime anomaly detection.” Nase more: 61.5-6 (2014): 96-101; Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/192572>, Oct. 7, 2014. [cited by applicant]
Patroumpas et al., “Online event recognition from moving vessel trajectories.” GeoInformatica 21 (2017): 389-427; Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10707-016-0266-x>, Aug. 16,… [cited by applicant]
Cretin et al., “Test data generation for false data injection attack testing in air traffic surveillance.” 2020 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops (ICSTW). IEEE, 202… [cited by applicant]