IP Library Granted Patent US 12,626,605
Granted Patent B1
US 12,626,605 · App. 17/544,645 · Granted May 12, 2026

Flight assistant

Inventors: Sean Patrick Suiter (Omaha, NE); Richard Andrew Kruse (Omaha, NE)
Assignee: Otto Aero Company
G08G5/55B64D45/08G08G5/21G08G5/30G08G5/34G08G5/54G08G5/58G08G5/76G08G5/26
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,626,605
App. No.
17/544,645
Granted
May 12, 2026
Kind
B1
Abstract

A system and apparatus for determining the best course of action at any particular point inflight. The system determines current aircraft configuration against an expected aircraft configuration to detect configuration errors, and then utilizes configuration errors and error trends to manage aircraft configuration and mission operation. The system may divert the aircraft to the best available landing sites or reconfigure the aircraft to resolve configuration errors. In an emergency the system may safely land the aircraft.

Claims (104)

1 . An aircraft, comprising:

(a) at least one sensor configured to report one or more of a position, an attitude, or an altitude;

(b) an autopilot for altering a performance setting of an aircraft component, the performance setting associated with at least one of landing gear, flaps, rudder, ailerons, or spoilers;

and

(c) one or more processors configured to:

(1) determine at least one current aircraft configuration based on at least one of a position, an attitude, or an altitude, the current aircraft configuration associated with at least one performance setting of the aircraft component;

(2) compare the at least one current aircraft configuration to at least one expected aircraft configuration;

(3) detect at least one configuration error associated with the comparing, wherein said at least one configuration error is associated with one or more of a climb/descent gradient, a gear position, a control surface position, or a pitot/static pitch/bank disagreement;

(4) direct said autopilot to reduce said at least one configuration error by adjusting the at least one performance setting;

and

(5) trigger at least one emergency procedure, each emergency procedure comprising automatically:

determining a suitability of each of a plurality of alternate landing sites;

selecting a first alternate landing site for the aircraft based on the determined suitability:

creating a route from a current position of the aircraft to the first alternate landing site;

instructing the autopilot to cause the aircraft to traverse the route;

reevaluating the suitability of the first alternate landing site based on at least weather conditions;

and

if the suitability of the first alternate landing site changes based on at least the weather conditions:

selecting a second alternate landing site;

creating a new route to the second alternate landing site;

and

instructing the autopilot to cause the aircraft to traverse the new route.

2 . The aircraft of claim 1 , wherein said one or more processors are configured to:

determine a viability of at least one current mission of the aircraft based on the current aircraft configuration;

and

alter one or more operations of the aircraft via the at least one aircraft component.

3 . The aircraft of claim 1 , wherein said one or more processors are configured to:

determine a landing solution for at least one category of emergency for a flight plan (mission) selected from the group including (1) land immediately, (2) land as soon as possible, or (3) land as soon as practicable;

and

direct the autopilot in executing the determined landing solution.

4 . The aircraft of claim 1 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to determine a rate of change of the at least one configuration error.

5 . The aircraft of claim 4 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to announce the current aircraft configuration based on at least one of the determined configuration error or the determined rate of change.

6 . The aircraft of claim 1 , wherein the at least one sensor is a first sensor and the one or more processors are further configured to:

(a) receive, via at least one second sensor, flight environment information including at least one of traffic data, weather data, wind data, flight plan data, terrain data, airport data, traffic control data, a ground-based signal, a space-based signal, or an arrival pattern;

and

(b) detect the at least one configuration error based on at least said flight environment information.

7 . The aircraft of claim 6 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to respond to the at least one configuration error by at least one of:

executing a configuration change via the at least one aircraft component;

executing a course correction via the at least one aircraft component;

or

executing a landing at an alternate landing site.

8 . The aircraft of claim 1 , wherein said performance setting is associated with a flight segment;

and

wherein the flight segment includes at least one of takeoff, climb, cruise, enroute, descent, approach, or landing.

9 . The aircraft of claim 1 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to determine mission viability by determining at least one energy state associated with the aircraft.

10 . The aircraft of claim 9 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to determine at least one reachable range associated with one or more alternative landing sites based on one or more of the current aircraft configuration, the aircraft position, the flight environment information, or the energy state of the aircraft.

11 . The aircraft of claim 10 , further comprising:

at least one display unit communicatively coupled to the control system and proximate to an operator of the aircraft, the display unit configured to:

(a) display one or more of the aircraft position, an alternate landing site, or at least one shape corresponding to the reachable range;

and

(b) accept control input from the operator, the control input including a selection of the one or more alternate landing sites.

12 . The aircraft of claim 1 , wherein:

the one or more processors are further configured to trigger the at least one emergency procedure at least partially in response to the detection of the configuration error;

and

wherein the procedure further includes causing the aircraft to change altitude.

13 . The aircraft of claim 1 , further comprising:

an aircraft flight control;

and

a display;

and wherein the one or more processors are further configured to:

(1) determine the at least one expected aircraft configuration based on at least one of user acknowledgement, user response time, aircraft altitude, aircraft attitude, or aircraft airspeed, wherein the at least one expected aircraft configuration is associated with at least one second performance setting of the aircraft component;

(2) reconfigure the aircraft to a safe configuration where at least one of:

a user has failed to timely acknowledge an interface request, the aircraft has proceeded outside an expected operation area,

or

the aircraft is proceeding to at least one of a position, altitude, attitude, or airspeed dangerous to the aircraft;

and

(3) monitor total energy as a function of at least one of the altitude, the airspeed, or thrust to determine the one or more alternate landing site options within range of a current position.

14 . The aircraft of claim 13 , wherein the display is further configured for displaying at least one of:

the ability of the aircraft to reach the selected alternate landing site;

a range radius;

the optimal engine-out/zero-thrust glide distance achievable;

the optimal glide distance affected by at least one of atmospheric conditions or pilot proficiency;

or

at least one alternate flight path based on adverse weather conditions.

15 . The aircraft of claim 13 , further comprising an alternate landing site selector including memory storing data including aircraft best glide speed, said memory including a database exported for use by at least one of a given flight, pilot, or aircraft.

16 . The aircraft of claim 13 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured to direct said autopilot to manipulate said aircraft flight control through at least a portion of said flight path within said aircraft flight envelope parameters.

17 . The aircraft of claim 16 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured to direct the autopilot in a series of control inputs calculated to safely secure the aircraft on the ground.

18 . A method for determining an aircraft configuration during a flight, comprising:

(a) determining at least one current aircraft configuration of an aircraft from at least one of aircraft position over time, aircraft altitude over time, or at least one sensor of the aircraft, wherein the current aircraft configuration is associated with at least one performance setting of the aircraft;

(b) determining at least one expected aircraft configuration based at least in part on a current aircraft flight segment associated with the flight;

(c) comparing said at least one current aircraft configuration with said expected aircraft configuration;

(d) determining at least one configuration error resulting from said comparison;

(e) receiving flight environment information including at least one of traffic data, weather data, wind data, flight plan, terrain data, airport data, aircraft data, air traffic control, ground signal, space based signal, or arrival pattern;

(f) determining a viability of at least one current mission associated with the aircraft;

(g) if said current mission is not viable, altering one or more operations of the aircraft via a control system of the aircraft based on the at least one determined configuration error;

(h) triggering at least one emergency procedure, each emergency procedure comprising automatically:

determining a suitability of each of a plurality of alternate landing sites;

selecting a first alternate landing site for the aircraft based on the determined suitability;

creating a route from a current aircraft position to the first alternate landing site;

directing the control system to cause the aircraft to traverse the route;

reevaluating the suitability of the first alternate landing site based on at least the weather data;

and

if the suitability of the first alternate landing site changes based on at least the weather data:

selecting a second alternate landing site;

creating a new route to the second alternate landing site; and

directing the control system to cause the aircraft to traverse the new route.

19 . The method of claim 18 , further comprising determining at least one current aircraft flight segment based on at least one of the aircraft altitude, the aircraft attitude, airspeed, time since departure, time to fix, time to arrival, or the aircraft position.

20 . The method of claim 18 , wherein said aircraft altitude further comprises at least one of an Above Ground Level (AGL) altitude or a Mean Sea Level (MSL) altitude.

21 . The method of claim 18 , wherein said traffic data further comprise at least one of TCAS, radar, ATC feed, ADS-B, and road traffic;

wherein said terrain data further comprise at least one of a DTED level 1 set, a DTED level 2 set, or satellite-based imagery;

wherein said airport data further comprise at least one of a runway length, a runway width, a runway lighting, an indication of airport rescue and fire-fighting personnel, a proximal medical facility or a proximal maintenance facility;

wherein said weather data further comprise at least one of a surface wind, an altitude based wind model, a ceiling, a visibility, a barometric pressure, a braking action, or an illumination;

and

wherein said aircraft data further comprise at least one of a configuration, a possible change in configuration, a position of a control surface, a performance characteristic, a weight, a pilot flight control input, an autopilot status, an MEL status, a DTED level 1 set, a DTED level 2 set or satellite based imagery.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 13, 2026
From: OTTO AERO COMPANY
To: AUTOMATIC LANDING SYSTEMS COMPANY
Reel/Frame 075255/0428 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded May 21, 2026
From: OTTO AERO COMPANY
To: AUTOMATIC LANDING SYSTEMS COMPANY
Reel/Frame 075622/0388 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 14, 2022
From: SUITER, SEAN PATRICK; KRUSE, RICHARD ANDREW
To: OTTO AERO COMPANY
Reel/Frame 060510/0845 →
Continuity (14)
Continuation 17492448 · Oct 1, 2021
Continuation 16673725 · Nov 4, 2019
Continuation 15152437 · May 11, 2016
Continuation 14142390 · Dec 27, 2013
Continuation 13831398 · Mar 14, 2013
Continuation 17478807 · Sep 17, 2021
Continuation 16673725 · Nov 4, 2019
Continuation 17478821 · Sep 17, 2021
Continuation 16673725 · Nov 4, 2019
Provisional Application 61900199 · Nov 5, 2013
Provisional Application 61870125 · Aug 26, 2013
Provisional Application 61754522 · Jan 18, 2013
Provisional Application 61750286 · Jan 8, 2013
Provisional Application 61747051 · Dec 28, 2012
References Cited (220)
US 4438475A · Haley · 1984 [cited by applicant]
US 5136267A · Cabot · 1992 [cited by applicant]
US 5136297A · Lux et al. · 1992 [cited by applicant]
US 5142480A · Morrow · 1992 [cited by applicant]
US 5459469A · Schuchman et al. · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5933098A · Haxton · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 5974349A · Levine · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6148179A · Wright et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6167238A · Wright · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6181990B1 · Grabowsky et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6278965B1 · Glass et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6353779B1 · Simon et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6438469B1 · Dwyer et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6553333B1 · Shenk · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6573841B2 · Price · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6591171B1 · Ammar et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6629023B1 · Silder, Jr. et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6804585B2 · Humbard et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6980959B1 · Garrow et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7006032B2 · King et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7061401B2 · Voos et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7167782B2 · Humbard et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7295135B2 · Younkin · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7305286B1 · Younkin et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7489992B2 · Valette et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7505835B2 · Brust et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7689328B2 · Spinelli · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7698025B1 · Cornell et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7786900B2 · Bitar et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7874521B2 · Shuster · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 7908042B2 · Brinkley et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8027758B2 · Ferro et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8035547B1 · Flanigan et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8087616B2 · Shuster · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8131407B1 · Robinson · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8140260B2 · Feyereisen et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8190727B2 · Henkel · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8234068B1 · Young et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8244455B2 · Case et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8292234B2 · Shuster · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8356776B2 · Berens et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8457889B2 · Feyereisen et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8477061B1 · Pedersen · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8527118B2 · Jones et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8543264B1 · Tomas · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8629788B1 · Greenleaf et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8983687B1 · Hunter et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9026275B1 · Young et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9047762B1 · Neuville et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9171473B1 · McNally et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9253753B2 · Rubin et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9257047B2 · Bailey et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9257048B1 · Offer et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9280903B2 · Judy et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9349296B2 · Wiesemann et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9355564B1 · Tyson et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9527587B2 · Levien et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9536433B2 · Savarit et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9542849B1 · Bertram et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9567097B2 · Horsager et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9567099B2 · Poux et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9583010B1 · Kolek et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9640079B1 · Moravek et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9646502B1 · Gentry · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9685090B2 · Kneuper et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9691286B2 · Bahrami et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9704405B2 · Kashi et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9728090B2 · Bitar et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9728093B2 · Wiesemann et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9733349B1 · Wood et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10114381B2 · Haskins et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10203700B2 · Haskins et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20020039072A1 · Gremmert et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020158168A1 · Greene · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20030093187A1 · Walker · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20040030463A1 · Stockdale et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040246145A1 · Andrews · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20040249519A1 · Frink · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050004723A1 · Duggan · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20050156777A1 · King et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050261814A1 · Ryan et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060031006A1 · Stenbock et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070005199A1 · He · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070018052A1 · Eriksson · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070129855A1 · Coulmeau · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20070194171A1 · Diamandis et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080039988A1 · Estabrook et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080154447A1 · Spinelli · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080195309A1 · Prinzel, III et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080300740A1 · Hamburg · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080312779A1 · Sacle · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20090027232A1 · Lavielle et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090138144A1 · Flannigan · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20090150012A1 · Agam et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090152391A1 · McWhirk · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090287365A1 · Riedinger · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090319104A1 · Bailly · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20100042316A1 · Caillaud · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20100057899A1 · Henkel · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100070110A1 · Badli et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100085236A1 · Franceschini et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100095084A1 · Manning · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100109865A1 · Armstrong · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100309222A1 · Feyereisen · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20100328138A1 · Guigné et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110184593A1 · Swope · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110215922A1 · Armstrong · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110251740A1 · Gomez Ledesma · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110264312A1 · Spinelli · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110298618A1 · Stahl et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110313597A1 · Wilson et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120056760A1 · Bourret et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120143482A1 · Goossen et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120177198A1 · Cabos · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120191273A1 · Jacobs et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120221175A1 · Spinelli · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120265374A1 · Yochum · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130060466A1 · Gurusamy et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130090842A1 · Stabile · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130096738A1 · Yamasaki · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130116863A1 · Goupil · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130131970A1 · Pendry et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130197721A1 · Gu et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130204523A1 · He et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130242864A1 · Vermande et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130274964A1 · Jesse et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130345905A1 · Parthasarathy · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140129058A1 · Elahi et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140152507A1 · McAllister · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140156166A1 · Moeckly et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140197980A1 · Schulte et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140210648A1 · Samuthirapandian et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140222248A1 · Levien et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140249693A1 · Stark et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140257692A1 · Stefani et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140297068A1 · Revell et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140304107A1 · McAllister · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140327564A1 · Sampigethaya · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150077270A1 · Rubin et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150081201A1 · Rubin et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150170524A1 · Stefani et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150296500A1 · Kanovsky et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150344149A1 · Mumaw et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150356873A1 · Kneuper et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160012289A1 · Petit · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160027310A1 · Samuthirapandian et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160107751A1 · D'Andrea et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160117931A1 · Chan et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160244187A1 · Byers et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160284222A1 · Nicholls et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170229024A1 · Moravek et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20190094886A1 · Haskins et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190129448A1 · Haskins et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
George, Fred, “Autonomy to the Rescue”, Avionics, Aviation Week & Space Technology Nov. 11-24, 2019, 40-41 Garmin Autoland. [cited by applicant]
Siegel, Diana et al., “Development of an Autoland System for General Aviation Aircraft.” Master Thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Report No. ICAT—Sep. 2011, Sep. 2011, 208 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Siegel, Diana et al., “Development of an Autoland System for General Aviation Aircraft.” Master Thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Report., ICAT—Sep. 2011, Sep. 2011, 208 Pages. [cited by applicant]
WikipediA, URL: https//en.wikipedia.orgwikiAutoland, Downloaded Sep. 28, 2021, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Anonymous. (Nov. 1981). Shuttle Autoland Performs Well on Approach. Aviation Week & Science Technology, 17. [cited by applicant]
Phillips, E. (Jan. 1991). GPS/IRU Data Guides New Autoland System. Aviation Week & Science Technology, 56-57. [cited by applicant]
Phillips, E. (Sep. 1993). D-GPS Systems Demonstrate Precision Autoland Capability. Aviation Week & Science Technology, 85-86. [cited by applicant]
Stein, K. (Aug. 1971). C-5A Autoland Tests Successful. Aviation Week & Science Technology, 52-57. [cited by applicant]
Coleman, H.. (Dec. 1966). Autoland System Tested in Heathrow Fog. Aviation Week & Science Technology, 85-88. [cited by applicant]
Asker, J. (Oct. 1993). Space Autoland System Shows GPS' Wide Uses. Aviation Week & Science Technology, 54-55. [cited by applicant]
Klass, P. (Jan. 1965). Lear Siegler Pushes Autoland Time-Lead. Aviation Week & Science Technology, 59-62. [cited by applicant]
Anonymous. (May 1971). Concorde Autoland Test Start; Flights Follow Operational Profile. Aviation Week & Science Technology, 20. [cited by applicant]
Hughes, D. (Oct. 1944). UPS, United Complete Autoland Tests. Aviation Week & Science Technology, 68. [cited by applicant]
Croft, J. (Jul. 2016). Mode Mistake. Aviation Week & Science Technology, 28-29. [cited by applicant]
Schofield, A. (Jul. 2012). Seamless Transition. Aviation Week & Science Technology, 34-35. [cited by applicant]
George, F. (Nov. 2019). Autonomy to the Rescue. Aviation Week & Science Technology, 40-41. [cited by applicant]
Butler, P. (Sep. 2020). Age of Automation. Aviation Week & Science Technology, 10. [cited by applicant]
Ropelewski, R. (Jul. 1982). Automatic Landing System Evaluated. Aviation Week & Science Technology, 57-65. [cited by applicant]
Smith, B. (Mar. 1999). First 717 Delivery Shifts to September. Aviation Week & Science Technology, 43. [cited by applicant]
Anonymous. (Aug. 1962). Exploratory FAA Tests Completed On U.K. Automatic Landing System. Aviation Week & Science Technology, 98. [cited by applicant]
Anonymous. (Nov. 2019). Enabling Autonomy. Aviation Week & Science Technology, 42-43. [cited by applicant]
Croft, J. (Apr. 2013). Pilot in the Loop. Aviation Week & Science Technology, 44-48. [cited by applicant]
Nordwall, B. (Mar. 1999). Wireless Connection Technology Advanced. Aviation Week & Science Technology, 63-64. [cited by applicant]
Taverna, M. (Oct. 2010). Wireless on the Move. Aviation Week & Science Technology, 38. [cited by applicant]
Anonymous. (Sep. 1982). Wireless Entertainment System Being Developed. Aviation Week & Science Technology, 78. [cited by applicant]
Rosenberg, B. (Jun. 2002). ETECHLOG a Front-Runner in Aircraft Wireless Transmission. Aviation Week & Science Technology, 65. [cited by applicant]
Mecham, M. (Aug. 2004). Wireless on the Flight Line: Connectivity and Inspectors. Aviation Week & Science Technology, 98. [cited by applicant]
Taverna, M. et al. (Oct. 2005). Going Airborne. Aviation Week & Science Technology, 45. [cited by applicant]
Anonymous. (Jul. 2003). The RTCA is Evaluating the Use of Portable Electronic Devices. Aviation Week & Science Technology, 61. [cited by applicant]
Deglmann. (Nov. 2016). An Array of Avionics Products. Aviation Week & Science Technology, MR034. [cited by applicant]
Anonymous. (Mar. 2018, Insights Through Flight Data. Aviation Week & Science Technology, MR028. [cited by applicant]
Seidenman, P. et al. (Apr. 2019). Fail Safe. Aviation Week & Science Technology, MR049. [cited by applicant]
Shay, L. (Jul. 2017). Results Oriented. Aviation Week & Science Technology, MR03. [cited by applicant]
Anonymous. (Jan. 2007). Boeing says its decision to abandon WiFi. Aviation Week & Science Technology, 21. [cited by applicant]
Anonymous. (Feb. 2007, WiFi Static. Aviation Week & Science Technology, 44. [cited by applicant]
Massey-Beresford, H. (May 2020). Technology Lift. Aviation Week & Science Technology, 53-54. [cited by applicant]
Croft, J. (Jul. 2015). Wake-up Call. Aviation Week & Science Technology, 64. [cited by applicant]
Nordwall, B. (Jun. 1998). Laptop Computers with Built-in Cellular Phones. Aviation Week & Science Technology, 51. [cited by applicant]
Advertisement. (Jul. 2012). Wireless GroundLink Comm+. Aviation Week & Science Technology, 99. [cited by applicant]
Carey, B. (Jul. 2019). Identify Yourself. Aviation Week & Science Technology, 12-13. [cited by applicant]
Mecham, M. (Jul. 2003). Taxiing Bandwidth. Aviation Week & Science Technology, 45-46. [cited by applicant]
Hughes, D. (Aug. 1993). Continental Pursues GPS-Only Approaches. Aviation Week & Science Technology, 57-58. [cited by applicant]
Anonymous. (Aug. 1999). 767 Phone Home. Aviation Week & Science Technology, 19. [cited by applicant]
Warwick, G. (Oct. 2008). Unmanned Benefits. Aviation Week & Science Technology, 52-53. [cited by applicant]
Advertisement. (Dec. 2003). Electrical Design Engineers (RF). Aviation Week & Science Technology, 94. [cited by applicant]
Legget, Julian, (Jun. 1933). “Happy Landings” in Fog, Popular Mechanics. pp. 973-975. [cited by applicant]
Boatman, Julie, (Mar. 5, 2020), “Garmin's Autoland Gets Flight Tested”, Flying Magazine. Retrieved from https://www.flyingmag.com/garmin-autoland-flight-tested/. [cited by applicant]
Charnley J. “The RAE Contribution to All-Weather Landing”. In: Journal of Aeronautical History 1 (Jan. 2011), pp. 3-21. [cited by applicant]
Federal Aviation Administration. (Jul. 2, 2018), Advisory Circular 120-118, Criteria for Approval/Authorization of All Weather Operations for Takeoff, Landing and Rollout, Retrieved from https://www.faa.gov/regulations_… [cited by applicant]
Garrison, Kevin, (Jun. 2012), “Categories of the ILS”, AVWeb, Retrieved from https://www.avweb.com/flight-safety/technique/categories-of-the-ils/. [cited by applicant]
Jackson, Hagan L., (Jan. 1947). New Instrument System Proposed For Flight and Landing Safety, Aviation, pp. 86-87. [cited by applicant]
Laron, George C. (Aug. 2012), “The First Autolanding”, Air Space Magazine, Retrieved from https://www.airspacemag.com/history-of-flight/the-first-autolanding-3818066/. [cited by applicant]
Mola, Roger, History of Aircraft Landing Aids, U.S. Centennial of Flight Commission, Retrieved from https://www.centennialofflight.net/essay/Government_Role/landing_nav/POL 14.htm. [cited by applicant]
Planes Are Landing by Radio When Fog Hides the Field. 1931. Chicago, IL: Popular Mechanics. [cited by applicant]
Wikipedia contributors. (Dec. 5, 2021). Blind Landing Experimental Unit. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Blind_Landing_Experimental_Unit&oldid=1058748820. [cited by applicant]
Singer, Neil, “Get it in Writing: Controller-Pilot Datalink Tackles Miscommunications with Text” AOPA Pilot, Turbine Edition, Jul. 1, 2022, pp. T-14-T-20. [cited by applicant]
SR-22 Pilot's Operating Handbook and FAA Approved Airplane Flight Manual for the Cirrus Design SR22, Rev 3 Supplement for Garmin GFC 700 starts on p. 389 (Dec. 14, 2020); ESP referenced on pp. 398-399, LVL button pp. 40… [cited by applicant]
Steel-Potter, Jaime; Steel Aviation, Cirrus Aircraft, The History, vol. 3, Phillipsburg Airport-317, Phillipsburg, Ohio; pp. 66-68. [cited by applicant]
Garmin GFC 600 Pilot's Guide; Garmin International, Inc., 1200 East 151st Street, Olathe, Kansas, 190-01488-00 Rev. H; Sep. 14, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Stephen Pope, “Aspen's Connected Panel Links EFBs with Avionics,” www.flyingmag.com; Jul. 26, 2011 https://www.flyingmag.com/news-aspens-connected-panel-links-efbs-avionics/. [cited by applicant]
Julie Boatman, We Fly: Garmin Autoland For the Beechcraft King Air 200; Flying, Issue 942, October. [cited by applicant]
Abzug MJ, Larrabee EE. (2002). Airplane stability and control: a history of the technologies that made aviation possible. Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-80992-4. [cited by applicant]
Final Report on the accident on Jun. 1, 2009 to the Airbus A330-203 registered F-GZCP operated by Air France flight AF 447 Rio de Janeiro-Paris; Bureau d'Enquetes et d'Analysis. [cited by applicant]
Flight Envelope Protection: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flight_envelope_protection (accessed Apr. 2, 2024). [cited by applicant]
North, David. (2000) “Finding Common Ground in Envelope Protection Systems”. Aviation Week & Space Technology, Aug. 28, pp. 66-68. [cited by applicant]
Pratt, R. (2000). Flight control systems: practical issues in design and implementation. Institution of Electrical Engineers. ISBN 978-0-85296-766-9. [cited by applicant]
Risukhin V. (2001). Controlling Pilot Error: Automation. McGraw-Hill Professional. ISBN 978-0-07-137320-3. [cited by applicant]